Experimental Investigation of Detonation Re-Initiation Mechanisms Following A Mach Reflection of A Quenched Detonation

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 44

Experimental Investigation of Detonation Re-initiation Mechanisms following a Mach Reflection of a Quenched Detonation

Rohit R. Bhattacharjee
M.A.Sc candidate

Matei I. Radulescu
Advisor MCG seminar Date November 9th, 2012

Introduction
Detonation waves are supersonic combustion waves Compression waves (p1~=20p0) Supersonic (M~=6) Practical applications include Detonation arrestors Pulse detonation engines Fundamental theory on detonations Zeldovich-von Neumann-Doering (ZND) Theory

Ideal (ZND) Detonation Wave

Real detonations

Mach Reflection

Forward jetting slipline

Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability

Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability

Propagation mechanism
Real detonations are different from ideal model 3D, transient, unsteady, cellular Multiple shock structure K-H, R-M instabilities, forward jet What is the propagation mechanism? Adiabatic shock compression Turbulent mixing Mechanisms involved in the detonation cell evolution

Self-propagating detonation cell cycle

Self-propagating detonation cell cycle

Self-propagating detonation cell cycle

Self-propagating detonation cell cycle

Self-propagating detonation cell cycle

Detonation re-initiation

Decoupled incident shock flame complex

Re-initiated Mach shock

Stochastic behaviour
a b c

Experiment 1 p0 = 3.5 kPa CH4+2O2


a b c Experiment 2 p0 = 3.5 kPa CH4+2O2

Diffraction around obstacles

Diffraction around obstacles

Diffraction around obstacles

Diffraction around obstacles

Diffraction around obstacles

Diffraction around obstacles

Diffraction around obstacles

Mach reflection behind obstacle

Mach reflection in planar detonation

Diffraction around obstacles


Detonation diffraction around an obstacle Quenches detonation wave Forms a decoupled shock-flame complex Shock front reflects to form a Mach reflection Benefits of detonation diffracting around obstacles Improve temporal and spatial resolutions More reproducible Retain main features of cellular gas dynamics

Adopt technique to study re-initiation mechanisms

Detonation diffraction and re-initiation Past study example 1

Teodorczyk, A., J.H.S. Lee, and R. Knystautas. 1991. Prog. Astronaut. and Aeronaut. 133:223240.

Detonation diffraction and re-initiation Past study example 2

T. Obara, J. Sentanuhady, Y. Tsukada, S. Ohyagi, Reinitiation process of detonation wave behind a slit-plate, Shock Waves 18 (2) (2008) 117127.

Detonation diffraction and re-initiation Past study example 3

M. I. Radulescu, B. M. Maxwell, The mechanism of detonation attenuation by a porous medium and its subsequent re-initiation, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 667 (2011) 96134.

Objective
Past results have identified several ignition mechanisms Adiabatic shock compression behind Mach stem, Kelvin-Helmholtz instability along the slipline, Richtmyer-Meshkov instability along the flame, Rapid combustion behind transverse wave The strong forward jetting of slipline behind Mach stem However, the key re-ignition mechanisms leading to reinitiation have not yet been clarified Isolate re-ignition mechanisms that lead to re-initiation following a Mach reflection of a shock-flame complex

Experimental Setup

M. Drolet, Design of an experiment to study the instability of detonation waves, undergraduate thesis, University of Ottawa, Mechanical Engineering Department, 2008.
L. Maley, Shock reflections in reactive gases, undergraduate thesis, University of Ottawa, Mechanical Engineering Department, 2012.

Experimental Setup (contd)

Courtesy Thanos Drivas

Inert shock reflections

Roughness induced ignition

t = t1

t = t1+70sec

Courtesy Logan Maley, Kadeem Deniese

t = t1+90sec

Roughness induced ignition

Mach reflection with self-ignition

Mach reflection with self-ignition

Mach reflection with self-ignition

Mach reflection with self-ignition

Detonation re-initiation

Detonation re-initiation

Detonation re-initiation

Detonation re-initiation

Detonation re-initiation

Conclusion
Forward jetting behind the Mach stem was found to be an important mechanism in increasing combustion rates For sufficiently strong Mach stem, re-initiation first appears along the Mach stem

Rapid ignition of the tongue of unburnt gas via turbulent mixing (shock ignition, KH instability) could lead to reinitiation of transverse wave

Acknowledgements

You might also like