Group and Team Dynamics: (Supplement: Chapter 5 Process Improvement Team)

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21

Group and Team Dynamics

(Supplement: Chapter 5 Process


Improvement Team)

IndM4230 (IndM 4260-Chapter 12)

Group Dynamics

What is Group Dynamics?


Social

process where small groups


interact.
Collective effect that individuals have
on each other.
Sense of belongings

Key to Group Dynamics:


Interaction,

interdependence and
communication

Group

What is group?

Two or more people who are psychologically


aware of each other and who interact to fulfill
a common goal.

Five dimension of groups.


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Primary and secondary


Formal and informal
Heterogeneous and homogeneous
Interacting and nominal*
Temporary and permanent

Groups versus Teams

What is a Team?
Having

members who share the same goals


Share leadership roles
Products produced collaborative ones.
Provides feedback
Defined set of goals (productivity, member
satisfaction and personal growth)
Video clips: Turtle and rabbit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nD6tUEp1lws

Group Development
Process takes time and effort on each
members.
Five stage model

Forming
Storming
Norming
Performing
Adjourning

(May be)

Tuckmans 5-Stage of
Group Development

Norms
Values that a group develops
expected behavior of individuals in the
group or team.
Once developed become the rules.
Usually unwritten.
Examples: Aircraft, automotive
assemblers.

Group Composition
Why are we attracted to some individuals?
Sharing common task goals.
Similar attitudes, opinions, behavior, goals,
age, education, and personality.
Continue exposure and interaction

Size of Group
Which is easier to work with: 3 or 16
individuals?
5 ~7 individuals may function effectively
Over 7 individuals
Low

participants talk less


Formal and Real interaction decreases

Meeting FTF vs Virtually impact


effectiveness.

Complexity of Interaction in Small and Large Groups

Tucker, M, McCarthy,A, & Benton, D. (2002). The Human Challenge. New jersey, Prentice Hall.

Group Cohesiveness

Three factors:
Amount

of interaction
Extent to the member share the same
mission and goals
Degree of personal attraction

Emotions
Emotional

conflict (Avoidance, withdrawal)


I dont care and Do anything, just get
this over with

Group Consensus
Arrive at a solution that is acceptable
to most group members.
Communication and Hard work.
Positive vs Negative Consensus
Focus on underlying objectives, rather
forcing them to defend.

Group Roles

Shared expectation of members


performance in their position.
Task-related

roles
Maintenance-related roles
Individual roles

Role Prescriptions and Role


Behaviors
What we say and do
Expected to do: RP
Actual do: RB
RB = RP = Effective or successful
RP: set of expectations affect a particular
role.

Doing as others expect you to do is


playing the role.

Role Ambiguity and Role


Conflict
Role Ambiguity: Employees lacks a clear
understanding of expectations.
Role conflict: expectations conflict with
each other/employees own expectation.
Discrepancy between a managers
concept/role and employees role
expectations motivation and efficiency
tend to be poor.

Types of Nonfunctional
Group/Team behavior
Types of nonfunctional group
behavior.
NOTE: In some circumstances, these
behaviors may be helpful to the group
activities.

Self-Managed Work Teams


Empowers employees.
Allow decision making.
Participative, Less hierarchical, without
external supervision.
Team is responsible for:

Hiring
Disciplining

team members
Coordinating workflow
Training employees
Coordination with the company .

Self-Managed Work Teams (Contd)


Benefit: employee commitment and
increase productivity.
Warning: Team decisions out of fear of
sanction by the rest of the group.

Self-Managed Work Teams (Contd)


Why need managers?
Familiar with the organization's
strategic objectives & resources
share insights and obtain resources.
Linking between the team and other
part of the department and
organization.

Group Phenomena

Groupthink
Think

alike inhibit alternative points of

view
Fear for breaking up the cohesiveness
Self-censorship
Creates a sense of infallibility

Risky Shift
Willingness

to endorse risky decisions

Discussion Questions

What determines group effectiveness?

You might also like