Hallmarks of Research Chapter2
Hallmarks of Research Chapter2
Hallmarks of Research Chapter2
Purposiveness
Rigor
Testability
Replicability
Precision and Confidence
Objectivity
Generalizability
Parsimony
Purposiveness
It has to start with a definite aim or purpose.
The focus is on increasing employee
commitment.
Increase employee commitment will translate
into less turnover, less absenteeism and
increased performance levels.
Thus it has a purposive focus.
2. Rigor
A good theoretical base and sound methodological design
would add rigor to the purposive study.
Rigor adds carefulness
Example:
A manager asks 10-12 employees how to increase the level
of commitment. If solely on the basis of their responses the
manager reaches several conclusions on how employee
commitment can be increases, the whole approach to the
investigation would be unscientific. It would lack rigor for
the following reasons:
3. Testability
After random selection manager and researcher
develops certain hypothesis on how manager
employee commitment can be enhanced, then
these can be tested by applying certain statistical
tests to the data collected for the purpose.
The researcher might hypothesize that
those employees who perceive greater
opportunities for participation in
decision making would have a higher
level of commitment.
4. Replicability
It means that it can be used again if similar
circumstances prevails.
Example:
The study concludes that participation in
decision making is one of the most important
factors that influences the commitment, we will
place more faith and credence in these finding
and apply in similar situations. To the extent
that this does happen, we will gain confidence
in the scientific nature of our research.
Confidence
Confidence refers to the probability that our
estimations are correct.
That is, it is not merely enough to be precise,
but it is also important that we can
confidently claim that 95% of the time our
results would be true and there is only a 5%
chance of our being wrong.
This is also known as confidence level.
6. Objectivity
The conclusions drawn through the interpretation of
the results of data analysis should be objective; that
is, they should be based on the facts of the findings
derived from actual data, and not on our subjective
or emotional values.
Example: If we had a hypothesis that stated that greater
participation in decision making will increase
organizational commitment and this was not supported
by the results, it makes no sense if the researcher
continues to argue that increased opportunities for
employee participation would still help!
7. Generalizability
It refers to the scope of applicability of the research
findings in one organization setting to other settings.
Example: If a researchers finding that participation
in decision making enhances organizational
commitment are found to be true in a variety of
manufacturing, industrial and service organizations,
and not merely in the particular organization
studied by the researcher, then the generalizability
of the findings to other organizational settings is
enhanced. The more generalizable the research, the
greater its usefulness and value.
8. Parsimony
Simplicity in explaining the phenomenon or problems that
occur, and in generating solutions for the problems.
For instance, if 2-3 specific variables in the work situation are
identified, which when changed would raise the
organizational commitment of the employees by 45%, that
would be more useful and valuable to the manager than if it
were recommended that he should change 10 different
variables to increase organizational commitment by 48%.
Deduction (Top-Down)
Induction
Observation
Observation is the first stage, in which
one senses that certain changes are
occurring or that some new behaviors,
attitudes and feelings are surfacing in
ones environment (i.e., the work
place).
Hypothesizing
It is the next logical step after theory
formulation.
From the theorized network of associations
among the variables, certain testable
hypotheses or educated conjectures
(assumptions) can be generated.
Hypothesis testing is called deductive
research.
Data Analysis
Data gathered are statistically analyzed
to see if the hypotheses that were
generated have been supported.
Co relational method will be used to
analyze and determine the relation ship
of two or more factors in the
hypotheses for example: stock
availability and customer satisfaction.
Deduction
Deduction is the process of
arriving at conclusions by
interpreting the meaning of
results of the data analysis.
1.
2.
Case Studies
Action Research
Those who are being
studied
participate in research process;
research incorporates popular
knowledge; focus on power with
goal of empowerment increase
awareness; tied to political action.