Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #62580

Merged
merged 44 commits into from
Jul 11, 2019
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #62580

merged 44 commits into from
Jul 11, 2019

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Jul 11, 2019

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

aschampion and others added 30 commits June 8, 2019 16:26
Because Eq types must be reflexively equal, an equal-length slice to the
same memory location must be equal.
The auxiliary file arc_wake.rs is in run-pass/auxiliary and also
ui/async-await/auxiliary. Remove the former one as their contents
are same.
Move run-pass/futures-api.rs to ui/async-await/futures-api.rs as it
needs to use arc_wake.rs.
The sizes for wasm are different.

Co-Authored-By: Tyler Mandry <[email protected]>
All ioctl(2)s will fail on O_PATH file descriptors on Linux (because
they use &empty_fops as a security measure against O_PATH descriptors
affecting the backing file).

As a result, File::try_clone() and various other methods would always
fail with -EBADF on O_PATH file descriptors. The solution is to simply
use F_SETFD (as is used on other unices) which works on O_PATH
descriptors because it operates through the fnctl(2) layer and not
through ioctl(2)s.

Since this code is usually only used in strange error paths (a broken or
ancient kernel), the extra overhead of one syscall shouldn't cause any
dramas. Most other systems programming languages also use the fnctl(2)
so this brings us in line with them.

Fixes: rust-lang#62314
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>
It's internal to resolve and always results in `Res::Err` outside of resolve.
Instead put `DefKind::Fn`s themselves into the macro namespace, it's ok.

Proc macro stubs are items placed into macro namespase for functions that define proc macros.
rust-lang#52383

The rustdoc test is changed because the old test didn't actually reproduce the ICE it was supposed to reproduce.
So it can be eventually used in `ExpnInfo`
More consistent with other naming:
ExpnFormat -> ExpnKind
ExpnKind::name -> ExpnKind::descr
DesugaringKind::name -> DesugaringKind::descr

Shorter, no tautology:
CompilerDesugaring -> Desugaring
CompilerDesugaringKind -> DesugaringKind
The expansions were created to allow unstable things inside `#[test_case/test/bench]`, but that's not a proper way to do that.
Put the required `allow_internal_unstable`s into the macros' properties instead.
It was used to choose whether to apply derive markers like `#[rustc_copy_clone_marker]` or not,
but it was called before all the data required for resolution is available, so it could work incorrectly in some corner cases (like user-defined derives name `Copy` or `Eq`).
Delay the decision about markers until the proper resolution results are available instead.
…osticSpanMacroExpansion

We have to deal with dummy spans anyway

Remove def-site span from expander interfaces.
It's not used by the expansion infra, only by specific expanders, which can keep it themselves if they want it.
Orthogonality and reuse are good.
Avoid the tricky scheme with callbacks and keep the invocation parent data where it logically belongs - in `Definitions`.

This also allows to create `InvocationData` entries in resolve when the data is actually ready, and remove cells and "uninitialized" variants from it.
Create real working and registered (even if dummy) `SyntaxExtension`s for them.
This improves error recovery and allows to avoid all special cases for proc macro stubs (except for the error on use, of course).

The introduced dummy `SyntaxExtension`s can be used for any other inappropriately resolved macros as well.
…ate errors

It either returns the indeterminacy error, or valid (but perhaps dummy) `SyntaxExtension`.

With this change enum `Determinacy` is no longer used in libsyntax and can be moved to resolve.

The regressions in diagnosics are fixed in the next commits.
This way we are processing all of them in a single point, rather than separately for each syntax extension kind.
Also, the standard expected/found wording is used.
This is going to be used when built-in macros are defined through libcore and made available to other crates through standard library prelude
…rting parts

Also move macro stability checking closer to other checks performed on obtained resolutions.
Tighten the stability spans as well, it is an error to *refer* to and unstable entity in any way, not only "call" it.
Ok, it's hard to explain what happens, but identifier's hygienic contexts need to be "adjusted" to modules/scopes before they are resolved in them.
To be resolved in all kinds on preludes the identifier needs to be adjusted to the root expansion (aka "no expansion").

Previously this was done for the `macro m() { ::my_crate::foo }` case, but forgotten for all other cases.
…rkers

Create a fresh expansion for them instead - this is the usual way to allow unstable features for generated/desugared code.
Fixes rust-lang#52363
Creating a fresh expansion and immediately generating a span from it is the most common scenario.

Also avoid allocating `allow_internal_unstable` lists for derive markers repeatedly.
And rename `ExpnInfo::with_unstable` to `ExpnInfo::allow_unstable`, seems to be a better fitting name.
Use variant names rather than descriptions for identifying desugarings in `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]`.
Both are highly unstable, but variant name is at least a single identifier.
petrochenkov and others added 14 commits July 11, 2019 00:12
The root expansion was missing one.
Expansions created for "derive containers" (see one of the next commits for the description) also didn't get expansion info.
Remove a bunch of `Option`s that assumed that dummy fragment creation could fail.

