China2024_webreport_fin
China2024_webreport_fin
China2024_webreport_fin
CHINA 2024
WHAT TO WATCH
A REP ORT BY
January 2024
With a solution-oriented mandate, the Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) tackles major policy challenges confronting the Asia-
Pacific in security, prosperity, sustainability, and the development of common norms and values for the region. The Asia Society
Policy Institute is a think- and do-tank designed to bring forth policy ideas that incorporate the best thinking from top experts in
Asia and to work with policymakers to integrate these ideas and put them into practice. As part of ASPI, the Center for China Analysis
(CCA) aims to unravel China’s complexities to deliver independent policy-relevant analysis. Drawing on an “inside out” approach to
China analysis, with an emphasis on Chinese-language sources, more than 30 CCA staff and fellows, located around the world, work
on issues related to China’s domestic politics; economy and technology; foreign policy and national security; climate, energy, and
environment; and contemporary Chinese society, culture, public health, and education.
The Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis and the Asia Society take no institutional positions on matters of public
policy and other issues addressed in the reports and publications they sponsor. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion
contained in this report are the sole responsibility of its authors and may not reflect the views of the organization and its board, staff,
and supporters.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to express their great appreciation to Inger Marie Rossing, Wendy Ma, and Clara Lambert for their outstanding
support in the preparation and publication of this report.
Looking ahead to 2024, are matters likely to improve? In short: not by much.
Across the economy, society, politics, the environment, and foreign policy, the team at the Asia Society Policy
Institute’s Center for China Analysis largely foresees a vexing year ahead for China as challenges continue to
proliferate — though some positive opportunities, at home and abroad, present themselves as possible excep-
tions. In this inaugural annual report, our analysts forecast ten key developments to watch in the year ahead:
1. China’s economy will continue to struggle: Beijing is likely to again set an official growth rate of around 5%
for 2024 but may find meeting this goal a real challenge. Lagging consumer demand, a persistent real estate
crisis, and the unlikelihood of a comprehensive government stimulus amid significant concerns about debt and
fiscal stability, especially at the local level, will continue to drag heavily on China’s economy in the year ahead.
2. Xi Jinping’s prioritization of security will weigh on growth: An important factor behind China’s economic
woes will be President Xi’s overriding emphasis on “comprehensive security” as a paramount policy priority. This
laser-like focus on security, stability, and national “self-reliance” makes it more likely that efforts to boost investor
confidence may falter and an exodus of foreign capital will persist, potentially leading to stealth controls on
international capital to maintain the yuan’s stability.
3. Eroding trust could further undermine confidence in governance and development: A growing “trust
deficit” is today reshaping the dynamics among China’s political elites, between the state and society, between
central and local governments, and within the general populace. Accentuated by — and contributing to —
China’s economic slowdown, this erosion of trust is exacerbating political instability, policy unpredictability,
social fragmentation, and other governance challenges and risks potentially leading the country into a uniquely
“Chinese-style” modernization trap.
4. A slowing economy will drive growing public discontent: The combination of slowing economic growth and
erosion of trust could heighten public discontent and even drive new protests in 2024. Events of nationwide
significance — such as the death in late 2023 of former premier Li Keqiang — have the potential to become
flashpoints for broader public and elite dissatisfaction.
5. We will see purges in the provinces as local liabilities rise: Worsening fiscal challenges combined with
growing central vs. local distrust are leading to intensified scrutiny of local finances and leaders. This is helping
trigger a wave of political and anti-corruption purges in the provinces, especially in poorer regions — leading to
new levels of political disruption and policy stagnation.
6. Xi will adopt a more oracular leadership style: Xi’s method of governing shows signs of increasingly shifting
to one of “delegated centralization,” in which he assigns day-to-day decision-making to trusted aides, while he
focuses on a grand strategy. This may further secure Xi’s image and power but will also increase policy fragmen-
tation, amplify tensions between security and development priorities, and reduce the effectiveness of interna-
tional diplomacy.
