Case of Vora & Co

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

BLOSSOMS- Quick Cooking Oats

Case of Vora & Co., Lucknow


Introduction
• Govt. stopped the importation of packaged
1959 cereals, Mr. Vora decides to enter the
business of processing and selling of quick
cooking rolled oats.

1961 • Company satisfied with quality and


processing equipment
(500cases/month, 1case-36 tins of
550gms)

• Irregular sales with below plant


1963 capacity. Six month period sales
averaged 83 cases per month
Marketing Mix- Product, Place, Price
& Promotion
Product and Packaging Place

Name: Blossom Oats * Company located in Lucknow


* Regions targeted
* First product offered was not satisfactory Kerala
* One case= 36 tins Mysore
* Weight of each tin- 550 grams Madras
* White oats used imported from Australia Bombay
* USP- quick cooking Kolkata
* Packaging cost was 40% of the total direct cost North regions- Delhi, Uttar Pradesh and
* Round heavy tins Rajasthan
* Label printed directly on tin, Blossom Oats
* Bright green background with brand name in
large red type at top of can
* Phrase- “White Oats”
Marketing Mix- Product, Place, Price
& Promotion
Price Promotion

For one case, Advertising Budget= Rs. 4000/-


Direct cost- Rs. 59.92 • Major advertising activities in major cities.
Overheads- Rs. 12.18 (for 500 cases) • Promotion through sales representatives.

Selling Price-
For North Regions- Rs. 81/case
For South Regions- Rs. 85/case
Distribution channels - Commission
North India
Commission of Commission of sub Retailers Trade Amount received by
agent agents Discount Co.
10% of list price 2.5% of Agent’s 10% trade discount 81- (8.1 + 8.1 + .
Commission 2025)
Rs. 8.1 0.2025 paisa 8.1 64.59

South India
Commission of Commission of sub Retailers Trade Amount received by
agent agents Discount Co.
10% of list price 2.5% of Agent’s 10% trade discount 85- (8.5 + 8.5 + .
Commission 2125)
Rs. 8.5 0.2125 paisa 8.5 67.78
Problems-
• Lower sales than expected.
• No definite data regarding volume of sales.
• Similar packaging to competing tin of Champion oats.
• Packaging cost was 40% of the total direct cost.
• Sales representatives were not qualified.
• No warehousing facilities with the agents.
• No ISI certification.
• No proper communication between Vora & co. and the selling agents.
Profit/ Loss calculation-
• Total direct cost = 29,960 (59.92*500)
• Total overhead cost = 6,090 (12.18*500)
• Total cost = 29,960 + 6090 = 36050

Selling price for all cases = 33000(66*500)

#since southern region sales were disappointed, we have taken average.

Profit/Loss = Total revenue – Total cost = 33000- 36050 = (3050)

Total direct cost 29,960


Total overhead cost 6,090
Total cost 36050
Selling price 33000
Profit/Loss (3050)
Recommendations-
• Improvement in packaging to reduce packaging costs and have differential packaging
from Champion Oats.
• Other packaging measurements other than 550 grams.
• Vora & Co. should focus on advertising and have proper supply chain.
• A definite commission and incentive plan should be laid for agent and distributors.
• USP “Quick Cooking” should be highlighted.
• Mr. Vora should have personal meetings with the distributors and retailors for better
communication and provide them incentives if sales target are achieved.
• Concentration of marketing efforts in South India, and appointment of experienced
agent.
New packaging
• The oats can be packed into corrugated boxes to reduce the overall packaging cost.
• The box should highlight the housewife theme as this product was appealing to them.
This can encourage preference in choosing the item from the stores.
Conclusion-
• Mr. Vora should continue the business as 3 years of time is very short to judge about
the continuity and profit of business.
• Since, there are only two companies producing and selling ready to cook oats in
India, the profit margin and market capture is vast.
• The company needs to get the product certified with ISI trademark and have an
innovative packaging with attractive advertising ideas to reach maximum count.
• It can also be understood that the product quality and taste was good and better than
the failed previous experiments. The Co. needs to compare between the quality of
BLOSSOM & CHAMPION to undertake changes related to the product quality.

You might also like