Chapter 10
Chapter 10
Chapter 10
~
------ -- -- --
I
I ,_
\
d
~
J
4. What are the different method s of DNA profiling?
. .
GLASS FRACTURE, MACRO ETCHING, AND BULLET TRAJECTORY 121
UNIT3
PHYSICAL. IDENTIFICAT
. ION CASES
I ;
• I
CHAPTER 10- ·
l ✓ ,
J •
I • •
• • .I I -
. -
- -- - - - - - - ~- -- -
'-~ ~ ~
12 2 FO RE NS IC• CH EM
~ ~ ~ ~ :. .. :=IST RV AN D TO XIC OL OG Y
:. .. :. .: .: :: := .: :. .= .: :. .: -, :_ _
-- ~ -- -
W ha t is Gl as s?
J
Gi as s co ns ist s of a m ix tu
I m or e alk ali ne ba se s, su ch
co nt ai n otp .er el em en ts an
re of sil ica (n at ur al sa nd )
as lim e, so da , or po ta sh . an d two or
Gl as s ma y also
t d m et al s, wh ic h -ar e ad de
re sis ta nc e, ha rd ne s.s , an d d fo r co lor , he at
ot he r .de sir ed, pr op er tie s.
Gl as s an d gl as s fra gm en
. ,
'
I
I
cr im in al in: ve ~t iga tio ns of
fle ein g th e sc en e of ve hi cle
of su ch m at er ia ls, ei th er
as
ts of te n ta ke an im po rt~
_s uc h of fe ns es as bu rg lar y,
ac ci de nt s, an d ot he rs . Th e
t role in
ho us eb re ak in g, ,
ul tim ate value
m ay be ob ta in ed fro m th em ev id en ce or as in ve sti ga tiv e ·1e ad s tha t
, de pe nd s on th e in ve sti ga
I an d . tra in in g in ~ e na tu re to rs' knowledge
. of gl as s; pr op er pr oc ed ur
pr es er va tio n, . an d ex an lin
'
. es of collection
at io n; an d w ha t ·th e lab or
ca n le ar n fro m th e gl as s qr ato ry tec hn ici an'
gl as s fra gm en ts. . - ·
Gl as s ~a ct ur es . an d ~,a
th ro ug h wh ic h se ve ra l ty pe s.s f~ a~ en ts ~a n pr ov id e inf orm ati on
s of de te rm in at io ns m ay be
as th os e lis t~i be lo w. . ·po ss ib le, su ch
1. In ve sti g~ to rs ca n d~
te rm in e :w he th er-a .fr ag me nt of gla ss
or jg in at ed fro m a -pa rti cu
la r gl as s ol;?ject th at ha s· be
br ok en {e .g. , a fra gm en t en
of he ad lig ht le ns fo un d at
sc en e of a ve hi cl e ac ci de nt tjl e
di d or di d no t or ig in ate~from
a br ok en he ad lig ht .of a su
sp ec t ve hic le) .
2. In ve sti ga to rs ca n de te
rm in e wh et he r a gl as s fra
or ig in at ed fro m a pa rti cu gm en t
la r ki nd of gl as s ob jec t, su
as a sp ec ta cl e le ns , he ad lig ch
ht le ns , or a wi nd ow pa ne .
3. In ve sti ga to rs ca n de te
rm in e th e or ig in an d di re cti
fr ac tu re , sp ec ifi ca lly , th ey on of a
ca n de te rm in e wh at ca us ed
an d th e di re ct io n fro m wh it
ic h th e ca us ati ve fo rce ca me
.
4. In ve sti ga to rs ca n de
te rm in e th e or de r in wh ich
fra ct ur es oc cu rre d, su ch th e
as in th e ev en t of mu lti ple
fra ct ur es , i? cl ud ip g bu lle
I
t ho le s .
5. in ve sti ga to rs ca n de te rm •
in e th e an gl e fro m ~h ic h
bu lle t st ru ck a gl as s ob je a
ct.