8. China will act to reestablish its international climate leadership: To respond to growing demands by the
international community and shift global climate-related attention away from China, while also advancing its
own national interests, China is likely to offer a more concrete climate plan in 2024. This may include ramping up
climate-related spending in developing countries and slowing or incrementally ending the construction of new
coal plants domestically.
9. China will significantly strengthen its pivot to the Global South: Motivated by deteriorating relations with
the advanced Western world and a need to secure greater access to raw materials; develop new markets; garner
political support; and bolster its diplomatic, security, and economic influence on the world stage, China will
increasingly turn its attention to building relations with the countries of the developing world. In 2024, this will
mean additional development aid, high-profile diplomatic extravaganzas, and a larger operational presence by
Chinese military and police forces in the Global South.
10. Two big elections will greatly complicate Chinese foreign policy: The January 13 election of Lai Ching-te
of the more independence-minded Democratic Progressive Party as president of Taiwan presents a significant
early political and policy challenge for Xi in 2024. The U.S. presidential election later in the year may prove
similarly pivotal, determining the trajectory of U.S.-China relations for the next four years and beyond. Beijing
is likely to continue its freeze on political ties with Taiwan and escalate its military pressure on the island, while
using most of 2024 to make what preparations it can to mitigate against and, if possible, capitalize on a possibly
chaotic shift in U.S. political leadership.
Utilizing its unique “inside-out” approach to China analysis, including emphasizing the use of Chinese sources
and leveraging a growing global network of diverse expertise, the Center for China Analysis will keep a close
watch on these and other critical developments throughout 2024. Dedicated to unraveling China’s complexities
and providing independent, policy-relevant analysis, we are pleased to present China 2024: What to Watch.
Taylah Bland is the Senior Program Officer for the China Climate Hub and an Affiliated Fellow on Climate and
the Environment with the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis. She specializes in China’s
domestic climate politics and international environmental law and diplomacy. She is a graduate of New York
University, Shanghai, and Tsinghua University where she was a Schwarzman Scholar.
Diana Choyleva, a leading expert on China’s economy, is Founder and Chief Economist at Enodo Economics.
She has analyzed China since 2000 and has co-authored three books. In 2023 she joined JPMorgan Asia Growth
and Income plc as a Non-executive Director to the Board, and the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China
Analysis, as a Non-Resident Senior Fellow on the Chinese economy.
Bates Gill is Executive Director of the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis. Dr. Gill has a 30-year
global career as a scholar, policy advisor, and institution-builder with a focus on China and Indo-Pacific affairs. His
most recent book is Daring to Struggle: China’s Global Ambitions under Xi Jinping (Oxford University Press).
Kate Logan is Associate Director of Climate at the Asia Society Policy Institute and a Fellow at the Asia Society
Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis. She has followed and analyzed China’s climate, energy and environ-
mental performance for over a decade at major think tanks, philanthropies, multilateral organizations, and NGOs.
Nathan Levine is a Research Fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis, where he
previously served as Assistant Director. An expert on U.S.-China relations and China’s politics and foreign policy,
he is an independent consultant, analyst, and writer. Nathan previously worked as a consultant with The Asia
Group and as a researcher with Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
Lyle J. Morris is Senior Fellow for Foreign Policy and National Security at the Asia Society Policy Institute’s
Center for China Analysis. Prior to joining ASPI, Lyle was a Senior Policy Analyst at the RAND Corporation and
served in the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) as the Country Director for China.
Lynette Ong is Professor of Political Science at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University
of Toronto, and a Senior Fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis. Her latest book,
Outsourcing Repression: Everyday State Power in Contemporary China, has won multiple international best book
awards. Her research has been covered in the New York Times, Economist, Washington Post, and other major
media outlets.
Jing Qian co-founded the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis alongside the Hon. Dr. Kevin
Rudd, to whom he served as a Senior Advisor for almost a decade. As the Managing Director, Jing leads CCA’s
strategy, research, and policy work on China, including a series of Track 1.5/2 dialogues. Jing co-leads the Decod-
ing Chinese Politics and Cure4Cancer projects, and serves as an Advisory Board Member of the Bloomberg New
Economy.
