L.Lazar EEMJ Vol.8 3 2009
L.Lazar EEMJ Vol.8 3 2009
L.Lazar EEMJ Vol.8 3 2009
net/publication/279688628
CITATION READS
1 589
3 authors, including:
Liliana Lazar
Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi
62 PUBLICATIONS 494 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Liliana Lazar on 11 September 2016.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
The etching of iron materials in sulphuric acid solutions allows the dissolution of the iron oxides with formation of iron sulphates.
The relatively low solubility of the formed sulphates imposes their separation for avoiding the contamination of the etching bath,
as well as for preventing the environmental pollution through the wastewater. Within the flow sheet of the processing of the hot or
cold rolled steel, a stage of separation by crystallization of iron sulphate is foreseen. The resulted iron(II) sulphate does not meet
the qualities of the technical product (FeSO4.7H2O), fact that limits its utilization.
In this paper, the possibility of recovering the iron(II) sulphate resulted from preliminary processing of the solution from etching
of rolled steels is studied. The re-crystallization of iron(II) sulphate from saturated solutions was investigated in order to reduce
the free acidity and the content of iron(III) sulphate, as well as to enhance the granulometry spectra. The re-crystallization was
performed in two stages at the temperature of 283.15 K. The obtained product meets the quality requirements for technical iron(II)
sulphate approved by the STAS 2189-80.
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed: e-mail: [email protected]
Lazăr et al./Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 8 (2009), 3, 541-547
FeO + H2SO4 = FeSO4 + H2O (1) Table 2 are presented the limit concentrations of the
pollutants in the residual fluxes (ICCP BREF, 2001;
Fe2O3 + 3 H2SO4 = Fe2(SO4)3 + 3 H2O (2)
2006).
Fe3O4 + 4 H2SO4 = Fe2(SO4)3 + FeSO4 + 4 H2O (3) For the recovery of free sulphuric acid from
spent pickle from sulphuric acid etching lines, the
heptahydrate crystallization process (FeSO4.7H2O), is
By using corrosion inhibitors and sulphuric
usually applied in industry (Cheremisinoff, 2003;
acid solutions of concentrations lower than 25 %
IPPC BREF, 2001). With respect to the type of
H2SO4, the metal cracking as a result of released
cooling, the following heptahydrate crystallization
hydrogen that diffuses in the metal surface layer may
processes for regeneration are available:
be avoided as is shown in Eq. (4):
crystallization with indirect cooling, cyclone
crystallization and vacuum cooling crystallization.
Fe + H2SO4 = FeSO4 + H2 (4)
The treatment of spent pickle solution by
crystallization avoids the need to neutralize free acid;
The residual solutions resulted from etching of furthermore the iron is precipitated as heptahydrate
the rolled steels contain 40 up to 80 g/L FeSO4. The and does not have to be subjected to neutralizing
relative low solubility of the formed sulphates either. Within the crystallization processes, a
imposes their separation (Oniciu and Grünwald, 1980; significant enhancement of the wastewater released
Vanya and Mets, 2007). The sulphuric acid recovery and a reduction of the salt load can be achieved.
process by crystallization is based on the solubility With this purpose, the etching solution is
relations of water, sulphuric acid and iron sulphate. subjected to concentration by vacuum evaporation at
Iron sulphate is more soluble at increasing temperatures higher than 315.15 K, followed by a
temperatures and crystallizes out of saturated crystallization process through cooling up to 278.15 –
solutions when being cooled (McLay and Reinhard, 283.15 K. The formed suspension is separated by
2007; Szép, 2000). sedimentation and centrifugation.
