Polyurethanes
Polyurethanes
Polyurethanes
Dr. Ulrich Meier-Westhues, born 1955, studied Chemistry European Coatings Tech Files
at the RWTH Aachen, Germany. After four years with
Herberts, Wuppertal, he joined Bayer BU Coatings and
Colorants in 1989. Today he is responsible for Business
Development Polyisocyanates in the Coatings, Adhesives Ulrich Meier-Westhues
and Sealants BU of Bayer MaterialScience, Leverkusen.
Polyurethanes
Coatings, Adhesives and Sealants
ISBN 3-87870-334-1
ISBN 978-3-87870-334-1
Ulrich Meier-Westhues
Polyurethanes
Coatings, Adhesives
and Sealants
Ulrich Meier-Westhues
Polyurethanes
Coatings, Adhesives
and Sealants
Ulrich Meier-Westhues
Polyurethanes – Coatings, Adhesives and Sealants
Hannover: Vincentz Network, 2007
(European Coatings Tech Files)
ISBN 3-87870-334-1
ISBN 978-3-87870-334-1
ISBN 3-87870-334-1
ISBN 978-3-87870-334-1
No more lost in the lab ! Register now free-of-charge for the most
comprehensive buyers' guide especially featuring a singular
compilation of raw material data for the coatings, printing inks,
adhesives, sealants and construction chemicals industries. Search
for more than 1,000 suppliers of raw materials, production
technology, occupational/ environmental safety and other services.
W W W. C O A T I N G S . D E / F O R M U L A T I O N C E N T E R
Foreword
Developing products that meet market needs, devising efficient and environmen-
tally friendly manufacturing processes, and asserting a position in the global com-
petitive environment – these are the drivers for innovation and technological ad-
vancement. Coating, adhesive and sealant technologies are playing an increas-
ingly significant role in this regard.
Polyurethane chemistry has had a considerable impact in these industrial appli-
cations, and in many cases has been the key to technology implementation. The
enormous diversity and possible combinations of polyurethane raw materials
result in the impressive variability of their properties. Their extraordinary adapt-
ability to meet the most diverse requirements enables the development of specific,
customized solutions.
Polyurethane chemistry has become established throughout the world in many
coating, adhesive and sealant applications, and its potential for further development
is by no means exhausted. New applications are continually being discovered, and
the polyurethane raw material product offerings are being systematically optimized
to meet growing demands.
While solventborne formulations have occupied center stage for many years, the
significance of solvent-free, waterborne or UV-cured systems is steadily increasing.
In this respect, polyurethane chemistry demonstrates that environmental improve-
ments, better quality and economy need not be mutually exclusive, but can ideally
be synergistic.
Polyurethane raw materials were first used in coating and adhesive applications 50
years ago. Since that time, the market has developed dramatically. Steady, above-
average growth is also expected over the coming decades. The reason for this is
both the extraordinary potential for innovation offered by this chemistry, as well
as the increasing globalization of the industry. The result is an expansion of produc-
tion capacities worldwide.
In this context, the chemical industry’s voluntary commitment to “Responsible
Care” made at the 2002 World Summit for Sustainable Development in Johannes-
burg takes on additional significance. Lawmakers and industry are both faced with
meeting and solving today’s global ecological challenges.
The fiftieth anniversary of polyurethanes has provided the impetus for writing this
book, which gives a comprehensive overview of the potential offered by polyure-
thane chemistry, and builds on the book “Polyurethanes for Coatings” published in
2001 by Manfred Bock and his team of authors. The content has been updated and
expanded to include adhesives and new areas of application. The book opens with
In line with the publisher’s guidelines, the authors have identified trade-
marked product names by enclosing them within quotation marks “ ”. While
every effort has been made to identify all products in this way, there can be
no guarantee of completeness. If a product is not identified thus, it should
not be construed to imply that the name can be used freely. It is also possible
in individual cases that unprotected product names may inadvertently have
been designated as registered trademarks. If the reader intends to use these
terms, he must himself investigate the associated proprietary rights. No li-
ability can be assumed for such usage. The same applies to the attribution
of product names to certain manufacturers. This does not necessarily imply
that the trademarks are the property of the respective manufacturers.
It should also be noted that the authors have expressed their personal views,
based upon their own knowledge. This does not absolve the reader of the
responsibility to perform their own tests with respect to the uses and ap-
plications of the various processes or products described herein, and/or to
obtain additional advice regarding the same. Any liability of the authors or
of Bayer MaterialScience AG is excluded, inasmuch as and to the extent
permitted by law, subject to all legal interpretations.
Contents
1 Introduction....................................................................... 14
1.1 Historical aspects................................................................. 14
1.2 Definition of scope.............................................................. 16
2 Economic aspects and market analysis............................ 17
2.1 Coatings............................................................................... 17
2.2 Adhesives and sealants........................................................ 20
3 Chemical principles........................................................... 25
3.1 Di- and triisocyanates.......................................................... 25
3.2 Isocyanate reactions............................................................. 28
3.3 Polyisocyanates................................................................... 30
3.4 Prepolymers......................................................................... 35
3.5 Blocked polyisocyanates..................................................... 35
3.6 Hydrophilically modified polyisocyanates.......................... 43
3.7 Coreactants.......................................................................... 45
3.7.1 Polyacrylate polyols............................................................ 46
3.7.2 Polyester polyols................................................................. 47
3.7.3 Polyether polyols................................................................. 49
3.7.4 Polycarbonate polyols......................................................... 49
3.7.5 Polycaprolactone polyols..................................................... 49
3.7.6 Polyurethane polyols........................................................... 50
3.7.7 Polyamines.......................................................................... 50
3.8 Aqueous dispersions............................................................ 52
3.8.1 Polyurethane dispersions..................................................... 52
3.8.2 Polyacrylate dispersions...................................................... 55
3.9 Urethane acrylates............................................................... 57
4 Coating technology principles.......................................... 62
4.1 Aspects of one- and two-component coating technology.... 62
4.2 Solventborne and solvent-free systems............................... 65
4.3 Waterborne systems............................................................. 67
4.4 Process technology.............................................................. 71
4.4.1 Processing of one-component polyurethane coatings......... 71
4.4.2 Processing of two-component polyurethane coatings......... 71
4.5 Polyurethane powder coatings............................................. 76
4.6 Radiation curing.................................................................. 78
4.6.1 Technology and coating formulation................................... 78
1 Introduction
The range of applications was broadened later with the introduction of products
based on aliphatic diisocyanates, initially hexamethylene diisocyanate. “Desmodur
N” was the first product of this type, and was launched in the early 1960s. Gradually,
the two-component (DD) coatings made by combining polyisocyanates (“Desmo-
dur”) with polyols (“Desmophen”) replaced the traditional alkyd coatings, first in
the field of large vehicle production. The driving force was the quality of the coat-
ings which, even when dried under mild conditions, matched the performance of
coatings which had been baked. This is important when coating large vehicles (air-
planes, rail wagons and buses) as their size makes baking impossible.
In the 1970s, it was found that the quality of automotive refinish coatings could be
substantially improved with the help of polyurethane chemistry. By adding poly-
isocyanates based on isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) to the medium-oil alkyd
resins mainly used at that time, the hardness, overcoatability and gasoline resis-
tance of the resulting coatings could be improved significantly. Today, two-com-
ponent polyurethane coatings have almost completely replaced alkyd resin chem-
istry in this segment.
The broad range of applications for polyurethanes in coatings was quickly recog-
nized. Other examples of applications include wood finishing, corrosion protection
and construction, as well as textile coating. Another advance has been the develop-
ment of two-component metering technology. The breakthrough in automotive
OEM finishing occurred in the mid-1980s, and since this time, plastic coatings have
become a further domain for polyurethanes.
Polyurethane adhesives came onto the market in the 1950s with the development
of the hydroxyl polyurethanes and the first trifunctional isocyanate crosslinker,
“Desmodur R”. The early 1960s also saw the development of plasticizer-resistant
hydroxyl polyurethanes, which laid the foundation for the success of these products
in shoe manufacture.
Solvent-free polyurethane reactive adhesives have been used since the 1970s, first
in automotive production, and then in the manufacture of laminated films and
sandwich elements. They were later joined by reactive sealants. Since the 1990s,
polyurethane-based reactive and aqueous dispersion adhesives have gained market
share in furniture manufacture, bookbinding and shoe sole production.
The process of substituting traditional technologies in coatings, adhesives and
sealants with polyurethane is still incomplete, and can be observed occurring
around the world [4, 5]. Against a background of increasingly demanding quality
requirements, ever more stringent environmental legislation, and cost optimization
of the end-product manufacturing processes, there has been growth in the use of
low-solvent, solvent-free, waterborne and radiation-curing formulations of one-
and two-component polyurethane systems. Bearing in mind current concomitant
References
[1] DRP 728 981 (1937) I. G. Farben
[2] O. Bayer, Angew. Chem. 59 (1947) 257
[3] D. Dieterich, Chemie in unserer Zeit, 24 (1990) 135
[4] M. Bock, et al., Globalisierung der Fahrzeugindustrie - eine Herausforderung bei der
Lackrohstoffentwicklung, Farbe und Lack 102 (9) (1996) 132
[5] M. Bock, H. Meiss, H.-U. Meier-Westhues, Globalisierung aus Sicht eines Lackroh
stoffproduzenten, 6. DFO-Automobiltagung, September 1998, Weimar, Berichtsband
Nr. 38, 1 ff.
[6] Bayer Archiv
[7] G. Oertel in: Kunststoff-Handbuch, G. W. Becker, D. Braun (Hrsg.), 3. Auflage, Band 7:
Polyurethane. Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien 1993
2.1 Coatings
World production of coatings for industrial applications, i.e. the total production
of coating systems – excluding dispersions for architectural coatings, totaled 13.0
million tons in 2005 [1]. This represented global consumption of 8.2 million tons
of coating raw materials or binders in supply form, corresponding to a value of
EUR 14.4 billion.
Material and regional distribution
The distribution of world coating raw material consumption is fairly balanced, with
one third going to Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA), just under a third
going to the Americas (NAFTA and LATAM), and slightly more than a third going
to Asia-Pacific (APAC). It should be emphasized here that APAC’s share of global
coating raw materials consumption has grown in the last ten years from 27 % to
approximately 37 % [1] (Figure 2.1).
The distribution by raw material type and volume shows that the traditional sys-
tems, such as alkyd resins, wax-free polyesters, amino and phenolic resins and
nitrocellulose, are still of great importance. In 2005, these product groups accounted
for just over 40 % of world consumption. However, there is a clear trend toward
higher-quality modern raw materials. For example, in the past ten years, the propor-
tion of polyurethane coating raw materials in global consumption has risen from
about 9 to 13 %, equivalent to 1.05 million tons.
The volume of waterborne coating resins, including those for cathodic electrode-
position (CED), from all chemical raw material classes totaled 8 %, as did the
volume of all types of powder coating resins. UV-curing resins now make up 3 %
of the world’s coating raw material consumption (Figure 2.2).
The distribution by value across all coating raw material classes shows that the
traditional systems now account for just 30 %. Polyurethane coating raw materials
hold a share of 18 %, worth EUR 2.6 billion, which shows that these raw materials
are used primarily in those market segments with more exacting quality require-
ments. In terms of value, waterborne coating resins have a share of approximately
12 %, with powder coating resins accounting for 9 %. UV-curing resins comprise
approx. 7 % of global consumption (Figure 2.3).
Figure 2.2: World consumption in 2005 of coating raw materials by product type
(volume), total: 8.2 million tons
Figure 2.3: World consumption in 2005 of coating raw materials by product type (value),
total: Euro 14.4 billions
Components
The main components of polyurethane coating raw materials are polyisocyanates
and polyols such as polyacrylates, polyesters and polyethers. The 1.05 million tons
of polyurethane coating raw materials used worldwide are distributed as follows:
• Polyisocyanates: 300,000 tons
• Polyacrylates: 370,000 tons
• Polyesters: 330,000 tons
• Polyethers and others: 50,000 tons
The key polyisocyanates used in coating raw materials are the aliphatic polyiso-
cyanates and prepolymers based on hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), isophorone
diisocyanate (IPDI) and dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (H12MDI), the aromatic
isocyanates toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI)
and the derivatives of these diisocyanates.
Fields of application
The main field of application for coating raw materials (excluding dispersions for
architectural coatings) in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA) is the construc-
tion industry with 28 %. This is followed by general industrial coatings with 24 %.
After wood and furniture coating with 14 %, automotive finishing and corrosion
protection each hold a roughly equal share of around 10 % (Figure 2.4).
The weighting is different if one considers only polyurethane coating raw materials,
total consumption of which in EMEA in 2005 amounted to 490,000 tons. The most
important fields of application in EMEA are wood and furniture coating and automo-
tive finishing with 30 % and 25 % respectively. They are followed by general indus-
trial coatings with 15 %. This shows clearly that high-quality polyurethane raw
Figure 2.4: Consumption of coating raw materials EMEA in 2005 by area of application,
total: 2.7 million tons
materials are preferred for applications with more exacting requirements in terms
of quality and durability – and these are correspondingly in a higher price segment
(Figure 2.5).
Market forecasts
For the coming years, annual market growth of some 5 % is forecast for polyure-
thane coating raw materials. It is expected that growth in the Asia-Pacific region
(APAC) will be above average at up to 10 %, whereas the European and North
American markets will grow at an average of 3 to 4 %. The market for polyurethane
coating raw materials is expected to reach a volume of over 1.3 million tons world-
wide by the year 2010.
It is expected that, especially in Europe, the Middle East, Africa and the Americas,
most of this growth will be accounted for by waterborne polyurethane coating raw
materials. By contrast, in Asia-Pacific, solventborne polyurethane coating raw
materials will continue to post strong growth.
Figure 2.5: Consumption of polyurethane coating raw materials in EMEA in 2005 by area
of application, total: 490,000 tons
If the total consumption of adhesives and sealants is broken down by the underly-
ing raw material classes, the diversification of the chemistry used in the adhesive
and sealant industry becomes apparent. In addition to the polyurethane-based raw
materials, natural products and a multitude of polymer materials can be used to
formulate adhesive and sealant systems. Polyurethanes account for around 9 % of
the total adhesives raw material market [4, 5] (Figure 2.7, page 24).
In recent years, however, the more complex application profiles in adhesive pro-
cesses have led to growing demand for high-quality adhesive and sealant systems.
Alongside other adhesive raw materials in particular, the polyurethanes and systems
based on that chemistry are benefiting due to their outstanding property profile
compared with other adhesive raw materials (Figure 2.8 and Figure 2.9, page 24).
Although solventborne adhesives and sealants are still traditionally used in some
applications, industry’s departure from these systems to ensure compliance with
VOC guidelines has been facilitated by the development of waterborne polyure-
thane raw materials and raw materials that are entirely solvent-free. Additionally,
new raw materials, such as silane-terminated polymers, satisfy the market demand
for tailor-made solutions, both for adhesives and sealants.
Figure 2.6: World consumption in 2005 of adhesives and sealants by region (volume),
total: approx. 10 million tons [2]
Figure 2.7: World consumption in 2005 of raw materials for adhesives and sealants by
chemical class (volume), total: approx. 5 million tons (dry) [4, 5]
Figure 2.8: Consumption of raw materials for adhesives and sealants in EMEA in 2005 by
application (volume), total: approx. 3.3 million tons (supply form) [6]
Figure 2.9: Consumption in 2005 of polyurethane raw materials for adhesives and sealants
in EMEA in 2005 by application (volume), total: approx. 0.2 million tons (supply form) [6]
*Sealants excl. transportation
Components
The main components of polyurethanes for adhesives and sealants are isocyanates,
polyisocyanates and prepolymers, and polyols such as polyesters or polyethers. The
most important isocyanates, polyisocyanates and prepolymers for adhesive and
sealant raw materials are based on the aromatic diphenylmethane diisocyanate
(MDI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI), as well as on the aliphatic hexamethylene
diisocyanate (HDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), dicyclohexylmethane diiso-
cyanate (H12MDI), and the corresponding derivatives of these diisocyanates.
