Rollup of 4 pull requests #125324
Merged
Rollup of 4 pull requests #125324
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also adds debug_asserts in Drop for Weak/Arc that the shared static is not being "dropped"/"deallocated".
It fails on my machine because it embeds pointer addresses in the expected output. This commit replaces the addresses with `0x[...]`.
… r=lcnr Make `EvalCtxt` generic over `InferCtxtLike` ...but don't change any of the impls, yet! These can get uplifted as we add more methods to `InferCtxtLike`/`Interner` :3 This is built on top of rust-lang#125230. r? lcnr
Use a single static for all default slice Arcs. Also adds debug_asserts in Drop for Weak/Arc that the shared static is not being "dropped"/"deallocated". As per rust-lang#124640 (review) r? dtolnay
…ed-viz, r=fmease rustdoc: Don't strip items with inherited visibility in `AliasedNonLocalStripper` Enum variants return `None` in `Item::visibility`, which fails the comparison to `Some(Visibility::Public)`. This means that all enums in type aliases are being stripped, leading to this in the `rustc_middle` docs: <img width="474" alt="image" src="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/3674314/83704d94-a571-4c28-acbd-ca51c4efd46e"> This regressed in rust-lang#124939 (comment). This switches the `AliasedNonLocalStripper` to not strip items with `None` as their visibility.
…r=Mark-Simulacrum Fix `tests/debuginfo/strings-and-strs`. It fails on my machine because it embeds pointer addresses in the expected output. This commit replaces the addresses with `0x[...]`. r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=4 |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 44d679b902 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
This was referenced May 20, 2024
|
Finished benchmarking commit (75cb5c5): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 3.9%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 671.145s -> 671.213s (0.01%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
EvalCtxtgeneric overInferCtxtLike#125255 (MakeEvalCtxtgeneric overInferCtxtLike)AliasedNonLocalStripper#125300 (rustdoc: Don't strip items with inherited visibility inAliasedNonLocalStripper)tests/debuginfo/strings-and-strs. #125309 (Fixtests/debuginfo/strings-and-strs.)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup