7 4 - Hypothesis-Testing
7 4 - Hypothesis-Testing
7 4 - Hypothesis-Testing
INTRODUCTION
In the field of Research, we are interested in making conclusions about the population of
interest. Most often, it is not possible to study the entire population and, therefore, we study instead
a sample which is taken from this population. For instance, we might be interested in finding out the
performance of elementary teachers in the region. Since it is impossible to take all the teachers, we
can study a representative sample and on the basis of our findings we can make decisions about the
population.
TEST OF HYPOTHESIS
A statistical hypothesis is a guess made concerning the population. The hypothesis may or
may not, in fact, be true. There are two types of statistical hypothesis, the null hypothesis Ho and the
alternative Ha. A null hypothesis is a statement that a parameter, say the population mean is equal
to a certain value, for a one sample case. For two samples, the null hypothesis is a statement of no
difference between two population parameters. The alternative hypothesis is opposite to the null
hypothesis. The null hypothesis is always paired with a corresponding alternative hypothesis. The
examples are given below:
Ho : µ = 50
Ha1 : µ ≠ 50 (non-directional or two -tailed test)
Ha2 : µ < 50 (Directional or one- tailed test)
Ha3 : µ > 50 (Directional or one- tailed test)
Ho : µ1 = µ2
Ha1 : µ1 ≠ µ2 (non-directional or two -tailed test)
Ha2 : µ1 >µ2 (Directional or one- tailed test)
Ha3 : µ1 <µ2 (Directional or one- tailed test)
or
2. the computed value is less than a negative critical value (value taken from the table of
normal curve),
A Type I error is made if a null hypothesis is rejected when it should NOT be rejected,
that is, the null hypothesis is TRUE; while a Type II error is committed when the null hypothesis is
not rejected when it SHOULD BE rejected, that is the null hypothesis is FALSE.
The level of significance is the probability of making a Type I error and is symbolized by α,
Alpha, with a common value from 1% to 5%.
RR REJECTION REGION (1 % - 5 %)
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES.
Two problems are given below to illustrate the concepts discussed above. In the first
example, a Z-test is used since the sample size is 30 or more (large sample). In the second example, a
t-test is used because the sample size is small, that is, less than 30.
Mean - µ
Z = ------------ ( Test statistic for comparing the sample mean
s / √n with the population mean)
1570 - 1600
Z = ----------------- = - 2.50 (computed Z-value)
120 / √ 100
Since the computed value of Z (= -2.50) is less than the critical Z-value (= - 1.96), the
null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis at 5% level of significance.
Conclusion.
The mean lifetime of the population of fluorescent bulbs produced by the company
is not equal to 1600 hours.
A test of breaking strength of six ropes manufactured by a company showed a mean breaking
strength of 7750 pounds(lb) and a standard deviation of 145 lb whereas the manufacturer claimed a
mean breaking strength of 8000 lb. Can we support the manufacturer’s claim at 0.01 level of
significance.
Ho : µ = 8000 lb
α : 0.01
Mean - µ
t = ------------ ( Test statistic for comparing the sample mean
s / √n-1 with the population mean)
7750 - 8000
t = ----------------- = - 3.86 (computed t-value)
145 / √ 6 - 1
From the t – table with one-tailed test at 0.01 level of significance and df = 5
Since the computed t-value (-3.86) is less than the critical t-value (-3.36), we reject Ho in
favor of the Ha at 1% level of significance and 5 degrees of freedom. Thus, it may be concluded that
the manufacturer’s claim seems to be unjustified.
Exercise 1
2. In a Biology experiment, a certain type of seed has always grown to a mean height of 8.5
inches. A sample of 26 seeds grown under new conditions has a mean height of 8.8
inches and a standard deviation of 1 inch. At 5% level of significance, test the hypothesis
that the new conditions do not grow better plants.
3. One hundred sixth-graders were tested and found to have a mean IQ of 105 with a
standard deviation of 16. Does this mean that these pupils have significantly higher IQ
than 100? Use 1% level of significance.