Introduction To Public Health
Introduction To Public Health
Introduction To Public Health
Introduction
Definition of terms
Health
“Persons are healthy when they are doing their activities with no apparent
symptoms of disease in them.” (Lay Point of view)
“The state of being free from illness or injury”. (The New Oxford Dictionary
of English)
“A measure of the state of the physical bodily Organs, and the ability of
the body as a whole to function. It refers to freedom from medically defined
diseases.” (Professional points of view)
“A state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely
the absence of disease or infirmity.” (The world Health Organization (WHO)
in1948)
As evident from the above definitions, health is multidimensional. The
WHO definition envisages three specific dimensions (physical, mental, and
social), some other dimensions like spiritual and emotional may also be
included.
Physical health- is concerned with anatomical integrity and physiological
functioning of the body. It means the ability to perform routine tasks
without any physical restriction. E.g., Physical fitness is needed to walk
from place to place.
Mental Health- is the ability to learn and think clearly and coherently. E.g.,
a person who is not mentally fit (retarded) could not learn something new
at a pace in which an ordinary normal person learns.
Social health- is the ability to make and maintain acceptable interaction
with other people. E.g. to celebrate during festivals; to mourn when a close
family member dies; to create and maintain friendship and intimacy, etc.
Emotional health - is the ability of expressing emotions in the appropriate
way, for example to fear, to be happy, and to be angry. The response of the
body should be congruent with that of the stimuli. Emotional health is
related to mental health and includes feelings. It also means maintaining
one’s own integrity in the presence of stressful situation such as tension,
depression and anxiety.
Recently, the WHO definition of health is facing different criticisms. The main
problematic aspects of the WHO definition have been summarized below.
Nowadays, some authors suggest that the WHO definition should be seen as an
inspirational goal rather than a real definition of health.
Instead of continuing to look for a new definition for substituting the WHO
definition, it is time to accept that the complexity of phenomenon obliges us to
have many definitions of health, among which no one will be truer, or more
comprehensive, or more exact than others, because each definition can only be
more or less useful for achieving some specific operational and knowledge
purposes in a specific context of application. Effectively many different scopes of
application are inside the clinical sciences: for example, planning public health
policies is very different from measuring individual’s health level before and after
a treatment, and assessing health among chronic patients may be very different
from doing it in acute diseases.
This newly proposed definition configures health as the capability to cope with
and to manage one’s own malaise and well-being conditions.
Illness
Public health
The concept of public health was being practiced in different times in different
places. Chinese medicine, Ayurvedic medicine in India (400 BC), Hippocrates in
Greece (460–377 BC) and Galen (AD 129–199) in Rome and their followers were
aware of the influences of season, diet, the winds and lifestyle for individual
people’s health.
Throughout the time there were different thinking about the cause of the
diseases and their respective treatments or prevention mechanisms. The
occurrence of different diseases like measles, influenza, small pox, syphilis,
dysentery, malaria, HIV/AIDS etc. in different times leads to the invention of
several thinking, concepts and instruments which contribute to the evolution of
the public health concept. Especially in 19th and 20th centuries different models,
that explains the causes of the diseases, become popular.
4| Introduction to PH handout for Medicine students;
By Wondimagegn W. (BSc., MPHE)
Nineteenth-century models
Each effort to prevent disease in the 19th century was based on one or the other
three theories of disease causality. These are:
1. Contagion theory
There were too many instances where people become ill regardless
of their isolation from human contact and
Too many others where brave souls nursed the dying and carried
their bodies to the graveyard yet remained well.
2. Supernatural theory
Proponents of this theory argue that supernatural forces cause disease. Disease
prevention measures based on this theory were important to the religious people.
The view among them was that disease is a punishment for transgression of
God’s laws. (i.e. the cause of the of disease is the sin practiced by people).
This theory held that disease results from wrong personal behavior. People
caused their own disease by living fully unhealthy. Hence, improper diet, lack of
exercise, poor hygiene and emotional tension become the focus of preventive
actions.
4. Miasma theory
This theory argues that disease is caused by the odor of decaying of organic
materials. It dates back to the Hippocratic idea that disease is related to climate.
It contrasted sharply from the other three theories since it conceptually
separated the source of the disease from the victim of the disease.
Twenty-century models
This theory held the notion that microorganisms cause diseases and it is possible
to control diseases using antibiotics and vaccines. There was criticism on this
theory by Thomas Mckeown that stated as the incidence of all major infectious
diseases begun to fall several decades before the introduction of vaccines and
antibiotics. Thus rising of living standards was responsible for the reduction of
disease not the discovery of antibiotics and vaccines.
This holds that unhealthy lifestyles are causes for diseases. This hypothesis
blames stress, lack of exercise, the use of alcohol and tobacco improper nutrition
for most chronic diseases. This theory rejects the notion central to the classic
germ theory, that a single disease has a single etiology. Instead they emphasize
the interrelatedness of many variables in disease causality, principally those
under the control of the individual. The critics surrounding this theory state that
the change for lifestyle requires overall social change.
It is also called the web of disease causation. The theory express that there are
multiple factors for a cause of a single disease entity. But it is incapable of
directing a truly effective disease prevention policy as the theories it replaces. Its
shortcomings are it gives few clues about how to prevent disease
Some view health as a right similar to justice or political freedom. The WHO
constitution sates that “. . . the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of
health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction
of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition”.