The test output changed due to not performing the expansion in `fn expand_invoc` in case of the recursion limit hit.
It's more convenient to have all this highly related stuff together on one screen (for future refactorings).
The `expand_invoc` function is compact enough now, after all the previous refactorings.
…iant

`InvocationKind::Attr { attr: None, .. }` meaning something entirely different from a regular attribute was confusing as hell.
Add a test for the issue resolved by removing `resolve_macro_path`

Add a test making sure that extern prelude entries introduced from an opaque macro are not visible anywhere, even it that macro

Fix test output after rebase
core: check for pointer equality when comparing Eq slices

Because `Eq` types must be reflexively equal, an equal-length slice to the same memory location must be equal.

This is related to rust-lang#33892 (and rust-lang#32699) answering this comment from that PR:

> Great! One more easy question: why does this optimization not apply in the non-BytewiseEquality implementation directly above?

Because slices of non-reflexively equal types (like `f64`) are not equal even if it's the same slice. But if the types are `Eq`, we can use this same-address optimization, which this PR implements. Obviously this changes behavior if types violate the reflexivity condition of `Eq`, because their impls of `PartialEq` will no longer be called per-item, but 🤷‍♂ .

It's not clear how often this optimization comes up in the real world outside of the same-`&str` case covered by rust-lang#33892, so **I'm requesting a perf run** (on MacOS today, so can't run `rustc_perf` myself). I'm going ahead and making the PR on the basis of being surprised things didn't already work this way.

This is my first time hacking rust itself, so as a perf sanity check I ran `./x.py bench --stage 0 src/lib{std,alloc}`, but the differences were noisy.

To make the existing specialization for `BytewiseEquality` explicit, it's now a supertrait of `Eq + Copy`. `Eq` should be sufficient, but `Copy` was included for clarity.
Prerequisites from dep graph refactoring rust-lang#2

Split out from rust-lang#60035 and overlaps with rust-lang#60559.
…andry

Move async-await tests from run-pass to ui

fix rust-lang#62236

r? @Centril
…lexcrichton

filedesc: don't use ioctl(FIOCLEX) on Linux

All `ioctl(2)`s will fail on `O_PATH` file descriptors on Linux (because
they use `&empty_fops` as a security measure against `O_PATH` descriptors
affecting the backing file).

As a result, `File::try_clone()` and various other methods would always
fail with `-EBADF` on `O_PATH` file descriptors. The solution is to simply
use `F_SETFD` (as is used on other unices) which works on `O_PATH`
descriptors because it operates through the `fnctl(2)` layer and not
through `ioctl(2)`s.

Since this code is usually only used in strange error paths (a broken or
ancient kernel), the extra overhead of one syscall shouldn't cause any
dramas. Most other systems programming languages also use the fnctl(2)
so this brings us in line with them.

Fixes: rust-lang#62314
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>
Continue refactoring macro expansion and resolution

This PR continues the work started in rust-lang#62042.
It contains a set of more or less related refactorings with the general goal of making things simpler and more orthogonal.
Along the way most of the issues uncovered in rust-lang#62086 are fixed.

The PR is better read in per-commit fashion with whitespace changes ignored.
I tried to leave some more detailed commit messages describing the motivation behind the individual changes.

Fixes rust-lang#44692
Fixes rust-lang#52363
Unblocks rust-lang#62086
r? @matthewjasper
…elix

Regression test for HRTB bug (issue 30786).

Close rust-lang#30786.
Fix typo in libcore/intrinsics.rs
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Jul 11, 2019

@bors r+ p=7 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2019

📌 Commit f9034ce has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 11, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2019

⌛ Testing commit f9034ce with merge 6907005...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2019
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #61665 (core: check for pointer equality when comparing Eq slices)
 - #61923 (Prerequisites from dep graph refactoring #2)
 - #62270 (Move async-await tests from run-pass to ui)
 - #62425 (filedesc: don't use ioctl(FIOCLEX) on Linux)
 - #62476 (Continue refactoring macro expansion and resolution)
 - #62519 (Regression test for HRTB bug (issue 30786).)
 - #62557 (Fix typo in libcore/intrinsics.rs)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure, checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: Centril
Pushing 6907005 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 11, 2019
@bors bors merged commit f9034ce into rust-lang:master Jul 11, 2019
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

📣 Toolstate changed by #62580!

Tested on commit 6907005.
Direct link to PR: #62580

💔 clippy-driver on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Manishearth @llogiq @mcarton @oli-obk @phansch, @rust-lang/infra).
💔 clippy-driver on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Manishearth @llogiq @mcarton @oli-obk @phansch, @rust-lang/infra).

rust-highfive added a commit to rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2019
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@6907005.
Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#62580>

💔 clippy-driver on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Manishearth @llogiq @mcarton @oli-obk @phansch, @rust-lang/infra).
💔 clippy-driver on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Manishearth @llogiq @mcarton @oli-obk @phansch, @rust-lang/infra).
@Centril Centril deleted the rollup-remihe0 branch July 29, 2019 02:57
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants