Chapter 3

Operator methods in
quantum mechanics
While the wave mechanical formulation has proved successful in describing
the quantum mechanics of bound and unbound particles, some properties can
not be represented through a wave-like description. For example, the electron
spin degree of freedom does not translate to the action of a gradient operator.
It is therefore useful to reformulate quantum mechanics in a framework that
involves only operators.
Before discussing properties of operators, it is helpful to introduce a further
simplication of notation. One advantage of the operator algebra is that it
does not rely upon a particular basis. For example, when one writes

H =
p
2
2m
,
where the hat denotes an operator, we can equally represent the momentum
operator in the spatial coordinate basis, when it is described by the dierential
operator, p = i
x
, or in the momentum basis, when it is just a number
p = p. Similarly, it would be useful to work with a basis for the wavefunction
which is coordinate independent. Such a representation was developed by
Dirac early in the formulation of quantum mechanics.
In the parlons of mathematics, square integrable functions (such as wave-
functions) are said form a vector space, much like the familiar three-dimensional
vector spaces. In the Dirac notation, a state vector or wavefunction, , is
represented as a ket, |. Just as we can express any three-dimensional
vector in terms of the basis vectors, r = x e
1
+ y e
2
+ z e
3
, so we can expand
any wavefunction as a superposition of basis state vectors,
| =
1
|
1
+
2
|
2
+ .
Alongside the ket, we can dene the bra, |. Together, the bra and ket
dene the scalar product
|
_

dx

(x)(x) ,
from which follows the identity, |

= |. In this formulation, the real

space representation of the wavefunction is recovered from the inner prod-
uct (x) = x| while the momentum space wavefunction is obtained from
(p) = p|. As with a three-dimensional vector space where a b |a| |b|,
the magnitude of the scalar product is limited by the magnitude of the vectors,
|
_
|| ,
a relation known as the Schwartz inequality.
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.1. OPERATORS 20
3.1 Operators
An operator

A is a mathematical object that maps one state vector, |,
into another, |, i.e.

A| = |. If

A| = a| ,
with a real, then | is said to be an eigenstate (or eigenfunction) of

A with
eigenvalue a. For example, the plane wave state
p
(x) = x|
p
= Ae
ipx/
is
an eigenstate of the momentum operator, p = i
x
, with eigenvalue p.
For a free particle, the plane wave is also an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian,

H =
p
2
2m
with eigenvalue
p
2
2m
.
In quantum mechanics, for any observable A, there is an operator

A which
acts on the wavefunction so that, if a system is in a state described by |,
the expectation value of A is
A = |

A| =
_

dx

(x)

A(x) . (3.1)
Every operator corresponding to an observable is both linear and Hermitian:
That is, for any two wavefunctions | and |, and any two complex numbers
and , linearity implies that

A(| +|) = (

A|) +(

A|) .
Moreover, for any linear operator

A, the Hermitian conjugate operator
(also known as the adjoint) is dened by the relation
|

A =
_
dx

(

A) =
_
dx(

A

| . (3.2)
From the denition,

| = |

A, we can prove some useful rela-
tions: Taking the complex conjugate,

= |

A

A|, and
then nding the Hermitian conjugate of

A

, we have
|

A

= (

A

| =

A|, i.e. (

A

=

A.
Therefore, if we take the Hermitian conjugate twice, we get back to the same
operator. Its easy to show that (

A)

and (

A +

B)

=

A

+

B

just
from the properties of the dot product. We can also show that (

A

B)

=

B

from the identity, |

A

B =

|

B =

|. Note that operators

are associative but not (in general) commutative,

A

B| =

A(

B|) = (

A

B)| =

B

A| .
A physical variable must have real expectation values (and eigenvalues).
This implies that the operators representing physical variables have some spe-
cial properties. By computing the complex conjugate of the expectation value
of a physical variable, we can easily show that physical operators are their own
Hermitian conjugate,
|

H|

=
__

(x)

H(x)dx
_

=
_

(x)(

H(x))

dx =

H| .
i.e.

H| = |

H =

|, and

H

=

H. Operators that are their
own Hermitian conjugate are called Hermitian (or self-adjoint).
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.1. OPERATORS 21
Exercise. Prove that the momentum operator p = i is Hermitian. Fur-
ther show that the parity operator, dened by

P(x) = (x) is also Hermitian.
Eigenfunctions of Hermitian operators

H|i = E
i
|i form an orthonormal (i.e.
i|j =
ij
) complete basis: For a complete set of states |i, we can expand
a state function | as | =

i
|ii|. Equivalently, in a coordinate rep-
resentation, we have (x) = x| =

i
x|ii| =

i
i|
i
(x), where

i
(x) = x|i.
Info. Projection operators and completeness: A ket state vector fol-
lowed by a bra state vector is an example of an operator. The operator which
projects a vector onto the jth eigenstate is given by |jj|. First the bra vector dots
into the state, giving the coecient of |j in the state, then its multiplied by the unit
vector |j, turning it back into a vector, with the right length to be a projection. An
operator maps one vector into another vector, so this is an operator. If we sum over
a complete set of states, like the eigenstates of a Hermitian operator, we obtain the
(useful) resolution of identity

i
|ii| = I .
Again, in coordinate form, we can write

i

i
(x)
i
(x

) = (x x

). Indeed, we can
form a projection operator into a subspace,

P =

subspace
|ii|.
As in a three-dimensional vector space, the expansion of the vectors | and
|, as | =

i
b
i
|i and | =

i
c
i
|i, allows the dot product to be taken
by multiplying the components, | =

i
b

i
c
i
.
Example: The basis states can be formed from any complete set of orthogonal
states. In particular, they can be formed from the basis states of the position or
the momentum operator, i.e.
_

dx|xx| =
_

dp|pp| = I. If we apply these

denitions, we can then recover the familiar Fourier representation,
(x) x| =
_

dp x|p
. .
e
ipx/
/

2
p| =
1

2
_

dp e
ipx/
(p) ,
where x|p denotes the plane wave state |p expressed in the real space basis.
3.1.1 Time-evolution operator
The ability to develop an eigenfunction expansion provides the means to ex-
plore the time evolution of a general wave packet, | under the action of
a Hamiltonian. Formally, we can evolve a wavefunction forward in time
by applying the time-evolution operator. For a Hamiltonian which is time-
indepenent, we have |(t) =

U|(0), where

U = e
i

Ht/
,
denotes the time-evolution operator.
1
By inserting the resolution of identity,
I =

i
|ii|, where the states |i are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian with
eigenvalue E
i
, we nd that
|(t) = e
i

Ht/

i
|ii|(0) =

i
|ii|(0)e
iE
i
t/
.
1
This equation follows from integrating the time-dependent Schrodinger equation,

H| =
it|.
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.1. OPERATORS 22
Example: Consider the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian

H =
p
2
2m
+
1
2
m
2
x
2
.
Later in this chapter, we will see that the eigenstates, |n, have equally-spaced eigen-
values, E
n
= (n +1/2), for n = 0, 1, 2, . Let us then consider the time-evolution
of a general wavepacket, |(0), under the action of the Hamiltonian. From the equa-
tion above, we nd that |(t) =

n
|nn|(0)e
iEnt/
. Since the eigenvalues are
equally spaced, let us consider what happens when t = t
r
2r/, with r integer.
In this case, since e
2inr
= 1, we have
|(t
r
) =

n
|nn|(0)e
itr/2
= (1)
r
|(0) .
From this result, we can see that, up to an overall phase, the wave packet is perfectly
reconstructed at these times. This recurrence or echo is not generic, but is a
manifestation of the equal separation of eigenvalues in the harmonic oscillator.
Exercise. Using the symmetry of the harmonic oscillator wavefunctions under
parity show that, at times t
r
= (2r + 1)/, x|(t
r
) = e
itr/2
x|(0). Explain
the origin of this recurrence.
The time-evolution operator is an example of a unitary operator. The
latter are dened as transformations which preserve the scalar product, | =

U|

U = |

U
!
= |, i.e.

U = I .
3.1.2 Uncertainty principle for non-commuting operators
For non-commuting Hermitian operators, [

A,

B] = 0, it is straightforward to
establish a bound on the uncertainty in their expectation values. Given a state
|, the mean square uncertainty is dened as
(A)
2
= |(

A

A)
2
= |

U
2

(B)
2
= |(

B

B)
2
= |

V
2
,
where we have dened the operators

U =

A |

A and

V =

B |

B.
Since

A and

B are just constants, [

U,

V ] = [

A,

B]. Now let us take the
scalar product of

U| +i

V | with itself to develop some information about

the uncertainties. As a modulus, the scalar product must be greater than or
equal to zero, i.e. expanding, we have |

U
2
+
2
|

V
2
+ i

U|

V
i

V |

U 0. Reorganising this equation in terms of the uncertainties, we

thus nd
(A)
2
+
2
(B)
2
+ i|[

U,

V ]| 0 .
If we minimise this expression with respect to , we can determine when
the inequality becomes strongest. In doing so, we nd
2(B)
2
+ i|[

U,

V ]| = 0, =
i
2
|[

U,

V ]|
(B)
2
.
Substiuting this value of back into the inequality, we then nd,
(A)
2
(B)
2

1
4
|[

U,

V ]|
2
.
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.1. OPERATORS 23
We therefore nd that, for non-commuting operators, the uncertainties obey
the following inequality,
AB
i
2
[

A,

B] .
If the commutator is a constant, as in the case of the conjugate operators
[ p, x] = i, the expectation values can be dropped, and we obtain the rela-
tion, (A)(B)
i
2
[

A,

B]. For momentum and position, this result recovers
Heisenbergs uncertainty principle,
p x
i
2
[ p, x] =

2
.
Similarly, if we use the conjugate coordinates of time and energy, [

E, t] = i,
we have
E t

2
.
3.1.3 Time-evolution of expectation values
Finally, to close this section on operators, let us consider how their expectation
values evolve. To do so, let us consider a general operator

A which may itself
involve time. The time derivative of a general expectation value has three
terms.
d
dt
|

A| =
t
(|)

A| +|
t

A| +|

A(
t
|) .
If we then make use of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, i
t
| =

H|, and the Hermiticity of the Hamiltonian, we obtain

d
dt
|

A| =
i

_
|

H

A| |

A

H|
_
. .
i

|[

H,

A]|
+|
t

A| .
This is an important and general result for the time derivative of expectation
values which becomes simple if the operator itself does not explicitly depend
on time,
d
dt
|

A| =
i

|[

H,

A]| .
From this result, which is known as Ehrenfests theorem, we see that expec-
tation values of operators that commute with the Hamiltonian are constants
of the motion.
Exercise. Applied to the non-relativistic Schrodinger operator for a single
particle moving in a potential,

H =
p
2
2m
+ V (x), show that x =
p
m
,

p =
x
V .
Show that these equations are consistent with the relations,
Paul Ehrenfest 1880-1933
An Austrian
physicist and
mathematician,
who obtained
Dutch citizenship
in 1922. He
made major
contributions
to the eld
of statistical
mechanics and its relations with
quantum mechanics, including the
theory of phase transition and the
Ehrenfest theorem.
d
dt
x =
_
H
p
_
,
d
dt
p =
_
H
x
_
,
the counterpart of Hamiltons classical equations of motion.
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.2. SYMMETRY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS 24
3.2 Symmetry in quantum mechanics
Symmetry considerations are very important in quantum theory. The struc-
ture of eigenstates and the spectrum of energy levels of a quantum system
reect the symmetry of its Hamiltonian. As we will see later, the transition
probabilities between dierent states under a perturbation, such as that im-
posed by an external electromagnetic eld, depend in a crucial way on the
transformation properties of the perturbation and lead to selection rules.
Symmetries can be classied into two types, discrete and continuous, accord-
ing to the transformations that generate them. For example, a mirror symme-
try is an example of a discrete symmetry while a rotation in three-dimensional
space is continuous.
Formally, the symmetries of a quantum system can be represented by a
group of unitary transformations (or operators),

U, that act in the Hilbert
space.
2
Under the action of such a unitary transformation, operators corre-
sponding to observables

A of the quantum model will then transform as,

A

U

U .
For unitary transformations, we have seen that

U

U = I, i.e.

U

=

U
1
.
Under what circumstances does such a group of transformations represent a
symmetry group? Consider a Schrodinger particle in three dimensions:
3
The basic observables are the position and momentum vectors, r and p. We
can always dene a transformation of the coordinate system, or the observ-
ables, such that a vector

A = r or p is mapped to R[

A].
4
If R is an element
of the group of transformations, then this transformation will be represented
by a unitary operator

U(R), such that

U = R[

A] .
Such unitary transformations are said to be symmetries of a general op-
erator

O( p, r) if

U =

O, i.e. [

O,

U] = 0 .
If

O( p, r)

H, the quantum Hamiltonian, such unitary transformations are
said to be symmetries of the quantum system.
3.2.1 Observables as generators of transformations
The vector operators p and r for a Schrodinger particle are themselves genera-
tors of space-time transformations. From the standard commutation relations
2
In quantum mechanics, the possible states of a system can be represented by unit vectors
(called state vectors) residing in state space known as the Hilbert space. The precise
nature of the Hilbert space is dependent on the system; for example, the state space for
position and momentum states is the space of square-integrable functions.
3
In the following, we will focus our considerations on the realm of low-energy physics
where the relevant space-time transformations belong to the Galilei group, leaving our
discussion of Lorentz invariance to the chapter on relativistic quantum mechanics.
4
e.g., for a clockwise spatial rotation by an angle around ez, we have,
R[r] = Rij xj, R =
0
@
cos sin 0
sin cos 0
0 0 1
1
A
.
Similarly, for a spatial translation by a vector a, R[r] = r + a. (Exercise: construct repre-
sentations for transformations corresponding to spatial reections, and inversion.)
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.2. SYMMETRY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS 25
one can show that, for a constant vector a, the unitary operator

U(a) = exp
_

a p
_
,
acting in the Hilbert space of a Schrodinger particle performs a spatial trans-
lation,

U

(a)f(r)

U(a) = f(r + a), where f(r) denotes a general algebraic

function of r.
Info. The proof runs as follows: With p = i,

(a) = e
a
=

n=0
1
n!
a
i1
a
in

i1

in
,
where summation on the repeated indicies, i
m
is assumed. Then, making use of the
Baker-Hausdor identity (exercise)
e

A

Be

A
=

B + [

A,

B] +
1
2!
[

A, [

A,

B]] + , (3.3)
it follows that

(a)f(r)

U(a) = f(r) + a
i1
(
i1
f(r)) +
1
2!
a
i1
a
i2
(
i1

i2
f(r)) + = f(r +a) ,
where the last identity follows from the Taylor expansion.
Exercise. Prove the Baker-Hausdor identity (3.3).
Therefore, a quantum system has spatial translation as an invariance group if
and only if the following condition holds,

U(a)

H =

H

U(a), i.e. p

H =

H p.
This demands that the Hamiltonian is independent of position,

H =

H( p),
as one might have expected! Similarly, the group of unitary transforma-
tions,

U(b) = exp[
i

b r], performs translations in momentum space.

Moreover, spatial rotations are generated by the transformation

U(b) =
exp[
i

e
n


L], where

L = r p denotes the angular momentum operator.
Exercise. For an innitesimal rotation by an angle by a xed axis, e
n
,
construct R[r] and show that

U = I
i

e
n
L + O(
2
). Making use of the identity
lim
N
(1
a
N
)
N
= e
a
, show that large rotations are indeed generated by the
unitary transformations

U = exp
_

e
n
L

.
As we have seen, time translations are generated by the time evolution op-
erator,

U(t) = exp[
i

Ht]. Therefore, every observable which commutes with
the Hamiltonian is a constant of the motion (invariant under time transla-
tions),

H

A =

A

H e
i

Ht/

Ae
i

Ht/
=

A, t .
We now turn to consider some examples of discrete symmetries. Amongst
these, perhaps the most important in low-energy physics are parity and time-
reversal. The parity operation, denoted

P, involves a reversal of sign on all
coordinates.

P(r) = (r) .
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.2. SYMMETRY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS 26
This is clearly a discrete transformation. Application of parity twice returns
the initial state implying that

P
2
= 1. Therefore, the eigenvalues of the parity
operation (if such exist) are 1. A wavefunction will have a dened parity
if and only if it is an even or odd function. For example, for (x) = cos(x),

P = cos(x) = cos(x) = ; thus is even and P = 1. Similarly =

sin(x) is odd with P = 1. Later, in the next chapter, we will encounter the
spherical harmonic functions which have the following important symmetry
under parity,

PY
m
= (1)

Y
lm
. Parity will be conserved if the Hamiltonian
is invariant under the parity operation, i.e. if the Hamiltonian is invariant
under a reversal of sign of all the coordinates.
5
In classical mechanics, the time-reversal operation involves simply run-
ning the movie backwards. The time-reversed state of the phase space
coordinates (x(t), p(t)) is dened by (x
T
(t), p
T
(t)) where x
T
(t) = x(t) and
p
T
(t) = p(t). Hence, if the system evolved from (x(0), p(0)) to (x(t), p(t)) in
time t and at t we reverse the velocity, p(t) p(t) with x(t) x(t), at time
2t the system would have returned to x(2t) = x(0) while p(2t) = p(0). If this
happens, we say that the system is time-reversal invariant. Of course, this is
just the statement that Newtons laws are the same if t t. A notable case
where this is not true is that of a charged particle in a magnetic eld.
As with classical mechanics, time-reversal in quantum mechanics involves
the operation t t. However, referring to the time-dependent Schrodinger
equation, i
t
(x, t) =