Polyesters may have an aliphatic, aromatic or araliphatic structure, vary in chain
length, and exhibit amorphous or crystalline properties. Polyethers can be varied
to yield the desired property profile through the choice of starter or chain-building
monomers.
The total world market of all polyurethane raw materials for adhesives and sealants
(including polymer reaction products) amounts to approx. 450,000 tons (dry) [4, 5].
Fields of application
The main field of application for adhesive and sealant raw materials in Europe, the
Middle East and Africa (EMEA) is the packaging segment (approx. 34 %; 3.3 million
tons), followed by pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSA, 16 %), the construction indus-
try (16 %), transportation (12 %), sealants (7 %), furniture manufacture (6 %), assem-
bly (4 %), bookbinding (<3 %) and disposable products (<2 %). Household/do-it-
yourself (DIY) applications and shoe manufacture each have a share of less than 1%.
Consideration of just the polyurethane-based adhesive and sealant raw materials
provides a completely different picture. Of the total market of approximately
190,000 tons, around 30 % is attributable to transportation, 18 % to sealants, 17 %
to packaging, 16 % to furniture and 12 % to construction. The remaining 7 % is
distributed between assembly, shoes, pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSA), house-
hold/DIY applications, disposable products and bookbinding. This shows clearly
that high-quality polyurethane adhesive and sealant raw materials are preferred for
applications with more exacting requirements in terms of quality and durability –
and these are correspondingly in a higher price segment (Figure 2.9).
Market forecasts
Adhesive and sealant applications in important industry segments such as transpor-
tation, construction, assembly (electronics) and furniture will see global growth at a
rate of between 2 and 5 % in the coming years. Regional differences are evident.
Depending on the industry segment, above-average growth of 4 to 8 % is anticipated
for the APAC region, while rather more moderate growth is expected in the remain-
ing regions (EMEA: approx. 3 %; NAFTA: approx. 1.5 %) [7].
The same magnitude of growth is expected in the markets for adhesive and sealant
raw materials. At least in Western Europe, a shift is anticipated in the adhesive
technologies used. Due to statutory regulations (VOC), the share of raw materials
for use in solventborne adhesives will drop significantly, with a proportional rise
in the share of materials for aqueous adhesives or entirely solvent-free systems. For
the time being, the less developed regions such as Eastern Europe, the Middle East
and Africa (MEA), LATAM and APAC do not anticipate substitution of the sol-
ventborne adhesive systems.
The relocation of entire production segments and manufacturing units from the
developed countries to emerging economies such as the Czech Republic, Slovakia,
Poland, Russia and China will lead in the coming years to increased demand there
for highly developed adhesive systems. Adhesive raw materials based on polyure-
thane chemistry will participate strongly here.
References
[1] Bayer MaterialScience AG, Market Intelligence, non-published market studies 2006
[2] ChemResearch, The global adhesive and sealant industry 2003–2006, at 2004
[3] ICIS news, October 2, 2006
[4] ChemResearch, The global adhesive and sealant industry 2003–2006 (dry resin demand),
at 2004
[5] CAS-EMEA-ADH, Internal knowledge, 2006
[6] CAS market database, EMEA-ADH, 2006, non-published
[7] Global Polymers Outlook, 2006
3 Chemical principles
NCO “Desmodur H”
OCN BASF: “Basonat H”
Rhodia: “Tolonate HDI”
Isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) Bayer MaterialScience:
(3-Isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexylisocyanate) “Desmodur I”
Degussa: “Vestanat IPDI”
H3C CH3
CH3
OCN
NCO
NCO
NCO
NCO
“Vestanat TMDI”
NCO
OCN OCN
H3C CH3 CH3 H3C H3C CH3
H3C CH3
CH3
NCO
H3C
NC O
NC O
OCN
Manufacturers /
Trade name
Triphenylmethane-4,4’,4’’-triisocyanate Bayer MaterialScience:
H
C
NCO
NC O
O
S
P
O O
NCO
With the exception of MDI, which is accorded special status on account of its low
vapor pressure, the German Ordinance on Hazardous Substances classifies mono-
meric diisocyanates as toxic substances. TDI has recently been classified as a highly
toxic substance and must be labeled T+. For occupational health reasons, mono-
meric diisocyanates are generally not used as coating raw materials. They must first
be converted into higher molecular weight, physiologically benign polyisocyanates
using suitable modification reactions.
Alcohol to O
urethane: NCO + HO R NH C O R
Urethane to O O
allophanate: NCO + NH C O R N C O R
C O
NH
Amine to O
Water to O
Urea to O O
C O
NH
Carboxylic O
amide:
Amide to O O
C O
NH
Anhydride to O O
imide:
NCO + O N + CO2
O O
Epoxide to O
oxazolidone: R' N O
NCO +
O
R'
Oxime to O
oxime NCO + HO N NH C O N
R R
carbamate:
R R
Carbon O
dioxide to
N N
oxadiazine 2 NCO + CO2
trione [8]: O O O
3.3 Polyisocyanates
A further argument in favor of converting diisocyanates into polyisocyanates –
apart from the occupational health aspect already mentioned – is the increase in
functionality achieved. The reactions described above make it possible to produce
2 NCO N N
Isocyanurate [12] O
N N
3 NCO
O N O
Iminooxadia- O
O O N
Linear polymer O O O O
n NCO N C N C N C N C
(α-Nylon)
Uretonimine [14]
N
3 NCO N N + CO2
polyisocyanates with a functionality greater than two which is necessary for spa-
tial crosslinking. Only then is the crosslinking density in the paint film adequate
to ensure high resistance properties. Otherwise, the characteristic properties of the
base isocyanate are retained in the derivative, e.g. the lightfastness of the aliphat-
ics compared with the tendency to yellow of the aromatics. Polyisocyanates based
on cycloaliphatic diisocyanates yield hard and, in certain circumstances, brittle
coatings which can be flexibilized via the choice of polyol, if necessary. In contrast,
polyisocyanates based on linear diisocyanates such as HDI result in flexible films
which can be adjusted with a wide range of polyols to meet various requirements
in terms of flexibility and hardness. As far as the reactivity is concerned, the same
applies to polyisocyanates as to diisocyanates. It is influenced by steric effects and
by the type of NCO bond – primary, secondary or tertiary.
Derivatization
The reaction principles shown in Figure 3.3 have gained industrial significance in
the derivatization of diisocyanates.
The following product classes are of special interest for coating applications:
• Isocyanate-functional urethanes and prepolymers obtained by reaction with
polyols (e.g. “Desmodur L”, “Desmodur E”)
Monomer separation
Strict requirements are set for polyisocyanates for coatings in terms of their color-
lessness. To remove the diisocyanate excess which has not reacted, only extremely
mild processes can be used which have no detrimental effect on the color quality
of the product. This is usually done by distillation in thin-film evaporators, a process
which exposes the product to high temperatures for only a brief time.
To ensure that handling is not hazardous, the content of volatile monomeric diiso-
cyanates in the polyisocyanates used in coating applications must be reduced to a
residual amount of less than 0.5 % by weight. Even after prolonged storage, this
threshold may not be exceeded. The polyisocyanates and any secondary products
which occur during their manufacture must therefore be stable to splitting back into
the free diisocyanates.
Tables 3.5 and 3.6 list some of the standard commercial polyisocyanates available
for the formulation of coatings.
3.4 Prepolymers
Prepolymers based on aliphatic and aromatic diisocyanates are also of special
significance (Table 3.6). These products are manufactured by reacting diisocya-
nates with long-chain polyols, especially polyether polyols (see Figure 3.4), but
also polyester and polycarbonate diols, with the excess monomeric diisocyanate
removed if necessary.
Prepolymers are primarily used for one-component moisture-curing coatings, as
well as for adhesives. Moreover, they find application in blocked form and also as
silane-terminated prepolymers (STP).
Figure 3.7: Blocking and crosslinking reaction with malonic esters and CPME-blocked
polyisocyanates
Cleavage reactions
One-component polyurethane coatings react at different temperatures, depending
on the blocking agent and the polyisocyanate on which they are based. The reactiv-
ity of blocked polyisocyanates with polyols has been studied by dynamic mechan-
ical analysis (DMA) on model systems formulated with various blocking agents
that are readily available on an industrial scale [18] (Table 3.8).
The results obtained confirm the experience that polyisocyanates blocked with ε-
caprolactam are very difficult to crosslink thermally, while by contrast, those
blocked with malonic ester can be crosslinked readily. What is interesting in this
respect is the catalytic effect of DBTL (dibutyl tin dilaurate), which substantially
reduces the initial crosslinking temperature. DBTL has been shown to be a less
suitable catalyst only in the case of malonic ester, which has been attributed to the
different crosslinking mechanism (see Figure 3.7). In this special case, the use of
a titanium compound has proven beneficial [19]. In the case of the CPME-blocked
system, a drop in the crosslinking temperature can be achieved through the use of
a zinc catalyst (e.g. zinc neodecanoate).
Using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) on model systems, the effect of the polyol
on the deblocking temperature has been found to be quite significant (Table 3.9).
Whereas DMA measures the curing (crosslinking) of the one-component polyure-
thane system, TGA records the release of the blocking agent by weighing. The
deblocking process can be tracked and the deblocking temperature determined. The
underlying chemical procedure is identical in both cases, but different parameters
are measured.
Comparison of Tables 3.8 and 3.9 shows that the crosslinking temperatures measured
by DMA for the non-catalyzed system are of the same magnitude as the deblocking
temperatures measured by TGA (Table 3.9, left-hand column) for the analogous
one-component polyurethane system. In contrast, the deblocking temperatures of
Table 3.8: Effect of DBTL catalyst on the initial crosslinking temperature when using
various blocking agents (DMA method)
Blocking agent Initial crosslinking temperatures [°C]
with 1% DBTL, based without DBTL
on the solid resin catalysis
ε-Caprolactam 163 175
Diethylamine 144 173
Cyclopentanone-2-carboxymethyl 140* 160
ester (CPME)
Butanone oxime 137 156
3,5-Dimethylpyrazole 112 158
Diisopropylamine 115 136
BEBA 100 –
Imidazole 98 123
Diethyl malonate – 104
* Zinc neodecanoate catalyst, 0.5 % by wt. based on the solid resin
Table 3.9: “Polyol effect” on the initial deblocking temperature when using various block-
ing agents (TGA method)
Blocking agent Initial deblocking temperatures [°C]
with polyol without polyol
ε-Caprolactam 177 234
Butanone oxime 157 220
3,5-Dimethylpyrazole 167 220
Diisopropylamine 140 220
the pure blocked polyisocyanates, i.e. in the absence of polyol coreactants, are
unexpectedly high. They are in the range of the cleavage temperature of aliphatic
urethanes, which is approximately 240 °C.
Blocked polyisocyanates per se are relatively heat-stable compounds. Only in the
presence of a coreactant are feasible crosslinking temperatures achieved, which can
be lowered further by catalysis.
Reactivity
The reactivity sequence for the blocking agents revealed by DMA and TGA mea-
surements has been confirmed in systems other than the model system used. The
only difference is smaller fluctuations in the crosslinking temperatures when using
other aliphatic polyisocyanates or polyols. Corresponding data for blocked aromatic
polyisocyanates are not yet available. However, in the light of past experience, it
is expected that their initial crosslinking temperatures will be around 10 °C lower.
A better understanding of the curing process in one-component polyurethane coat-
ings can be obtained by measuring the curing state as a function of baking time and
temperature. The relevant parameters for assessing the paint films are the glass
transition temperature (Tg) and the residual blocking agent content.
Table 3.10 shows the analysis of three one-component clearcoat systems in which dif-
ferent blocking agents were used and a two-component polyurethane reference system.
Of the many measured values [18], only two curing states are shown since these are
sufficiently representative. In terms of the blocking agent, 3,5-dimethylpyrazole is
the most reactive. At baking conditions of 30 minutes at 140 °C, a higher Tg is attained
and the content of still unreacted blocked NCO groups, i.e. the residual 3,5-dimeth-
ylpyrazole content, is correspondingly lower. At the same time, however, the cross-
linking process is not yet complete under these baking conditions and a relatively
large amount of blocking agent remains in the paint film in bound form.
Table 3.10: Curing states of one-component polyurethane coatings as a function of the baking
time, characterized by Tg of the paint film and residual blocking agent in the paint film
Baking temperature 140 °C
Baking time 30 min Baking time 60 min
Blocking agent Tg [°C] Residual blocking Tg [°C] Residual blocking
agent content [%] agent content [%]
3,5-Dimethylpyrazole 73 14 80 5
Butanone oxime 68 27 77 12
For comparison: 80 – 80 –
Corresponding two-
component polyure-
thane coating
Yellowing
When used in one-component coatings, blocked polyisocyanates can result in sig-
nificant thermal yellowing, especially under overbaking conditions (see Table 3.11).
The blocking agent is mainly responsible for this. Thermal yellowing is determined
colorimetrically using the CieLab method. The one-component polyurethane
clearcoats with various blocking agents are applied on top of a white basecoat. After
baking for 30 minutes at 140 °C, the colorimeter displays the yellowing on the
individual test panels as the b value. The higher this value is, the yellower the coat-
ing appears. The baked paint films are then overbaked for 30 minutes at 160 °C and
measured again.
In Table 3.11, the difference between the two yellowing values, i.e. the overbake
yellowing Δb, is assessed. Values less than 1 are acceptable whereas those greater
than 1 are generally not. In systems blocked with malonic ester, for example, Δb
values up to 20 are observed.
Of the blocking agents shown in the table, only 3,5-dimethylpyrazole and BEBA
are so resistant to thermal yellowing (Table 3.11) that they pass the overbaking test
required by the automotive industry.
Generally speaking, the thermal yellowing of blocked polyisocyanates can be
mitigated and reduced to an acceptable level by the addition of stabilizers such as
hydrazide or HALS compounds (hindered amine light stabilizers; manufactured by
Ciba Specialty Chemicals) [20].
Suitability characteristics
Normally, different blocking agents should not affect the film properties yielded
by a one-component polyurethane coating, provided that the blocking agent is
completely cleaved and evaporates. In practice, however, the properties are not only
determined by the polyisocyanate and polyol, but also by the blocking agent.
Table 3.11: Thermal yellowing as a function of the blocking agent used
Blocking agent b
Butanone oxime 1 to 3
BEBA 0.8 to 1
Imidazole 2 to 5
Diethyl malonate 10 to 20
3,5-Dimethylpyrazole 0.6 to 1
Cyclopentanone-2-carboxymethyl ester 0.8 to 1.2
Diisopropylamine approx. 21*
*A diisopropylamine-blocked isocyanate undergoes substantially less yellowing under coil coating baking condi-
tions, with a ∆b of approx. 0.5. In this case, it would seem that the proportion of blocking agent remaining in the
film is lower as a result of the higher baking temperature
The residual blocking agent that remains in the paint film at a certain baking tem-
perature (Table 3.10) has a detrimental effect on the film quality. A comparative test
of one- and two-component polyurethane OEM clearcoats shows that one-compo-
nent polyurethane baking coatings have lower etch resistance, for example.
Malonic ester blocking agents are again the exception [21, 22]. Here, crosslinking is
not initiated by cleavage of the blocking agent but by transesterification with the
polyol with cleavage of the alcohol (see Figure 3.7). This reaction yields ester
groups instead of urethane groups. The cured paint film is therefore softer and less
resistant to solvents. These disadvantages can be overcome by selecting suitable
polyols and polyisocyanates.
Occupational hygiene
Within the context of the German Ordinance on Hazardous Substances, all of the
above-named blocking agents have some degree of hazard potential. Diethyl mal-
onate is the least hazardous and is approved for food-contact applications, for
example, in seals for crown corks.
Butanone oxime, 1,2,4-triazole, 3,5-dimethylpyrazole and diisopropylamine require
labeling as sensitizing, irritating or corrosive. For this reason, blocked polyisocya-
nates should be manufactured in such a way as to minimize the content of free,
excess blocking agent. It is not difficult to control the manufacturing processes to
ensure that the content of free blocking agent is less than 1 %.
Systems blocked with cyclopentanone-2-carboxymethyl ester have the great advan-
tage that the blocking agent is incorporated into the coating. For this reason, the
blocking agent does not feature in the product label.
