-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implement proper linkchecker hardening #68791
Conversation
cc @ehuss |
Looks good, could we update rustc-guide submodule to see if the change works well here? |
5952741
to
5e086c8
Compare
It broke on my other machine, so I pushed a fix. I also added a commit to update rustc-guide. It seems to be working locally. |
Thanks! r=me if @ehuss also approves it (and I could r+ here) |
Seems ok to me. I'm still of the opinion that the benefit of linkchecking on rust-lang/rust doesn't outweigh the cost, but I understand you find it useful. |
Okay, let's then |
📌 Commit 5e086c8 has been approved by |
…JohnTitor implement proper linkchecker hardening r? @JohnTitor This implements proper linkcheck filtering... we might need to fiddle with a bit to adjust what is or isn't filtered, but this seems to work reasonable locally.
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #67359 (Rename -Zexternal-macro-backtrace to -Zmacro-backtrace and clean up implementation.) - #68524 (Generator Resume Arguments) - #68791 (implement proper linkchecker hardening) - #68886 (Mark fn map_or() as eagerly evaluated.) - #68888 (error code examples: replace some more ignore with compile_fail) - #68894 (Update E0565 examples) Failed merges: r? @ghost
r? @JohnTitor
This implements proper linkcheck filtering... we might need to fiddle with a bit to adjust what is or isn't filtered, but this seems to work reasonable locally.