H(x, t), we can see that the operation t t is
equivalent to complex conjugation of the wavefunction,

if

H

=

H.
Let us then consider the time-evolution of (x, t),
(x, 0) e

H(x)t
(x, 0)
c.c.
e
+
i

(x)t

(x, 0)
evolve
e

H(x)t
e
+
i

(x)t

(x, 0) .
If we require that (x, 2t) =

(x, 0), we must have

H

(x) =

H(x). Therefore,

H is invariant under time-reversal if and only if

H is real.
Info. Although the group of space-transformations covers the symmetries
that pertain to low-energy quantum physics, such as atomic physics, quantum op-
tics, and quantum chemistry, in nuclear physics and elementary particle physics new
observables come into play (e.g. the isospin quantum numbers and the other quark
charges in the standard model). They generate symmetry groups which lack a classical
counterpart, and they do not have any obvious relation with space-time transforma-
tions. These symmetries are often called internal symmetries in order to underline
this fact.
3.2.2 Consequences of symmetries: multiplets
Having established how to identify whether an operator belongs to a group
of symmetry transformations, we now consider the consequences. Consider
a single unitary transformation

U in the Hilbert space, and an observable

A
which commutes with

U, [

U,

A] = 0. If

A has an eigenvector |a, it follows
that

U|a will be an eigenvector with the same eigenvalue, i.e.

U

A|a =

AU|a = aU|a .
This means that either:
5
In high energy physics, parity is a symmetry of the strong and electromagnetic forces, but
does not hold for the weak force. Therefore, parity is conserved in strong and electromagnetic
interactions, but is violated in weak interactions.
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.3. THE HEISENBERG PICTURE 27
1. |a is an eigenvector of both

A and

U, or
2. the eigenvalue a is degenerate: the linear space spanned by the vectors

U
n
|a (n integer) are eigenvectors with the same eigenvalue.
This mathematical argument leads to the conclusion that, given a group G of
unitary operators

U(x), x G, for any observable which is invariant under
these transformations, i.e.
[

U(x),

A] = 0 x G,
its discrete eigenvalues and eigenvectors will show a characteristic multiplet
structure: there will be a degeneracy due to the symmetry such that the
eigenvectors belonging to each eigenvalue form an invariant subspace under
the group of transformations.
Example: For example, if the Hamiltonian commutes with the angular mo-
mentum operators,

L
i
, i = x, y, z, i.e. it is invariant under three-dimensional rota-
tions, an energy level with a given orbital quantum number is at least (2 + 1)-fold
degenerate. Such a degeneracy can be seen as the result of non-trivial actions of
the operator

L
x
and

L
y
on an energy (and

L
z
) eigenstate |E, , m (where m is the
magnetic quantum number asssociated with

L
z
).
3.3 The Heisenberg Picture
Until now, the time dependence of an evolving quantum system has been
placed within the wavefunction while the operators have remained constant
this is the Schrodinger picture or representation. However, it is some-
times useful to transfer the time-dependence to the operators. To see how, let
us consider the expectation value of some operator

B,
(t)|

B|(t) = e
i

Ht/
(0)|

B|e
i

Ht/
(0) = (0)|e
i

Ht/

Be
i

Ht/
|(0) .
According to rules of associativity, we can multiply operators together be-
fore using them. If we dene the operator

B(t) = e
i

Ht/

Be
i

Ht/
, the time-
dependence of the expectation values has been transferred from the wavefunc-
tion. This is called the Heisenberg picture or representation and in it,
the operators evolve with time while the wavefunctions remain constant. In
this representation, the time derivative of the operator itself is given by

t

B(t) =
i

H

e
i

Ht/

Be
i

Ht/
e
i

Ht/

B
i

H

e
i

Ht/
=
i

e
i

Ht/
[

H,

B]e
i

Ht/
=
i

[

H,

B(t)] .
Werner Heisenberg 1901-76
A German physi-
cist and one of
the founders of
the quantum the-
ory, he is best
known for his un-
certainty princi-
ple which states
that it is impossi-
ble to determine
with arbitrarily high accuracy both
the position and momentum of a par-
ticle. In 1926, Heisenberg devel-
oped a form of the quantum theory
known as matrix mechanics, which
was quickly shown to be fully equiva-
lent to Erwin Schrodingers wave me-
chanics. His 1932 Nobel Prize in
Physics cited not only his work on
quantum theory but also work in nu-
clear physics in which he predicted
the subsequently veried existence of
two allotropic forms of molecular hy-
drogen, diering in their values of nu-
clear spin.
Exercise. For the general Hamiltonian

