Why Self-Archive?: Elizabeth Harbord Head of Collection Management
Why Self-Archive?: Elizabeth Harbord Head of Collection Management
Why Self-Archive?: Elizabeth Harbord Head of Collection Management
Context
White Rose
SHERPA Experience so far librarians and academics LEADIRS http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/leadirs/index.htm
Libraries
Self-archiving universities
Pros:
Organises, manages and shares research output (especially for RAE) and protects its intellectual property Raises profile of university and badges research with university identity May ultimately reduce costs of journal subscriptions
Cons:
Cost of running repository and ensuring all research publications are deposited Impact on research ratings if research not published in prestigious journals while current model is in place
Self-archiving libraries
Pros:
Opportunity to be more involved in scholarly communication process by running institutional repositories Advocacy process will strengthen links with academic departments Librarians have appropriate skills (metadata) May be solution to journals financial crisis?
Cons:
Additional cost of advocacy and running the repository (e.g. copyright clearance, metadata creation) unless project or centrally funded
Self-archiving authors
Pros:
Dissemination of research more quickly Impact of research more citations Access to research easier and repositories cross-searchable
Cons:
Extra work Need publication in reputable journals for RAE, promotion Unpopular if seen as driven by managerial considerations
Make the self-archiving process as easy as possible, and/or provide staff to deposit e-prints and add metadata Address copyright concerns ROMEO/Sherpa list http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php
Conclusions
Cultural and organisational issues are more important than technical ones
Self-archiving is being promoted alongside the current scholarly publishing model but financial savings for libraries (and universities) will only happen if that model changes