The indicators of the etching of rolled steels in
solutions of sulphuric acid are presented Table 1. In
Emissions in air
Wastewaters, wastes
Processed
rolled steel
Table 1. The indicators of the etching of rolled steels in solutions of sulphuric acid
542
Researches on possibility to recovery and reuse the iron(II) sulphate from etching of rolled steels
Table 2. Best alternative technologies (BAT) decisions for etching in solutions of sulphuric acid
Usually, the iron(II) sulphate does not meet the Analyzing the phase diagram, one see that
qualities of a technical product (FeSO4.7H2O), due to depending on the temperature and concentration of
the fact that it contains iron(III) sulphate, free the solution, the iron(II) sulphate may crystallize
sulphuric acid, untransformed iron oxides and other under the shape of three hydrates: iron sulphate
impurities above the limits admitted by STAS 2189- heptahydrate FeSO4.7H2O (H7), at temperatures lower
80. All these limit the use of this product, reason for than 329.75 K; iron sulphate tetrahydrate FeSO4.4H2O
which appears the need to investigate the possibility (H4), at temperatures ranged between 329.75 – 337.55
to recovery it for obtaining a quality product that may K and iron sulphate monohydrate FeSO4.H2O (H1), at
be further utilized for water purification, for pigments temperatures higher than 337.55 K. The domain of
manufacture, for catalyst synthesis, in textile industry, the unsaturated solutions decreases at temperatures
etc. above 337 K, when iron sulphate monohydrate
The recovery and reuse of the iron(II) sulphate crystallizes.
resulted through crystallization of the residual At the environmental temperature, the stabile
solutions from rolled steels etching process, may be form is iron sulphate heptahydrate. For obtaining the
carried-out throughout the following possibilities stabile form, the crystallization process should be
(IPPC BREF, 2001): performed at temperatures lower than 329.75 K, the
a) conditioning by re-crystallization; value corresponding to P1. The domain corresponding
b) ammonia conversion yielded in solutions of to crystallization of heptahydrate is delimited by the
ammonia sulphate with 36 – 37 % (NH4)2SO4 and points EP1RQ.
synthetic magnetite (Fe3O4); The laboratory experimental research
c) decomposing using concentrated sulphuric acid concerning the recovery of iron(II) sulphate obtained
with formation of iron(III) sulphate and sulphur by crystallization of residual solutions from rolled
dioxide; steel etching was carried-out through re-
d) thermal decomposing leading to formation of crystallization in two stages. Within a first stage of
sulphur dioxide; crystallization, a solution almost saturated of iron(II)
e) production of several pigments based on sulphate (35 % FeSO4), was prepared de at
iron(III) oxide. temperature of 328.15 K, using the iron(II) sulphate
In this paper, the possibility of conditioning resulted from etching and water (AB line). The
the iron(II) sulphate resulted from etching of rolled solution was further cooled up to la 283.15 K aiming
steels in order to reduce the free acidity and the at crystallization of the stable form (H7). The
content of iron(III) sulphate, as well as to enhance the crystallized iron(II) sulphate was separated by
granulometry spectra is studied aiming at achieving a filtration, dried and analyzed by chemical point of
product that meets the quality requirements for view. In the second stage of re-crystallization, a
technical iron(II) sulphate imposed by the STAS solution of iron(II) sulphate was prepared at
2189-80. temperature of 328.15 K, using the iron(II) sulphate
from the first stage of re-crystallization. The solution
2. Experimental was further cooled to 283.15 K, leading to
crystallization heptahydrate that was subjected to
The establishment of the technologic regime some stages including filtration, drying and chemical
for crystallization of iron(II) sulphate was performed characterization.
on the basis of analysis of the solid – liquid phase The process of crystallization of iron(II)
equilibrium in the system H2O – FeSO4 (Szép and sulphate heptahydrate is plotted through the line BL
Ivaniciuc 1998; Szép, 2000). The equilibrium from phase equilibrium diagram corresponding to the
diagram plotted in the coordinates temperature– system [H2O – FeSO4] – Fig. 2. It was chosen to
concentration of FeSO4 in solution is presented in Fig. obtain the saturated solution at temperature of 328.15
2. K in order not to exceed the crystallization domain of
543
Lazăr et al./Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 8 (2009), 3, 541-547
iron(II) sulphate heptahydrate (EP1RQ). The and free acidity. In the pilot or industrial plants, the
saturated solution correspondent to the point B is stock solution may be reused in the process of iron(II)
cooled with occurrence of separation of the solid sulphate crystallization from the residual solution
phase that evolves from point R to point M. The resulted from rolled steels etching.
liquid phase evolves from point B to point N. The block diagram of the experimental
Concordant to NLM, the stock solution resulted from protocol is depicted in Fig. 3. The experimental
the crystallization process contains around 17 % researches were done on laboratory equipment
FeSO4. consisting in a glass reactor foreseen with a mixing
It is not recommended to perform the system with variable rotating speed, inserted in a
conditioning by re-crystallization with recirculation of thermostatic system.