Neil Thomas is a Fellow on Chinese Politics at the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis,
where he studies Chinese elite politics, political economy, and foreign policy. Previously, he was a Senior Analyst
for China and Northeast Asia at Eurasia Group, a Senior Research Associate at MacroPolo, and a lecturer at the
University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy.
The Context
China’s economy has struggled to bounce back since the COVID-19 pandemic, when the government’s draco-
nian “zero COVID” lockdowns helped crush consumer spending and overall economic activity for a sustained
period. However, many economists point to much deeper and longer-running structural problems in the Chinese
economy as having come to a head over the past several years, trapping China in a “new normal” of significantly
slower growth.
In this view, China’s economy faces deep structural problems and is increasingly running into the limits of its
current growth model. For decades, China relied on investment-led growth, pouring money into infrastructure,
real estate, and export-driven industrial manufacturing, while consumers maintained a high savings rate. That
model is no longer performing: public investment has reached a point of severe diminishing returns, China is now
awash in high levels of debt, and overspending on a property construction bubble has led to a significant crisis.
Further weighing on the economy is largely stagnant productivity growth and a private sector shaken by Presi-
dent Xi Jinping’s insistence on growing the Party-state’s control over the economy and finance.
The obvious solution to this impasse would be to shift to a growth model driven by a much higher share of
consumer spending. So far, however, Chinese consumer demand has remained sluggish in 2023. Consumers
have signaled that they remain deeply wary about the future, still saving an average of 2% more of their income
than before the pandemic (when they already had among the highest savings rates in the world). Moreover, the
economy fell into deflation in 2023, creating spiraling incentives to wait to spend. China also faces a serious long-
term demographic crisis, further threatening its ability to grow rich before it grows old.
Although China officially met its annual growth target of “around 5%” in 2023, with 5.2% growth according to
official data, most economists predict these structural factors will only further weigh on China in 2024.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) forecasts growth will slow to 4.6%, while other leading economists predict
growth to fall below 4%. Beijing, however, is poised to again set an official growth rate of around 5% in March,
according to policy insiders involved in the deliberations of China’s Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC),
held in December 2023.
Achieving this target will likely require significant policy changes, however. The Chinese property sector (which
still represents some 23% of GDP) shows no signs of recovery — or even that it has yet hit bottom. Restoring
robust growth, therefore, will largely hinge on whether Chinese consumers can be convinced to spend, and
private sector entrepreneurs to invest. Beijing has signaled only limited action is likely forthcoming, however,
including a minor shift in rhetoric at the CEWC from “stability” to “progress,” hinting at a potentially minor expan-
sion of stimulus measures. Overall, however, the CEWC declared that China must “adhere to high-quality devel-
opment as the hard truth of the new era” — signaling the economy should indeed be prepared for a long slog.
• Sweeping government stimulus efforts are highly unlikely amid continuing fiscal and debt concerns.
• A broader financial crisis or economic recession is unlikely, but China’s economy is likely to continue to at best
muddle through in 2024 rather than demonstrate a significant recovery.
The Context
China’s economy has begun to flounder as debt deflation, international decoupling, and depressed consumer and
private sector confidence have combined to present the sternest test for the Chinese development model since
Beijing began its period of reform and opening more than four decades ago.
Contributing to this challenge is China’s pivot under Xi Jinping toward more fundamentally autarkic, statist, and
ideological policies. In this environment, private entrepreneurs have reduced their willingness to invest for the
long term, while foreign investors have also become wary and are increasingly pulling their money from China.
Chinese consumers have hedged by increasing their savings at the same time Beijing is desperate to boost
consumer spending as an engine of economic growth.
A primary cause of this contradictory approach is Xi’s overriding emphasis on national security, including China’s
need for technological and economic “self-reliance” to fend off threats he sees posed by the United States and
its allies, which he has accused of waging a campaign of “encirclement and suppression.” So far, Xi has demon-
strated a willingness to double down on national security even at the expense of growth, if necessary.
