Challenges For Accreditation
Challenges For Accreditation
Challenges For Accreditation
Paul Chang MBBS, MPH Derick P. Pasternak MD, MBA Managing Directors, JCI
Presentation Topics
Short overview of Joint Commission International (JCI) Common characteristics of accreditation programs Current challenges How programs must change to meet those challenges
Organizational Base
Joint Commission International (JCI) is the international arm of The Joint Commission (TJC). TJC and JCI are independent non-profit, non- governmental agencies Accredit over 17,000 organizations Worldwide
143 of those are acute care hospitals in 28 countries
Accreditation A Definition
Usually a voluntary process by which a government or non-government agency grants recognition to health care institutions which meet certain standards that require continuous improvement in structures, processes, and outcomes. Accreditation is often confused with:
Licensure-governmental activity that sets minimum standards to protect the public Certification that evaluates special capability or unique skills/ability
Copyright, Joint Commission International
Improve the management of health services Create a learning organization Enhance staff recruitment and retention Improve or expand sources of payment
Globalizations Impact
Multinational companies need to know where employees can receive quality health care International insurance companies need to know where they should pay for services with good outcomes
Copyright, Joint Commission International
Does the organization meet international norms - e.g., patient rights, research, ethics? Is clinical care guided by the best science e.g., practice guidelines
Accreditation System
Design
Sources of Funding
Conclusions
Traditional national accreditation programs are not positioned to provide comparative information to those new stakeholders with global needs for quality information. International accreditation programs can provide the needed information but need to be structured in a way that ensures international transparency and accountability.
Conclusions
The methodology of accreditation is flexible enough to be customized to meet particular stakeholder needs
e.g., Patient safety and risk assessments, leadership assessments, infection or medication risk assessments
Thank You
www.jointcommissioninternational.org
Copyright, Joint Commission International