H =
p
2
2m
+ V (x), show that the posi-
tion and momentum operators obey Hamiltons classical equation of motion.
3.4 Quantum harmonic oscillator
As we will see time and again in this course, the harmonic oscillator assumes a
priveledged position in quantum mechanics and quantum eld theory nding
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.4. QUANTUM HARMONIC OSCILLATOR 28
numerous and somtimes unexpected applications. It is useful to us now in
that it provides a platform for us to implement some of the technology that
has been developed in this chapter. In the one-dimensional case, the quantum
harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian takes the form,

H =
p
2
2m
+
1
2
m
2
x
2
,
where p = i
x
. To nd the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, we could
look for solutions of the linear second order dierential equation correspond-
ing to the time-independent Schrodinger equation,

H = E, where

H =

2
2m

2
x
+
1
2
m
2
x
2
. The integrability of the Schrodinger operator in this case
allows the stationary states to be expressed in terms of a set of orthogonal
functions known as Hermite polynomials. However, the complexity of the ex-
act eigenstates obscure a number of special and useful features of the harmonic
oscillator system. To identify these features, we will instead follow a method
based on an operator formalism.
First few states of the quantum
harmonic oscillator. Not that the
parity of the state changes from
even to odd through consecutive
states.
The form of the Hamiltonian as the sum of the squares of momenta and
position suggests that it can be recast as the square of an operator. To this
end, let us introduce the operator
a =
_
m
2
_
x + i
p
m
_
, a

=
_
m
2
_
x i
p
m
_
,
where, for notational convenience, we have not drawn hats on the operators a
and its Hermitian conjuate a

. Making use of the identity,

a

a =
m
2
x
2
+
p
2m
+
i
2
[x, p] =

H

1
2
and the parallel relation, aa

=

H

+
1
2
, we see that the operators full the
commutation relations
[a, a

] aa

a = 1 .
Then, setting n = a

a, the Hamiltonian can be cast in the form

H = ( n + 1/2) .
Since the operator n = a

a must lead to a positive denite result, we see

that the eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator must have energies of /2 or
higher. Moreover, the ground state |0 can be identied by nding the state
for which a|0 = 0. Expressed in the coordinate basis, this translates to the
equation,
6
_
x +

m

x
_

0
(x) = 0,
0
(x) = x|0 =
_
m

1/2

e
mx
2
/2
.
Since n|0 = a

a|0 = 0, this state is an eigenstate with energy /2. The

higher lying states can be found by acting upon this state with the operator
a

. The proof runs as follows: If n|n = n|n, we have

n(a

|n) = a

aa

..
a

a+1
|n = (a

a
..
n
+a

)|n = (n + 1)a

|n
6
Formally, in coordinate basis, we have x

|a|x = (x

x)(a+

m
x) and x|0 = 0(x).
Then making use of the resolution of identity
R
dx|xx| = I, we have
x|a|0 = 0 =
Z
dxx|a|x

|0 =

x +

m
x

0(x) .
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.4. QUANTUM HARMONIC OSCILLATOR 29
or, equivalently, [ n, a

] = a

. In other words, if |n is an eigenstate of n with

eigenvalue n, then a

|n is an eigenstate with eigenvalue n + 1.

From this result, we can deduce that the eigenstates for a tower |0,
|1 = C
1
a

|0, |2 = C
2
(a

)
2
|0, etc., where C
n
denotes the normalization. If
n|n = 1 we have
n|aa

|n = n|( n + 1)|n = (n + 1) .
Therefore, with |n + 1 =
1

n+1
a

|n the state |n + 1 is also normalized,

n + 1|n + 1 = 1. By induction, we can deduce the general normalization,
|n =
1

n!
(a

)
n
|0 ,
with n|n

=
nn
,

H|n = (n + 1/2)|n and
a

|n =

n + 1|n + 1, a|n =

n|n 1 .
The operators a and a

represent ladder operators and have the eect of

lowering or raising the energy of the state.
In fact, the operator representation achieves something quite remarkable
and, as we will see, unexpectedly profound. The quantum harmonic oscillator
describes the motion of a single particle in a one-dimensional potential well.
Its eigenvalues turn out to be equally spaced a ladder of eigenvalues, sepa-
rated by a constant energy . If we are energetic, we can of course translate
our results into a coordinate representation
n
(x) = x|n.
7
However, the
operator representation aords a second interpretation, one that lends itself
to further generalization in quantum eld theory. We can instead interpret
the quantum harmonic oscillator as a simple system involving many ctitious
particles, each of energy . In this representation, known as the Fock space,
the vacuum state |0 is one involving no particles, |1 involves a single particle,
|2 has two and so on. These ctitious particles are created and annihilated
by the action of the raising and lowering operators, a

