create an issue for miri even in status test-fail #61938
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
r? @kennytm |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit d8eea92 has been approved by |
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2019
create an issue for miri even in status test-fail I fired up python to see that this parses, but I wouldn't know how to test this script.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2019
create an issue for miri even in status test-fail I fired up python to see that this parses, but I wouldn't know how to test this script.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2019
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #61505 (Only show methods that appear in `impl` blocks in the Implementors sections of trait doc pages) - #61701 (move stray run-pass const tests into const/ folder) - #61748 (Tweak transparent enums and unions diagnostic spans) - #61802 (Make MaybeUninit #[repr(transparent)]) - #61839 (ci: Add a script for generating CPU usage graphs) - #61842 (Remove unnecessary lift calls) - #61843 (Turn down the myriad-closures test) - #61896 (rustc_typeck: correctly compute `Substs` for `Res::SelfCtor`.) - #61898 (syntax: Factor out common fields from `SyntaxExtension` variants) - #61938 (create an issue for miri even in status test-fail) - #61941 (Preserve generator and yield source for error messages) Failed merges: r? @ghost
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2019
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #61505 (Only show methods that appear in `impl` blocks in the Implementors sections of trait doc pages) - #61701 (move stray run-pass const tests into const/ folder) - #61748 (Tweak transparent enums and unions diagnostic spans) - #61802 (Make MaybeUninit #[repr(transparent)]) - #61839 (ci: Add a script for generating CPU usage graphs) - #61842 (Remove unnecessary lift calls) - #61843 (Turn down the myriad-closures test) - #61896 (rustc_typeck: correctly compute `Substs` for `Res::SelfCtor`.) - #61898 (syntax: Factor out common fields from `SyntaxExtension` variants) - #61938 (create an issue for miri even in status test-fail) - #61941 (Preserve generator and yield source for error messages) Failed merges: r? @ghost
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2019
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #61505 (Only show methods that appear in `impl` blocks in the Implementors sections of trait doc pages) - #61701 (move stray run-pass const tests into const/ folder) - #61748 (Tweak transparent enums and unions diagnostic spans) - #61802 (Make MaybeUninit #[repr(transparent)]) - #61839 (ci: Add a script for generating CPU usage graphs) - #61842 (Remove unnecessary lift calls) - #61843 (Turn down the myriad-closures test) - #61896 (rustc_typeck: correctly compute `Substs` for `Res::SelfCtor`.) - #61898 (syntax: Factor out common fields from `SyntaxExtension` variants) - #61938 (create an issue for miri even in status test-fail) - #61941 (Preserve generator and yield source for error messages) Failed merges: r? @ghost
This was referenced Jun 21, 2019
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2019
publish_toolstate: don't use 'new' from inside the loop I think I made a mistake in rust-lang#61938 by using `new` outside the inner loop. This PR fixes that. However, no issue got created at all for rust-lang#62003 (comment), and I don't know why that is. The script should be [triggered by Traivs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/56a12b2ad058f22f1ef090713df15598525ba4a4/.travis.yml#L240), and I can find no trace of that in [the build log](https://travis-ci.com/rust-lang/rust/jobs/209880042).
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2019
publish_toolstate: don't use 'new' from inside the loop I think I made a mistake in rust-lang#61938 by using `new` outside the inner loop. This PR fixes that. However, no issue got created at all for rust-lang#62003 (comment), and I don't know why that is. The script should be [triggered by Traivs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/56a12b2ad058f22f1ef090713df15598525ba4a4/.travis.yml#L240), and I can find no trace of that in [the build log](https://travis-ci.com/rust-lang/rust/jobs/209880042).
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2019
publish_toolstate: don't use 'new' from inside the loop I think I made a mistake in rust-lang#61938 by using `new` outside the inner loop. This PR fixes that. However, no issue got created at all for rust-lang#62003 (comment), and I don't know why that is. The script should be [triggered by Traivs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/56a12b2ad058f22f1ef090713df15598525ba4a4/.travis.yml#L240), and I can find no trace of that in [the build log](https://travis-ci.com/rust-lang/rust/jobs/209880042).
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2019
publish_toolstate: don't use 'new' from inside the loop I think I made a mistake in rust-lang#61938 by using `new` outside the inner loop. This PR fixes that. However, no issue got created at all for rust-lang#62003 (comment), and I don't know why that is. The script should be [triggered by Traivs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/56a12b2ad058f22f1ef090713df15598525ba4a4/.travis.yml#L240), and I can find no trace of that in [the build log](https://travis-ci.com/rust-lang/rust/jobs/209880042).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I fired up python to see that this parses, but I wouldn't know how to test this script.