Economic challenges in 2023 led to subtle critiques within China of Xi’s ability to lead the country in a positive
direction; toward the end of the year, Beijing began to shift its policy toward prioritizing growth. This included a
change in diplomatic approaches, with Xi meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden and U.S. business leaders in
San Francisco in an attempt to reassure American and international investors that they are welcome and can
still find attractive opportunities in China. Regulators also worked to further level the playing field for private
enterprises, including developers seeking to stem an ongoing crisis in the property sector. And China’s annual
Central Economic Work Conference concluded in December with a nod to the need to balance development with
security, declaring that economic work will be the central task for 2024. It offered no concrete solutions, however.
So, it remains unclear whether the actions taken so far entail a substantial and lasting elevation of economic
development to be genuinely on par with national security, or whether these steps merely represent a tactical
pause in Xi’s relentless pursuit of geopolitical and ideological goals.
• China will continue to struggle with debt, and business and consumer confidence may not substantially
improve.
• This could ultimately lead to the imposition of stealth controls on international capital, as preferable to a yuan
devaluation that would outright undermine Beijing’s long-standing efforts to present China’s currency as a
stable alternative to the dollar.
Xi has repeatedly sought to rally China’s people to prepare for an as-yet-to-be-defined painful struggle. It remains
to be seen how willing the population will be to endure this, and if economic hardship and diminished prospects
for development will spark any popular or elite political discontent, or if such discontent could be enough to alter
Xi’s long-term policy platform.
The Context
China is currently experiencing a simultaneous
erosion of trust across multiple domains:
Among political elites: Since the advent of the 20th Party’s Congress in 2022, China has witnessed a
pronounced transformation in elite political dynamics. The combination of relentless anti-corruption campaigns
and an aggressive push toward concentration of power has disrupted the previous relatively stable equilibrium.
This has led to a breakdown in the predictability of the rules and norms of elite politics, and a diminishing sense
of consensus and security among the political elite.
Between the state and society: In the post-Mao era, China has operated under an implicit social compact:
political compliance in exchange for increasing prosperity. However, the resurgence of Marxist-Leninist ideology
has transformed the once-celebrated maxim “to get rich is glorious” into “to get too rich is dangerous.” This
ideological shift, together with a strategic pivot from prioritizing economic growth to emphasizing security, has
led to policy inconsistencies, as starkly revealed during the COVID crisis. These developments have significantly
eroded the long-standing pact among the government, private entrepreneurs, and society at large, resulting in a
substantial and likely enduring trust deficit.
Between central and local governments: China’s governance framework is evolving, characterized by increased
centralization of power. As local governments grapple with financial challenges due to dwindling revenues from
land sales and a lack of new revenue sources, their ability to effectively implement national policies is increasingly
questioned by the central government. This situation is exacerbated by local protectionism, which further compli-
cates the central-local relationship. Coupled with a shift in the criteria for evaluating and promoting officials,
from performance-based metrics to political loyalty, this has produced a noticeable impact on the efficiency and
enthusiasm of local bureaucracies, historically essential for the rise of political elites. These shifts within China’s
governance structure are leading to a growing erosion of trust between central and local governments, adding
complexity to the dynamics of China’s political landscape.
Among the general populace: The expansion of the Party and state’s control and influence over more and more
aspects of life is shrinking space for the private sector, civil society and non-governmental organizations, and the
practical activities of everyday self-governance. Concurrently, state-led security campaigns encouraging commu-
nity members and students to surveil and report on each other (especially on specific groups of particular suspi-
cion, such as overseas returnees and teachers) are further eroding basic social trust and altering social dynamics.
• Societal fragmentation: declines in societal trust could lead to greater social fragmentation,
as individuals and groups are further atomized from traditional community structures and
grow more distrustful of institutions and each other.
• Governance challenges: Chinese central and local governments may confront increased
governance challenges, including reduced capacity to respond effectively to unforeseen
events, such as social unrest, natural disasters, or international instability. 无信不立
(Without Trust,
Nothing Stands)
Overall, by 2024 China could find itself ensnared in a unique modernization trap marked by inter-
nal trust deficits and governance challenges that broadly undermine its ability to develop. Avoiding this scenario
hinges on the Chinese leadership’s ability to rebuild trust and confidence within the country, as well as on the
international stage.