During the baking process, the blocking agents split off and enter the waste air.
They should be treated in the same way as solvent vapors (VOC) to render them
harmless, for example, by incineration.
Cost-effectiveness
ε-Caprolactam, butanone oxime and diisopropylamine are products manufactured
on bulk scale, and are thus inexpensive. In contrast, diethyl malonate, 1,2,4-triazole,
3,5-dimethylpyrazole [23] and BEBA are relatively expensive, although they are
easily accessible on a large scale. The cost-effectiveness of diethyl malonate is not
only reduced by the relatively high purchase price but also by the large amounts
required because of its molecular mass.
Bearing in mind these factors, one-component polyurethane baking coatings can
be customized to meet a wide range of end-user requirements. Compared with
two-component polyurethane technology, the main advantage of one-component
systems is their ease of handling. However, this is frequently offset by reduced film
3.7 Coreactants
The properties of polyurethane coatings are not only affected by the polyisocyanate,
but also in large measure by the hydroxyfunctional coreactant, the polyol. Selecting
suitable polyols and polyisocyanates makes it possible to control key characteristics
of the coating and the resulting paint film. Solids content, drying, gloss, elasticity
and hardness, resistance to chemicals and hydrolysis, and cost-effectiveness are
just some examples in this respect. Research in the past has therefore concentrated
greatly on the development of new and improved resins.
Manufacture
The industrial manufacture of polyacrylate polyols is performed by thermally ini-
tiated radical polymerization of the monomers in organic solvents or in substance
[35–37]
. There are two ways of manufacturing aqueous products. They can be pro-
duced as primary dispersions by emulsion or suspension polymerization directly
in water [38-42]. Alternatively, they are first produced in organic solution and then
dispersed in water to yield secondary dispersions [43-45].
The initiators used in radical polymerization in solution or substance and in suspen-
sion polymerization are azo compounds such as azobisisobutyronitrile or peroxides
such as t-butyl peroxy-2-ethyl hexanoate. In the case of emulsion polymerization,
water-soluble initiators such as ammonium peroxodisulfate are used.
Properties
The properties of polyacrylate polyols
and the polyurethane coatings in which
they are used are largely governed by the
choice of monomer, the hydroxyl content,
the molecular weight and the glass transi-
tion temperature (Tg) [46]. The molecular
Figure 3.10: Structure of a polyacrylate weight of the polyacrylate can be influ-
polyol enced significantly by the polymerization
temperature, the type and amount of initiator used and the addition of molecular
weight controllers such as mercaptans [47]. The Tg can be set via the selection of
hardening and softening monomers [46] and the hydroxyl content by the amount of
hydroxy monomer used.
Applications
Polyacrylate polyols occupy a significant position in polyurethane coatings technol-
ogy. As a result of the ongoing development of these products, the market now
offers a broad range of resins for use in a wide variety of applications, as shown by
the following examples:
• Wood/furniture coating with the need for fast drying
• Automotive refinishing with its special requirements in terms of quality and
cost-effectiveness
• Automotive OEM finishing with the requirement for long-term resistance prop-
erties such as gloss retention
• Plastic coatings requiring high flexibility and good chemical resistance
• Corrosion protection expecting good long-term resistance properties in the
topcoats
Reaction process
As already mentioned, polyester polyols are produced by a condensation reaction
of polycarboxylic acids with polyols, splitting off water. There are two processes
which are used in particular. The first is the melt condensation process in which the
coreactants are reacted in the melt at temperatures of approximately 160 to 260 °C.
The reaction is performed either in a vacuum or in a stream of inert gas to remove
the water. The second process is azeotropic esterification performed in an organic
solvent which acts as the carrier to remove the reaction water.
The condensation reaction can be accelerated by increasing the reaction tempera-
ture and the amount of inert gas used, by reducing the pressure and/or by the addi-
tion of catalysts, which is particularly advantageous towards the end of the esteri-
fication process. Suitable catalysts include bases such as lithium hydroxide or tin
compounds such as di-n-butyl tin oxide. As a binder for coatings, the polyester
polyol is used either solvent-free as a viscous resin or it is dissolved in a solvent.
It may also be used in solid form or as a dispersion in water [48].
Formulation
Aqueous supply forms require the availability of sufficiently hydrophilic centers
in the polymer. These may be neutralized acid groups which are introduced prefer-
ably after the condensation reaction by reacting the polyester polyol with dicarbox-
ylic acid anhydrides, e.g. tetrahydrophthalic acid anhydride, and opening the anhy-
dride ring. However, this often yields a polyester that is susceptible to saponification
[49]
. To produce resins that are resistant to saponification, the carboxyl group is
introduced via dimethylol propionic acid with the aid of diisocyanates such as
isophorone diisocyanate [50].
Properties and applications
The properties of polyester polyols and of the polyurethane coatings in which they
are used are determined by the choice of raw materials, the molecular weight, the
Tg and the functionality [51]. Generally speaking, saturated polyester polyols have
good pigmentability and yield coatings with good weather stability and high gloss.
This makes them suitable for a broad range of applications from vehicle finishing
(including aircraft) to general industrial coatings (machinery). However, only the
non-aromatic products yield good UV stability, since aromatic polyesters tend to
Polycaprolactone polyols are also used as polyol building blocks in the manufacture
of high molecular weight polyurethanes. A further use of the ring-opening polymeriza-
tion of ε-caprolactone is in the modification of higher molecular weight polyols, e.g.
polyacrylate polyols [59]. The technical advantages of polycaprolactone polyols include
their flexibility and weather stability, in addition to their low viscosity. The main
applications for these materials are in two-component polyurethane coatings for plas-
tics (automotive sector) and in solvent-free coatings for construction applications.
3.7.6 Polyurethane polyols
Polyurethane polyols are produced using the diisocyanate polyaddition process [60–62]
in which diisocyanates are reacted with an excess of diols and/or polyols. On account
of their high viscosity, these products are as yet of little importance in the field of
solventborne coating systems. By contrast, hydroxyfunctional aqueous polyurethane
dispersions are used successfully in one-component and two-component systems for
wood and plastic coatings, e.g. for producing soft-feel effects, and for glass coatings.
3.7.7 Polyamines
Unblocked amino groups have very high reactivity with isocyanate groups. Polyurea
coatings can therefore only be applied using two-component application equipment
developed for this purpose. At the present time, polyether amines are normally used
in combination with aromatic isocyanate prepolymers. Aliphatic prepolymers have
only played a subordinate role up to now. The main applications are coatings for
concrete or systems for heavy-duty corrosion protection [63, 64].
The reactivity can be lowered by significantly reducing the reactivity of one of the
coreactants, e.g. by blocking. One example of this is the reaction of TDI prepoly-
mers (e.g. “Desmocap”) with aromatic amines. Such combinations are frequently
used to flexibilize epoxy/amine systems [65, 66].
Blocking reactions
Low molecular weight blocked diamines have become particularly significant as
reactive thinners for high solid polyurethane coatings, e.g. for automotive refinish-
ing. The most important blocking reactions for amines are those with aldehydes to
form aldimines [67, 68] and with ketones to form ketimines [67, 69–71] (see Figure 3.13).
On contact with water, e.g. atmospheric humidity, the blocking reaction is reversed
to produce the starting amines, which are then available to react with isocyanate
groups [71, 72]. Even in the absence of water, crosslinking can be achieved – espe-
cially under the influence of heat. In this case, cyclic ureas are formed by dispro-
portionation [74].
Reacting amino alcohols with aldehydes or ketones (Figure 3.14) splits off water
and yields 1,3-oxazolanes (oxazolidines), another class of blocked amines [73, 76].
These can reacted with diisocyanates via available hydroxyl groups to form bifunc-
tional blocked amines (bisoxazolidines).
Polyaspartics
Polyaspartic esters are special polyamines with secondary amino groups. These can
be produced either by the addition of primary aliphatic diamines to maleic or
fumaric acid di(cyclo)alkyl esters [77, 78] (Figure 3.15), or by the addition of primary
aliphatic amines to unsaturated oligoesters or polyesters [78, 79].
Polyaspartic esters based on diethyl maleate and cycloaliphatic diamines are sol-
vent-free, low viscosity substances with secondary amino groups, whose reactivity
is reduced by electronic and steric effects to such an extent that they can be used
to formulate highly reactive two-component polyurethane coatings with an ade-
quate pot life.
This specifically adjustable reactivity enables the formulations of fast-drying coat-
ings for highly productive, modern coating concepts. These systems are of par-
ticular interest for use in automotive refinish, large vehicle and industrial coatings,
corrosion protection and construction. The polyaspartics are used as the main binder
or as reactive thinners [81– 83].
R = (cyclo)alkyl
Figure 3.14: Formation of 1,3-oxazolanes
R = (cyclo)alkyl, R’ = (cyclo)alkylene
Figure 3.15: Manufacture of diaspartic acid esters
Composition
The two-phase systems with the greatest industrial significance are aqueous disper-
sions in which water forms the continuous phase. In this dispersion state, the
thermodynamics of which are inherently unfavorable, special auxiliaries and addi-
tives (emulsifiers) can be used to stabilize the hydrophobic macromolecules. In
this respect, a distinction is made between external and internal emulsifiers that
can be further categorized as anionic, cationic or nonionic emulsifiers, depending
on their charge.
Among the external emulsifiers used in polyurethane chemistry are high molecular
weight polyvinylpyrrolidones or alkylphenol-initiated ethylene oxide polyethers.
These are added in concentrations varying from 0.5 to 5 % [85]. However, internal
emulsifiers provide far more application variability and enhanced product proper-
ties. They are incorporated into the polymer backbone and anchored there via
covalent bonds. Polyethers with a high ethylene oxide content are used as nonionic
hydrophilic building blocks which are incorporated into the polymer backbone
[84, 86]
. Hydroxyfunctional polyvinylpyrrolidones are also available as nonionic
hydrophilic building blocks [87].
Stabilization
The stability of polyurethane dispersions is affected by a large number of factors,
both internal and external [86, 92–94]. The attracting van der Waals forces between the
particles in the dispersion are counteracted by various repelling interactions. One
of these is the electrostatic repulsion of the charged particles which is the dominant
effect in ionically stabilized polyurethane dispersions. By contrast, the stability of
nonionically stabilized polyurethane dispersions can be explained by an entropy
effect. The conformation freedom of the polyether chains that penetrate the aqueous
phase is limited by the approach of particles, which constitutes inadequate stability.
This is thermodynamically unfavorable and leads to the particles being repelled.
Moreover, the polyether chains themselves interact as they approach each other.
These interactions are less favorable than the interactions with the dispersion
medium (water) and thus the approach of the particles is prevented.
Ionically stabilized polyurethane dispersions are more vulnerable to the addition
of salts or to changes in the pH value and easily lose their stability when they freeze
or are exposed to high shear forces. By contrast, nonionically stabilized aqueous
dispersions are more sensitive to high temperatures. The best stabilization is
achieved by a combination of both mechanisms – ionic and nonionic – in the same
polymer chain [86, 94].
Manufacturing process
There are many processes which can be used to manufacture high molecular weight
polyurethane dispersions, with hydroxyfunctionality if required. The basic general
principle for achieving high molecular weights is the chain extension of NCO-
functional prepolymers with (blocked) polyamines, water or aminoalcohols. Since
the high molecular weights are only achieved after dispersion, prepolymers with
relatively low molecular weights can be produced – this confers significant advan-
tages for their manufacture.
In the emulsifier/shear force process, external emulsifiers and high shear forces are
used to produce emulsions or dispersions of low molecular weight NCO-functional
prepolymers [95, 96]. Chain extension with the dispersion medium (water) combined
with condensation or the addition of diamines allows the production of higher
molecular weight polyurethane ureas with good stability.
In the melt dispersion process (Figure 3.16, page 54), sufficiently low viscosity,
ionic and/or nonionic hydrophilically modified NCO prepolymers are placed in an
aqueous dispersion. The amine component used as the chain extender can either be
added to the dispersion water or to the prepolymer dispersion following the disper-
sion stage. By contrast, in the ketimine/ketazine process, the blocked diamine
References
[1] C. Six, F. Richter, Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Chapter 4, DOI:
10.1002/14356007.a14_611 by Wiley-VCH, Organic Isocyanates, 2002
[2] EP 289 840 (1987) Bayer AG
[3] DE 4 231 417 (1992) Hüls AG, DE 4 413 580 (1994) Bayer AG, WO 97/17 323 (1995)
BASF AG
[4] W. Wieczorrek in: Lackharze, D. Stoye, W. Freitag (Hrsg.), Carl Hanser Verlag,
München, Wien 1996, 183 ff.
[5] R. Saxon, R. W. Dexter, G. C. Hewitt, Cellular Polymers 4 (1985) 117
[6] EP 749 958 (1995) Bayer AG
[7] DE 1 101 394 (1958) Bayer AG
[8] EP 379 914 (1989) Bayer AG
[9] H. J. Laas, R. Halpaap, J. Pedain, Farbe und Lack, 100 (1994) 330
[10] R. Lomölder, F. Plogmann, P. Speier, Journal of Coatings Technology, 69 (1997) 51–57
[11] H. J. Laas, R. Halpaap, J. Pedain, J. prakt. Chem. 336 (1994) 185
[12] EP 10589 (1978) Bayer AG
[13] DE 196 11 849 (1996) Bayer AG
[14] K. Wagner, K. Findeisen, W. Schäfer, W. Dietrich, Angew. Chem. 93 (1981) 855
[15] H. Mundstock, R. Pires, F. Richter, J. Schmitz, Macromol. Symp., 187 (2002) 281–292
[16] EP 666 276 (1994) Bayer AG; EP 682 012 (1994) Bayer AG
[17] Ch. Gürtler et al., Farbe und Lack 11-2005, 111, 22–23
[18] Th. Engbert, E. König, E. Jürgens, Einsatz einkomponentiger Einbrennurethan
beschichtungen, Farbe und Lack 102 (1996) 51–58
[19] 1K Polyurethaneinbrennlacke und deren Verwendung: DE 10 109 228 (2002) Bayer AG
[20] Stabilisation against thermal yellowing: EP 615 992 (1993) Miles Inc.; US 5 216 078
(1992) BASF; EP 654 490 (1993) Bayer AG
[21] U. Röckrath et al., Investigations of crosslinking mechanism of etch resistant clearcoats,
22. Int. Conference in Org. Coatings Science and Technology, Athens, June 1996
[22] V. Mirgel, K. Nachtkamp, Farbe und Lack 89 (1983) 928–934
[23] Procedure to synthesize DMP blocked polyisocyanates: EP 713 871 (1994) Bayer AG
[24] R. Pires, H. J. Laas, Easy emulsification plus improved chemical resistance: Hydro-
philic polyisocyanates with high functionality improve waterborne 2K-PUR coatings,
European Coatings Journal 11 (2001) 16 –22
[25] WO 97/31960 (1996) Rhodia Chimie
[26] EP 486 881 (1990) BASF AG
[27] EP 206 059 (1985) Bayer AG
[28] EP 540 985 (1991) Bayer AG
[29] EP 959 087 (1998) Bayer AG
[30] WO 01/88006 (2000) Bayer AG
[31] M. Melchiors, H. J. Laas, M. Mechtel, Sulfonathydrophilierte Polyisocyanate: die nächste
Härtergeneration für wässrige Zweikomponenten-Polyurethanlacke; 69. Vortragstagung
der GDCh-Fachgruppe „Anstrichstoffe und Pigmente“, 22.–24. September 2004, Ulm/
Neu-Ulm
[32] M. Mechtel, Ch. Irle, H. J. Laas, M. Melchiors, New Hydrophilic Polyisocyanates for
Waterborne 2K-PU-Coatings; The European Coatings Conference: Polyurethanes for
High Performance Coatings III, March 18–19, 2004, Berlin/Germany
[33] M. Melchiors, H. J. Laas, T. Münzmay, R. Gertzmann, Graffiti resistant waterborne 2K
Polyurethane Coatings, XXVIIIth FATIPEC Congress, June 12–14, 2006, Budapest,
Hungary
[34] Applications of Cardura E 10, Technical Manual CA 1.2 by Shell (1990)
[35] D. H. Klein, J. Paint Technol. 42 (1970) 335
[36] W. H. Brown, T. J. Miranda, J. Paint Technol. 36 (2) (1964) 92
[37] G. Markert in: Houben-Weyl, Methods of Organic Chemistry, 4th ed., Vol. E20/2,
H. Bartl, J. Falbe (Hrsg.), Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1987, 1156
[38] Emulsion Polymerization of Acrylic Monomers, Publication CM 104 v. Rohm & Haas
[39] Emulsionspolymerisation von Acrylmonomeren, Publication by Ugilor, Paris 1971
[40] H. Fikentscher, H. Gerrens, H. Schuller, Angew. Chem. 72 (1960) 856
[41] H. Rauch-Puntigam, Th. Völker, Acryl- und Methacrylverbindungen. Springer Verlag,
Berlin 1967
[42] G. Markert in: Houben-Weyl, Methods of Organic Chemistry, 4th ed., Vol. E20/2,
H. Bartl, J. Falbe (Hrsg.). Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1987, 1150
[43] E. Knappe in: Glasurit-Handbuch: Lacke und Farben, BASF Farben und Fasern AG
(Hrsg.). Vincentz Verlag, Hannover 1984, 66–69
[44] EP 358 979 (1988) Bayer AG
[45] DE 4 322 242 (1993) BASF AG
[46] P. Denkinger in: Lackharze, D. Stoye, W. Freitag (Hrsg.). Carl Hanser Verlag, München,
Wien 1996, p. 317
[47] G. Henrici-Olive, S. Olive, Adv. Pol. Sci. 2 (1961) 496–577
[48] A. Sickert, D. Stoye in: Lackharze, D. Stoye, W. Freitag (Hrsg.). Carl Hanser Verlag,
München, Wien 1996, 51–54
[49] E. T. Turpin, J. Paint Technol. 47 (602) (1975) 40–46
[50] H. Blum, P. Höhlein, J. Meixner, Farbe und Lack 94 (5) (1988) 342–344
[51] A. Sickert, D. Stoye in: Lackharze, D. Stoye, W. Freitag (Hrsg.), Carl Hanser Verlag,
München, Wien 1996, 49–51
[52] EP318 800 (1987) Bayer AG
[53] W. Freitag in: Lackharze, D. Stoye, W. Freitag (Hrsg.), Carl Hanser Verlag, München,
Wien 1996, 103–104
[54] US 2 999 844 (1956) Bayer AG
[55] DE 1 770 245 (1968) Bayer AG
[56] US 2 933 477 (1956) Union Carbide Corp.
