-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement built-in attribute macro #[cfg_eval]
+ some refactoring
#82682
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @varkor (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 1, 2021
3 tasks
petrochenkov
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 1, 2021
…acros` This logic is applicable to two specific macros and not to the expansion infrastructure in general.
This is simpler and mirrors what invocation collector does
petrochenkov
changed the title
[WIP] Implement built-in attribute macro
Implement built-in attribute macro Mar 6, 2021
#[cfg_eval]
#[cfg_eval]
+ some refactoring
This should be ready for review.
r? @Aaron1011 |
petrochenkov
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Mar 6, 2021
Aaron1011
reviewed
Mar 7, 2021
@@ -1452,6 +1452,18 @@ pub(crate) mod builtin { | |||
/* compiler built-in */ | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/// Expands all `#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]` attributes in the code fragment it's applied to. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should add an example here prior to stabilization, but it doesn't need to block this PR.
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 5d27728 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 7, 2021
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2021
Implement built-in attribute macro `#[cfg_eval]` + some refactoring This PR implements a built-in attribute macro `#[cfg_eval]` as it was suggested in rust-lang#79078 to avoid `#[derive()]` without arguments being abused as a way to configure input for other attributes. The macro is used for eagerly expanding all `#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]` attributes in its input ("fully configuring" the input). The effect is identical to effect of `#[derive(Foo, Bar)]` which also fully configures its input before passing it to macros `Foo` and `Bar`, but unlike `#[derive]` `#[cfg_eval]` can be applied to any syntax nodes supporting macro attributes, not only certain items. `cfg_eval` was the first name suggested in rust-lang#79078, but other alternatives are also possible, e.g. `cfg_expand`. ```rust #[cfg_eval] #[my_attr] // Receives `struct S {}` as input, the field is configured away by `#[cfg_eval]` struct S { #[cfg(FALSE)] field: u8, } ``` Tracking issue: rust-lang#82679
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2021
Implement built-in attribute macro `#[cfg_eval]` + some refactoring This PR implements a built-in attribute macro `#[cfg_eval]` as it was suggested in rust-lang#79078 to avoid `#[derive()]` without arguments being abused as a way to configure input for other attributes. The macro is used for eagerly expanding all `#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]` attributes in its input ("fully configuring" the input). The effect is identical to effect of `#[derive(Foo, Bar)]` which also fully configures its input before passing it to macros `Foo` and `Bar`, but unlike `#[derive]` `#[cfg_eval]` can be applied to any syntax nodes supporting macro attributes, not only certain items. `cfg_eval` was the first name suggested in rust-lang#79078, but other alternatives are also possible, e.g. `cfg_expand`. ```rust #[cfg_eval] #[my_attr] // Receives `struct S {}` as input, the field is configured away by `#[cfg_eval]` struct S { #[cfg(FALSE)] field: u8, } ``` Tracking issue: rust-lang#82679
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2021
Implement built-in attribute macro `#[cfg_eval]` + some refactoring This PR implements a built-in attribute macro `#[cfg_eval]` as it was suggested in rust-lang#79078 to avoid `#[derive()]` without arguments being abused as a way to configure input for other attributes. The macro is used for eagerly expanding all `#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]` attributes in its input ("fully configuring" the input). The effect is identical to effect of `#[derive(Foo, Bar)]` which also fully configures its input before passing it to macros `Foo` and `Bar`, but unlike `#[derive]` `#[cfg_eval]` can be applied to any syntax nodes supporting macro attributes, not only certain items. `cfg_eval` was the first name suggested in rust-lang#79078, but other alternatives are also possible, e.g. `cfg_expand`. ```rust #[cfg_eval] #[my_attr] // Receives `struct S {}` as input, the field is configured away by `#[cfg_eval]` struct S { #[cfg(FALSE)] field: u8, } ``` Tracking issue: rust-lang#82679
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2021
Implement built-in attribute macro `#[cfg_eval]` + some refactoring This PR implements a built-in attribute macro `#[cfg_eval]` as it was suggested in rust-lang#79078 to avoid `#[derive()]` without arguments being abused as a way to configure input for other attributes. The macro is used for eagerly expanding all `#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]` attributes in its input ("fully configuring" the input). The effect is identical to effect of `#[derive(Foo, Bar)]` which also fully configures its input before passing it to macros `Foo` and `Bar`, but unlike `#[derive]` `#[cfg_eval]` can be applied to any syntax nodes supporting macro attributes, not only certain items. `cfg_eval` was the first name suggested in rust-lang#79078, but other alternatives are also possible, e.g. `cfg_expand`. ```rust #[cfg_eval] #[my_attr] // Receives `struct S {}` as input, the field is configured away by `#[cfg_eval]` struct S { #[cfg(FALSE)] field: u8, } ``` Tracking issue: rust-lang#82679
This was referenced Mar 8, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2021
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#82047 (bypass auto_da_alloc for metadata files) - rust-lang#82415 (expand: Refactor module loading) - rust-lang#82557 (Add natvis for Result, NonNull, CString, CStr, and Cow) - rust-lang#82613 (Remove Item::kind, use tagged enum. Rename variants to match) - rust-lang#82642 (Fix jemalloc usage on OSX) - rust-lang#82682 (Implement built-in attribute macro `#[cfg_eval]` + some refactoring) - rust-lang#82684 (Disable destination propagation on all mir-opt-levels) - rust-lang#82755 (Refactor confirm_builtin_call, remove partial if) - rust-lang#82857 (Edit ructc_ast_lowering docs) - rust-lang#82862 (Generalize Write impl for Vec<u8> to Vec<u8, A>) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements a built-in attribute macro
#[cfg_eval]
as it was suggested in #79078 to avoid#[derive()]
without arguments being abused as a way to configure input for other attributes.The macro is used for eagerly expanding all
#[cfg]
and#[cfg_attr]
attributes in its input ("fully configuring" the input).The effect is identical to effect of
#[derive(Foo, Bar)]
which also fully configures its input before passing it to macrosFoo
andBar
, but unlike#[derive]
#[cfg_eval]
can be applied to any syntax nodes supporting macro attributes, not only certain items.cfg_eval
was the first name suggested in #79078, but other alternatives are also possible, e.g.cfg_expand
.Tracking issue: #82679