The Context
China is facing an economic slowdown that is largely structural in nature, with traditional investment-led engines
of growth, such as real estate and construction, in decline. This structural decline was accentuated by three years
of pandemic lockdowns, which badly impacted small and medium-sized businesses and accelerated a global
relocation of supply chains out of China. Consumer confidence has been badly hit over the past several years, as
has that of private sector investors.
For the government, this presents a serious and growing problem. Since at least 1989, the de facto social contract
between people and the state in China was that the people would accept the Party’s authority and restrictions
on political rights in exchange for rapid growth in prosperity. And for decades, the Party seemed to deliver on this
promise, with China experiencing rapid growth and modernization. Notably, many Chinese under age 40 have
no previous experience of an economic recession in their lifetimes. Now the situation has changed, and quite
suddenly.
In June 2022, youth unemployment rates hit a record high of 21%; the government then responded to such
unfavorable data by announcing it would cease publishing unemployment statistics. The issue of high youth
unemployment, including among college-educated young people, is likely of serious concern to the Party-state,
especially after the “white paper” protests of November 2022, when protestors, most of them college students,
gathered not only to demonstrate against strict pandemic restrictions but also to explicitly shout such sentiments
as “down with the CCP!”
Meanwhile, the economic situation has spurred other protest as well. The dramatic contraction of the property
sector, which was precipitated by Xi’s “three red lines” policies explicitly intended to deflate the real estate bubble,
has undermined the fortunes of middle-class Chinese, who overwhelmingly save household wealth in the form of
property. According to analysis by the Social Unrest in China project, from June 2022 to June 2023 construction
workers and homebuyers were the two largest groups in non-pandemic-related protests, comprising 28.1% and
22.6%, respectively, followed by transport workers (7.6%) and manufacturing workers (6.7%). Discontent has
also grown among migrant workers, who have seen demand for labor (and, therefore, wages) decline alongside
construction and manufacturing.
Finally, wealthy Chinese elites are also undertaking a more subtle form of protest by increasingly engaging in
unprecedented levels of capital flight, moving their assets to safe havens abroad, such as Singapore and London.
The Context
Local government debt is a significant and
growing risk to China’s economic stability, rising
from 62% of GDP in 2019 to 76% in 2022. Local governments are seeing revenues from land sales and taxes sink
with the struggling property market, returns from infrastructure fall after years of over-construction, and liabilities
mount as many struggle to pay off bills incurred to maintain the central government’s strict zero COVID policies
from 2020 to 2022.
In 2023, the Party proposed a basket of measures to reduce local government debt risks, as well as a long-term
mechanism to resolve such risks. Part of this effort will involve investigations of local finances by the Party’s
Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) and the State Council’s National Audit Office. They will
now have extra political backing from the new Central Financial Work Committee, which exists to enhance Party
discipline in the financial sector.
In August 2023, the CCDI announced the detention of Sun Zhigang, a retired Party Secretary of Guizhou, a few
months after the province declared itself unable to resolve its debt problems. Political insiders attribute his deten-
tion at least partially to Guizhou’s debt issues. The incident is one of what appears to be a growing wave of cases
in which the central government is attempting to use anti-corruption and Party discipline mechanisms to address
— or at least show the appearance of addressing — worsening local government fiscal problems.
• A significant political story of 2024 could be purges in the provinces, rather than personnel dramas in the
capital, as was the case in 2023. Such a campaign would likely be most concentrated in China’s poorer and
more indebted provinces in the northeast and southwest, creating political disruption and policy stasis in
affected areas.
• Localities everywhere will face more pressure to reduce debt, potentially leading to more incentives to
support private firms and boost growth and revenue. However, pressure to cut expenditures may also reduce
the provision of public services, potentially contributing to rising social tensions — an outcome that creates
different policy headaches for Beijing.