6. Fi na lly , in ve sti ga to rs ca n
de te rm in e wh et he r a p~ ic ul
gl as s ob jec t, su ch as a ar
ja r or a bo ~tl e, co nt ain ed
- in fla m m ab le or ex pl os iv ~
e su bs ta nc e:
I
________________..:,___~--------------i,,
GLASS ,FRACTURE, MACRO ETCHING
123\ I
AND BULLETTRAJE CTORV
1
2. Copper= Bluish
3. Manganese = Brownish
4. Gold = Ruby red ·
,.
I'
Properties of Glass
· The va,lue of glass-either ·as evidence or in the development ~f
investigative leads~epends on its physical properties,.which make It
possible to determine the manner by which a piece of glass was broken
or to determine whether glass· fragments .did or did :,;iot originate from
the same source.
'
Differences in amounts of mineral composition of · ingredients
used in one batch of molten glass , frdm th,o se._used in another batch
coulq. also prc;>duce variations that ~an be identified under laboratory
·procedures. Glass possess properties that help a laboratory. examiner
analyze its composition. First, glass seldom breaks squarely across but
leaves. convex/ concave edges, or stress lines, on the fractured edges;
second·, glas·s produce both radial (primary) .and concentric (sec<;>ndary)
fractures wh:en .broken; .and
third, glass bends and stretches before
breaking. .,
I-
Radial
l
J
· Ridge Lines
. I- • .
Factors to Be Determin~~ in .G lass Frq.cture
1. Point of Imj:,act~~H'ere 1 the front of the glass can be determined
through the 1accumul~tjon <?f dust and dirt on the glass.
t • J -'- ~
'•
••
4. Cause of Fracture .
•
•
. . I
' .
• I
'
the edges of both the concentric
and radial fractures.· A partial reconstruction of the object should· be
j made as an initial step, so that radial and concentric fractures can be
positively determined.
l
On radial fracture lines, the stre~s lines on-the rear side (±:e., the
J side opposite to the side of impac~) are well developed and di~tinct,
( whereas those on the front, or·impact side, are not that well developed
,
and distinct as they tend ~o run
together and lose their individuality. :
.
Ch ara cte nst fcs 01 the FraC:Ure
b tween the window and the "sh oot e,r ," which .
. ' . .. dt . al I . ~s
a,. ))1stance e .~~
related t? the pro jec tile s m1µal ~ enm n oc1 ty
Fragments
Collecting and H an ~ Glass and Glass
st
h oth er typ es of evi den ce, gla ss and gla ss fra gm ent s mu
- As wit
ed on the cri me sce ne sketch
be pho tog rap hed and the ir locations not
y are han d)e d or 'moved to a
mu st be pro per ly identified before .the
st .be rec ord ed con cer nin g the
diff ere nt location. The specific dat e mu
oth etic al rel atio n it ma y have
gla ss and any obvious, sus pec ted , or hyp
to the crim e bei ng i.nvestigatetl. ,
•
I
• ✓•
f'
GLASS FRACTURE, MA~R0 ETCHING, AND BULLET TRAJEC TORY 129
cottect1on
' .
in collec~ ng _glass an~ gl~ss fragme nts as part of a body of eviden ce
t.ed to an mcide nt being investi gated, there are severa l measu res
rela ....... ust be followe d. These are listed below.
tbat .1...~ , • • •
Preservation
_/ .
In order to properly; preserve glass.or glass fragments, especially
if they are to be used as evidence , these should be:
. or similar material;
1. wrapped _in soft paper,. cotton
~
Laboratory Examination
.. It is often a~vantageous to delay the submission of some items
(e.g., piec;es of broken he.a dlights found at the scene of a fleeing-
the-scene vehicle accident) to the laboratc;ny because the temporary
retention of such pieces could allow visual matching of remaining
pieces found ~n a suspected vehicle. Thes~ can be later confirmed by
laboratory analysis.
