EAM Essentials
EAM Essentials
EAM Essentials
Prof R Saravanan
IES, Anna University, Chennai &
DL – ISHRAE HQ New Delhi
Learning Objectives..
To improve energy efficiency, reduce energy costs,
and minimize environmental impact in Buildings
EPI : kWh/sqm
Sample energy end uses—can be
indexed against similar building system
average loads to identify energy
savings opportunities.
Table for Star Rating of the Office Building
BEE Schedule for Star Rating of Office Buildings
Star Rating of the Office Building
Medium Office Building :
(30000 sqm<BUA<10000 sqm) :: 65 % AC area
Climate 1 Star 2 Star 3 Star 4 Star 5 Star
Composite 131.5 118.5 105 91.75 78.5
Warm and 123.5 110.5 97 83.75 70.5
Humid
Temperate 136.25 123 109.75 96.5 83.25
kWh/sqm
Utility Cost Analysis
Example on Electricity Consumption Analysis
Utility Cost Analysis
Office Building, 130 kVA, Contract Demand : 400 kW, Monthly Working hours : 180 h
Month Consumption Demand Demand cost Energy Charges Total Cost
April 270 375 1,44,000 388800 5,32,800
May 300 375 1,44,000 432000 5,76,000
June 312 375 1,44,000 449280 5,93,280
July 302 375 1,44,000 434880 5,78,880
August 289 375 1,44,000 416160 5,60,160
Demand
September 260 375 1,44,000 374400 Cost +
5,18,400
400 1,53.600
October 270 375 1,44,000 388800 Electricity
5,32,800
November 260 375 1,44,000 374400 Cost
5,18,400
December 266 375 1,44,000 383040 5,27,040
January 250 375 1,44,000 360000 5,04,000
February 260 375 1,44,000 374400 5,18,400
March 266 375 1,44,000 383040 5,27,040
Replacement of
Inefficient Motors • To provide a comprehensive and detailed
analysis of the facility, a breakdown of energy
Process Modifications use
• First quantitative evaluation of ECO, EEM –
Furnace Redesigning
selected to correct the defects or improve the
VFDs Installations existing installation
• On-site measurement and analysis using any
Revamping of Piping software tool
Systems, etc.
Comprehensive Energy Audit
• Comprehensive Analysis of Energy Systems
• Development of Baseline (of the building’s
energy use)
– Identification of Energy Uses
– Evaluation of Energy Savings
– Cost Effectiveness of Selected E.E.M
• Various Mathematical Tools are used
– Degree day methods
– Linear regression Methods
– Simple Pay Back Analysis
Comprehensive Energy Audit
• Review mechanical and electrical system design,
installed condition, maintenance practices, and
operating methods.
• Review existing operating and maintenance
problems.
• Measure key operating parameters and compare
to design levels, for example, operating schedules,
heating/cooling water temperature, supply air
temperature, space temperature and humidity,
ventilation quantities, and light level at the task.
• Such measurements may be taken on a spot basis,
or logged, manually or electronically.
Comprehensive Energy Audit
• Prepare a breakdown of the total annual energy use
into end-use components,
• List all possible modifications to equipment and
operations that would save energy.
• Review the list of practical modifications with the
owner/operator and select those that will be
analyzed further. Prioritize the modifications in the
anticipated order of implementation.
• For each practical measure, estimate the potential
savings in energy cost and its energy index.
Comprehensive Energy Audit
• Estimate the cost of each practical measure.
• Estimate the impact of each practical measure
on building operations, maintenance costs,
and non-energy operating costs.
• Estimate the combined energy savings from
implementing all of the practical measures
and compare to the potential derived
• Prepare a financial evaluation of the estimated
total potential investment using the owner’s
chosen techniques and criteria
Common Energy Audit findings,
Solutions & Savings
Audit Findings Solutions – ECM Savings
Excessive water leaving chilled Check & improve shaft seal A flow of 1 L/min.
