Group 5 Syllabus Process and Product Oriented Syllabus
Group 5 Syllabus Process and Product Oriented Syllabus
Group 5 Syllabus Process and Product Oriented Syllabus
Syllabus Design
Process and Product Oriented Syllabus
Infographic Style
Product-oriented Process-oriented
Syllabuses Syllabuses
Analytic and synthetic syllabus planning Process-oriented syllabuses
Analytic syllabuses Procedural syllabuses
Grading tasks
Meaning
You can simply impress your audience and add a unique zing and
appeal to your Reports and Presentations with our Templates.
Easy to change colors, photos and Text.
A synthetic language teaching strategy is
Analytic and
one in which the different parts of language
are taught separately and step by step· so
that acquisition is a process of gradual
Examples of function :
Identifying, Advising,
Denying.
Example of notion :
Time, Size, Duration
Syllabus
Synthetic Analytic
Syllabus Syllabus
Syllabus designer concern:
2. sequencing of these
items.
Functional-Notional Syllabuses
The selection and
grading of items become
much more complex
Necessary to carry
out some form of
needs analysis
Look beyond linguistic
notions of simplicity and
difficulty
Procedural and Task-Based Syllabus
Both task-based and procedural
syllabuses share a concern with the
classroom processes which stimulate
learning.
Prabhu provides the 01 Information-gap
following three task activity
'types' which were used
in the project:
02 Reasoning-gap
activity
03 Opinion-gap
activity
Place Your Picture Here
based syllabuses
represents a change
of focus rather than a
revolution in syllabus
design.
Content Syllabus
The content syllabus is yet another realization of the analytic approach to syllabus design.
Whether content syllabuses exemplify product or process syllabuses is a matter for
conjecture. In fact, most of them would probably be located at the centre of the
product/process continuum.
The syllabus is given a logic and coherence which might be missing from analytic
syllabuses which are little more than a random collection of tasks. In addition, the logic of
the subject may provide a non-linguistic rationale for selecting and grading content.
In a recent publication, Mohan (1986) argues for content-based syllabuses on the
grounds that they facilitate learning not merely through language but with language.
Mohan develops a knowledge framework which can be used for organizing knowledge
and learning activities. The knowledge framework consists of a specific, practical side and
a general, theoretical side.
You can simply impress your audience and add a unique zing and
appeal to your Reports and Presentations with our Templates.
Easy to change colors, photos and Text.
The natural approach
The principles underpinning the approach are claimed to be
based on empirical research and can be summarized as
follows:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The goal of the Comprehension Production Activities which The affective
Natural precedes emerges (Le. promote filter is
Approach is production. learners are subconscious lowered.
communication not forced to acquisition rather
skills. respond). than conscious
learning are
central.
The authors of the approach claim that:
01
The following
example illustrates
the way in which a
given text is
processed at
increasing levels
of sophistication
following
suggested by
Nunan.
Brown and Yule (1983) devote considerable attention to task
difficulty. They suggest that listening tasks can be graded
with reference to speaker, intended listener, and content.
When listening to a tape, the fewer the speakers, the easier
the text will be to follow. Following one speaker will be
easier than following two, following two will be easier than
following three, and so on. According to Brown and Yule,
even native speakers have difficulty following a taped
conversation which involves four or more participants.
In relation to the intended listener, they suggest
that texts, particularly ‘authentic’ texts which are
not addressed to listener, may be boring to the
learner and therefore difficult to process. They go
on to state that:
.. . it is, in principle not possible to find material
which would interest everyone. It follows that the
emphasis should be moved from attempting to
provide intrinsically interesting materials, which we
have just claimed is generally impossible, to doing
interesting things.which materials . . . these
materials should be chosen, not so much on the
basis of their own interest, but for what they can
be used to do. (Brown and Yule 1983:83)
Insert Your Image