Laboratory examination of fractured glass found at .the ·scene of
1
the crime may indicate the following:
'
• the type of glass,
• . the manufacturer of the glass,
• the point of origin of ~e glass fragments,
GLASS FRACTURE, MACRO ETCHING, AND BULLET TRAJECTORY 131
•
•, the bullet's direction and angle of impact; aptd
.
• . . th~ sequence of holes.
'
I
j
1. Fluorescence ~~mination
A fluorescence examination is conducted based on the fact that
mineral constituents imbue a distinctive type and degree of fluorescence
to ·the glass that originate from one molten batch. While the results
~f UV comparisons of two or mo~e pieces .may not be positive in
establishing sµriilarity, they may be positively dissimilar, hence could
play a _useful-role in the elimination process.
'(
. .
-,Given that · flu~rescence examination requires that the glass
must pe r absolutely clean to preclude fluorescent reaction from
· ·contaminanfs,. there
r
is a need to wash the glass in acetone or a similar
solvent, and then in :water.. For this reason, caution should be taken
that this examination is not performed untjl after other examinations
for surface debris, fingerprints, and so on, have been completed.
2. , Spectrogtaphic Analysis
-, The constituents'.o f glass, especially the minor or trace constituents
·(e.g., contaminants and minor· elements added for specific purposes),
could easily undergo spec~rographic anaixsis, which identifies and
, measures the quantities of these constituents. The presence (or absence)
and the quantities of these minor constituents play· a more crucial
· role in spectrographic analysis than the basic constituents commonly
found in comparatively greater qu~tities. Thus,, the Spectrograph is
":[ery useful in demonstrating major differences between two samples;
can
it also indicat~ their non-identity: .
i
t
Density analysis is based on .the relative den_sities of t\\'.'O or
more pieces of glass. Compariso n of the qensities of a known ·and an
unknown piece of glass may help determine whether they are similar
or dissimilar. • I
Deftnitfon of Terms
• Concavity. - refers to a depression or excavatio n beiow ·
the general level. ·
. .
• Alteration - refers to changes or modificati on made in anything.
• · Molecule - smallest particle of a compound
I
J
''
. '.
GLASS FRACTURE, MACRO ETCHING, AND BULLET TRAJECTORY 133
purposes of Macrb-Etching_
.
Macro-etching has several uses as stated below.
I •
''•
3. polishing the area using sand paper; 'and
4. taking,a photograph of the possible evidence.
' . ..
- .
. .
•• • ••
1
.
1I
3. -Model of the vehicle and the chassis number not tallying
' with"' that of the rating· plate (alteration of the production
J num~er) ;. . ., ,, ~
'
t
1
partly superimposed by the letters and numbers
6. Misalignments of n~be~s and letters
. ,
. . .
I I
GLASS FRA~TURE, MACRO ETCHING, AND BULL.ET TRAJECTORY 135
What is B~et.Trajec;j:ory?
A bullet's trajectory refers to the path of flight it follows from firing
up to ~eaching its target. In cases of shootings where .the victim is the
target, the forensic specialist-works out !4e trajectory of the bullet as
part· of the crime scene reconstruction. The science of investigating
projectile motion ·i s known as· ballistics, which involves equations that
can be used to" determine a trajectory.
• I
. . .
The main task of the ballistic_s specialist is to determine the range
of a bullet's trajectory. When a bullet lea~es a gun, it carries various
gases with it that often form ·a tattoo-like pattern on the skin of the
victim. The spread and extent of this pattern reveal the range between
the perpetrator and the victim. The investigator must reproduce the
pattern by firing the weapon, if it is still available, or a similar one
at blank targets in, a laborat01:y condition. Knowing the range can
help establish·, where_ a perpetrator was sjanding, which may either
.corroborate or con~radict witness statem~nts: Identifying the range can
also• determine wheth~r
J
a• fatal shooting
I
was a homicide or a suicide.