[57] EP 117 538 (1983) Union Carbide Corp.
[58] A. Balas, G. Palka, J. Foks, H. Janik, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 29 (1984) 2261
[59] EP 279 311 (1987) Bayer AG
[60] DRP 728 981 (1937) I.G. Farben
[61] O. Bayer, Angew. Chem. 59 (1947) 257
[62] G. Oertel in: Kunststoff-Handbuch, G. W. Becker, D. Braun (Hrsg.), 3. Auflage, Band 7:
Polyurethane. Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien 1993
[63] K. Buecking, European Coatings Journal 10 (1998) 730-731
[64] A. Perez, J. Reddinger, J.A. Johnston, Modern Paint and Coatings 90 (11) (2000)
26–29
[65] DE 2 131 299 (1971) Bayer AG
[66] DE 2 722 514 (1977) Bayer AG
[67] DE 2 546 536 (1975) Bayer AG
[68] US 4 448 939 (1982) Air Products & Chem.
[69] DE 2 356 213 (1973) Schering AG
[70] US 4 046 744 (1976) Rohm & Haas
[71] DE 1 694 237 (1968) Bayer AG
[72] DE 1 719 121 (1967) Bayer AG
Physical drying
Resins which form a film solely by physical drying mechanisms are used in a
number of applications. Such resins include polymers such as polyurethanes and
polyurethane ureas dissolved in organic solvents. These are valued in, for example,
coatings for plastics and textiles.
Above all, physically drying binders in the form of aqueous dispersions have come
to dominate in formulations for do-it-yourself construction applications. These
one-component systems are easy to handle and, as a rule, fulfill the purpose for
which they are intended unless extreme demands are made on their resistance
properties. It should be pointed out here that physically drying systems are not
crosslinked – the film hardness results from associative interactions between the
molecular chains. As a result, they can be resolubilized (dissolved/swollen) by
solvents and cleaning agents.
To improve the resistance properties in such systems, high mean molecular weights
of up to 150,000 g/mol are the goal [1]. However, an infinite increase in the molecu-
lar mass is not feasible due to the associated increase in viscosity of the coating
and the resulting application problems. The situation is different in the case of
aqueous and non-aqueous dispersed two-phase systems. There, the limitations
imposed by high molecular weights are applicable only to a limited extent.
Chemical drying
In the case of reactive coatings, a distinction must be made between systems with
one or two and more components.
Typical systems
In addition to one-component binders based on moisture-curing isocyanate pre-
polymers, stable one-component systems can be formulated by combining poly-
isocyanates with polyols or polyamines. However, this requires the modification
of the reactive groups of the individual components or of the overall system. The
following coating systems of this basic type are currently in use:
• blocked polyisocyanates/polyols
– in dissolved form for baking coatings
– in solid form as powder coatings
• polyisocyanates/blocked amines that react with atmospheric moisture to yield
free amines or react with isocyanates at elevated temperatures
• microencapsulated systems in which the coreactants are separated by a diffusion
barrier and the crosslinking reaction is initiated thermally [3]
Air-drying coatings
One-component polyurethane coatings which cure at room temperature include
those systems with polyunsaturated hydrocarbon chains which crosslink with
oxygen. These are produced, for example, by the incorporation of suitable fatty
acids or fatty alcohols into the polyurethane polymer. The addition of driers (cat-
alysts) based on salts of cobalt, lead and manganese (primary driers) and of mag-
nesium, zinc, calcium and strontium (auxiliary driers) allows these products to
crosslink in air. Depending on the resin structure and the ambient conditions, dif-
ferent reactions will occur [4]. The crosslinking reaction is usually based on a rad-
ical mechanism with secondary reactions yielding ketones, aldehydes and other
oxidation products.
In contrast to the fatty acid-modified polyurethanes described above, coatings that
contain double bonds activated by carbonyl groups in the alpha position or allyl
ether groups can be cured in seconds by exposure to high-energy radiation such as
UV light (radiation curing) [5]. The precondition for this type of curing process is
an adequately high density of double bonds in the one-component system and the
addition of photoinitiators.
Dual-cure technology
Of particular interest are dual-cure systems that combine polyurethane and UV
crosslinking mechanisms. The advantages are, on the one hand, the cost-effective
process control and, on the other hand, the fact that the coating cures chemically
in those areas that are hidden from the radiation source. The quality of the resulting
paint films is high, and investigations are currently underway to determine the suit-
ability of these systems in coating both metal and plastics.
Silyl-modified polyurethanes
Polyurethanes modified with trialkoxysilyl groups are a new class of products that
can also be processed as one-component systems [6]. These products are obtained
by reacting NCO-functional prepolymers with special aminoalkoxysilanes. Catal-
ysis with metal salts hydrolyzes the alkoxysilyl groups to form silanols. Crosslink-
ing results from the subsequent silane polycondensation.
Application
The advantages of one-component applica-
tion of moisture-curing coating systems are
offset by several disadvantages including
the complex formulation procedure and the
need for careful pre-drying of the pigments
if they are moist. The conditions are differ-
ent in the case of systems containing two
or more components where particular
attention must be given to the exact meter-
ing of the polyol and the hardener.
Quality characteristics
Whether using solventborne or solvent-free two-component polyurethane coatings,
the film quality obtained is largely independent of the drying temperature. Even at
the lowest temperatures, an adequately long curing time results in a degree of
crosslinking equivalent to that achieved under baking conditions. This fact was
instrumental in the switch to this technology for coating aircraft and for refinishing
in automotive body shops, both segments where baking is not an option. Two-
component polyurethane coatings have also made an important contribution towards
the use of plastics in automotive engineering. For reasons including design (color
matching with the body), they are used increasingly to finish add-on components
such as fenders. They also provide long-term protection and prevent the plastic
from becoming brittle on exposure to weathering.
The curing conditions for two-component polyurethane coatings can be influenced
with catalysts as required. Particularly suitable for this purpose are metal salts, e.g.
tin or zinc salts, and tertiary amines (chemical drying). There is a wealth of litera-
ture that discusses the use of catalysts in polyurethane crosslinking [8 –11].
Crosslinking via aziridines [22] and polycarbodiimides [23] are described as additional
curing methods. Polyurethane dispersions that contain ketoester groups can be
crosslinked with polyamines or polyhydrazides [24] and polyurethane dispersions
that contain trialkoxysilyl groups crosslink by condensation [25]. Occasionally, mixed
crosslinking mechanisms are used, for example in the manufacture of baking sys-
tems. These combine an OH-functional dispersion with a blocked polyisocyanate
crosslinker and a melamine crosslinker.
Waterborne two-component polyurethane systems
High-grade waterborne two-component polyurethane coatings were first described
in 1988 [26–29]. Free polyisocyanates are emulsified in an aqueous hydroxyfunctional
polymer dispersion or solution. Dispersions of hydroxyfunctional polyurethane,
polyacrylate, polyester or urethane-modified polyester are normally used.
Key coating properties such as gloss and resistance depend directly on the forma-
tion of a homogeneous and dense polymer network. The main prerequisite for
achieving this is to ensure that the hydroxyfunctional polymer dispersion and the
polyisocyanate are mixed as homogeneously as possible. The dispersion of the
polyisocyanate in the aqueous phase is supported by three factors: reducing the
interfacial tension, applying high shear forces during emulsification and ensuring
the low viscosity of the dispersed phase (the polyisocyanate component) [30].
The interfacial surface tension can be reduced by using a polyisocyanate with
internal hydrophilic modification, e.g. “Bayhydur 3100”. External emulsifiers such
as a suitable polyol can also produce this effect [31–33]. However, excessive hydro-
philic modification will have a negative impact on the coating properties. Lower
hydrophilicity requires the use of a dispersion technique in which high shear forces
are applied. Jet dispersion has proven very effective, and this technique, together
with the selection of suitable polyols, enables the use of purely hydrophobic poly-
isocyanates (Figure 4.3, page 70).
Modern internally modified polyisocyanates thus combine high functionality
(highly branched coating systems) with low viscosity (good mixing). Anionically
modified polyisocyanates exhibit the best property profile in this regard. After
mixing the polyisocyanate with the aqueous polyol, a number of reactions take
place in parallel during the pot life and curing (Figure 4.4, page 70).
In addition to the desired crosslinking reaction between the isocyanate and hydroxy
groups to form urethane, the isocyanate groups also react with water to form urea
and carbon dioxide. However, this reaction is relatively slow, and also increases
the crosslinking density. The carboxylate groups of anionically stabilized polyol
dispersions likewise react with isocyanates. However, this can only occur to any
significant extent once the neutralizing agent has evaporated from the paint film.
The consequence of the slow reaction between the isocyanate groups and water is
that the application properties of the coating remain fairly constant throughout the
pot life. With a judicious choice of components, pot lives of up to 8 hours can be
achieved. When a suitable binder is used, the carbon dioxide that is formed as the
film cures does not lead to blistering, since it can diffuse out of the film at the time
it is generated (in statu nascedi) [34, 35].
Of the variety of mixer units available, static mixers are the ones most frequently
used in two-component application [36]. The mixing efficiency is essentially deter-
mined by the viscosities and the product affinities of the coating components. High
viscosities or wide differences in viscosity require a correspondingly large number
of screw elements in the mixer. To improve the feed properties, mixing and appli-
cation, it is common to process high viscosity materials in the “hot” state, e.g. at
40–60 °C. The supply tanks and feed hoses are therefore designed to be heatable.
The noticeable limitation of this mode of operation is that the pot life for the two-
component system is significantly reduced.
Under certain circumstances, static or dynamic (Ultraturrax) mixers may not be able
to achieve adequate homogenization of two-component coatings with critical mis-
cibility. This is true in the case of waterborne two-component polyurethane coatings,
for example, in which non-hydrophilically modified polyisocyanates are used as the
hardener component. Such systems are best mixed by jet dispersion (see Figure 4.5),
which yields a high degree of homogenization even with components which are
extremely difficult to mix. This allows good film quality to be achieved [37].
When working with jet dispersion, the polyisocyanate and polyol components are
first pre-emulsified via a flat spray nozzle. The jet disperser – a nozzle bored with
facing pairs of holes – releases the pressure of the formulation (∆p >20 bar) and
yields a microdispersion with a maximum particle size of approx. 1 µm.
Depending on the viscosity of the two-component system used, a spray coater will
use a spray gun with air atomization (high- and low-pressure processes) or, in the
case of high viscosity, an airless spray gun, i.e. techniques that are also commonly
used for one-component coatings. In addition, an air-assisted airless atomizer can
also be used, in which a fast-flowing stream of coating is homogenized by air jets [38].
(up to 50 bar). Variable air-driven and electric motors are used to drive the pumps.
The feed volume is governed by the chamber size and speed of the gear pump.
Because of the small volumes involved (from 2 ml), flushing can be achieved
quickly and efficiently, especially if the unit is equipped with flank flushing with
alternating air and solvent intervals (less than 30 s). This allows rapid changeover
to a different color. When using flushable gear pumps, only one metering unit is
required for the mill base.
In continuous coating operations, e.g. production line coating, electronically con-
trolled and monitored two-component units are used.
A microprocessor control and regulation device compares the actual values against
the specified metering ratios, and if necessary, automatically adjusts the amounts
within a tolerance threshold of ±5 %. Color changeover with automatic intermedi-
ate flushing takes place in the color changeover block.
General conditions for applying two-component polyurethane coatings
A number of important prerequisites must be met when applying two-component
polyurethane coatings so as to ensure optimal coating quality. These include care-
ful observation of the pot life (see above), good mixing of the mill base and hard-
ener, and observance of the tolerance threshold of ±5 % for metering accuracy, in
particular at the given mixing ratio of the two components. If operating within these
thresholds, there is no reason to expect any deterioration in the film quality. In order
to test the function of the unit, it is recommended that the mixing ratio of the two
components, mill base and hardener, is checked regularly by measuring the volume
flows of the materials.
One key requirement for the successful application of two-component polyurethane
coatings is careful handling. This includes flushing the spray guns and other com-
ponents of the application unit (hoses) during the pot life. A 1:1 mixture of butyl
acetate/xylene is suitable as the flushing solvent when applying solventborne sys-
tems. When flushing the spray gun, the operator must avoid inhaling the solvent
vapors that are emitted. When applying aqueous two-component polyurethane coat-
ing systems, a mixture of water, butylene glycol and dimethylethanolamine in a
ratio of 89:10:1 is used as the flushing solvent on the mill base side (component A).
On the hardener side (component B), butyl acetate is used to flush the unit.
If the unit contains hardener, exposure to water or moisture, e.g. via the flushing
solvent or leaks in the unit, must be prevented. For this reason, the hardener tanks
are overlaid with nitrogen or dry air. When the filling level falls as the hardener is
used, more air must be fed in through a drying cartridge. Brief contact with atmo-
spheric moisture, e.g. when transferring the product from one container to another,
has no detrimental effect.
Moving parts such as piston rods in the metering pump are protected from their
surroundings by a fluid seal. Plasticizers such as “Mesamoll” are especially suit-
able as lubricants and sealants, since they prevent the formation of polyurea on
the piston rods.
Safety precautions
Stainless steel is normally used to manufacture two-component units, pipes and
transport containers. Zinc-galvanized surfaces are entirely unsuitable owing to the
catalytic effect of the zinc. Plastics are generally unsuitable as container materials
because of their permeability to water vapor. Multilayer plastic composites, which
are considered impermeable in this respect, have not yet found use in this field. The
hoses used to convey the hardener, e.g. made from nylon, must be emptied and
flushed before long interruptions in operation, for example on weekends, to prevent
gelling as the result of moisture diffusion. This does not apply to Teflon hoses, but
their limited flexibility restricts the handling of the spray gun.