The Context
Both Mao and Deng increasingly eschewed day-to-day politics as they aged in favor of paying more attention
to political grand strategy. Xi began showing signs of following a similar pattern in 2023, including delegating
more duties and decisions to close confidants such as Li Qiang, Cai Qi, He Lifeng, and Chen Yixin. He has also
attended fewer domestic policy meetings and made fewer trips abroad compared to the same point in his previ-
ous two terms in office.
Xi has focused more of his time on culture, ideology, Party building, and touring the country to evaluate policy
implementation. He appears to have placed greater trust in his lieutenants, for instance allowing Li Qiang to
advance more business-friendly policies in the State Council, and delegating the task of pursuing more robust
national security policies to leaders such as Cai Qi.
Rather than showing political weakness, this shift reflects the dominance of Xi’s position following his factional
sweep of the 20th Party Congress. He has surrounded himself with close political allies and ousted his potential
rivals. A more oracular style now allows him to conserve energy as he ages, further control access to himself,
deflect blame for anything that goes wrong, and preserve his dominance by balancing governance responsibili-
ties among emerging sub-factional networks.
This may result in greater political volatility and more questionable policymaking, however, with Xi relying on
an ever-closer circle of trusted advisors who increasingly compete for his favor. It may also limit the impact of
international diplomacy by further isolating Xi — still the ultimate decision-maker despite appearances — from the
outside world.
• Xi will travel abroad mostly only for major summits in friendly countries, such as to the Shanghai Cooperation
Organization (SCO) in Kazakhstan, BRICS in Russia, G20 in Brazil, and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
(APEC) in Peru.
• Other leaders, especially Premier Li Qiang, could travel more to conduct diplomacy with U.S. allies in Asia
and Europe. This would reflect a shift to focus diplomacy with the West on trade and investment, while
saving geopolitical energy and strategic engagement for China-friendly forums more aligned with developing
countries.
The Context
China was hit by a number of climate-induced
extreme weather events in 2023, including a period of unrelenting summer rain that caused intense flooding
around the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. At one point, precipitation exceeded 60% of a typical year’s rain in
just 83 hours; Beijing experienced its heaviest rainfall in 140 years. Nearly two million people were affected by
flooding, causing nearly a hundred deaths; much of the major agricultural region’s crops were destroyed, and
economic losses totaled more than $13 billion. Meanwhile, China’s northwest suffered a record-breaking heat-
wave, with temperatures in parts of Xinjiang breaking 125 degrees Fahrenheit in July 2023.
These highlight the increasingly difficult climate environment faced by China, in which such extreme scenarios
may become increasingly common. For Beijing, this is a political issue. Throughout Chinese history, extreme
weather events — particularly flooding — and ruling governments’ ability to respond to them have traditionally
been viewed by the populace as a key test of legitimacy. Failure to respond effectively to natural disasters was
frequently taken as an omen that a dynasty had lost the “mandate of heaven” — and indeed often played an
instrumental role in the fall of governments. Chinese leadership is today keenly aware that they too must be able
to effectively handle a changing climate and its impacts at home.
In 2022, China published a “National Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (2022–2035),” which aimed to
strengthen China’s societal and economic resilience to climate change. It promotes proactive adaptation by
monitoring and predicting extreme weather, as well as increasing agricultural, water, and urban resilience, among
other targets. But this ambitious strategy requires significant development and coordination among government
departments, as well as significant investment of capital, labor, and bureaucratic attention.
• This effort will be framed as an issue of national security, overlapping with other high-priority security issues
favored by Xi Jinping, including food, water, energy, and infrastructure security.
• Chinese climate adaptation and resilience efforts will proceed regardless of the result of climate change
negotiations at the international level but will need to accelerate.
• The Chinese public will become more aware of severe weather events and increasingly begin to make the
connection between them and climate change.
The Context
Global progress on confronting climate change
hinges on China, which accounts for around a third of global emissions. The last time China made headline
commitments on climate was in 2020, when President Xi Jinping announced China’s “dual carbon” targets to
peak carbon emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. Xi also said China would stop
building new coal-fired power plants abroad in 2021. As China’s economic picture began to worsen amid the
pandemic, however, Beijing retreated from overt pledges as it sought to maintain flexibility in the face of concerns
about energy security and its domestic economy. Yet, the country’s emissions are now likely to peak well ahead of
schedule, and clean energy has become a new engine for economic growth.