and a with canoni-

cal commutation relations, [a, a

] = 1. Later in the course, we will nd that

these commutation relations are the hallmark of bosonic quantum particles
and this representation, known as the second quantization underpins the
quantum eld theory of the electromagnetic eld.
Info. There is evidently a huge dierence between a stationary (Fock) state
of the harmonic oscillator and its classical counterpart. For the classical system, the
equations of motion are described by Hamiltons equations of motion,

X =
P
H =
P
m
,

P =
X
H =
x
U = m
2
X ,
where we have used capital letters to distinguish them from the arguments used to de-
scribe the quantum system. In the phase space, {X(t), P(t)}, these equations describe
a clockwise rotation along an elliptic trajectory specied by the initial conditions
{X(0), P(0)}. (Normalization of momentum by m makes the trajectory circular.)
7
Expressed in real space, the harmonic oscillator wavefunctions are in fact described by
the Hermite polynomials,
n(x) = x|n =
r
1
2
n
n!
Hn
r
m

exp

mx
2
2

,
where Hn(x) = (1)
n
e
x
2
d
n
dx
n
e
x
2
.
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.4. QUANTUM HARMONIC OSCILLATOR 30
On the other hand, the time dependence of the Fock space state, as of any sta-
tionary state, is exponential,

n
(x, t) = x|ne
iEnt/
,
and, as a result, gives time-independent expectation values of x, p, or any function
thereof. The best classical image for such a state on the phase plane is a circle of
radius r = x
0
(2n + 1)
1/2
, where x
0
= (/m)
1/2
, along which the wavefunction is
uniformly spread as a standing wave.
It is natural to ask how to form a wavepacket whose properties would be closer to
the classical trajectories. Such states, with the centre in the classical point {X(t), P(t)},
and the smallest possible product of quantum uncertainties of coordinate and momen-
tum, are called Glauber states.
8
Conceptually the simplest way to present the
Glauber state | is as the Fock ground state |0 with the centre shifted from the
origin to the classical point {X(t), P(t)}. (After such a shift, the state automati-
cally rotates, following the classical motion.) Let us study how this shift may be
implemented in quantum mechanics. The mechanism for such shifts are called the
translation operators.
Previously, we have seen that the space and momentum translation operators are
given by

F
X
= exp
_

pX
_
,

F
P
= exp
_

P x
_
.
A shift by both X and P is then given by

= exp
_
i

(P x pX)
_
= e
a

a
,

F

= e

aa

,
where is the (normalised) complex amplitude of the classical oscillations we are
trying to approximate, i.e. =
1

2x0
(X + i
P
m
). The Glauber state is then dened
by | =

F

|0.
Working directly with the shift operator is not too convenient because of its
exponential form. However, it turns out that a much simpler representation for the
Glauber state is possible. To see this, let us start with the following general property
of exponential operators: if [

A,

B] = (where

A and

B are operators, and is a
c-number), then (exercise cf. Eq. (3.3)),
e

A

Be

A
=

B + . (3.4)
If we dene

A =

a a

, then

F

= e

A
and

F

= e

A
. If we then take

B = I, we
have = 0, and

F

= I. This merely means that the shift operator is unitary -

not a big surprise, because if we shift the phase point by (+) and then by (), we
certainly come back to the initial position.
If we take

B = a, using the commutation relations,
[

A,

B] = [

a a

, a] = [a

, a] = ,
so that = , and

F

a

F

= a + . Now let us consider the operator

F

a

F

.
From the unitarity condition, this must equal a

F

, while application of Eq. (3.4)

yields

F

a +

F

, i.e.
a

F

=

F

a +

F

.
Applying this equality to the ground state |0 and using the following identities,
a|0 = 0 and

