-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add vec::Drain{,Filter}::keep_rest
#95376
Conversation
r? @kennytm (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
I haven't looked at the code, but I think this is a better answer to 90% of what |
Truth be told, when I struggled with the default behavior of |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #95798) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Ping from triage: |
7fa7bac
to
810a63e
Compare
I think this should be the default for
Perhaps adding a defaulted const generic |
r? rust-lang/libs-api |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #97729) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
These methods allow to cancel draining of unyielded elements.
810a63e
to
50c98a8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am on board with this API. Next steps are:
- I think this is the kind of method that would benefit from a usage example in the rustdoc.
- Needs a tracking issue.
Some considerations to note in the tracking issue for discussion before we could stabilize:
- Just change the not-yet-stable
Drop for DrainFilter
to keep rest?- Advantage: usually what you want (??)
- I don't have a good picture what the use cases involve drain_filter and not exhausting the iterator obtained from it.
- Disadvantage: inconsistent with stable
Drop for Drain
- If you want to remove rest (matching the current unstable behavior of drain_filter) then you'd need to write
.foreach(drop)
to explicitly drop all the rest of the range that matches the filter.
- Advantage: usually what you want (??)
&mut self
instead ofself
?- If you're holding a
Drain
inside a struct and are operating on it from a&mut self
method of the struct,keep_rest(self)
is impossible to use. :(- You'd want something like
mem::replace(&mut self.drain_filter, Vec::new().drain(..)).keep_rest()
but the borrow checker won't like that. - Failing that, you'd need to change your
Drain
field toOption<Drain>
and useself.drain_filter.take().unwrap().keep_rest()
along withunwrap()
everywhere else that the drain is used. Not good.
- You'd want something like
- We'd need to define behavior of calling
.next()
after.keep_rest()
. Presumably one of:.next()
returnsNone
- this is considered incorrect usage and so
.next()
panicks .keep_rest()
sets a flag inside the Drain which Drop will use to decide its behavior, and you're free to continue accessing iterator elements in between.
- If you're holding a
I've updated docs and the tracking issue ✅ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
@bors r+ |
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#95376 (Add `vec::Drain{,Filter}::keep_rest`) - rust-lang#100092 (Fall back when relating two opaques by substs in MIR typeck) - rust-lang#101019 (Suggest returning closure as `impl Fn`) - rust-lang#101022 (Erase late bound regions before comparing types in `suggest_dereferences`) - rust-lang#101101 (interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information) - rust-lang#101123 (Remove `register_attr` feature) - rust-lang#101175 (Don't --bless in pre-push hook) - rust-lang#101176 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS selectors for `.table-display`) - rust-lang#101180 (Add another MaybeUninit array test with const) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This PR adds
keep_rest
methods tovec::Drain
andvec::DrainFilter
underdrain_keep_rest
feature gate:Both these methods cancel draining of elements that were not yet yielded from the iterators. While this needs more testing & documentation, I want at least start the discussion. This may be a potential way out of the "should
DrainFilter
exhaust itself on drop?" argument.