Two key interests could thus propel China to more actively substantiate its international climate leadership in
2024. The first is China’s desire to shape expectations for expected climate targets — namely, on climate finance
in 2024 and domestic emissions reductions in 2025. A high-profile U.S.-China climate statement in November
2023 clarified positions ahead of COP28 in Dubai the following month, but also exhibited key gaps on China’s
level of ambition for post-2030 emissions cuts and whether China should be obligated to financially support
developing countries to meet their climate goals. China could take action to preemptively set expectations for
upcoming targets and address outstanding questions around its climate action. As China’s dual carbon targets
show, it is willing to be a pioneer on the global stage when doing so can also help protect its core interests.
The second is China’s international reputation. Concerns about China’s massive pipeline of new coal power
plants slated for construction are reaching an inflection point, including from climate-vulnerable developing
countries that China wants to keep in its geopolitical orbit. Many of these same countries also struggle to access
climate finance due to debt distress caused in part by Chinese lending. China’s vocal emphasis on South-South
climate cooperation at COP28 may foreshadow greater action by China to respond to these and other reputa-
tional pressures. Even recent language from China’s typically hard-nosed top diplomat Wang Yi acknowledged
that climate cooperation meets the “urgent needs and universal expectations of the international community.”
• China could also offer a more concrete plan for ramping up climate-related spending in developing countries,
potentially in the form of a quantitative target for finance or clean energy capacity. Importantly, this could
address domestic overcapacity in clean energy manufacturing by selling it in greater quantities abroad,
especially to markets that concurrently advance Beijing’s security interests.
The Context
China’s relations with the United States and the broader Global West — including the European Union and
Australia — have deteriorated sharply in recent years. Although Beijing has made attempts to restore relations
with these states, these efforts have met with limited success. Technological controls and economic barriers
continue to proliferate as an incremental but substantial decoupling with the Global West has proceeded. There-
fore, Beijing has increasingly embarked on a proactive pivot to make cultivation of relations with the Global South,
rather than the Global West, the center of its geopolitical strategy. This strategy aims to secure access to raw
materials; develop new markets; garner political support; and bolster China’s diplomatic, security, and economic
influence on the world stage.
Several Chinese initiatives and diplomatic breakthroughs have set the scene for much more to come in this
regard in 2024. These include the high-profile rollout of three major new Chinese initiatives targeting the Global
South: the Global Development Initiative (GDI) in 2021, the Global Security Initiative (GSI) in 2022, and the Global
Civilization Initiative (GCI) in 2023. These initiatives set forth a development and political framework that Beijing
believes will resonate among developing countries seeking to achieve a more equitable and stable world. Addi-
tionally, in 2023, China successfully brokered a reopening of long-suspended diplomatic ties between Iran and
Saudi Arabia; held the first China–Central Asia Summit; oversaw the expansion of the BRICS grouping to admit
Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates; and convened the Third Belt and
Road Forum, which attracted senior leaders from more than 90 countries, mostly from the Global South.
• The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), held every three years and set to convene in Beijing in
2024, will become a principal focal point for China’s accelerated engagement with the Global South.
• At the BRICS 2024 summit, hosted by Russia, China will support admittance of several more countries to the
body; more than 30 countries have expressed interest in joining, including Algeria, Bolivia, Cuba, Indonesia,
and Kazakhstan.
• Beijing will press hard to insert language that aligns with the aims of the GDI, GSI, and GCI and its goals
for transforming global governance into upcoming UN sessions and documents, including the high-profile
“Summit for the Future” in September 2024.
• China will significantly expand the operational presence of its military and police forces in the Global South,
including through training programs and new basing arrangements.
The Context
Beijing regards the DPP as a secessionist party bent on permanently separating Taiwan from Mainland China.