F

|0 = |, we nally get a very simple and elegant result:

a| = | .
8
After R. J. Glauber who studied these states in detail in the mid-1960s, though they
were known to E. Schrodinger as early as in 1928. Another popular name, coherent states,
does not make much sense, because all the quantum states we have studied so far (including
the Fock states) may be presented as coherent superpositions.
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.5. POSTULATES OF QUANTUM THEORY 31
Thus the Glauber state is an eigenstate of the annihilation operator, corresponding to
the eigenvalue , i.e. to the (normalized) complex amplitude of the classical process
approximated by the state. This fact makes the calculations of the Glauber state
properties much simpler.
Presented as a superposition of Fock states, the Glauber state takes the form
(exercise try making use of the BCH identity (3.3).)
| =

n=0

n
|n,
n
= e
||
2
/2

n
(n!)
1/2
.
This means that the probability of nding the system in level n is given by the
Poisson distribution, P
n
= |
n
|
2
= n
n
e
n
/n! where n = ||
2
. More importantly,
n = n
1/2
n when n 1 the Poisson distribution approaches the Gaussian
distribution when n is large.
The time-evolution of Glauber states may be described most easily in the Schrodinger
representation when the time-dependence is transferred to the wavefunction. In this
case, (t)
1

2x0
(X(t) + i
P(t)
m
), where {X(t), P(t)} is the solution to the classical
equations of motion, (t) = i(t). From the solution, (t) = (0)e
it
, one may
show that the average position and momentum evolve classically while their uctua-
tions remain stationary,
x =
x
0

2
=
_

2m
_
1/2
, p =
mx
0

2
=
_
m
2m
_
1/2
.
In the quantum theory of measurements these expressions are known as the standard
quantum limit. Notice that their product xp = /2 corresponds to the lower
bound of the Heisenbergs uncertainty relation.
Exercise. Show that, in position space, the Glauber state takes the form
x| =

(x) = C exp
_

m
2
(x X)
2
+ i
Px

_
.
This completes our abridged survey of operator methods in quantum me-
chanics. With this background, we are now in a position to summarize the
basic postulates of quantum mechanics.
3.5 Postulates of quantum theory
Since there remains no rst principles derivation of the quantum mechanical
equations of motion, the theory is underpinned by a set of postulates whose
validity rest on experimental verication. Needless to say, quantum mechanics
remains perhaps the most successful theory in physics.
Postulate 1. The state of a quantum mechanical system is completely
specied by a function (r, t) that depends upon the coordinates of the
particle(s) and on time. This function, called the wavefunction or state
function, has the important property that |(r, t)|
2
dr represents the
probability that the particle lies in the volume element dr d
d
r located
at position r at time t.
The wavefunction must satisfy certain mathematical conditions because
of this probabilistic interpretation. For the case of a single particle, the
net probability of nding it at some point in space must be unity leading
to the normalization condition,
_

|(r, t)|
2
dr = 1. It is customary to
also normalize many-particle wavefunctions to unity. The wavefunction
must also be single-valued, continuous, and nite.
Advanced Quantum Physics
3.5. POSTULATES OF QUANTUM THEORY 32
Postulate 2. To every observable in classical mechanics there corre-
sponds a linear, Hermitian operator in quantum mechanics.
If we require that the expectation value of an operator

A is real, then
it follows that

A must be a Hermitian operator. If the result of a mea-
surement of an operator

A is the number a, then a must be one of the
eigenvalues,

A = a, where is the corresponding eigenfunction. This
postulate captures a central point of quantum mechanics the values
of dynamical variables can be quantized (although it is still possible to
have a continuum of eigenvalues in the case of unbound states).
Postulate 3. If a system is in a state described by a normalized wave-
function , then the average value of the observable corresponding to

A
is given by
A =
_

Adr .
If the system is in an eigenstate of

A with eigenvalue a, then any mea-
surement of the quantity A will yield a. Although measurements must
always yield an eigenvalue, the state does not have to be an eigenstate
of

A initially. An arbitrary state can be expanded in the complete set
of eigenvectors of

A (

A
i
= a
i

i
) as =

n
i
c
i

i
, where n may go to
innity. In this case, the probability of obtaining the result a
i
from the
measurement of

A is given by P(a
i
) = |
i
||
2
= |c
i
|
2
. The expecta-
tion value of

A for the state is the sum over all possible values of the
measurement and given by
A =

i
a
i
|
i
||
2
=

i
a
i
|c
i
|
2
.
Finally, a measurement of which leads to the eigenvalue a
i
, causes the
wavefunction to collapses into the corresponding eigenstate
i
. (In
the case that a
i
is degenerate, then becomes the projection of onto
the degenerate subspace). Thus, measurement aects the state of the
system.
Postulate 4. The wavefunction or state function of a system evolves in
time according to the time-dependent Schrodinger equation
i

t
=

H(r, t) ,
where

H is the Hamiltonian of the system. If is an eigenstate of

H,
it follows that (r, t) = (r, 0)e
iEt/
.
Advanced Quantum Physics