Multiphase Chemical Reactor Engineering
Multiphase Chemical Reactor Engineering
Multiphase Chemical Reactor Engineering
Reactor Engineering
Quak Foo Lee
Ph.D. Candidate
Chemical and Biological
Engineering
The University of British Columbia
Different Types of
Reactor
Stirring Apparatus
Straight Through
Transport Reactor
Riser
Settling
Hopper
Standpipe
Agitator
Plug Flow Model
CA,out
H
t=
Vρ
C A ,in ≅ C A ,out
Particle surrounding by
fluid of essential constant
CA,in concentration, CA,m
Gas + solids
Batch Mix Flow: Charge
Reactor
Residence time
distribution
Heat Effects !!
Heat Effects on Reactions
of Single Particles
Normally (developed) dealing with exothermic and endothermic
reaction.
If reaction occurs at a rate such that the heat absorbed (endothermic)
or generated (for exothermic) can’t be transferred rapidly enough,
then non-isothermal effects become important:
The particle T ≠ the fluid T
For exothermic reaction, Tp will increase and the rate of reaction will
increase above that expected for the isothermal case.
Two conditions:
i) Film ∆T (external ∆T) Tf (bulk fluid) ≠ Tp (particle)
ii) Intraparticle ∆T (internal ∆T) Tr=Rp ≠ Tr=∞
Non-Reacting
Fluid at Tf
Energy Balance
dH
Qconvection + Qradiation = m
dt
Heat in by convection and radiation = change in enthalpy of particle
d ( C pT p )
[
4πR hcv (T f − T p ) + σ ∈m T − T
2
( w
4 4
p )] = m dt
Where,
Area of sphere = 4πR2
Hcv = convection coefficient
σ = Stefan-Boltzman constant
Єm = emissivity of the particle (wall has Є = 1)
Energy Balance
hr = σ ∈m
(T w
4
− Tp4 )
(T F − Tp )
m p C p dTp
( hcv + hr ) ⋅ (TF − Tp ) =
Aρ dt
hcv d p 1 1
= Nu = 2 + 0.6 Re p Pr 2 3
kf
Vd p Cpµ µ
Re p = ; Pr = ;ν =
ν kf ρ
2. Small Particles:
Volumetric Reaction
Small such that no
internal gradients
V p ( − rAv ) ⋅ ( − ∆H r ) = hA p (T p − T f )
Steady State:
Volume of
particle Rate of Exothermic Rxn:
( − ∆H r ) ⋅ ( − rAv ) R
reaction -∆Hr = (+)
(T p − Tf )= ⋅
-rAv = (+)
h 3
3. Large Particles:
Possible Internal Particle
Gradients
We have to solve the conduction equation
Non reacting particle: the conduction equation for sphere:
1 ∂ 2 ∂T ∂T
r ke = ρC p ,s
r ∂r
2
∂r ∂t
Surface :
( )
dT Ke = effective thermoconductivity
ke = h T f − Tp within the particle
dr r=R
r=R
∂T/∂r = 0 at steady state
Internal gradient Tr = 0 ≠ Tr = R0
Tr r =0
≠ Tr r = R0
External gradient T f ≠ Tr r =R
Reacting Systems
General equation for volumetric
reactions
(Reaction in porous particles)
reaction rate
Energy balance
∂T 1 ∂ 2 ∂T
ρ C p (1 − ε ) = 2 r ke + rAv ( − ∆ H r ) (2)
∂t r ∂r ∂r
k r C AmCSn = ( − rAv )
k r ( T ) C C = ( − rAv )
m n (3)
A S
In Steady State
Showed that for steady conditions:
dT dC A
− ke = De ( − ∆H r )
dr dr
Integrate at r = 0, r = R
For sphere
De
( Tr =0 − TS ) = ( C A,s − C A,r =0 ) ⋅ ( − ∆H r )
ke
TS = Tr r=R
Some Notes
If we know CA,s (surface concentration) and CA,r=0 (CA
within pellet at r = 0), we can calculate temperature
gradient, previous equation tell us either we need or
don’t need to worry about T gradient within particle.
