Final
Final
Final
Jamshedpur
TITLE
‘STUDY ON VERTICAL TAKE OFF AND LANDING AIRCRAFT’
3) Transmittor 72MHz 1
4) Receiver 2.4GHz 1
5) Electronic speed 2
control
6) Material Depron
Wing- 90cm
Tail -45cm*18cm
7) Fuselage Length-65cm
Model of Aircraft
Top view Front view
Side view
CONCLUSION
Whilst a stable hover was not achieved during the course of the project, there were still
a number of significant achievements throughout the project. The first major task in this
project was the choice of which platform to base our design on.
To develop a realistic working model of the system, a full solid model of the frame and
components was constructed in Solid Works. The biggest constraint was keeping the
weight down enough to ensure thatthe thrust to weight ratio exceeded the chosen
minimum of 1.5:1.
Through the review of the mechanical system the components required to produce thrust,
namely the batteries, motors and propellers, were chosen and subsequently purchased.
These components, whilst expensive, have enormous potential for producing thrust.
The frame design was manufactured in the workshop and was assembled with all the
Chosen components. The frame displayed a high degree of robustness and
controllability, provided the control system were sufficiently tuned. As such makes a
solid control platform for future development.
Mathematical Modeling-This project intended to implement a state space controller
which required an accurate model of the system dynamics. The mathematical model of,
the aircraft whilst in hover was derived using force and moment balancing,
motor/propeller response properties and differential equations of motion. In order to design a controller
the
nonlinear terms were approximated as linear about their operation points.
Significant achievements were accomplished in the implementation of the control system, even though
the
control system itself was not sufficiently tuned.
REFERENCES
•Airfield Models (2005).
•http://www.airfieldmodels.com/informationsource/modelaircraftenginespropellers.html
•Bell Agusta (2005). http://www.bellagusta.com/pdf/ba609 2004.pdf.
•Boeing (2005). http://www.boeing.com/rotorcraft/military/v22
•Cazzolato, B. (2005a). 3 Degree of Freedom Hover Tutorial. The University of Adelaide.
•Cazzolato, B. (2005b). Advanced Automatic Control Lecture Notes. The University of
•Adelaide, Adelaide.
•Cazzolato, B. (2005c). Automatic Control II Lecture Notes. The University of Adelaide,
•Adelaide.
•Chapman, L. (2005). http://www.geocities.com/v22chap. Accessed 15/3/05.
•Dorf, R. and Bishop, R. (2001). Modern Control Systems. Prentice Hall, New Jersey,
•9th edition.
•Franklin, J. A. (2002). Dynamics, Control and Flying Qualities of V/STOL Aircraft.
•AIAA.
•Hamel, R. L. R. O. J., Tarek; Mahony (2002). Dynamic modelling and configuration
•Stabilization for an x4-flyer. IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain.
•Hansen, C. and Snyder, S. D. (1996). Active Control of Noise and Vibration. Spon Press.
•HazelProp (2005). http://www.hartzellprop.com/engineering/engineering faqs.htm.
•Accessed 19/9/05.
•ICARE (2005). Personal correspondence. 28/7/05.
•Jarrett, M., Ng, R., and Teske, T. (2004). Radio Controlled Vertical Take-Off
•https://blog.privatefly.com/vtol-the-aviation-future-is-vertical