Lajabu V Kasitomu Anor (Personal Injury 855 of 2014) 2017 MWHC 73 (20 June 2017)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI
PRINCIPAL REGISTRY
PERSONAL INJURY NUMBER 855 OF 2014
BETWEEN
CHIFUNDO LAJABU (THROUGH ALICE LAJABU HIS MOTHER)...................PLAINTIFF
AND
EKLEZIO KASITOMU..................................................................FIRST DEFENDANT
CHARTER INSURANCE COMPANY.........................................SECOND DEFENDANT
RULING ON ASSESMENT OF DAMAGES

CORAM:
HONOURABLE MZONDE MVULA : ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

PRESIDING MR. KAGUNDU : OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
RESPONDENTS : ABSENT (WITHOUT REASON)
MRS J. CHILIMAMPUNGA : COURT CLERK & OFFICIAL INTEPRETER
ORDER
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff took out a writ of summons on 29 th August 2014 claiming negligence which occurred
on the heels of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on or about 2nd July 2014. By Judgment of
the Court, the applicant succeeded in damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenities of
life, which damages to be assessed by the registrar. Costs for the action to be borne by the
defend ant. Matter was set down for assessment on 1 st June 2017 at 11.00am, on which date
both defendants were absent. On proof of due service, we proceed to deliver the order as follows:
2.0 THE LAW
In civil cases the burden of proving negligence lies on the one alleging the same, mostly the
plaintiff. The burden of proof lies upon the party who substantially asserts the affirmation of the
issue See Robins v. National Trust Company [1927] AC 515. In Malawian jurisprudence the
standard of proof in civil cases is on the balance of probability. See Msachi v. Attorney General
[1991] 14 MLR 287.
The issue for determination is how much the plaintiff should be paid under each head of the claim
herein.
2.1 Damages for pain and suffering
The applicant submits that the court should look at the figure that will put the plaintiff in a position
he would have been had the tort not been committed. See Livingston v. Raywards Coal Co.
(1880) 5 A.C 25. The Court said on p.39:
"where any injury is to be compensated by damages in settling a sum of money to be given as

damages, you should as nearly as possible get at a sum of money which will put the party who
has been injured in the same position he would have been if he had not sustained the injury for
which he is now claiming compensation"
2.2 The injuries
During evidence given viva voce, the applicant who was 16 years old at the time of the accident,
submitted that he had suffered an open fracture on the first metatarsal, as well as multiple
bruises on the right leg. This was provided on exhibit CL l (a) the medical report. The same
provided level of incapacity at 20%. Citing the most recent case in this submission, the applicant
draws reference to the case of Elida Bello v. Prime Insurance Company Limited civil cause
177 of 2012. The plaintiff in that case sustained a deep cut wound on the left leg and another on
the head. She was awarded the sum of K2, 500,000.00 on 14th January 2013. In a related
development, in Elizabeth Mmadi and Magret Mmadi v. Reunion Insurance Company
personal Injury cause 385 of 2011, the first applicant suffered cut wounds and injuries. She was
awarded K550, 000.00 for pain and suffering. This was made on 3rd May 2012. In Wonderson
Mbeta v. Steve Adam and Prime Insurance Company Limited civil cause 178 of 2011, the
plaintiff suffered a deep cut wound on the left side of the head, bruises on the right foot and ear,
and cut in the right eye. He was awarded K 2,000,000.00 as damages for pain suffering and loss
of amenities of life. This was on 20th January 2013.
In the instant case, it was observed that the plaintiff sustained a deep cut wound under his foot
that required 6 stitches to suture, bruises on his leg and a major sprain on top of the right foot.
This necessitated the applicant to wear a protective boot for the bones to come back together.
The plaintiff is a form 3 student at Soche Excel who said he is feeling better despite suffering
numbness if he stays idle for long periods. Considering that the plaintiff is aged 19 and with
chance to heal somehow as he matures as he is still developing, the injury is to the leg which is
almost fully recovered as applicant was able to climb the steps and give evidence at Court as
well as walk to and from school, I feel the sum of k1, 400, 000 would adequately compensate him
with 20% incapacitation for damages for
2
pain suffering and loss of amenities of life. The decided cases which the applicant submitted for
us to consider to mete out a higher award were considered. However looking at the injuries
sustained, against the decided cases to persuade me to award higher quantum, to me, did not
justify the said amounts in this case. I have distinguished the cases and injuries sustained, and I
feel my judicial discretion which I must exercise judiciously, against other decided cases I looked
up to guide me, led me to the conclusion arrived at in the present set up.
2.3 Special damages
The plaintiff submitted under oath in exhibit to have spent k10, 500 for the medical report and K3,
000 for the police report. I shall award the same to the tune of K13, 500.00
3.0 Conclusion
Having heard the case for the plaintiff which is uncontroverted, I shall award the plaintiff the sum
of K 1,400,000 as damages for pain suffering and loss of amenities of life, the sum of K10, 500
as special damages for cost of medical report, the sum of K 3,000 as cost of police report
bringing the total to K1, 413,500.00
3.1 Costs
Costs are in the discretion of the court. In most cases, costs follow the event. In this case
therefore, I wiII award costs to the plaintiff, who succeeded in his claim against the defendants.
3.2 Right of Appeal
Any party dissatisfied with the assessment ruling can appeal to the Judge in Chambers within 30
days of this order.
Made in Court this 20th June 2017
_______________
Mzonde Mvula
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
-

Lajabu V Kasitomu Anor (Personal Injury 855 of 2014) 2017 MWHC 73 (20 June 2017)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lajabu V Kasitomu Anor (Personal Injury 855 of 2014) 2017 MWHC 73 (20 June 2017)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lajabu V Kasitomu Anor (Personal Injury 855 of 2014) 2017 MWHC 73 (20 June 2017)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI

RULING ON ASSESMENT OF DAMAGES

HONOURABLE MZONDE MVULA : ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

2.0 THE LAW

2.1 Damages for pain and suffering

"where any injury is to be compensated by damages in settling a sum of money to be given as

2.2 The injuries

2.3 Special damages

3.2 Right of Appeal

Made in Court this 20th June 2017

You might also like