Meta Analysis

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 26
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that meta-analysis is a quantitative approach for systematically combining results of previous research to arrive at conclusions about the body of research. It involves numbers, is systematic and methodical, and combines results from previous studies to draw new conclusions.

The four steps of a meta-analysis are: 1) Identify relevant studies, 2) Determine eligibility of studies using inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3) Abstract data from eligible studies, 4) Analyze data from eligible studies statistically.

Potential sources of bias in meta-analyses include poor quality trials and publication bias where studies showing beneficial effects are more likely to be published than those showing no effect.

What is meta analysis?

Quantitative approach for


systematically combining results of
previous research to arrive at
conclusions about the body of research.

What does it mean?


Quantitative : numbers
Systematic : methodical
combining: putting together
previous research: what's already done
conclusions: new knowledge

The popularity of meta


analyses
publications
3000

Number of Publications

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0
93-94

94-95

95-96

96-97

97-98

98-99

99-00

2000-1

2001-2

2002-3

2003-4

Year of Publications

Number of Meta Analysis publications are steadily increasing


since 1993. We graphed the counts of journal articles included
meta analysis as publication type from Pubmed, from years

Four Steps of Meta


Analysis
Identify your studies
Determine eligibility of studies
Inclusion: which ones to keep
Exclusion: which ones to throw
out

Abstract Data from the studies


Analyze data in the studies
statistically

Identify your studies


Be methodical: plan first
List of popular databases to search
Pubmed/Medline
Embase
Cochrane Review/Trials Register

Other strategies you may adopt


Hand search (go to the library...)
Personal references, and emails
web, eg. Google (
http://scholar.google.com)

How to Search for


literature
Formulate your question appropriately
If you are searching pubmed
Use Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) [1]
Lookup word in text word, abstract, title
[2]
Combine [1] with [2] using boolean logic
Set up proper filters

For Others, use text word, abstract


Huh?!, what is boolean logic??

Boolean Logic: AND

this is AND zone, covering common area


between two ellipses

Boolean Logic OR

this is boolean OR, covering the two ellipses

Example: Research Issue


Let's say we want to know whether
streptokinase is protective for death
from acute myocardial infarction.
How should we set up a search
strategy? We will search pubmed
only

The Search
streptokinase[text word] OR acute myocardial
infarction[text word] produces ALL articles
that contain EITHER streptokinase OR acute
myocardial infarction anywhere in the text
inclusive, many
streptokinase [text word] AND acute
myocardial infarction [text word] will capture
only those subsets that have BOTH
streptokinase AND acute myocardial infarction
anywhere in the text restrictive, few.......
Next, we shall look at the PUBMED Screen

Remember to choose both PUBMED,


Choose your DATABASE hereand MESH for formulating search.
Choose PUBMED CENTRAL for free
articles!

Keep some, throw out


others
Cannot include all studies
Keep the ones with
high levels of evidence
good quality
check with QUOROM guidelines

Usually, MA done with RCTs


Case series, and case reports definitely out
Selection problems are major problems

MA = Meta Analysis; RCT = Randomized Controlled Trial

Plan of Action
ARE THE STUDIES ELIGIBLE FOR MA (STEP I)?
DISCARD
NO
YES

ABSTRACT THE DATA


ENTER INTO A SPECIFIED FORMAT

How to Abstract Data:


Guidelines
Create a spreadsheet (Excel, or Open Office
Calc)

For each study, create the following columns:


name of the study
name of the author, year published
number of participants who received intervention
number of participants who were in control arm
number who developed outcomes in intervention
number who developed outcomes in control arm

Lets do that to our streptokinase myocardial


infarction study, next

Spreadsheet Data for Strepto Study


We got like 22 studies to do our meta analysis, after all

Cont
We created seven columns
trial:
trial identity code
Trial name: name of trial
year:
year of the study
pop1:
study population
deaths1:
deaths in study
pop0:
control population
deaths0:
deaths in control

Analyze Data
Statistically
Combine data to arrive at a summary, 3
measures
Effect Size (Odds Ratio)
Variance with 95% Confidence Interval
Test of heterogeneity
Two Graphs
Forest Plot
Funnel Plot

Examine why the studies are


heterogeneous, if they are
Use Statistical Packages, several choices
Lets see what we got for streptokinase
versus deaths from AMI

Summary Estimates for Strepto


Study
Mantel Haenszel OR=0.77

95% Confidence Interval


[0.72, 0.83]

Test of Heterogeneity:
Chi-square (df=21) = 31.5

P-Value = 0.07

The pooled Odds Ratio


shows that those
receiving streptokinase
at AMI are about 77% at
risk of death (23% less
That in 95 out of 100
likely to die)
such meta analyses, the
pooled Odds Ratio would
lie between 0.72 and
0.83, indicating a
statistically significant
protective effect
That these studies
were not
significantly
heterogeneous

Funnel Plot: what and


how to read

Cont..
Plots the effect size against the sample size
of the study
To study a funnel plot, look at its LOWER
LEFT corner, thats where negative or null
studies are located
If EMPTY, this indicates PUBLICATION BIAS
Note that here, the plot fits in a funnel, and
that the left corner is not all that empty, but
we cannot rule out publication bias

Issues in meta analysis


Choosing a model
Fixed effects model or random effects?

Bias in meta analysis


poor quality of trials
publication bias

Quality control in meta analysis


QUOROM guidelines

Statistical Software for meta


analysis

Fixed Effects or Random Effects


Model?
Fixed Effects Model
Effects Model

Random

conduct if it is reasonable to
Conduct if test of heterogeneity is
assume underlying Rx effect is
significant (shows heterogeneity)
SAME for all studies
Pooling: Mantel Haenszel OR
Assume that TRUE log Assume that
TRUE log normal distribution
Test: test of heterogeneity
If significant, go for random
Method: DerSimonian
effects model
Lairs method (DSL) of
short 95% CI for summary
calculating Odds Ratio
smaller summary estimate
OR=0.78 [0.69,0.88]
OR=0.77 [0.72,0.83]

Bias in Metaanalysis
Poor Quality of Trials
To avoid them, learn more at CONSORT statement
[http://www.consort-statement.org ]

Publication Bias
study showing beneficial effects of new treatment
more likely to be published than one showing no
effect
negative trials assumed to contribute less; never
show up in the literature base
use several approaches to avoid this
Use Funnel Plots to examine the influence of
publication bias

Quality Control in MA:QUOROM


Table
Detailed Guidelines
A Good Checklist
Use it for reporting
Meta Analysis
Systematic
reviews

Statistical Software for Meta


Analysis
Huge Checklist
[http://faculty.ucmerced.edu/wshadish/]
Free Software:
EpiMeta: from Epi Info
Revman: from Cochrane Collaboration
meta package in R for statistical
computing

Non-free
meta module in STATA

Summarizing...
Defined meta analysis
quantitative research synthesis

Outlined basic steps


Information retrieval
Data Abstraction
Data Analysis
Model Selection: Fixed Effects or
Random effects

Outlined some issues and listed


software

You might also like