the stock solution after the stages of separation in the The iron(II) sulphate crystallized in each stage
case of preparation of the saturated solutions, due to was decanted, filtered and dried in a dryer at 373.15
the fact that this needs processing related reduction of (±2) K. The samples obtained in each re-
the iron(III) sulphate to iron(II) sulphate and crystallization stage have been chemically analyzed in
neutralization of the sulphuric acid. order to determine content of the iron(II) and iron
Thus, the quality of the iron(II) sulphate is (III) sulphate, as well as of free sulphuric acid.
influenced by accumulation of the iron(III) sulphate
Fig. 2. Phase diagram of solid – liquid equilibrium in the system H2O – FeSO4
(hydrates composition: H7 = 54.7 % FeSO4 şi H7 = 67.8 % FeSO4).
544
Researches on possibility to recovery and reuse the iron(II) sulphate from etching of rolled steels
Crystallized
iron(II) sulphate
Separation by filtration
Stock solution (I)
iron(II) sulphate
(re-crystallization I)
Separation by filtration
Stock solution (II)
iron(II) sulphate
(re-crystallization II)
75
In every attempt, for achievement of a
%wt.
50
saturated solution, the ratio water/iron(II) sulphate
25 from etching was calculated on the basis of mass
balance taking into account the following values:
0 volume of experimental reactor (1000 mL), space
FeSO4.7H2O Fe2(SO4)3 H2SO4, free
factor ( = 0.8) and solution concentration of 35 %
crystallization 96.7 1 0.36 FeSO4 (respectively, solution density equal to 1269.5
kg/m3).
Fig. 4. The chemical composition of iron(II) sulphate The mass balance for obtaining the solution of
resulted from etching iron(II) sulphate necessary for re-crystallization
process is presented in Table 4.
545
Lazăr et al./Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 8 (2009), 3, 541-547
Table 4. The mass balance for obtaining the saturated solution of iron(II)
Molecular
Component weight, kg/kmol Components amounts
75
economics of these processes, however, usually are
%wt.
546
Researches on possibility to recovery and reuse the iron(II) sulphate from etching of rolled steels
After the second stage of re-crystallization, the IPPC BREF, (2006), Integrated Pollution Prevention and
content in iron(II) sulphate attained 98.68 % Control – Reference Document on Best Available
FeSO4.7H2O, the final product not exhibiting free Techniques for the Surface Treatment of Metals and
acidity. In this case, the content in iron(III) sulphate is Plastics, European Commission, August 2006, on line
at: www.anpm.ro.
of 0.3 % Fe2(SO4)3. In these conditions a product McLay Dedietrich W.J., Reinhard F.P., (2007), Waste
corresponding to S quality group imposed by STAS minimization and recovery technologies, Metal
2189-80 can be obtained. Finishing, 105, 715-742.
The experimental results show that application Oniciu L., Grünwald M., (1980), Corrosion and its
of re-conditioning by double re-crystallization leads reduction in chemical industry, Scientific and
to high quality technical sulphate, which does not Encyclopaedic Publishing House, Bucharest.
exhibit free acidity. STAS 2189-80, Technical iron(II) sulphate. Technical
quality requirements and methods of analysis.
Szép Al., Ivaniciuc M., (1998), Technology of inorganic
References
salts (laboratory handbook), Technical University
Cheremisinoff N.P., (2003), Handbook of Solid Waste Printing House, Iaşi.
Management and Waste Minimization Technologies, Szép Al., (2000), Crystallization of salts from aqueous
Butterworth-Heinemann Publishing House, Oxford. solutions, Cermi Publishing House, Iasi.
IPPC BREF, (2001), Integrated pollution prevention and Vanya P., Mets K., (2007), Feasibility of regenerating
control – Reference Document on Best Available etching acids as part of the metal-etching process,
Techniques in the Ferrous Metals Processing Industry, Metallurgist, 51, 186-188.
Romanian Ministry of Environment and Waters, Wiśniewski J., Wiśniewska G., (1997), Acids and iron salts
National Environmental Protection Agency, December removal from rinsing water after metal etching,
2001, on line at: www.anpm.ro. Desalination, 109, 1997, 187-193.
547