Compared with one-component coatings, the processing of two-component coat-
ings is inherently more complex, and more expensive if two-component units are
used. However, there are numerous case studies showing that, if the units are oper-
ated properly and maintained regularly, they can function for many years without
breakdown.
Two-component technology is particularly strongly represented in automotive
OEM finishing. Two-component polyurethane coatings are being utilized increas-
ingly in the automotive industry, and can be applied reliably when suitably main-
tained two-component units are used. The manual spray application of two-com-
ponent polyurethane coatings has also proven successful and is employed world-
wide, for example, in car repair shops.
link with the hydroxyl groups of the binder to form urethane [44]. However, the
blocking agent content is being viewed increasingly critically, since these cleaved
substances are released during the crosslinking reaction and may enter the environ-
ment at least to some extent.
Blocking agent free polyurethane powder coatings
Powder coating crosslinkers containing uretdione groups represent an alternative
to blocked polyisocyanates [45]. As has already been described, isocyanate groups
may dimerize to form uretdiones. This reaction is reversible (Figure 4.9). Uretdio-
nes are therefore also characterized as internally blocked isocyanates.
Reacting uretdione diisocyanates with suitable diols yields linear polyuretdione
polyurethanes, which can be used as crosslinkers in the manufacture of blocking
agent free polyurethane powder coatings (see Fig. 4.10).
At sufficiently high temperatures, the uretdione rings open to form free isocyanate
groups which then take part in a crosslinking reaction. However, a baking
temperature of at least 180 °C is required for uretdione crosslinking, higher than is
needed for hardeners blocked with ε-caprolactam. Catalysis with suitable amidine
bases reduces the baking temperature to approx. 150 °C [46].
Only in very recent times has it been possible to develop a catalyst system that
enables the curing of uretdione powder coatings at a temperatures of 130 °C, which
is extremely low for powder coating systems [47]. This catalyst system, which con-
tains zinc acetylacetonate as the main component, is now commercially available
Figure 4.11: Low temperature crosslinking of a uretdione with the formation of allophanate
Figure 4.12: Radiation sources for curing coatings and printing inks
Figure 4.13: World consumption in 2005 of unsaturated acrylate binders, total: 215,000 tons
Due to its weather stability, high density of allophanate and urethane structures,
well-balanced functionality and double-bond density, this new product type has the
potential for use in a wide range of plastic coating applications (see Figure 4.17,
page 84). Metal coatings are also being developed.
UV-curing polyurethane dispersions are thus primarily used for spray coatings, e.g.
for wood, furniture and plastics. They are also applied by printing and roller coat-
ing on PVC flooring, and are used as printing inks.
(CeO2, ZnO), IR reflection (ZrO2, TiO2), photocatalysis (TiO2) and much more [59–
61, 65]
. In addition to the introduction of nanoparticles, attention is also now focusing
on hybrid technologies used to combine organic polymers with sol-gel processes.
In this way, interpenetrating networks or in situ precipitated nanoparticles, or com-
bined systems can be formed [59,60,64]. With the aid of such hybrid technologies,
further improvements can be made to easy-to-clean and self-cleaning properties,
water resistance, adhesion and corrosion protection [75].
From a market perspective (raw material manufacturers and end users), the greatest
potential lies in automotive OEM and refinishing, marine applications, corrosion
protection, metal and wood finishes, general industrial coatings and architectural/
decorative uses. The biggest technological leaps expected by raw material manu-
facturers and end users center on scratch resistance, self-cleaning/easy-to-clean
properties, improved durability, antimicrobial properties, UV protection, water
resistance, adhesion and photocatalysis.[58, 66]
Polyurethane coatings are already used in such applications on account of their
property profiles, but their range of performance can continue to grow with the
utilization of nanotechnology. For example, in two-component polyurethane top-
coats, the use of silica nanoparticles and chemical customization of the polymer
matrix significantly improve scratch resistance[73, 74]. The literature describes a
hybrid topcoat based on polyurethane in which silica gel produced by a sol-gel
process is combined with ceroxide nanoparticles. Both the scratch resistance and
the weather stability are improved [64].
In addition to the expectations and the positive effects of the nanotechnology-modi-
fied coatings already discovered, challenges such as processability, cost, environ-
mental issues and hygiene must be considered. Thus the manufacture, formulation
and applications technology of such coating raw materials in conventional processes
can lead to complications so technological pathways must be attempted and the cor-
responding formulation and application technical know-how must be learned [58, 72].
The higher costs for incorporating nanoparticles must be justified either on the basis
of the corresponding improvements in the properties, or by keeping the amounts
used to a minimum. The effect of nanomaterials on the environment and health
is currently under intense investigation, and these factors have been accepted by
industry from the very beginning. Consortia that include industry and independent
research institutions have dedicated themselves to a series of international projects
on this subject, in order to be able to assess any potential risks early on [58].
Nanotechnology has shown itself to be an emerging field with great potential for
coating and adhesive applications. Despite initial successes, there is still enormous
need for further development so that technological advances can be converted into
innovative products. In many applications, polyurethane-based coatings have dem-
onstrated strengths due to their property profiles. Nanotechnology can serve to raise
the level of quality even higher. This should yield options for accessing new appli-
cations for polyurethanes.
References
[1] D. Dieterich in: Houben-Weyl, Methoden der Organischen Chemie, Bd. E20, H. Bartl,
J. Falbe (Hrsg.). Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1987, 1641 ff.
[2] Q. Bell, Raw Materials and their usage, in: Solvent-borne urethane resin, Vol. 1: Surface
Coatings, Chapman and Hall, New York 1993, 153 ff.
[3] D. Dieterich in: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Vol. A 21. VCH
Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim 1992, 684.
[4] W. Kern, H. Willersinn, Angew. Chem. 67 (19/20) (1955) 573
[5] W. Fischer, i-Lack 61 (2) (1993) 54
[6] EP 596 360 (1992) Bayer AG
[7] Photo: 2 Komponenten Maschinenbau GmbH (2KM)
[8] L. Thiele, Isocyanatreaktionen und Katalyse in der Polyurethanchemie, Fortschritts-
bericht, Acta Polymerica 30 (1979) 323–342
[9] L. Thiele, R. Becker, Catalytic Mechanism of Polyurethane Formation, Adv. Ureth.
Sci. Tech. 12 (1993) 59–85
[10] D. Dieterich in: Houben-Weyl, Methoden der Organischen Chemie, Bd. E20, H. Bartl,
J. Falbe (Hrsg.), Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1987, 1604 ff.
[11] P. F. Haas, K. Uhlig in: Kunststoff-Handbuch, G. W. Becker, D. Braun (Hrsg.),
3. Auflage, Band 7: Polyurethane, Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien 1993
[12] R. M. Rynders, C. R. Hegedus, A. G. Gilicinski, Characterization of Particle Coales-
cence in Waterborne Coatings, Journal of Coatings Technology 67 (845) (1995) 59
[13] Bechara, Formulating with polyurethane dispersions, European Coatings Journal 4
(1998) 236
[14] DE 3 313 237 (1983) Bayer AG
[15] T. A. Potter, J. W. Rosthauser, H. G. Schmelzer, 11th Intern. Conf. Org. Coat. Sci.
Technol., Athens, Greece, July 8–12, 1985, Preprints 331
[16] DE 3 231 062 (1982) Bayer AG
[17] US 4 190 567 (1976) Kao Soap Co
[18] EP 285 898 (1987) Bayer AG
[19] EP 436 941 (1990) Hoechst AG
[20] DE 4 012 339 (1990) Bayer AG
[21] DE 3 219 413 (1982) Vianova Kunstharze AG
[22] US 5 133 997 (1991) Union Carbide Marble Care Inc
[23] DE 3 523 856 (1985) Bayer AG
[24] EP 442 652 (1990) Imperial Chemical Industries
[25] DE 3 737 245 (1987) Bayer AG
[26] EP 358 979 (1988) Bayer AG
[27] L. Kahl, M. Bock, H. J. Laas, B. Klinksiek, Wässrige 2K-PUR-Klarlacke für die
Autoerstlackierung, Teil 1, Industrie-Lackierbetrieb 63 (12) (1995) 424; Teil II, ebd.
64 (2) (1996) 63
[28] M. Bock, J. Petzoldt, Aqueous Polyurethane Coating Systems for Plastics, Modern
Paint and Coatings, (2) (1996) 22
[29] M. Sonntag, E. Jürgens, Wässrige 2K-PUR-Lacke für die Autoreparatur- und Serien-
lackierung, J. Oberflächentechnik (6) (1997) 12
[30] B. Klinksiek, B. Koglin, Verfahren zur Herstellung von Salben und Cremes, GVC
Tagung Köln (1991), Vortrag 11
[60] H. Schmidt, Considerations about sol-gel process: from the classical sol-gel route to
advanced chemical nanotechnologies, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. (2006) 40, 115 ff.
[61] S. Kaskel (2005), Transparent inorganic-organic hybrid materials, VDI-Berichte 1920, 23 ff.
[62] Nanoparticle composites for coating applications. Cayton, Roger H. Editor(s): Laudon,
Matthew; Romanowicz, Bart. NSTI Nanotech 2004, Boston, MA, United States, Mar.
7–11 (2004), 3 312–315
[63] DE-A 19 811 790
[64] DE 102 004 048 874 A1 (A1), Hybride Decklacke
[65] B. P. Mallik, Nanotechnology opens up new vistas for surface coatings, Surface Coat-
ings International A5, (2006), 248 ff.
[66] B. Voit, Analyse des Innovations-und Nachhaltigkeitspotentials und Erarbeitung von
Leitlinien der Oberflächenforschung, DFO Forschungsagenda „Oberfläche“ (2006),
Düsseldorf
[67] B. Xu et al., Calculating barrier properties of polymer/clay nanocomposites: effects
of clay layers, Polymer 47, (2006), 2904 ff.
[68] M. A. Osman et al., Polyurethane adhesive nanocomposites as gas permeation barrier,
Macromolecules 36, (2003), 9851 ff.
[69] DE 10 344 449, Klebstoff-Zusammensetzung mit Barriere-Eigenschaften
[70] M. D. Alexander et al., Polymer modified off-axis multiwall nanotubes for fabrication
of electrically conductive polyurethane nanocomposites. Polymer Preprints 44 (2),
(2003) 294 ff.
[71] W. Chen et al., Carbon nanotube-reinforced polyurethane composite fibers. Composites
Science and Technology 66(15), (2006) 3029 ff.
[72] U. Hoffmann, D. Michels (2006), Nanomaterialien, Besser Lackieren Jahrbuch 2006,
111ff.
[73] www.ppg.com/car_autocoat/pressrelease_1_8_03_Ceramiclear.htm
[74] US 6 593 417 (2003), Coating compositions having improved scratch resistance,
coated substrates and methods related thereto
[75] High Tec Surfaces, Achema 2006, 28th International Exhibition Congress
Polyurethanes 42 %
Figure 5.1: Industrial wood and furniture coatings, world production by system, 2005;
total: approx. 2.3 million tons [1]
Figure 5.2: Industrial wood and furniture coatings, world production by region, 2005;
total: approx. 2.3 million tons [1]
VIN Meier_eng.indb 94
Table 5.1: Properties of polyisocyanates
HDI HDI TDI HDI/TDI TDI TDI Trend
isocyanurate biuret adduct isocyanurate isocyanurate isocyanurate
low viscosity high viscosity
Viscosity increasing
Reactivity increasing
Sandability increasing
Pot life longer
Flexibility increasing
Compatibility
with
NC increasing
CAB increasing
High viscosity
Applications for polyurethane coatings
Yellowing
HDI HDI TDI HDI/TDI TDI TDI Trend
isocyanurate biuret adduct isocyanurate isocyanurate isocyanurate
low viscosity high viscosity
Yellowing decreasing
yield the same usually high yellowing resistance, the quality is sufficient for a large
number of applications, e.g. in the field of home furnishings.
Polyester/polyether combinations
Highly crosslinked wood coatings with outstanding resistance to abrasion and chem-
icals can be formulated using highly branched hydroxyl-bearing polyesters and poly-
ethers. The normally high hydroxyl content of these resins, which can be between 5
and 12 % (calculated on the solid resin) requires crosslinking with reactive polyiso-
cyanates like the “Desmodur L” products. Such combinations yield parquet and stair
coatings with outstanding wear resistance. These systems have also proved ideal as
a barrier coating for tropical woods with a high content of phenolic substances, e.g.
rosewood, which are to be coated with radically curing binders. Without the barrier
coating, the radical crosslinking reaction would be disrupted by chain termination.
High solids
In the field of industrial wood coatings, in contrast to the coating of metals, high
solids systems have not been widely used for satisfying emission requirements. The
main reason is the slower curing speed of high solids systems which can be com-
pensated only to a small extent by a higher curing temperature. Faster curing sys-
tems based on low viscosity polyaspartics, aldimines and/or ketimines also enable
reduction of the solvent content of ready-to-use two-component polyurethane coat-
ings for industrial wood finishing. This principle can be used to formulate high
solids wood coatings with a solids content of up to 70 %.
Thanks to their lower price, unsaturated urethane acrylates based on TDI are ideal
for use in UV-curing coatings for cork tiles. These are used as an alternative to
parquet and as wall and ceiling paneling.
5.1.7 Waterborne polyurethane coatings
Waterborne polyurethane systems also offer many options for favorably influencing
the technical properties of wood coatings. It was only as recently as 1975 that
urethane-modified, medium-oil, water-reducible alkyd resins were first used in any
significant quantity to formulate wood varnishes.
Since the mid-1970s, polyurethane dispersions have been used increasingly in the
formulation of wood and furniture coatings. The reasons for this are not only
environmental as the result of the reduced solvent requirement but also economic
since there is no need for thermal waste gas incineration. These waterborne systems
are used mainly as trade and do-it-yourself coatings for parquet. In Germany,
waterborne coatings now account for more than 70 % of the systems used in this
area of application.
Waterborne one-component polyurethane coatings
One-component polyurethane dispersions have now achieved considerable market
importance. These dispersions, usually based on the aliphatic diisocyanates IPDI
and H12MDI, are characterized by their high level of toughness with elasticity,
resistance to chemicals and weather stability. They are therefore suitable as, for
example, modifying resins for polyacrylate dispersions, above all to improve the
mechanical properties. Such combinations comply with the requirements of EN927.
These products are used in the industrial coating of wooden window frames, in
parquet coatings, and in furniture coatings. Polyurethane/polyacrylate dispersions
based on aliphatic or aromatic isocyanates are being used increasingly for parquet
coating. In addition, pure aliphatic polyurethane dispersions are often used, in
particular for sealing light woods such as maple or beech. Properties such as abra-
sion and scratch resistance can be improved further by the addition of nanoscale
fillers, usually based on inorganic materials.
The N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) still found in many polyurethane dispersions is
now viewed as a critical issue. In the mid term, this will lead to replacement of the
dispersions presently available on the market with new NMP-free dispersions, par-
ticularly in Europe. Coatings with a low or no co-solvent content can be formulated
using polyurethane or polyurethane/polyacrylate dispersions produced by the acetone
process. Of particular benefit is the low solvent content of the ready-to-use coatings.
Waterborne two-component polyurethane coatings
Waterborne two-component polyurethane coatings were first used in the wood and
furniture industry as pigmented systems for coating kitchen and office furniture.
Component B:
“Bayhydur XP 2655”, 80 % in MPA
14.5
100.0
Technical data:
Viscosity: *Set flow time of Component A to
17 s / DIN 4 by adding thickener.
Component A + B approx.
38 s / DIN 4
Solids content 37 %
Pot life approx. 3 h
technology has been dramatic. For one thing, waterborne UV-curing coatings can
be applied using all conventional methods (curtain coating, spraying, rolling) and
they allow cost-effective manufacturing due to the fast crosslinking reaction. A
further benefit is found in the outstanding property profile of the coatings. They are
resistant to abrasion, scratching and chemicals and comply with EN 12720. In short,
application and properties are virtually identical to those of solventborne two-com-
ponent polyurethane coatings, but are coupled with extremely low emissions.
