Classic bait-and-switch wrapped in shiny new tech toys! Recent investments in #NDIS tech upgrades, including DART, ICT PACE Salesforce, could be viewed as strategic moves by NDIA to centralize control & cut costs, at the expense of participant autonomy. Bit like giving a kid a shiny new bicycle with one hand while tightening the training wheels with the other. Sure, they're upgrading the systems, but at what cost?
Evidence suggests procurement process for these systems, particularly Salesforce, was marred by ethical concerns & cost blowouts, a contract value ballooning from $27 million to $135 million due to scope changes. Additionally, there were instances of undisclosed gifts & hospitality received by NDIA officials from Salesforce, raising questions about the integrity of the procurement process. Did the extra cash come with a side of accountability, or just an expensive lunch for a few NDIA officials? The sweet aroma of undisclosed gifts, where transparency goes to die. Ethical Concerns? More like ethical nightmares. A little gift here, a hospitality event there & suddenly, what was supposed to be a transparent process looks more like a backroom deal. Who needs a fair procurement process when you can have a cozy relationship with your vendor?
Centralized Control or should we say, centralized surveillance? By tightening the reins on financial management, NDIA might save a few bucks, but what happens to participant choice? It's like they’re handing out free collars to the participants – complete with a shiny tag that says, "Property of NDIA." Big question here is NDIA really trying to empower participants, or are they just trying to tighten their grip under the guise of efficiency? Line between progress & control is a thin one & it seems like they’re walking it with a pair of blinders on. Maybe it's time someone held magnifying glass up to see who’s really benefiting from these “upgrades.”
Cost-Cutting Agenda: NDIA is playing Monopoly with people’s lives, and the utilities and railroads are all marked "NDIA-owned." They’re streamlining operations alright – straight down the highway of control, where autonomy is just a pit stop that no one’s allowed to visit. Reduces participant choice & increase surveillance, aligning with a broader cost-cutting agenda. Shifting towards these systems may reflect an underlying strategy to enforce stricter controls over spending while limiting participant autonomy in managing their plans.
Tech Upgrades or Trojan Horses? If these new systems are so great, why does it feel like they’re more about watching participants than helping them? It’s the classic government move – sell it as empowerment, but the fine print reads “You’re now under stricter surveillance.” These upgrades might enable NDIA to take direct control over transactions too, reducing the role of intermediaries like plan managers, centralizing financial management.
Time we ask how these technological changes align with the original goals of NDIS.
6
3 Comments