water pump glands excessive flow
means 1000 kWh
per year
Overcooled spots due to Balance the air supply system, Add 15 to 25%
improper air balancing dampers as appropriate
Air flow of VAV /AHU Add inverter type variable speed drive 10 to 30% fan power
controlled by inlet guide vanes
Secondary chilled water pump Add inverter type speed drive (with 10 to 30% pump
driven by constant speed motor controlling sensor at strategic point downstream and at power
setting such that adequate pressure at low load
condition can be provided far away from cooling coil)
Conserve energy by optimizing fresh air intake
to select AHUs through CO2 monitoring
• Present System
– There are around 50 AHUs are installed in the
Hotel at various locations for air conditioning
– Typically in all AHU rooms there is fresh air
opening and fresh air is added constantly at
around 15 % of total circulated air to maintain
CO2 level in the air conditioned area
– Fresh air dampers are provided with manual
control and are kept open always irrespective of
actual fresh air requirement
Conserve energy by optimizing fresh air intake
to select AHUs through CO2 monitoring
• Fresh air supply to AHUs constitute
substantial heat load as the air is to be
conditioned from ambient temperature to
23-25oC and higher enthalpy due to
humidity
• CO2 level varies in the air conditioned area
due to operational changes and occupancy
• As per ASHRAE specification the CO2 level
in air conditioned area should not be more
than 1000 PPM
Conserve energy by optimizing fresh air intake
to select AHUs through CO2 monitoring
• Proposal
– Install motorised fresh air dampers in all AHU rooms
and automate with CO2 level in the return air
– CO2 sensors positioned in return air duct will measure
CO2 level and give feedback to motorised damper to
open or close through microprocessor or PLC control
• This automation will accrue the following
advantages:
– Avoiding manual operation
– Maintaining stipulated comfort level in air
conditioned area always
– Reduces substantial fresh air load for AHUs
Conserve energy by optimizing fresh air intake
to select AHUs through CO2 monitoring
Description Unit Formula Value
Present fresh air supply in all AHUs @ 15%
62000
fressh air supply CFM A
Proposed fresh air supply by saving of 50 % CFM B 31000
VLI load index for Delhi (annual) ton hrs/cfm C 17.594
D=B
Total fresh air load reduction considering xCX5000/87 3,11,309
average operation of 5000 hrs for all AHUs ton hrs 60
Power consumed per TR kW/TR E 0.85
Power cost Rs. F 8.5
G=DxEx
22,49,210.13
Recurring annual savings Rs. Lacs F
One time cost of implementation Rs. Lacs H 2500000
Payback months I=H/J x12 13
Energy Audit - Procedure
Vapour compression
• Investment Grade Audit
heat pump for hot
water generation • Detailed intensive modifications focusing on
potential costly ECO, ECMs requiring rigorous
On-site power energy study.
generation
Waste to energy
projects
Detailed Energy Audit
• Most Comprehensive & Time Consuming
• Use of hand held / stationary instruments
• Sophisticated Computer Simulations
• Carried out for:
– Evaluating Energy use
– Identifying Potential savings
– Recommending Energy Retrofits
– Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Energy
Retrofits
Renewable Energy Intervention for
HPB – Case Study
• Tapping waste heat sources available at the site would
provide substantial heat sources
• Solar and Heat Pumps coupled with the existing
systems would lead to lifecycle cost savings
• This eliminate the use of expensive commercial
energy for hot water generation.
• Therefore, the potential for savings could be from
50% to as high as 100%.
• Also, heat pumps are an efficient and cost effective
option for supplementary needs.
Renewable Energy Intervention for HPB –
Case Study
Renewable Energy Intervention for
HPB – Case Study
Electrical
Description Boiler Heat pump
heater
Input kW 10 10 10
Efficiency % (COP) 0.85 0.95 3.5
Heating output kW 8.5 9.5 35.0
ikW/kW of heating (only heating) 1.18 1.05 0.29
Solar PV cooling systems are versatile and can be used in various applications,
including residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. They are more commonly
employed for smaller cooling loads and can be integrated with existing cooling
systems.
[email protected] _ SC_COP28 55
Solar Thermal system - VAM
Average Solar Energy Available at the Location : 5.5 kWh/m2/day
Energy Production @ 50 % efficiency of the collector :
2.75 kWh/ m2 / day
Cooling production considering SE VAM @ COP of 0.7 :
1.925 kWh / m2 / day
For DE VAM @ COP of 1.2 : 3.3 kWh / m2 / day
Set Priorities