The DPP’s victory challenges Xi’s narrative that Taiwan is moving inexorably toward reunification with China. A
third consecutive electoral triumph for the DPP — by one of the mainland’s least favorite Taiwanese politicians —
has therefore likely provoked a rethink in Beijing. It may even have concluded that Taiwan’s public sentiment has
irreversibly shifted in favor of formal independence. If so, the prospects for much greater Chinese pressure on
Taiwan — perhaps even a coercive military takeover — could increase considerably, and we may see evidence of
this shift in posture over the course of 2024.
In the United States, a Trump victory would inject tremendous uncertainty into an already volatile U.S.-China
relationship. Trump’s capricious, unpredictable style of leadership — on top of the usual disjunction of a change
in presidential administrations — presents a major wild card for Xi and a Chinese system that prefers stability
and predictability. On the other hand, Beijing may not necessarily view a change in administrations as entirely
unfavorable. President Biden has largely continued the Trump administration’s historically hardline China poli-
cies anchored in “strategic competition.” In fact, Biden has arguably upped the ante by pushing an ideological,
democracy vs. autocracy framing of the China challenge, rallying a much tighter coalition of democratic allies
willing to act as a balance against Beijing and ramping up the scope and intensity of U.S. technology controls
targeting China. While Biden has a much stronger personal relationship with Xi, long-term systemic rivalry will
probably triumph over personalistic politics.
• Xi will use 2024 to signal China’s intent for peace, stability, and win-win relations with the United States, while
making what political preparations it can to both mitigate against and capitalize on a possibly chaotic shift in
U.S. political leadership.
More from Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis
The Geopolitical Implications of the Taiwanese Elections for China, the United States and the World
The “Rebirth” of Europe-Taiwan Relations: Explaining Europe’s New Balance Between Beijing and Taipei
The New Domestic Politics of U.S.-China Relations
Decoding Xi’s “Tone-Changing” U.S.-China Speech in San Francisco
The 2024 Taiwanese Elections: A Primer
Future Crises in the Indo-Pacific: The Shadow of Chinese Public Opinion
Together and Apart: The Conundrum of the China-Russia Partnership
The Beijing-Moscow Axis: Evolving European Perspectives
Interpreting Xi Jinping’s Shifting Strategy on the Russia-Ukraine War
Unease, Not Confidence, Defines China’s “Partnership” with Russia
China’s Economy Ahead of the Third Plenum: The End of the “China Miracle”?
The End of Experimentation and Aspiration in Xi Jinping’s China
China’s Agenda at the UN General Assembly: What to Expect in 2023
The Rise of Xi Jinping’s Young Guards: Generational Change in the CCP Leadership
Opportunities for Leadership: Loss and Damage Climate Financing and U.S.-China Strategic Competition
Key Factors Shaping China’s Engagement With International Environmental Law
Picking the Rose, Leaving the Thorn: Why China’s AI Regulations Are Worth Careful Examination
Europe’s China Challenge: The Narrow Path for France, Germany, and the EU
“Generation N”: The Impact of China’s Youth Nationalism
What To Watch During the Two Sessions
Aerospace Engineers to Communist Party Leaders: The Rise of Military-Industrial Technocrats at
China’s 20th Party Congress
Taiwan Strait Crises: Island Seizure Contingencies
Cooperate, Compete, Confront, or Conflict: Comparing the China Components of the National Security
Strategies of the Trump and Biden Administrations
Determining the Future of the Internet: The U.S.-China Divergence
China’s Political-Economy, Foreign and Security Policy: 2023
The Last Generation: Why China’s Youth Are Deciding Against Having Children
The Explosive Rise of Psychotherapy in China
Involution: The Generation Turning Inward and Away From Xi’s Chinese Dream
China’s 20th Party Congress Leadership Reshuffle: Stasis or Sweep?
What China’s New Central Military Commission Tells Us About Xi’s Military Strategy
2022, Xi Jinping’s Annus Horribilis: Or is it?
Raising the Curtain on China’s 20th Party Congress: Mechanics, Rules, “Norms,” and the Realities of Power