Agenda Settimg Theory

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

AGENDA SETTING

THEORY
“The creation of what the public
thinks is important”
Theorists
Maxwell McCombs and Donald L.
Shaw
Year
1972
“News Media is powerful to tell
people what to think about”
History and Orientation
Agenda setting describes a very powerful influence of the media –
the ability to tell us what issues are important.
 As far back as 1922, the newspaper columnist Walter Lippman
was concerned that the media had the power to present images to
the public.
 McCombs and Shaw investigated presidential campaigns in
1968, 1972 and 1976. In the research done in 1968 they focused
• Investigating the agenda-setting function of the
mass media, they attempted to assess the
relationship between what voters in one community
said were important issues and the actual content of
the media messages used during the campaign.

• McCombs and Shaw concluded that the mass


media exerted a significant influence on what
voters considered to be the major issues of the
Core Assumptions and
Statements
 Core

Agenda-setting is the creation of public awareness and concern of salient issues


by the news media.
 Assumptions

Two basis assumptions underlie most research on agenda-setting:


(1)The press and the media do not reflect reality; they filter and shape it;
(2)Media concentration on a few issues and subjects leads the public to perceive
those issues as more important than other issues.
Statement
Bernard Cohen (1963) stated:
“The press may not be successful much of the time
in telling people what to think, but it is stunningly
successful in telling its readers what to think
about.”
Conceptual Model
Types
 Media Agenda

Media agenda is the set of topic addressed by the media sources (e.g.
Newspapers, television and radio).
 Public Agenda

Public agenda is the set of topic that members of public believe is important.
(e.g. Issues and debates that are discussed by people).
 Policy Agenda

Policy agenda represents issues that decision-makers ( e.g. legislators and those
who influence the legislative process) believe are particular salient.
Two Levels of Agenda
Setting Theory
1st Level
Mostly studied by researcher, media uses objects or issues
to influence the people what people should think about.
2nd Level

Media focus on the characters of issues how people should


think about.
Gate Keeping
The main concept associated with the agenda
setting is Gate Keeping ( control over the selection
of content discussed in media).
e.g. News comes from various sources; editors
choose what should appear and what should not that
is why they are known as Gatekeepers.
Priming
 Activity of the media in proposing the values and standards by which
objects of the media attention can be judged. Media’s content will provide
a lot of time and space to certain issues, making it more vivid.
 In simple words, media is giving utmost importance to a news so that it
gives people the impression that is the most important information.
 Particular news is carried as a heading or covered everyday for months.
 Headlines, special news features, discussions, expert opinions are used.
 Media primes a news by repeating it and giving it more importance.
Framing
 Framing is a process of selective control. Framing talks about
how people attach importance to certain news for example in
case of attack, defeat win and loss, how media frames the news
such that people perceive it in a different way.

 We can take India and Pakistan war, same happening is framed


in different ways in both the countries so depending on which
media you view your perception will differ.
Scope and Application
Just as McCombs and Shaw expanded their focus, other
researchers have extended investigation of agenda setting
to issues including history, advertising, foreign and
medical news.
Criticism
 Media users not ideal, people may not pay attention to details.
 Effect is weekend for people who have made up their mind.
 Media cant create problems. They can only alter the awareness
and priority etc.
 Entirely too difficult to measure.
 Itcan be proven false if people are not exposed to the same
media , they wont feel the same issues are important.

You might also like