Intervene - Draft CRL OP 29156 of 2024

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

(Criminal Original Jurisdiction)


CRL.M.P. No. of 2024
In
CRL.O. P No.29156 of 2024
In
Crime No. 8/2024 dated 05.11.2024
(On the file of the Inspector of DCB Police, Salem District)
M.Govindaraju,(M/62)
S/o.Meyyadi,
No.9/62, Erangadu,
Kamalapuram,
Salem District-636309. .... Petitioner / Intervenor /
De-Facto Complainant
Vs

1. Johnson Suresh Babu, …. Respondent / Petitioner


/ Accused No.2

2. The State
Rep. by Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch, Salem. ….Respondent / 1st Respondent
/ Complainant

AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE INTERVENOR/PETITIONER

I, M.Govindaraju,S/o Meyyadi, aged about 62 years residing at No.9/62, Erangadu,

Kamalapuram, Salem District-636309 do hereby solemnly afform and sincerely state

as follows:

1. I am the Petitioner/ De-facto Complainant herein. I made a complaint against

6 Accused namely, (i) A1-Mr.G.Chandrasekaran, (ii) A2-Mr.Suresh Babu(Alias)

Karunakaran, (iii) A3-Mr.Thangayaraj, (iv) A4-Mr.Senthil Kumar, (v) A5-

Mr.M.K.Monesh, and (vi) A6-Ms.Vijayalakshmi, for cheating him of Rs.14,50,000/- on


a false promise of getting a public appointment as Junior Assistant to my son,[Mr.

Arun Kumar] to the Salem District Crime Branch, Police Station, Salem on

05.11.2024 which culminated into an FIR No.8/2024 on the file of the Salem DCB

Police Station, Salem, U/S 120B, 420, 506(1) of IPC.

2. On the said misrepresentation, I paid the amount of Rs.14,36,900/- from the

period between 10.02.2021 to 30.03.2022. The said was paid to the accused’s as

follows:

(i) Accused No.1/Mr.G.Chandrasekaran – Rs.50,000/- by Online Bank Transfer;

(ii) Accused No.2/Mr.Suresh Babu – Rs.5,00,000/- in multiple instalments via


Online Bank Transfer;

(iii) Accused No.3/Mr.Thangayaraj- Rs.2,00,000/- in a single instalment via online


bank transfer;

(iv) Accused No.4/Mr.Senthil Kumar- Rs.1,00,000/- in 2 instalment on the same


day vide online bank Transfer;

(v) Accused No.5/Mr.M.K.Monesh – Rs.5,86,900/- on different instalments in a


single day vide online bank transfer dated 30.03.2022;

(vi) Accused No.6/Mr.Vijayalakshmi- handed over a Cheque for Rs.6,00,000/- as


a guarantee to the payments made for the 5 th Accused in my son’s name
Mr.Arun Kumar.

3. As the transactions were done only through online, on filing of FIR they

returned certain amount as follows:

(i) The Entire amount of Rs.50,000/- paid to Accused No.1 was returned to to me

through online;
(ii) The Entire Amount of Rs.2,00,000/- paid to Accused No.3/Mr.Thangayaraj was

returned to me through online;

(iii) The Entire amount of Rs.1,00,000/- paid to Accused No.4/Mr.Senthil Kumar-

was returned to me through online;

Except the above said amounts which was returned to the petitioner, the balance

amount of Rs.10,86,900/- has not been paid back by the 2nd Accused & 5th Accused.

4. Through various means the Accused No.2, 5 and 6 are threatening me that

they are powerful and if I persist in pressing the criminal charges. The bail

applications filed by the 1st and 3rd Accused, and the Anticipatory Bail Application

filed by the 6th Accused were rejected by the Court’s below wherein I had also

intervened and opposed the said Bail and Anticipatory Bail applications.

5. The Accused Nos. 2nd, 5th and 6th are absconding, and they are not yet

arrested by the Police and brought into custody. They are continuously threatening

me through various means to withdraw the case. The said Accused No.6 Ms.

Vijayalakshmi is is the Leader of the Women Wing of PMK, Ilampillai Panchayat

Union and I fear that she would be her political might to force me to withdraw the

case. Therefore, all the Accusedare in collusion and the Accused are acting at the

behest of the 6th Accused, who is the entire brain behind this cheating, who is at

present absconding. Now at present, only the 2nd accused has filed this Application

for Anticipatory Bail. The bail applications of the Accused Nos. 1 and 3 and the

anticipatory bail application for 6th accused were dismissed wherein I intervened and

opposed the bail.


6. I humbly submit that the 2nd Accused is not entitled to be enlarged on

Anticipatory Bail for following reasons:

(i) Only by ensuring the arrest of the 2nd Accused, the place in which they are
keeping the ill-gotten cheating money could be unearthed and possibly
recovered by the Police and the whereabouts of the 5 th and 6th Accused could
be traced by the Police.

(ii) Even before the arrest, the accused are in collusion and are threatening me to
withdraw the charges. if they are let out on bail, they will be even more
emboldened to threaten and force me to withdraw the case.

(iii) If the Accused no.2 is let out on Bail, by colluding with others will tamper with all
the evidence and hinder with the investigation and trial.

(iv) The Entire money having been transferred only through online and the return of
money by accused no.1,3 and 4 makes it very clear that the case is an open
and shut case and the conviction is imminent.

(v) Even the short duration of judicial custody on arrest before conviction is going
to be adjusted in the final quantum of sentence and hence the accused are no
prejudiced seriously.

(vi) Further I came to know that the accused persons have divided the amount
equally and hence unless all the 6 Accused are arrested and enquired jointly
the truth cannot be uncovered and appreciated by the Prosecution.

(vii) Further the investigation is still in progress, and other accused persons except
Accused Nos. 1 & 3 are yet to be arrested, and hence it is just and necessary,
that the bail should not be granted which may hinder the investigation.

7. I humbly submit that the balance of convenience is to arrest the accused and

conduct the trial expeditiously which would alone ensure speedy investigation and

trial to meet the ends of justice as envisaged u/s 528 of BNSS,2023. Therefore, it is

just and necessary for this Hon'ble Court to dismiss the Crl.OP.
8. I humbly submit that I am being the de facto complainant would be seriously

prejudiced if the Original petitioner is enlarged on bail. I was allowed to intervene

before the trial court and the bail applications were dismissed. Therefore, it is just

and necessary for this Hon'ble Court to permit the petitioner herein to implead in this

Crl.OP.

Therefore, for the reasons stated above, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be

pleased to allow the petitioner herein to intervene in this Crl.O.P.No.29156 of 2024

and pass such further or other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit

and proper on the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

Solemnly affirmed at Chennai this the

21st day of Nov’2024 and signed his Before me

name in my presence

You might also like