Reviewer Credits

How many #journals & #publishers are joining Reviewer Credits? GREAT QUESTION: Here is the list from last week .. / reviewercredits.com 🥰 🔻 What do we offer to #journals & #publishers? 👉 lnkd.in/dZra9CUF Some of the many benefits of working with Reviewer Credits: 👉 Centralized Reviewer Management: Seamlessly integrate and manage your entire reviewer pool across all journals. 👉 Tap into our diverse global network of certified peer reviewers and track their performance with our innovative Reviewer Graph, ensuring a smooth and efficient peer review process. 👉 Reviewer Buy-in System: Foster a deeper sense of commitment and loyalty among your peer reviewers. Our unique Reviewer Buy-in feature enhances engagement, speeds up response times, and significantly boosts reviewer retention. 👉 By creating an implicit agreement with Reviewer Credits, peer reviewers feel more involved and committed to providing timely, quality peer reviews. 👉 Reviewer Pool Custom Diversification: Enhance the quality and breadth of your peer reviews by diversifying your reviewer pool. 👉 Reviewer Credits empowers you to find potential peer reviewers, using parameters such as gender, performance metrics, impact factor, and more. 👉 Our targeted approach ensures a balanced and comprehensive review process, enriching the integrity and depth of your publications. Learn more here: 👉 lnkd.in/dZra9CUF

Continuing our theme: How to effectively peer review ..... More helpful 🅰️ 🅱️ ©️ Top Tips for #researchers ... 🔻 @ reviewercredits.com / Reviewer Credits lnkd.in/dYxH6Zjv What does peer review involve we hear you ask!? Typically, peer review involves 🅰️ 🅱️ ©️: a) Submission: Authors submit their research paper to a journal. b) Editorial Assessment: The editor-in-chief or assigned editor evaluates the manuscript’s suitability for the journal. c) Assignment to Reviewers: The editor assigns the manuscript to subject-matter experts or peers for evaluation. d) Peer Review: Reviewers critically analyze the manuscript, assessing its strengths, weaknesses, and scholarly merit. e) Decision: Based on the reviewers’ feedback, the editor makes a decision on whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript. f) Revision (if necessary): If revisions are requested, authors make the necessary changes and resubmit the revised manuscript. g) Final Decision: The editor evaluates the revised manuscript and makes a final decision on its acceptance or rejection. Need more? reviewercredits.com / Reviewer Credits https://lnkd.in/dYxH6Zjv

Get ready for an insightful discussion to gain clarity on building a future-ready AI strategy for publishing. Join us for the webinar titled “AI and Publishing: Building a Successful Strategy” on January 22, 2025, Wednesday, at 8.30 AM PST | 11.30 AM EST | 4:30 PM GMT, featuring speakers Thad McIlroy, principal of The Future of Publishing, digital publishing analyst and author of The AI Revolution in Book Publishing, Venu Prasad Menon, managing director at Amnet ContentSource. In this session we’ll explore the challenges and opportunities AI presents for book publishers across trade, scholarly, and STM domains. Register Here - https://lnkd.in/gGhDiWpn To download Thad Mcllroy's book AI and Publishing: Building a Successful Strategy - https://lnkd.in/gj_t3VFH #webinar #AI #AIinPublishing #FutureOfPublishing #BookPublishing #DigitalPublishing #ArtificialIntelligence

🌟 𝐃𝐚𝐲 𝟏𝟑: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰 𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧! 🌟⁣ ⁣ Peer review is at the heart of quality research. With ScienceOpen, you can contribute to the global research community by reviewing articles easily and effectively! 🎥 In today’s video, you’ll learn: ✅ How to find articles ready for review on ScienceOpen ✅ The step-by-step process for submitting a constructive review ✅ Tips for providing impactful feedback and contributing to scholarly communication 🔎 Peer reviewing not only helps the community but also builds your reputation as a researcher. ScienceOpen makes the process transparent, efficient, and rewarding. 🎥 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨: https://lnkd.in/dukz9fug 🔗 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐠 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭: https://lnkd.in/dPyN8nAK Let’s elevate research, one review at a time! 🌐 #ScienceOpen #PeerReview #OpenScience #ResearchCommunity

It's crucial to recognize & compensate researchers working for publishers performing peer review -> reviewercredits.com ...... 🔻 WHY? Reviewer Credits

Greeting Cards are a traditional way to share Season's Greetings! 🎄🎁 What to write on a #peerreview Card? @ reviewercredits.com Reviewer Credits

Heard about Portable Peer Review? 👉 lnkd.in/d4HBMkHi 🔻 How does it work? Portable peer review lets researchers transfer peer review feedback from one journal to another if their manuscript is resubmitted elsewhere after a rejection. The feedback they receive can follow their manuscript, helping speed up the publishing process. That’s less work for reviewers and editors. The Portable Peer Review model streamlines the review process and reshapes the academic publishing landscape. But, naturally, this mode of peer review has pros and cons. While it saves time and effort, making disseminating new research faster and more efficient, it also raises concerns about review quality and appropriateness because standards can vary between journals. We dig into the benefits and possible shortcomings from a journal editor’s perspective and in the interest of transparent and effective review and research. 👉 lnkd.in/d4HBMkHi

Can AI fix the peer review bottleneck? Top journals weigh in

Every day is exactly the same. 😅 #peerreview #reviewerservice #editor #publishing #reviewerselection

Performing a peer review (esp for the first time) can be extremely nerve-wracking! Check out our 10 steps to help ..... 🔻 @ reviewercredits.com 👉 lnkd.in/gtcdC6m6 Great peer reviewers combine academic knowledge, strong communication, and a desire to do good work. They see being a reviewer as a way to help authors publish quality research and to advance their field of study. They want to make a difference and feel they need recognition for their work. Great peer reviewers must also be good time managers, not taking on review requests when they won’t have the time and focus to make useful contributions. As a researcher, you’ve probably already been at the end of good and not-so-good reviews. Maybe you’re already a reviewer, but feel something is missing in your reviews. More here 👉 lnkd.in/gtcdC6m6