. ,
I • •' '
Bullet ~qle Characteristics
When the body' offers no e~dence of the bullet's entrance . and
•exit paths, firearm examiners ~e summoned t~ examine the victim's
clothing. When a bullet ~trikes ~ object, such as a piece of clothing,
a' bullet entrance/exit hole is created. This is why if is important to
discuss the characteristics of bullet holes in aid of inve·s tigation.
r I
r
,..:- ----- ----- ----- ----- ~
136 FORENSIC CHEMISTRY AND TOXICOLOG~
'
i
t
,' .
• .,
Typical contact .
• Typical bu/lent entrance .
ho1e in a holster entrance hole
'
(
the bullet to fragment, expand, or. even tumble.- The resulting
secondary bullet entrance hole h~s a very irregular shape .,tpa,t,,
makes it difficult to visibly distinguis~ ' it fr9m an exit 'hole.
Fortunately, subsequent testing for gunshot residues cari· h~lp
make this type_of determination. Meanwhile, bu~le.t s that strike .
a target at an extreme leave an elongated hole that ·have ~~ly
even margins. Often, a grazing bullet could ca..use several.hol~~ ·
in·a wri~ed or folded garment. , · ,
· Another common characteristic of b~1let entrance holes
is the presence of bullet wipe residue. Bullet wipe residue
GLASS FRACTUR_
E, MACRO ETCHING, AND BULLET TRAJECTORY 137
~ -
. darkened ring arqund the immediate margin of a bullet
15 :; thUS, it}s not ~way~ visible on darker colored materials.
h 0 bullet wipe residue is caused by lead being wiped from
fhe . . .
th :d
. surface of the bullet as it passes through the material.
bullets no~ally· leave the heaviest deposits of bullet
~ e residue, bu~ Jacketed bullets can also do the same. Lead
WlPling in th~ barrel and le~d primer residues c~ be seen on
foh_~ surface-of ~ jacketed bullet.
t . '
I •
Tools ·Necessary for Trajectt;,ry ·Determination ·
. . ' '
• I , r
'.
• .. , Clear plastic pro~actor , ,' ,.
. I , \ I
• _C ?mpass -~ ·
• Adhesiv~ ·markers· (~umeri~al -~ cl alp,h abetical)
. .
• Bubble or torpedo level
_______:,_;__. :.._~~---- ----------- -
'1.38 FORENSIC CHEMISTRY AND TOXICOLOGY . __./
outside to inbound. r:
' .
e. Ir' the hole,. in the gl~ss is less than .2 inches· in
diameter, inyestigato;rs pass a string through _..a ·
drinking straw, and then· attach the string to a
small spring to be inserted through th~ bullet ·hole.
A common tqothpick is then 'inserted through the_
opposite end of the spring, allowing the string to be
•
I
_p ulled tight with light tension. The string is then
attached to the pole at the appropriate level based
''
on the trajectory and lase_1: light indications.
. .
2. Buildings
I
Summary
,
In this -chapter, we learned that glass is a mixture of silica and two
or more alkaline bases, such as lime, soda, or potash. Glass contains
other elements and metals, which are added to enhance color, heat
resistance, degree of hardness, and other specific properties. We also
Jearned about· the types of glass fractures, namely, radial or primary
fracture and concentric or secondary fracture. Several factors to de
determined in exrunining glass fracture include Point of Impact;
Directio1;1 of Im.pact or Force (p~rpendicular shot, angle from the
right, angle from the left); Laser pointer; Age of the Fracture (fresh or
·old fracture); and Cause of Fracture (natural or mechanic~ means) .
. Me~while, we also learned that macro-etcping is an application
of chemical solution·•on the metal surface where the serial number
is normally located, after which any reaction that may ~ake place is
observed: We also summed up the purposes and processes of macro-
e,tching. Finally, we learned about bullet trajectory, the tools necessary
for trajectory determination, bullet entrance and ✓exit holes and
methods t~ identify them, all of which help investigators determine
clues that can aid the investigation being conducted.