Montague-Chelmsford Reforms

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

MONTAGUE-

CHELMSFORD
REFORMS (1919)
SUBMITTED BY:
MOHAMMAD ALYAAN RAZA
9-E

Lord Chelmsford Edward Montague


2
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Coming Reasons for


Background
About Introducing

Reaction of Main
Indians Provisions
3
BACKGROUND

• First World War was over and Indians had given full support to British
• As a reward, Indians expected self-rule or at least a greater share in the government
• In Lucknow Pact (1916), Congress and Muslim League had set joint demands to British
• In 1917, Tilak and Annie Besant, a British lady working for Congress, launched
campaigns for self-rule through Home Rule Leagues
• Merger pressure from Indian National Congress, All- India Muslim League, and Home
Rule Leagues forced British Government to give Indians a greater share in the
government
4
COMING ABOUT

• In November 1917, Under Secretary of State for India: Edward Montague and
Viceroy: Lord Chelmsford, took a fact-finding tour of India
• They had meetings with several Indian leaders
• In July 1919, Montague-Chelmsford report was issued
• These reforms aimed at establishing the self-governing institutions with increasing
association of Indians in all departments of state so that a self-government could be
established as an integral part of British Empire later
5
REASONS FOR INTRODUCING

After the Minto-Morley reforms of 1909, British decided to introduce reforms in India
after every 10 years.
• To make governance of India easy and on modern or British style
• To please Indians since they had supported the British in the first World War and could
support them again when needed
• Indians were demanding larger share in the government and it was time to respond
quickly before things could get worse
6
MAIN PROVISIONS
The Reforms
Proposed :

Legislative Assembly Council of State


• Lower house Bicameralism • Upper house
• Total 145 members • Total 60 members
• 104 elected (52 general, 30 Muslims, 9
• 33 elected
Europeans, 7 Landlords, 4 Indian
Community Representatives, 2 Sikhs) • 27 nominated
• 41 nominated (26 officials, 15 non-officials) • Tenure was 5 years
• Elected for 3 years
7
MAIN PROVISIONS
Divided into
2
Reserved Subjects Transferred Subjects
State • Forests
• Justice
Departments
• Police • Education

• Revenue • Public Works

• Power Resources • Public Health

• Press and Publication • Local Government

They were more important and controlled by They were less significant, controlled by Indian
provincial governors. ministers who were responsible to the
provincial legislative councils and nominated
by Viceroy.
8
MAIN PROVISIONS

• Diarchy was introduced in provinces which allowed the Governor General to interfere in provincial matters when
wanted
• Separate electorates were given to Muslims and Sikhs
• Council of Princes was set up with 108 members from important princely states to discuss matters related to them
• It provided establishment of the Public Service Commission in India
• Viceroy had almost all powers to appoint or dismiss ministers and pass any laws without approval of legislative
bodies
• Executive Council now had 3 Indians who were nominated by Viceroy
• Indian representation was increased on Indian Council with 3 Indians out of 12 in total
9
MAIN PROVISIONS

Voter Qualifications:
• Must have property
• Must have income, revenue or land rent of at least Rs.3000 per annum
• Must be a male
• Must have experience of legislative councils, hold specific title, membership of the
University, Senate or hold office in a local body
Under these restrictions, only 2 percent of Indians could vote. Therefore 5.5 million of India’s
250 million population were allowed to vote.
10
REACTION OF INDIANS

• Many Indians had fought in the War; therefore, they were expecting much greater concessions
and were bitterly disappointed
• In fact, in one of their special sessions, the Congress condemned these reforms as ‘Inadequate,
unsatisfactory and disappointing’
• Only the moderates in Congress supported these reforms but were soon excluded from the party
• Mr. Jinnah was not happy but did no condemn them in hope that the powers of the viceroy were
temporary
• Other communities of India e.g. Sikhs, non-Brahmins, Eurasians started demanding concessions
too since separate electorates for Muslims had been reluctantly accepted by British
11

THANK YOU!

You might also like