The Evaluation of Political Language
The Evaluation of Political Language
The Evaluation of Political Language
The paper "Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of
Language" provides an overview of research on political discourse analysis, which is a field that
examines how language is used in political contexts.
One of the key findings of the paper is that language is not just a tool for communication, but
also a means of shaping our understanding of the world. This idea is central to many
philosophical approaches to language, such as the linguistic turn in philosophy and the work of
philosophers like Ludwig Wittgenstein and J.L. Austin.
The linguistic turn in philosophy refers to a shift in focus from traditional philosophical
questions about knowledge, truth, and reality to questions about language and its role in shaping
our understanding of the world. This approach emphasizes how language is used to construct
social reality and shape our beliefs and values. Political discourse analysis can be seen as an
application of this broader philosophical perspective, exploring how language is used to
construct political reality and shape our political beliefs and values.
J.L. Austin's work on speech acts is also relevant to political discourse analysis. Austin argued
that language is not just a means of conveying information, but also a means of performing
actions. For example, when a politician makes a promise, they are not just conveying
information, but also performing an action that creates an obligation. Political discourse analysis
can be seen as an application of this idea, exploring how political actors use language to perform
actions and achieve their goals.
Overall, the paper "Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the
Politics of Language" provides a valuable overview of research on political discourse analysis
and highlights the importance of interdisciplinary research that combines insights from
linguistics, political science, sociology, and philosophy to better understand the complex
relationship between language and politics.
The paper "Language and Power: An Empirical Analysis of Linguistic Strategies Used in
Superior-Subordinate Communication" draws on the anthropological and sociolinguistic theory
of "politeness" to explore how power is communicated through specific linguistic gestures used
by superiors and subordinates in daily interactions. The study highlights the quantitative analysis
of language, which is often neglected in organizational studies that rely on self-report or abstract
survey measures to define communication tactics.
The paper's contribution to the understanding of influence tactics and communication distortion
in hierarchical relations is significant. By analyzing transcripts of speech behavior, researchers
can discover how specific communicative practices contribute to message distortion. Moreover,
the study shows how power differentials are embedded in everyday speech, which can help
understand how the more abstract role requirements of organizational positions are translated
into the minutia of everyday gestures and "interaction rituals."