Important in this context is that many of UV-curing dispersions are polyurethane
dispersions. The cured paint films are thus similar to conventional two-component
polyurethane coatings in chemical terms as well. Similar raw materials are used to
achieve much the same end result as that yielded by solventborne two-component
polyurethane coatings. However, very different routes are followed (Figure 5.6).
In a UV-curing coating, in contrast to a two-component coating, the time-determin-
ing polyol/isocyanate reaction already takes place during manufacture of the poly-
urethane dispersion. All that is needed for the coating to crosslink on the substrate
is a few seconds of exposure to UV light. It is obvious that these systems allow a
considerably faster process speed.
A further advantage is the recyclability of the coatings by, for example, ultrafiltra-
tion or application in a wet-on-wet spray booth. This makes spray application an
economically viable option even for shaped components. For this reason, one
important field of application for these coatings is on chairs and other furniture and
stairs. The drying times can be shortened further by using special dryers to acceler-
ate flash-off of the water before UV-curing. Newly developed dryers have been
designed particularly for drying waterborne coatings. The various systems use
infrared or microwave radiation or apply a pre-dried air current to the substrate. An
interesting new use of waterborne UV-curing coatings, on account of their high
weather stability, is in the industrial coating of wooden window frames.
5.1.9 Outlook
The increased market share of waterborne polyurethane coatings – in Europe driven
mainly by strict solvent emission legislation – has resulted in an enormous variety
of raw materials. This in turn has driven the development of waterborne polyure-
thane systems, resulting in a large number of solutions that are of interest not only
in ecological terms. UV-curing waterborne coatings especially are seeing strong
growth worldwide, as application is much faster and overspray losses lower than
is the case with conventional solventborne systems.
The success of modern waterborne polyurethane coatings is foreseeable. In Europe,
this development will be at the cost of solventborne products, including equivalent
polyurethane systems. In parallel, the global market for solventborne two-component
polyurethane coatings continues to grow, a situation which is not expected to change
in the foreseeable future. The reason for this is the rapid growth in strong polyure-
thane coating markets such as the People’s Republic of China. The competition with
other solventborne systems will most likely result in polyurethane coatings continu-
ing to gain greater global importance in the field of wood and furniture coating.
Figure 5.7: Coating systems used in general industrial coating in Europe, 2004,
total: 2.9 million tons [6]
Industrially coated goods are now found in virtually all segments of the consumer
and capital goods industries. Among the largest users of industrial coatings are the
transportation, machine engineering, construction, and household appliances seg-
ments. With European legislators seeking to reduce solvent emissions from coating
processes by means of laws such as the Solvent Emissions Directive (SED), and the
Decopaint Directive (DPD), there is a significant trend toward the use of more
environmentally friendly coating systems, particularly in the field of general indus-
trial coating. High solids coatings, waterborne coatings, powder coatings, and radi-
ation-curing systems are becoming increasingly important (Figure 5.7). Since qual-
ity requirements are also developing steadily, above-average growth of polyurethane
coatings, especially waterborne polyurethane coatings, can be anticipated.
5.2.1.1 Technical aspects of polyurethane coatings
At present, alkyd coatings are still the standard systems in many general industrial
coating applications. A first step in the introduction of polyurethanes in this field
was the modification of alkyd resins with polyisocyanates. On account of their good
property profile and their application efficiency, two-component polyurethane coat-
ings have now become firm favorites for protecting high-quality industrial goods.
Variants
Owing to the wide variability of their components (polyisocyanates and polyol
polymers), polyurethanes coatings can be used in many applications. Combinations
of aromatic polyisocyanates such as TDI adducts and trimers with polyols are
particularly suitable for use as primers and one-coat finishes. These coatings dry
quickly and the resulting paint films have good resistance to chemicals. However,
the coatings crosslinked with aromatic isocyanates show a distinct tendency to
yellowing, which thus limits their use in pale-colored topcoats. Aliphatic polyiso-
cyanates are more versatile and can be used to formulate primers, one-coat finishes
and topcoats. These coatings have good resistance to weathering, chemicals and
yellowing. HDI-based polyisocyanates flexibilize the paint films, whereas IPDI
polyisocyanates exhibit rapid physical drying. The properties of the paint films are
governed largely by the polyol component. The resin type and hydroxyl content
influence the gloss, adhesion and resistance properties of such coatings.
Primers are usually epoxy resin systems or two-component polyurethane formu-
lations (mainly polyester-based). These provide good corrosion protection com-
bined with good adhesion – especially at low hydroxyl contents. When using
polyacrylates in the formulation of primers, these often have a hydroxyl content
of 1.3 to 3 %. If better weather stability is required, products with a hydroxyl
content of about 4 % must be used, thereby yielding a higher crosslinking density.
A hydroxyl content of more than 5 % produces good chemical resistance up to
easy-clean properties.
Properties
The requirements made of coatings
used for general industrial applications
vary as widely as the range of possible
applications. In the case of two-compo-
nent polyurethane coatings, it has been
found that systems which are suitable
for automotive refinishing can also be
used in many general industrial applica-
tions. They meet many of the require-
ments specified. Table 5.3 shows the Figure 5.8: Polyurethane coating for
formulation of a typical white coating extreme conditions
for industrial applications.
The main prerequisites for a uniform appearance and property profile of the paint
films are homogeneous mixing of the components and a suitable application pro-
cess. Depending on the specification, coatings of this type can be dried under
conditions ranging from room temperature to baking. Table 5.4 compares two
industrial coatings, one based on polyurethane and the other on an alkyd resin. It
clearly shows the characteristic advantages of polyurethane coatings in terms of
hardness, resistance to solvents and weather stability.
Applications
Large objects such as construction and agricultural machinery are normally coated
with air-drying systems. Smaller objects such as wheels and window frame profiles
can be baked on-line, e.g. for 15 to 20 minutes at 130 °C.
Air-drying, solventborne one-component polyurethane coatings, usually applied in
thick coats, provide resistance to abrasion and absorb noise and heat. They are
formulated on the basis of moisture-curing, aromatic or aliphatic polyisocyanates.
Solventborne one-component polyurethane baking coatings also have specific
advantages. These combinations of blocked polyisocyanates with polyester and
polyacrylate polyols are preferred to polyester/melamine coatings, above all because
of their superior mechanical and chemical resistance properties. This has led to the
addition of blocked polyisocyanates to polyester/melamine coatings to improve
their resistance properties or film strength. Such coatings are applied by spraying
and crosslinked at the temperature needed to split off the blocking agent. Examples
of applications for one-component polyurethane baking coatings are household
appliances and components for bicycles and cars.
5.2.1.2 Waterborne polyurethane coatings
In order to effectively reduce solvent emissions during coating, low-solvent and
solvent-free binders have been developed since the beginning of the 1990s for
industrial coating applications. The driving force here is the constant tightening of
environmental legislation in Europe and North America. Following initial success
with water-reducible alkyd and polyester coatings, which have the disadvantage of
a relatively high co-solvent content, waterborne polyurethane systems, both air-
drying and baking, now hold a significant market share.
Waterborne one-component polyurethane coatings
Compared with other air-drying coatings, air-drying one-component coatings based
on polyurethane dispersions are characterized by their high mechanical resistance
properties such as abrasion resistance. The reason lies in their chemical structure
comprising urethane and urea groups. This is why they are also used as modifiers
in other waterborne coating systems, e.g. acrylate dispersions.
The film properties can be improved further by intramolecular or intermolecular
crosslinking. This is achieved in, for example, polyester/alkyd polyurethane disper-
sions by oxidative drying under the catalytic influence of metal salts. These disper-
sions yield coatings with particularly good resistance to hydrolysis, good pigment
wetting properties and high gloss (Table 5.5). Key applications for such coatings
are in the production of automotive accessories and components for agricultural
and construction machinery.
Waterborne one-component polyurethane baking systems are already widely used
in industrial coating. Hydrophilic or hydrophobic, blocked polyisocyanates (“Bay-
hydur BL” or “Desmodur BL”) are used as the crosslinkers. Polyesters, acrylates
or epoxy resins are used as the hydroxyfunctional polyols. The emulsifying effect
of the polyol dispersions makes it possible to use hydrophobic polyisocyanates, for
example, in electrodeposition coating processes.
Table 5.5: Properties of an air-drying waterborne one-component polyurethane coating in
comparison with a solventborne one-component alkyd resin coating
PES/polyurethane Solventborne
dispersion one-component
(dried in air or by alkyd resin coating
oxidation)
Solids content at spray viscosity 50–55 44–46
(25 s /DIN cup 4 mm) [%]
Drying at RT [h] 4–6 4–6
Gloss 20° / 60° approx. 85/90 approx. 80/85
Pendulum hardness after 7 days 90 –110 30–40
at RT [s]
Water resistance* 1 2
Weather stability* 2 4
* 1 = very good, 2 = good, 4 = satisfactory
Figure 5.9: Flow chart and characteristics of the coil coating process [7]
Because a coil coating unit is a closed system that is equipped with thermal waste
gas incineration, it is both economical and environmentally friendly. Working by
the motto finish first, fabricate later, coil coating yields a material with a precoated
surface (Figure 5.10), which can be supplied to the metal-processing industry for
cutting, shaping and processing as required.
Market evaluation
The introduction of this precoated material in manufacturing represented an impor-
tant change. Subsequent processing was simplified because post-manufacture coat-
ing was no longer necessary. The outsourcing of production processes in many
industrial sectors has given a significant boost to coil coating in recent years.
In 2005, approximately 18 million tons of steel and aluminum were coil coated
worldwide, with Europe, the Americas (NAFTA + South America) and ROW (Asia,
Africa, Australia) each accounting for approximately one third. In Europe, this
volume corresponds to nearly 1.4 billion square meters of coil coated metal (Figure
5.11, page 110). Considerable growth of the market for coil coated material is also
expected in the coming years.
The most important areas of application for coil coated materials (Figure 5.12, page
110) are construction (cladding and roofing), transportation (automotive and large
vehicle engineering, mobile homes), household appliances (white goods) and gen-
eral engineering.
Coating systems
Worldwide, approximately 550,000 tons of coating materials are applied by the
coil coating process. In 2005, about 170,000 tons of coatings were used in Europe
alone (Figure 5.13, page 110). Most of this volume is accounted for by solventborne
coating systems. The use of waterborne systems is difficult on account of waste
gas incineration and the problems associated with applying powder coatings to a
Figure 5.11: Deliveries of coil coated steel and aluminum in Europe, 2005 [8]
Figure 5.12: Uses of coil coated metal in Europe, 2005, total: 1,370 million m2 [8]
Figure 5.13: Coil coating consumption in Europe, 2005, total: approx. 170,000 tons [8]
fast-moving metal coil have not yet been solved. The use of radiation-curing coat-
ings has been under investigation for some time, but no industrial application has
been found as yet.
Due to the growing demands made of the coating material in terms of flexibility
and resistance properties, polyurethane systems have posted above-average growth
rates in recent years and already rank third (with 11%) after polyester/melamine
systems and PVC plastisols in the field of topcoats. In the area of primers, their
share is estimated to be significantly higher. Table 5.7 shows typical properties of
the coating systems used for coil coating.
Polyester/melamine systems, which account for the largest share of the coating
materials in terms of volume, are characterized by their good resistance and shap-
ing properties. They are used for primers, topcoats and backing coatings.
Polyurethane systems are characterized by an excellent balance between hardness
and flexibility, outstanding resistance to chemicals and good weather stability. They
are preferred for applications requiring extremely good shaping properties (suit-
ability for deep drawing) and resistance properties. They are used for primers,
topcoats and backing coats.
PVC plastisols are used exclusively in the formulation of topcoats. They can be
applied in very high film thicknesses, yielding good corrosion resistance in aggres-
sive atmospheres and very good shaping properties. However, these materials are
sensitive to strong UV radiation and a high thermal load.
PVDF systems are also used exclusively for topcoats. They display high UV resis-
tance and very low chalking. They are characterized by the longest durability in
outdoor applications.
On account of their inadequate weather stability, epoxy resin systems can only be used
for backing coats and primers. They are characterized by good adhesion on metal and
good corrosion resistance, but show certain disadvantages in terms of flexibility.
Polyurethane systems
The standard polyurethane systems used in coil coating are combinations of
blocked polyisocyanates and hydroxyfunctional polymers, usually saturated poly-
esters. The ratio of binder to hardener is usually chosen to yield an equivalent ratio
of hydroxyl-bearing and blocked polyisocyanate groups. Depending on the appli-
cation, the coatings also contain fillers, pigments and additives. Polyurethane sys-
tems formulated in this way are stable at room temperature and only cure after
application on the substrate and on exposure to the necessary baking temperature
(PMT = peak metal temperature). After the blocking agent has split off, the poly-
isocyanate groups react with the hydroxyl groups to form a high molecular poly-
urethane network.
It is a special characteristic of the polyurethane systems that raw material and coat-
ing manufacturers can custom-formulate coating systems by specific choice of the
components. This modular principle permits coating materials with a wide property
spectrum that is unsurpassed.
The choice of blocked polyisocyanate affects the reactivity of the coating system
and the properties of the resulting polyurethane paint film, such as a balance between
hardness and flexibility and resistance properties. The reactivity of the blocked
polyisocyanates depends mainly on the blocking agent, but can be increased by the
use of a suitable catalyst, such as DBTL, which lowers the baking temperature.
While aromatic blocked polyisocyanates are mainly used for the production of
backing coats and primers on account of their low resistance to light, the lightfast
aliphatic polyisocyanates can also be used for topcoats. Polyisocyanates based
on linear aliphatic diisocyanates such as HDI, e.g. “Desmodur BL 3175” are
characterized mainly by their low viscosity and yield paint films with high resis-
tance properties and very high elasticity. Products based on cycloaliphatic diiso-
cyanates such as IPDI, e.g. “Desmodur BL 4265“ or H12MDI, range from highly
viscous to solid and yield tough but flexible coatings with particularly good resis-
tance to chemicals and abrasion. A wide range of hydroxyfunctional polyesters are
available, e.g. the “Desmophen T” product line. The typical hydroxyl contents are
reflected in OH numbers between 5 and 100. The molar masses are between 3,000
and 30,000 g/mol. The ratio of aliphatic and aromatic components can also be
varied within wide boundaries. The excellent balance of hardness and flexibility in
polyurethane coatings is also demonstrated in Figure 5.14.
The superior flexibility of polyurethane coatings compared to polyester/melamine
systems can be attributed to the chemical structure of the hardener used. Blocked
polyisocyanates have a relatively uniform functionality of about three and yield a
largely homogeneous network structure while forming hard and soft segments. In
the case of melamine hardeners, a self-crosslinking reaction takes place in addition
to the desired reaction with the hydroxyfunctional polyester, as a result of which
clusters develop which have an adverse effect on the flexibility (Figure 5.15).
Table 5.8 shows typical properties of polyurethane coatings and the resulting fields
of application. Polyester/melamine or epoxy resin systems are normally used for
backing coats. Polyurethane systems are preferred for the production of sandwich
Table 5.8: Properties of polyurethane coil coatings [9]
Properties Especially important for:
Corrosion resistance All applications (primers)
Overcoatability All applications (universal primers)
Balance between hardness and flexibility, low All applications (primers,
thermal cracking topcoats)
High-build coatings Construction and automotive
(primers, topcoats)
Chemical resistance (hydrolysis, chemicals, spot- Appliances and general engineer-
ting) ing (topcoats)
Weather stability Construction (topcoats)
Abrasion resistance Construction (topcoats)
Printability Automotive (topcoats)
Foam adhesion, gluability All applications (backing coats)
panels for the construction and household appliance industries, because they form
an outstanding bond with rigid polyurethane foams.
Polyurethane primers are used where high requirements are made in terms of flex-
ibility, adhesion and corrosion protection and they are suitable as so-called univer-
sal primers. These coating materials can be applied to nearly all substrates (cold-
rolled steel, electrolytically and hot-dip galvanized steel, galfan, galvalume, alu-
minum) and can be overcoated with a variety of topcoats based on different chem-
istries (polyurethane, polyester/melamine, PVDF systems). They are widely used
in construction, transportation and the household appliances industry.
