House's Path Goal Theory

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

House’s Path Goal Theory

What is House’s Path Goal Theory

 In 1971, Robert House introduced his version of a contingent theory of


leadership known as the Path Goal Theory. According to House’s theory
leader’s behavior is contingent upon the satisfaction, motivation, and
performance of their subordinates.
 has its roots in the expectancy theory of motivation. 
 The theory is based on the premise that an employee’s perception of
expectancies between his effort and performance is greatly affected by a
leader’s behavior.
 The leaders help group members in attaining rewards by clarifying the paths
to goals and removing obstacles to performance. They do so by providing the
information, support, and other resources which are required by employees to
complete the task.
House’s theory
advocates servant
leadership.
As per servant leadership theory,
leadership is not viewed as a
position of power. Rather, leaders
act as coaches and facilitators to
their subordinates.
According to House’s path-goal
theory, a leader’s effectiveness
depends on several employee and
environmental contingent factors
and certain leadership styles. All
these are explained in the figure 1
below:
Figure 1: Path-Goal Leadership Theory 
The four leadership styles are:
 Directive: 
o Here the leader provides guidelines, lets subordinates know what
is expected of them, sets performance standards for them, and
controls behavior when performance standards are not met. He
makes judicious use of rewards and disciplinary action. The style is
the same as task-oriented one.
o The work will normally be complex and unstructured, and
Leadership followers will usually lack experience and accept a high degree of
outside control. There is little emphasis on personal payoffs for
reaching the goal because the work is inherently satisfying.
Styles
 Supportive: 
o The leader is friendly towards subordinates and displays personal
concern for their needs, welfare, and well-being. This style is the
same as people-oriented leadership.
o The supportive style puts more emphasis on improving the work
environment and looking after individuals’ welfare. It makes sense
to adopt this approach when the followers can perform their tasks
skillfully with confidence and do not want close supervision but do
need someone to help reduce the stress that may arise from doing
a repetitive task.
 Participative: 
o The leader believes in group decision-making and shares information
with subordinates. He consults his subordinates on important decisions
related to work, task goals, and paths to resolve goals.
o The leader adopting the participative style is facing followers who are
similar to those in the supportive style, however, here the work is
much less structured, repetitive and predictable. With this approach,
the leader consults their colleagues on decisions and takes their
opinions and ideas into account, strengthening the path-goal
connection in three ways;

Leadership  Achievement-oriented: 

Styles o The leader sets challenging goals and encourages employees to reach
their peak performance. The leader believes that employees are
responsible enough to accomplish challenging goals. This is the same as
goal-setting theory.
o The leader adopting the participative style is facing followers who are
similar to those in the supportive style, however, here the work is
much less structured, repetitive and predictable. With this approach,
the leader consults their colleagues on decisions and takes their
-According to the theory, these leadership opinions and ideas into account, strengthening the path-goal
styles are not mutually excusive, and connection in three ways;
leaders can select more than one kind of a
style suited for a particular situation.
Contingencies
The theory states that each of these styles will be
effective in some situations but not in others. It

Conclusion
further states that the relationship between a
leader’s style and effectiveness is dependent on the
following variables:
 Employee characteristics: These include factors
 The theory has been subjected to empirical
such as employees’ needs, locus of control, testing in several studies and has received
experience, perceived ability, satisfaction, considerable research support.
willingness to leave the organization, and
anxiety.
 This theory consistently reminds the
leaders that their main role as a leader is
 Characteristics of work environment: These to assist the subordinates in defining their
include factors such as task structure and team
dynamics that are outside the control of the
goals and then to assist them in
employee. accomplishing those goals in the most
efficient and effective manner.
o When team cohesiveness is low, a supportive
leadership style must be used whereas in a  This theory gives a guide map to the
situation where performance-oriented team leaders about how to increase subordinates'
norms exist, a directive style or possibly an satisfaction and performance level.
achievement-oriented style works better. Leaders
should apply directive style to counteract team
norms that oppose the team’s formal objectives.

You might also like