r ∂r
2
∂r ∂t Ts
In Steady State, rc
k e ∂ 2 ∂T r Tf
r =0
r ∂r ∂r
2
R
Solve
T − Tc
=
( 1
rc − 1r ); dT Tc − Ts
= 1 1 2
Tc − Ts ( 1
R − r1c ) dr ( )
R − rc r
T Conditions
Tc = T r = r
c
Ts = T r = R
T = T r =r
Boundary Condition 1: r
= rc
Heat is generated = Heat conducted out through product layer
Area
dT
akr CS ,0C A ,c ( − ∆H r ) = − ke
dr r = rc
− akr CS ,0C A ,c ( − ∆H r ) 1 1
TC − TS = ⋅ −
ke R rc
Boundary Condition 2: r
=R
Heat arriving by conduction = Heat removed for
from within particle convection
= h(TS − T f )
dT
− ke
dr r=R
ke 1
TS − T f = − ( TC − TS )
(
hR R R1 − r1c )
Can be obtained
Bi-1
from B.C. 1
Solution
Combine equations and eliminate TS to get Tc-Tf
TC − T f
= akr CS ,0C A ,c ( − ∆H r ) ⋅ rc2
1 1 − 1 + 1
ke rc R hR 2
Recall from Isothermal
SC Model
De
2
C A ,c akr CS ,0 rc
=
C A, f De 1 1 1
1 + − 1 −
ak C r r
r s ,0 c c Bim R
TC − T f C A, f ( − ∆ H r )
=
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
− + 2 − + +
ke rc R hR De rc R akr CS ,0 rc k m R 2
2
a) Endothermic
with poor heat transfer, heat will be consumed in reaction, and if
can’t transfer heat in, TC will drop
reaction rate ↓ markedly and rate of reaction become the slow
step occurring at a rate dictated by the flow of heat.
b) Exothermic
initial rapid reaction and with poor Q, TC will increased, then rate
of reaction ↑ and eventually reach point where gaseous reactant
can’t be transferred fast enough (external mass transfer or
diffusion). Hence rate is limited.
Fixed Bed
Reactor
Fixed Bed Reactor
Solids take part in reaction unsteady state or semi-batch mode
Over some time, solids either replaced or regenerated
CA,out
Regeneration
Breakthrough
curve
CA,out /CA,in
1 2
CA,in t
Isothermal Reaction:
Plug Flow Reactor
Plug flow of fluid – no radial
gradients, and no axial dispersion
z + dz CA,f + dCA,f
z CA,f
U0 =
(
Vgas m 2 / s )
U0 (m/s) superficial velocity
( )
Axs m 2
Mass Balance
Input – Output – Reaction = Accumulation
[
U 0C A , f − U 0 ( C A , f + dC A , f ) ] ∂
− [ ( − rAv ) ⋅ dz ] = (ε ⋅ ∂C A , f ⋅ ∂z )
∂t
Divide by ∂z and take the limits as ∂z 0
∂C A , f ∂C A , f
ε +U0 + rAv = 0
∂t ∂z
mol 1 dN A
rAv 3 = = kv (1 − ε ) C A , f
''
m reactor⋅ s Vr dt
For steady state:
Volume of reactor
∂C A , f
→0
∂t
Therefore,
dC A , f
U0 + k v'' (1 − ε ) C A , f = 0
dz
Conversion as a function
of Height
Integrating with CA,f = CA,f,in at z = 0
C A, f kv'' (1 − ε )
X A = 1− = 1 − exp − z
C A , f ,in U0
Note 1: Same equation as for catalytic reactor with 1st order reaction
Note 2: Can be used in pseudo-homogeneous reaction
Balance on Solid
aA (fluid) + S (solid) Products
Input – Output – Reaction = Accumulation
Over increment of dz: input = 0, output =0
∂C s
( − rsv ) ⋅ ∆z = (1 − ε ) ⋅ ∆z
∂t
∂C s
(1 − ε ) + rsv = 0
∂t
( − rav ) = a ⋅ ( − rsv )
∂C s rAv
+ =0
∂t a ( 1 − ε )
Solve These Equations
∂C A , f ∂C A , f a (1 − ε ) ∂Cs
∂C A , f
ε +U0 + rAv = 0 − =0
∂t ∂z
Av
∂z U0 ∂t
er
tut
∂C 'A , f
ti
∂Cs'
bs
+ =0
Su
∂z ∂t
∂C s rAv
+ =0 C 'A , f = f ( z ,t )
∂t a (1 − ε )
Cs' = f ( z ,t )
a) Shrinking Core Model
b) Uniform reaction in porous particle, zero order
in fluid
c) Uniform reaction, 1st order in fluid and in solid
d) Park et al., “An Unsteady State Analysis of
Packed Bed Reactors for Gas-Solid Reactions”,
J. Chem. Eng. Of Japan, 17(3):269-274 (1984)
e) Evans et al., “Application of a Porous Pellet
Model to Fixed, Moving and Fluid Bed Gas-
Solid Reactors”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des.
