Bruno Laurent

Security Withdrawn from Ex-CM Champai Soren, Claims Conspiracy https://lnkd.in/gmYSSDxf BJP leader accuses Hemant Soren govt of political plot over security recall Key Points: • Former Jharkhand CM Champai Soren alleges security vehicles withdrawn • Accuses JMM-led government of political conspiracy against him • Soren’s Z-Plus security significantly reduced since joining BJP RANCHI – Former Jharkhand Chief Minister Champai Soren has accused the current state government of withdrawing vehicles assigned for his security. The BJP leader claims this action disregards established rules and protocols. Moreover, Champai Soren alleges a political conspiracy by the JMM-led government against him. He shared his concerns on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. "I don’t need security among my people in Jharkhand," Soren stated defiantly. However, he emphasized that the public would respond to this perceived political plot. The former CM directly accused Chief Minister Hemant Soren of orchestrating the conspiracy. Furthermore, Champai Soren’s security has seen significant reductions since he joined the BJP. Despite holding Z-Plus security due to his former position, his protection has been scaled back. In addition, the government had previously withdrawn security personnel assigned to him. Now, they have allegedly taken away the vehicles as well. On the other hand, Champai Soren remains confident in public support. He has called on citizens to stand against what he views as political maneuvering. Meanwhile, the state government has not yet responded to these serious allegations. The post Security Withdrawn from Ex-CM Champai Soren, Claims Conspiracy appeared first on Town Post. https://lnkd.in/g4A5f6VR

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dTxGsKrN #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dvw5kNah

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

Grooming 101: Tips and Tricks for Maintaining Your Afghan Hound's Luxurious Coat Grooming 101: Tips and Tricks for Maintaining Your Afghan Hound's Luxurious Co... Read More - https://lnkd.in/dPz7a4z5

Army channel now online (still not complete), next will be Germany and then all other (always related to our FreaksGeneration countries). Once done we will do that for Australia, Canada, America, Austria, UK too. Maybe some Asian countries too. via #rtpnews #roadtopetabyte #telegram #rtpannouncements #roadtopetabyteannouncements #rtpannouncement #roadtopetabyteannouncement

Democrats look to strip Secret Service protection from Trump if he’s convicted House Democrats looking to strip Secret Service protection have introduced a bill that would strip Secret Service Read more... https://lnkd.in/dkmazwJx #thedualside #america #usa #news #Update #DonaldTrump #court #bothsides, #politics #india #trendingnow #instagram #viralpost #Trump #Republicans #memes #indianpolitics #geopolitics #womeninpolitics #uspolitics #newblogpost #LatestNews #PoliticalNews #trendingvideo #CoronavirusLockdown #followforfollowback #newblogger #media #politics #dailynews #instanews #trendingnews #BreakingNews

God created The Simulation to show love and compassion: “God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him” (1 John 4:16) #Jesus #Biblequote #Christianquotes #IntelligentDesign #WeLiveinaSimulation #ScienceandFaith #SimulationHypothesis #SimulationCreationism

🤔 Militant groups are always morphing and assimilating. Consider the new front called TJP. They have committed 5 attacks on security forces in Pakistan in 2023. Very little as far as social media presence is available. https://lnkd.in/g-562kb7 #insurgency #counterterrorism #counterintelligence #counterinsurgency