Special combinations of blocked polyisocyanates and hydroxyfunctional epoxy
resins are used in automotive engineering for the formulation of weldable anti-cor-
rosion primers [10]. The outstanding corrosion protection properties eliminate the
need for the labor-intensive application of cavity sealing systems.
At present, the main fields of application for polyurethane topcoats are in construc-
tion (cladding and roofing), but also in the production of sun protection systems,
window frame profiles, garage doors (Figure 5.16), the automotive industry, e.g.
trucks, mobile homes, traffic signs, and the household appliance industry, e.g. white
goods, lamps and electronic equipment.
Important criteria for the use of these coatings are their excellent flexibility, out-
standing weather stability and resistance to chemicals, as well as special properties
such as overcoatability and printability. High-build polyurethane coatings are being
used increasingly as substitutes for PVC plastisols in the production of cladding
and roofing. Combination of a polyurethane-based primer and topcoat can yield a
total dry film thickness of about 80 to 100 µm. The coatings can also be modified
with polyamide powder to optimize the abrasion resistance.
Polyurethane systems have gained increasing importance as primers, topcoats and
backing coats in the coil coating industry. Their decorative, protective and other
functional properties enable their use in demanding applications in the metal-pro-
cessing industry. Above-average growth is expected to continue.
coatings (golden varnishes) differ from the basecoats (stamping paints) and
clearcoats (silver varnishes) for exterior can coatings (Figure 5.17). The dry film
thicknesses are generally 13 g/m² or 12 µm at the most.
Sheet metal packagings are used in various forms for receiving, transporting and
storing various fillings, primarily foodstuffs (food, luxury food, animal food), but
also chemical products. Much of this packaging is produced from pre-coated sheets
using cutting, soldering, welding, stamping and other shaping processes, such as
deep and stretch drawing. Coil coated metal is processed to a lesser extent. Packag-
ing produced by this resource-kind process can be recycled after use.
Metal packaging has been divided into the following categories corresponding to
its use [12, 13]:
• Beer and beverage
• Food cans
• Aerosol cans
• General line
• Crowns, caps and closures
• Can ends
• Collapsible tubes
Market evaluation
An estimated 520,000 tons
of coatings material are used
worldwide for can coating ap-
plications. In 2004, 155,000 tons
of coatings were used in Europe
alone (Figure 5.18).
Corresponding to the variety
of applications, a wide range
of coating materials is found,
Figure 5.17: Schematic representation of the
the main functions of which are
coating sequence on a three-piece can protective and decorative.
Figure 5.18: Can coating consumption in Europe, 2004, total: approx. 155,000 tons [13]
Coating systems
Interior can coatings (golden varnishes) have the function of creating an impene-
trable barrier between the metal substrate and the product contained by the can. As
well as general coating properties such as adhesion, elasticity, hardness and resis-
tance of the paint film to metal shaping processes, typical preservation properties
are also required. These are resistance to acidic foodstuffs and food additives, even
when subjected to heat sterilization, pasteurization or hot filling, as well as non-
toxicity and tastelessness. Non-toxicity in respect of foodstuffs is governed by EU
legislation (EC Directive 2002/72/EC) and the regulations of the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA §175300). In the case of chemical products, a large
number of special resistance properties are required. These include resistance to
emulsion paints or to the propellants used in aerosol cans. Most interior can coat-
ings are based on combinations of epoxy and phenol resins.
Basecoats (stamping paints) are used as exterior can coatings. These are pigmented
systems which, in addition to the general coating properties already mentioned, must
display good hiding power, optimal levelling, good gloss, stackability, resistance to
yellowing and perfect printability, even with UV-curing printing inks. Initially, mod-
ified alkyd resins and epoxy resins were used to formulate stamping paints. These
were then replaced by polyester and polyacrylate resins, which are now being sub-
stituted by polyurethane systems to satisfy growing coating quality requirements.
Polyurethane systems have the deep drawing properties required in particular for
processing two-piece food cans and satisfy sterilization resistance requirements.
Clearcoats, which give a metallic silver effect on white plate and are therefore also
called silver varnishes, provide the optical finish to an exterior coating. They are
expected to protect complex printed designs from scratching and other damage and
to yield a brilliant appearance with a strong promotional effect.
Epoxy resins and combinations of polyester and amino resins were initially used
for clearcoats as well, but are now being substituted increasingly by polyurethane
systems. Figure 5.19 shows ex-
amples of the application of poly-
urethane coatings as basecoats
and clearcoats.
Polyurethane systems
Solventborne polyurethane sys-
tems for can coating applications
consist of blocked polyisocya-
nates (“Desmodur BL”) and hy-
droxyfunctional polymers (“Des- Figure 5.19: Applications for polyurethane
mophen”). systems in the can coating segment
HDI-based products are preferred for applications which require particularly high
elasticity and deep drawing properties, while products based on IPDI or H12MDI are
used for applications which require special resistance to chemicals and abrasion.
Waterborne polyurethane systems for can coating applications consist of hydro-
philically modified polyisocyanates (“Bayhydur BL”) and water-reducible, hy-
droxyfunctional polymers (“Bayhydrol”). These waterborne systems produce low
emissions and yield coatings which are resistant to sterilization and equal to sol-
ventborne coatings in terms of their other properties. Due to VOC legislation,
waterborne systems will win market share from solventborne systems.
Application efficiency
The major advantage of the spray
application of powder coatings com-
pared to liquid coatings is that the Figure 5.20: Powder coating application using
powder which is not deposited on the corona process
the object – the overspray – can be
collected and mixed with fresh powder without any great need for cleaning. This
results in a high material yield of nearly 100 % which, together with the absence of
solvent emissions and off-gas purification, minimal disposal costs and low operat-
ing costs, makes powder coating an interesting alternative compared to the applica-
tion of liquid coatings, both from ecological and economic aspects.
Uses
The downside is that the use of powder coatings is still limited by a number of
framework conditions.
• Relatively high baking temperatures are required (120 to 220 °C).
• Film thicknesses of about 60 to 70 µm are usually achieved, which is relatively
high compared to liquid coatings (30 to 40 µm).
• In many cases, poorer leveling and resistance properties must be accepted.
In recent years, considerable effort has therefore been invested in overcoming these
disadvantages and expanding the range of applications for powder coatings, for
example, to automotive finishing [16]. Although the films yielded by the coatings are
already of a high quality, there is still the need to further reduce the film thickness
for cost reasons. The success of these efforts is shown by the fact that powder coat-
ings, including polyurethane-based systems, are now used as both primer surfacers
and clearcoats by individual automotive producers in Europe and NAFTA.
Powder crosslinkers
Blocking is necessary because the powder coatings are manufactured by extrusion
at temperatures up to 140 °C. Moreover, powder coatings are expected to have good
storage stability. As a rule, the reactivity of unprotected compounds with NCO
end groups is too high and they would cure prematurely with the coreactant, e.g.
during extrusion.
The reactivity can be controlled by the type of blocking agent used. Today, IPDI
products blocked with ε-caprolactam [17] are widely used. As the powder melts dur-
ing the baking process, such hardeners help produce favorable rheological proper-
ties which has a positive effect on leveling. This is because some of the ε-capro-
lactam remains in the paint film and promotes the flow behavior of the melt [18].
Some of the caprolactam is emitted in the off gas, which explains the low VOC
content of such powder coating systems.
Increasingly, internally blocked polyuretdione hardeners containing no blocking
agent are used, which represents an important step toward the emission-free ap-
plication of polyurethane powder coatings. Typical baking conditions for these
second-generation polyurethane powder coatings are ten minutes at 180 °C object
temperature. Development work to further decrease this temperature by catalysis
has yielded the first successes in recent years. Polyuretdione hardeners can now be
crosslinked fully by baking for ten minutes at 140 °C [19].
There is no doubt that this development will yield new application possibilities for
powder coating systems. Uretdione powder hardeners are characterized by their
very good pigmentability [20]. The outstanding optical properties such as gloss and
leveling are also worth particular mention. These result above all from the low melt
viscosity yielded by polyuretdiones [21].
Powder resins
Hydroxyfunctional terephthalic acid polyesters with different OH numbers and
functionalities have proven ideal as the coreactants for the polyurethane powder
hardeners described above. Due to the variety of binders available on the market,
it is now possible to produce high gloss to dull matte films with good leveling [22],
depending on the formulation.
In a typical industrial coating formulation, polyesters with a hydroxyl number of
30 to 50 are used. Given stoichiometric crosslinking, this yields coatings with good
mechanical resistance (reverse impact) and weather stability (Florida, 5° south: at
least 50 % gloss retention after one year). Stoichiometric crosslinking of polyesters
with a higher hydroxyl number yields coatings with excellent chemical resistance.
Polyesters with a hydroxyl number of 100 or more are suitable for use in the easy-
to-clean coatings that are now increasingly in demand. As well as terephthalic acid
polyesters, isophthalic acid esters have been available for some years. These yield
coatings with particularly good weather stability, referred to as super durable (Flor-
ida, 5° south: at least 50 % gloss retention after two years) [23]. Hydroxyl-bearing
polyacrylates are also used to a small extent.
Properties
A powder coating is not only required to remain chemically stable during prolonged
storage, even at temperatures of 40 to 50 °C, but it must also be free-flowing and
retain its application properties. This must be borne in mind when selecting the
binder. As a rule, a polyurethane powder coating is formulated to have a glass
transition temperature (Tg) of above 50 °C. Due to their pronounced polar proper-
ties, polyurethane powder coatings are characterized by their particularly good
tribo application properties (see above). Depending on the formulation and applica-
tion, the coatings are cured for 10 to 25 minutes at temperatures between 150 and
210 °C. Table 5.9 describes a typical guide formulation for a blocking agent free
polyurethane powder coating.
The main uses for polyurethane powder systems are as coatings for household ap-
pliances, bicycle frames, metal furniture, add-on automotive components, toys and
sports equipment as well as window frames (see Figure 5.21, page 122).
A primary development goal still lies in increasing the reactivity of polyurethane
powder coatings. Reducing the minimum baking temperature to below 140 °C should
open up a range of other applications such as plastics finishing and wood coating.
Table 5.10: Comparison of the properties of selected powder coatings for outdoor applications
COOH- COOH- COOH- OH-
polyester/ polyester/ polyester/ polyester/
TGIC “Primid “Araldit “Crelan
XL 552” PT 910” EF 403”
Appearance, flow ++ + ++ ++
Mechanical properties ++ ++ ++ ++
Weather stability ++ ++ ++ ++
Powder stability + + o +
Overbaking resistance ++ o + +
Gas oven resistance ++ – + +
Cleavage products none water none none
Blister-free in thick coats ++ – ++ +
++ = very good, + = good, 0 = moderate, – = poor
Figure 5.22: World powder coating consumption by chemical system, 2005, approx:
1 million tons [27]
Figure 5.23: World market for anti-corrosion and marine coatings, 2005,
total: approx. 1.6 million tons [35]
Figure 5.24: Use of anti-corrosion and marine coatings in Europe 2005, total: 380,000 tons [35]
For example, the further processing and transport of the coated steel components
are possible much earlier. Figure 5.29 shows a typical application of a single-coat
polyaspartic finish on shotblasted steel.
Wind energy plants
Wind energy is a fast-growing market. Globally installed capacities are expected
to reach 132,000 MW in 2010, an increase from 59,000 MW in 2005 [42]. The de-
mands on coatings in this market are very high since a service life of 30 to 40 years
is expected and typically maintenance is difficult to carry out. Due to the fact that
high performance is inherent to the nature of polyurethanes, they are widely used
in the wind energy market. The main parts of a wind turbine on which polyurethanes
are commonly used are the tower and the blades (see Figure 5.30). The towers are
often made out of steel and therefore have to be protected against corrosion. The
standard in protective coatings is a three-coat system comprising a primer, inter-
mediate coat and topcoat. Two-component polyurethane systems based on acrylic
polyols and aliphatic polyisocyanates are the standard binders for these topcoats.
As a new approach, polyaspartic coatings are used as topcoats for the steel segments
because they yield increased productivity by allowing higher film thicknesses.
The blades are made of composite materials which combine light weight with high
strength. Composites consist of a fibrous reinforcing network embedded in a polymer
matrix. A gelcoat can be used to reduce the fiber patterns on the surface of the parts.
Aliphatic two-component polyurethanes are suitable for these gelcoats due to their
long-term durability, high abrasion resistance and outstanding weather stability. A
two-component polyurethane may consist of a branched short-chain polyester and
an aliphatic HDI polyisocyanate. Recent gelcoat developments focus on polyaspar-
tics which offer the benefits of a shorter curing time and customizable pot life.
5.2.5.7 Pipe coating
A specialty in the segment of heavy corrosion protection is the exterior coating of
pipelines installed in the ground or under water. Deviating from the typical three-
coat structure used in civil engineering applications, an exterior pipe coating is
usually a one-coat system. This is applied directly to the metal substrate without a
primer and has the necessary resistance properties thanks to the high film thick-
nesses of 800 μm to 1,500 μm that are required. This ensures long-term corrosion
protection of the pipelines after installation. The coating systems used for pipes can
be roughly classifed according to the application, depending on whether single pipe
sections are coated in the factory or complete pipelines (or only weld joints) are
coated on-site. In the case of factory coatings (OEM), three-coat systems compris-
ing an epoxy powder primer, epoxy adhesive and polyolefin finish are often used
in addition to pure epoxy powder systems. Also, two-component polyurethane
coating systems are being used increasingly because of the advantages they offer.
Figure 5.31: Applying an OEM polyure- Figure 5.32: Rehabilitating a gas pipeline
thane coating on a pipeline [43] in the Ukraine [44]
chemical thickening during application. Table 5.12 gives an overview of the most
important requirements for underground pipelines as per DIN EN 10290.
In the case of underground pipelines, the mechanical properties of the exterior
coating system are of the greatest importance. For example, the high impact resis-
tance of the coating prevents damage during transportation or subsequent installa-
tion. A flexible coating system makes it possible to cold bend pipe sections in the
field without cracks forming. Good long-term flexibility, even at low temperatures,
and good adhesion on the metal surface are essential for lasting protection of un-
derground pipelines. These properties can be provided by appropriately formulated
aromatic two-component polyurethane systems. As the protective current for pipe-
lines serves as active corrosion protection, the pipe coatings have to pass the ca-
thodic disbondment test as per ASTM G8 or ASTM G42 [45] (Figure 5.33).
Given the many raw materials available for formulating solvent-free two-compo-
nent polyurethane systems, the mechanical properties, viscosity and reaction time
can be optimized specifically to satisfy individual requirement profiles. Standard
products for the development of reactive two-component polyurethane systems are
polyols based on polyethers, polyether/polyester combinations, polyether/polyac-
rylate combinations, polymeric MDI isocyanates, amines and catalysts [46].
Special one-component polyurethane coatings or high viscosity two-component
polyurethane systems are used as repair systems (for spot repair). It should be men-
tioned that the adhesion properties of polyurethane pipe coating systems, especially
if cathodic protection is applied, depends greatly on the pretreatment of the sub-
strate. In both OEM and repair coating work, the substrate has to be shotblasted (SA
3.0 for OEM and SA 2.5 for spot repair, as per ISO 8501-1). The depth of roughness
Rz is between 50 μm to 90 μm as per the given specifications (ISO 4287-1). After
Figure 5.33: Schematic representation of the cathodic protection test system based on
ASTM G42
shotblasting, the surface is checked. The mill parings, mill scale, weld beads and
other surface defects exposed by blasting have to be removed. Particularly in the
case of on-site coating, it is advisable to monitor ambient conditions. The coating
process must be interrupted if the temperature on the steel surface falls 3 °C below
the dew point of the ambient air or is lower than 5 °C, or the relative humidity is
more than 90 %.
Interior pipe coatings
As a rule, only one coat is applied as the interior coating for steel pipes. However, the
film thicknesses are very different to those of the exterior coating and may vary great-
ly depending on specification and application. For the interior coating of gas pipelines,
for example, film thicknesses between 50 μm and 100 μm are required for both OEM
and repair applications. Solvent-free two-component polyurethane systems are also
used for this, as are to solventborne epoxy coatings.