13(2):146-155 (1974)
a) In Shrinking Core
Model
rAv = ak v (1 − ε )C A ,c C S ,o
Recall that De For SCM
C A ,c akv CS ,o rc2 3
= rc
C A, f
1 +
De 1
1 1 Cs = Cs ,o
ak C r r − 1 − Bi R R
r S ,o c c m
∂ r R 3
Solid Phase
rc2 c + kv C A ,c rc = 0 Solve
CA,f = f(z)
∂t 3 rc = f(z,t)
Liquid Phase ∂C A , f
U0 + akv (1 − ε ) Cs ,oC A ,c = 0
∂z
Conversion vs Time
t=0 t>0
z
Overall Conversion of
Solid
L 3
rc
∫ R dz 1 L
3 ∫ c
1− X s = 0
L
= 3
r dz
LR 0
∫ dz
0
Height Vs time
(Graphical)
Unreacted
z/L bed depth
Reaction
All CA has zone
been
reacted
Completely
reacted
t/τ
Particles at bed
entrance are
completed reacted
b) Uniform Reaction in Porous
Particle
and Zero Order in Fluid
CS
dX S 1− X S =
= k (1 − X S ) where C0
dt 1
− dX S = dCS
C S ,0
U0 ∂C A , f
⋅ + kCS = 0
a(1 − ε ) ∂z
∂C S
+ kCS = 0
∂t
c) Uniform Reaction and 1st
order in Fluid and in solid
∂C A , f
U0 + akv (1 − ε )η C A ,s CS = 0
∂z
∂C A ,s
+ akv (1 − ε )η C A ,s CS = 0
∂t
Non-Isothermal Packed
Bed Reactor
For mass continuity did balance on
fluid and on solid
For energy balance, we do balance
on each phase
Non-Isothermal Packed
Bed Reactor
Assumptions:
1) Adiabatic reaction – no heat lost through shell to
surroundings (no radial temperature gradients) q
=0
2) Biλ is small – uniform T within particle (an
exothermic reaction Tp > Tg)
3) Plug flow of gas and use Tref =0 for enthalpy
calculations
4) Assume an average density can be used (ρg =
constant)
Modeling
q =0
Tf + dTf z + dz
Tf z
Tf,0
U0 kg
G 2 = U0ρg
m s
Moving Bed Reactor
Solids in
Vs
Gas out
∆z
U0
Gas in
Solids out
Moving Bed Reactor
(MBR)
Steady state reactor where solids moving at
near their packed bed voidage
Counter or co-current operation
Solid usually move downward (vertical shaft
reactor or furnace)
Voidage is near that of a packed bed
Slightly above random loose-packed
voidage
Solids move mainly in a plug floe, but region
near wall have a velocity distribution
Advantages of MBR
True counter-current flow
Uniform residence time (essentially plug flow)
Reasonable ∆P
Throughput variable
Generally larger particle dp > 2-3 mm
Difficulties coping with wide size distribution of
particles (fines tend to block up the void
spaces)