Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
tenth edition
©
© 2005
2005 Prentice
Prentice Hall
Hall Inc.
Inc. All
All rights
rights reserved.
reserved. 11–2
11–2
11–
11–2
Determining Pay Rates
Employee compensation
– All forms of pay or rewards going to employees
and arising from their employment.
Direct financial payments
– Pay in the form of wages, salaries, incentives,
commissions, and bonuses.
Indirect financial payments
– Pay in the form of financial benefits such as
insurance.
Questions to Ask:
2. What are the employee behaviors or actions necessary to successfully implement this
competitive strategy?
3. What compensation programs should we use to reinforce those behaviors? What should
be the purpose of each program in reinforcing each desired behavior?
*An alliance between recruiters Korn/Ferry International and the Wall Street Journal.
Table 11–2
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–20
Establishing Pay Rates (cont’d)
Step 2. Job evaluation
– A systematic comparison done in order to
determine the worth of one job relative to
another.
Compensable factor
– A fundamental, compensable element of a job,
such as skills, effort, responsibility, and working
conditions.
Table 11–3
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–24
Job Evaluation Methods:
Job Classification
Raters categorize jobs into groups or classes
of jobs that are of roughly the same value for
pay purposes.
– Classes contain similar jobs.
– Grades are jobs that are similar in difficulty but
otherwise different.
– Jobs are classed by the amount or level of
compensable factors they contain.
This is a summary chart of the key grade level criteria for the GS-7
level of clerical and assistance work. Do not use this chart alone for
classification purposes; additional grade level criteria are in the Web-
based chart.
Figure 11–4
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–32
Establishing Pay Rates (cont’d)
Step 5. Fine-tune pay rates
– Developing pay ranges
• Flexibility in meeting external job market rates
• Easier for employees to move into higher pay grades
• Allows for rewarding performance differences and
seniority
– Correcting out-of-line rates
• Raising underpaid jobs to the minimum of the rate range
for their pay grade.
• Freezing rates or cutting pay rates for overpaid (“red
circle”) jobs to maximum in the pay range for their pay
grade.
Figure 11–5
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–34
Federal Government Pay Schedule:
Grades GS-8–GS-10,
New York, Northern New Jersey, Long Island,
January 2000
A good compensation administration program is comprehensive and flexible and ensures optimum
performance from employees at all levels. The following checklist may be used to evaluate a company’s
program. The more questions answered “yes,” the more thorough has been the planning for
compensation administration.
Source: Reprinted with permission of the publisher, HRnext.com. Copyright HRnext.com, 2003. Figure 11–6
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–36
Pricing Managerial and Professional Jobs
Compensating managers
– Base pay: fixed salary, guaranteed bonuses.
– Short-term incentives: cash or stock bonuses
– Long-term incentives: stock options
– Executive benefits and perks: retirement plans,
life insurance, and health insurance without a
deductible or coinsurance.
Figure 11–7
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–45
Strategic Compensation
Strategic compensation
– Using the compensation plan to support the
company’s strategic aims.
– Focuses employees’ attention on the values of
winning, execution, and speed, and on being
better, faster, and more competitive..
IBM’s strategic compensation plan:
– The marketplace rules.
– Fewer jobs, evaluated differently, in broadbands.
– Managers manage.
– Big stakes for stakeholders.
Figure 11–8
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–49
Key Terms
employee compensation ranking method
direct financial payments job classification (or grading)
indirect financial payments method
Davis-Bacon Act (1931) classes
Walsh-Healey Public Contract Act (1936) grades
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act grade definition
Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) point method
Equal Pay Act (1963) factor comparison method
Employee Retirement Income pay grade
Security Act (ERISA) wage curve
salary compression pay ranges
salary survey competency-based pay
benchmark job competencies
job evaluation broadbanding
compensable factor comparable worth
2. Skill
A. (acquired) Facility in muscular coordination, as in operating machines, repetitive movements, careful
coordinations, dexterity, assembling, sorting, etc.
B. (acquired) Specific job knowledge necessary to the muscular coordination only; acquired by
performance of the work and not to be confused with general education or specialized knowledge.
It is very largely training in the interpretation of sensory impressions.
Examples
1. In operating an adding machine, the knowledge of which key to depress for a subtotal would be skill.
2. In automobile repair, the ability to determine the significance of a knock in the motor would be skill.
3. In hand-firing a boiler, the ability to determine from the appearance of the firebed how coal should be
shoveled over the surface would be skill.
3. Physical Requirements
A. Physical effort, such as sitting, standing, walking, climbing, pulling, lifting, etc.; both the amount
exercised and the degree of the continuity should be taken into account.
B. Physical status, such as age, height, weight, sex, strength, and eyesight.
Source: Jay L. Otis and Richard H. Leukart, Job Evaluation: A Basis for Sound Wage Administration, Figure 11–A1
p. 181.© 1954, revised 1983. Reprinted by permission of Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–53
Sample Definitions of Five Factors Typically
Used in the Factor Comparison Method
4. Responsibilities
A. For raw materials, processed materials, tools, equipment, and property.
B. For money or negotiable securities.
C. For profits or loss, savings or methods’ improvement.
D. For public contact.
E. For records.
F. For supervision.
1. Primarily the complexity of supervision given to subordinates; the number of subordinates is a
secondary feature. Planning, direction, coordination, instruction, control, and approval
characterize this kind of supervision.
2. Also, the degree of supervision received. If Jobs A and B gave no supervision to subordinates,
but A received much closer immediate supervision than B, then B would be entitled to a higher
rating than A in the supervision factor.
To summarize the four degrees of supervision:
Highest degree—gives much—gets little
High degree—gives much—gets much
Low degree—gives none—gets little
Lowest degree—gives none—gets much
5. Working Conditions
A. Environmental influences such as atmosphere, ventilation, illumination, noise, congestion,
fellow workers, etc.
B. Hazards—from the work or its surroundings.
C. Hours.
Source: Jay L. Otis and Richard H. Leukart, Job Evaluation: A Basis for Sound Wage Administration, Figure 11–A1 (cont’d)
p. 181.© 1954, revised 1983. Reprinted by permission of Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–54
Ranking Key Jobs by Factors1
Table 11–A1
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–55
Ranking Key Jobs by Wage Rates1
Figure 11–A2
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–56
Comparison of Factor and Wage Rankings
Figure 11–A3
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–57
Job (Factor)-Comparison Scale
Figure 11–A4
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–58
The Point Method of Job Evaluation
Step 1. Determine clusters of jobs to be
evaluated
Step 2. Collect job information
Step 3. Select compensable factors
Step 4. Define compensable factors
Step 5. Define factor degrees
Step 6. Determine relative values of factors
Source: Richard W. Beatty and James R. Beatty,“Job Evaluation,” in Ronald A. Berk (ed.), Performance
Assessment: Methods and Applications (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), p. 322.
Figure 11–A2
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–60
Evaluation Points Assigned to
Factors and Degrees
Figure 11–A5
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–61