The depth of roughness Rz is in the re-
gion of 50 μm to 70 μm as per the given
specifications (ISO 4287-1). In the case
of drinking water pipelines, the film
thicknesses of the OEM interior coat-
ing range between 300 μm and 500 μm,
while repair coatings are in the region
of 1,000 μm to 3,000 μm. In this appli-
cation, solvent-free, reactive, aliphatic
polyurea systems based on aliphatic
Figure 5.34: Applying an aliphatic poly- polyisocyanates combined with special
urea coating to the interior of a drinking amines have proved ideal due to their
water pipe [44]
outstanding mechanical properties.
These systems are already approved for
drinking water applications in a number
of EU countries (see Figure 5.34).
5.2.6 Wire coating
The winding wires used for electric coils
that produce magnetic fields, in contrast
to electric cables, have only thin insula-
tion layers in the range between 5 and
100 µm. The wires are wound tightly to
yield effective current densities and coil
performance in electrical components
Figure 5.35: Armature winding of coated (see Figure 5.35). The insulation layer
copper wire to produce an AC electric motor of these winding wires is produced by
coating in film thicknesses of 5 to 100 μm. The coating is applied by wetting the
wires in an enamel bath and then stripping them through a die or, in the case of fine
wires, through felt. Several coats of the same coating, usually five to ten, are applied
in succession. The wire is dried in an oven after application of each coat. The oven
temperature is 500 °C or above. The contact times are in the region of seconds on
account of the production speed and vary greatly with the diameter of the wire.
The wire is nearly always made from copper or, more rarely, aluminum. Diameters
typically vary from 0.1 mm to 1 mm in circular wires. However, there are also very
fine wires with diameters starting at approximately 0.018 mm and heavy rectangu-
lar wires with edge lengths in the centimeter range.
The coated wires have to meet many requirements:
• Flexibility
• Coating adhesion
• Abrasion resistance
• Thermal resistance (softening range)
• Temperature index
• Resistance to chemicals (sealants)
• Resistance to oxidation
• Dielectric strength
• Threshold temperature of the operating range (tan delta)
• Direct solderability
Coils which are used in generators, electric motors and transformers – all apparatus
which operate at high energy densities or high ambient temperatures – are subjected
to correspondingly high continuous temperature loads. Polymers with high thermal
resistance are used as the insulation material because they can meet the requirement
profile. Polyesters are most widely used, followed by polyester imides and amide
imides. Imides and polyhydantoins are used for special applications. For their appli-
cation as coatings, however, it is essential that these polymers are completely
soluble in organic solvents. N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), cresols and phenols are
often the only solvents suitable. The solvents which evaporate during drying of the
coatings are catalytically burned in the wire coating machine, thus contributing a
considerable amount of energy for operating the drying oven.
If wires are to be joined by soldering or in some other way, the insulating coating
must first be burned off or removed mechanically. This usually involves increased
effort. It is generally perceived as a disadvantage that polyurethanes have lower
heat resistance than polyester imides, but this has proved to be a significant advan-
tage in wire coating. At the temperatures used in direct soldering (starting at around
320 °C), the urethane groups are split off so quickly that the entire coating film
vaporizes in just a few seconds, depending on the wire diameter. Polyurethane-
coated wires can therefore be directly soldered without pretreatment, an undeniable
As a result, the binder particles carry a positive charge which, given simultaneous
charge equilibrium, enables them to coagulate as a deposit on the car body that
serves as the cathode. Polyurethane/epoxy resin combinations dominate as binders
in this application. As a rule, these are amine-extended, aromatic epoxy resins based
on bisphenol A and incorporating blocked di- or polyisocyanates. Quaternization
of the tertiary amine function with organic acids yields the necessary positive
charge on the particles.
The reversibly blocked isocyanate groups incorporated in the resin molecule allow
subsequent crosslinking in the baking oven at temperatures of 150 to 180 °C.
The di- or polyisocyanates used to synthesize the polyurethane/epoxy system are
based on toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and increasingly also diphenylmethane diiso-
cyanate (MDI). Monomeric MDI can be used, but the oligomeric prepolymerized
form is preferred. CED primers formulated with these materials are characterized by
improved bath stability and the increased stone chip resistance of the baked film.
CED systems formulated with aliphatic isocyanates based on HDI or IPDI or their
derivatives are a specialty (Japan). The advantages of these systems are their low
baking temperatures of 150 to 160 °C and their lightfastness. However, the corro-
sion protection properties of these products are inferior to MDI systems.
Among the blocking agents used are ε-caprolactam, methyl ethyl ketoxime or ether
alcohols such as diethylene glycol monomethyl ether. When selecting the blocking
agent, it is important that the resulting products have adequate stability, e.g. to
hydrolytic degradation (bath stability), and that the unblocking temperature is not
too high. Development work by automotive coating manufacturers is aimed at
achieving lead-free systems and lower baking temperatures to satisfy ecological
requirements, and improved stone chip resistance and corrosion protection in
response to technical demands.
Seam sealers are used to seal the weld seams in a car body. The welding process
removes anti-corrosion layers such as the zinc galvanization or organic precoats
on the steel, exposing it to the risk of corrosion at the weld seams. To provide
adequate protection, a seam sealer must be sufficiently flexible and suitable for
application in a thickness of several millimeters. Polyurethane systems meet both
requirements and thus have specific advantages over the established PVC systems.
In contrast to PVC materials, solvent-free polyurethane systems can be applied in
coats thinner than 100 μm which yield a compact film with outstanding adhesion
on the CED primer. Despite the thinner film thickness, their abrasion resistance is
as good as that of PVC systems (Figure 5.39). For this reason, polyurethane under-
body coating systems can be applied in thin layers in areas of the car body which
are less exposed to stone chipping. This contributes to an overall reduction in the
weight of the vehicle.
Depending on the polyol/polyisocyanate combination, one- and two-component
polyurethane systems can be formulated to yield the desired flexibility. One par-
ticular advantage is that the flexibility at low temperatures is not reduced signifi-
cantly, so the stone-chip resistance of the systems remains effective. As well as
seam sealing and underbody coating systems, materials are applied to provide
sound insulation. These are usually mats based on bituminous substances that are
fitted by hand. The mats melt during pre-gelling of the underbody coating system
and adhere to the substrate.
Figure 5.39: Abrasion resistance of PVC and polyurethane underbody coating systems
(Sablux test)
Suitable solvent-free polyurethane systems can also be formulated for this applica-
tion. These coatings can be applied on the automated line. They have excellent
long-term adhesion to the substrate and satisfy the sound insulation requirements
of the automotive industry. Also available are solvent-free, one-component poly-
urethane underbody coating and seam sealing systems containing microencapsu-
lated hardeners, e.g. TDI-based. Depending on the type of microencapsulation,
these systems can be baked at temperatures of 100 °C. The microcapsules are
destroyed by the heat, releasing the hardener for the crosslinking reaction. However,
because of its relatively high price, this technology is used only in niche applica-
tions[49]. One alternative technology to the use of coatings for underbody protection,
as described above, is to fit plastic panels on the undersides of cars. These provide
stone-chip protection and sound insulation.
5.3.3 Primer surfacers
Originally conceived as an intermediate coat with filling properties, the primer
surfacer has undergone considerable transformation in recent decades, with more
change still to come. For example, it has increasingly assumed a color-imparting
function in support of the topcoat. In order to satisfy demands for solvent reduction,
waterborne binders have been developed which have a property profile fully equiv-
alent to solventborne primer surfacer resins.
Solventborne primer surfacers
The stone-chip protection properties required of a primer surfacer can be optimized
using polyurethane resins, which has allowed their breakthrough in this field of
application. Polyurethanes yield primer surfacers that combine toughness with flex-
ibility yet retain good sanding properties. Moreover, the stone-chip resistance of
primer surfacers formulated with alkyd and polyester resins crosslinked with
melamine and/or urea resins can be improved considerably by adding blocked
polyisocyanates. This improves the stone-chip behavior of the overall finish.
The greatest effect is achieved using blocked polyisocyanates based on hexameth-
ylene diisocyanate (HDI) or diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI). Considering the
baking temperatures of 130 to 150 °C that are typical for primer surfacers, estab-
lished blocking agents such as methyl ethyl ketoxime and malonic acid ester are
suitable, but not, for example, ε-caprolactam [50].
A typical primer surfacer formulation (solventborne) is shown in the left column of
Table 5.13 (page 142). In 2003, around 40 % of the solventborne primer surfacers
used in Europe contained blocked polyisocyanates, either combined with melamine
or used as the sole hardener. In this way, a very broad spectrum of requirements
with respect to application reliability, leveling and stone-chip resistance can be
satisfied. The solvent can be chosen to match the flash-off behavior of the primer
surfacer to the conditions on individual coating lines.
Table 5.13: Comparison of two typical formulations for solventborne and waterborne
primer surfacers
Solventborne primer Waterborne primer
surfacer [% by wt.] surfacer [% by wt.]
Polyester “Desmophen T 1665”*/** “Bayhydrol PT 241” **
“Desmophen 670” (calculated on solids) 19%
(calculated on solids) 21%
Polyisocyanate “Desmodur BL 3175” ** “Bayhydur BL 5140” **
(blocked) (calculated on solids) 7 % (calculated on solids) 7 %
Melamine 9% 3%
Pigments/fillers 30 % 21 %
Org. solvent 33 % 5%
Water – 45 %
Sum 100 % 100 %
* “Desmophen T” designates wax-free polyesters.
** Supplied by Bayer MaterialScience
the other hand a waterborne polyurethane dispersion is used in the polyol component.
Good conditions therefore exist to produce primer surfacers with properties typical
of polyurethane systems, such as flexibility and stone-chip resistance.
A waterborne primer surfacer formulation is shown in Table 5.13 (right column).
In 2003, the automotive industry in Europe used waterborne primer surfacers on
some 9 million cars, which is equivalent to about 46 % of the total market. The
upward trend in the use of waterborne primer surfacers remains strong (Figure
5.40). Since 2000, Japanese and Chinese automakers have also been increasingly
using waterborne primer surfacers.
To ensure reliable application of waterborne primer surfacers, the spray booths and
flash-off zones must be air-conditioned to maintain the correct humidity and tem-
perature. The addition of 5 to 10 % by weight of co-solvent improves the flash-off
behavior, making the resulting paint film less vulnerable to fluctuating conditions
on the coating line. Despite the low solids content of around 50 % by weight, com-
pared to 70 % by weight in the case of high solid systems, solvent emissions from
waterborne primer surfacers are halved.
Alternative concepts
Other new concepts have been developed in parallel with waterborne primer surfacer
systems. One example is a process in which, instead of applying and baking a primer
surfacer in a separate operation, a functional coat of reduced film thickness is applied.
This may or may not be force-dried before wet-on-wet application of the topcoat.
Both coats, or in the case of metallic coatings, all three coats, are then baked together.
For both economic and environmental reasons, these 3 Coat-1 Bake systems have
attracted great interest in Europe and Asia and are already in use there [53].
A further alternative to the classic primer surfacer is represented by powder coating
systems. So far, this technology has only been used in niche applications in Europe.
In the United States, on the other hand, powder primer surfacers has been used on
nearly 2.5 million cars and light commercial vehicles since 1997 – almost 15% of
total production. Most of these powder systems are based on polyester/epoxy chem-
istry. If high stone-chip protection is required, U.S. automakers may also consider
polyurethane powder systems and these are already in use there.
5.3.4 Basecoats and clearcoats
Around 80 % of the topcoats used in the automotive industry are two-coat systems
consisting of a color-imparting basecoat and a clearcoat applied wet-on-wet (see
Figure 5.41, page 144). The remaining 20 % are one-coat systems, i.e. pigmented
topcoats, which – as the term implies – are applied and baked on in a single layer.
As the optical and long-term resistance properties of these coatings are inferior to
two-coat systems, their use is declining. This technology will therefore not be
discussed further here.
Basecoats
The main function of the basecoat is to impart color and special effects. Modern
basecoats cannot only be formulated in virtually any color but also to yield metal-
lic or pearlescent effects. A key function of the basecoat binder is to maximize
these effects.
Both solventborne and waterborne basecoat systems are found on the market.
There is a particularly pronounced trend toward the use of waterborne systems as
these allow a large reduction in solvent emissions of up to 85 % compared to sol-
ventborne formulations. Moreover, waterborne systems have advantages with
regards to special effects and stone-chip resistance. In 2004, waterborne basecoats
were applied on around 60 % of all the vehicles produced in Europe and the trend
remains on the increase.
Most basecoat formulations contain combinations of polyacrylate and polyurethane
binders. Polyurethane resins, e.g. “Bayhydrol”, greatly enhance important quality
characteristics such as brilliance, adhesion, leveling, flexibility, and, as a result,
stone-chip resistance.
Clearcoats
The binders used in clearcoats are expected to satisfy particularly high requirements
in terms of lightfastness, weather stability, resistance to etching and scratching, and
retention of optical properties (gloss, brilliance), even after many years of use. Most
of the binders used today in the formulation of automotive clearcoats are acrylic
resins crosslinked with various hardener systems.
Figure 5.41: Coating line for waterborne basecoats and two-component polyurethane
clearcoats in the automotive industry [62]
Figure 5.46: Self-healing two-component polyurethane clearcoat with high reflow capacity
TSA – – – +
One-component + + ++ +
polyurethane/TSA
Two-component ++ ++ ++ ++
polyurethane, hs
One-component + + + -
polyurethane,
waterborne
Two-component + ++ ++ ++
polyurethane,
waterborne
Powder + + + +
++ = very good, + = good, - = moderate
The addition of blocked IPDI-based polyisocyanates can greatly increase the acid
resistance of solventborne melamine-crosslinked clearcoat systems. Here too,
blocked HDI-based polyisocyanates primarily increase the scratch resistance. On
account of their tendency to yellow on exposure to heat, blocked polyisocyanates
were long considered unsuitable for use in automotive OEM topcoats. Today, hard-
eners blocked with 3,5-dimethylpyrazole are used almost exclusively since they
are virtually non-yellowing [70]. However, the other film properties are not of the
same high level as those yielded by two-component polyurethane coatings. Block-
ing polyisocyanates therefore does not serve primarily to improve the film proper-
ties but to allow a simplification of the application process compared with two-
component technology.
Waterborne one-component polyurethane clearcoats
Alternative systems based on aqueous products have also been developed for one-
component automotive clearcoats. In the same way as for solventborne clearcoats,
the addition of blocked polyisocyanates in waterborne one-component systems
greatly improves the resistance properties. A slurry clearcoat based on blocked
polyisocyanates has been in use in automotive OEM finishing for many years as a
solvent-free alternative to powder clearcoats. The leveling and brilliance of the
waterborne one-component clearcoats are highly dependent on the rate of evapora-
tion of the water and thus on ambient conditions, making process control more
complex than when using solventborne systems. Waterborne two-component
clearcoat systems perform far better in this respect as they are less sensitive to
fluctuations in humidity and temperature.
5.3.5 Outlook
Since their first use in 1985, polyurethane clearcoats have experienced dramatic
growth rates in automotive OEM finishing. In 2005 around 15 million cars world-
wide were finished with two-component polyurethane clearcoats, polyurethane-
modified one-component clearcoats, or clearcoats containing polyurethane struc-
tures (carbamate systems). This upward trend is continuing, especially in the case
of two-component polyurethane clearcoats. Strong growth rates are expected in the
coming years, particularly in Asia, often in combination with the introduction of
waterborne basecoats. The waterborne two-component polyurethane clearcoats
described above represent ecologically interesting alternatives which permit a fur-
ther reduction in solvent emissions from the coating process.
UV-curing polyurethane clearcoats also represent an innovative development. They
can be crosslinked just photochemically (mono-cure) or by a combination of pho-
tochemical and thermal curing (dual-cure) [71]. This technology would appear to
offer further scope for optimizing the scratch and chemical resistance properties
(see Figure 5.47, page 150).
Figure 5.47: Optimization potential of scratch and etch resistance of OEM clearcoats
Figure 5.48 and 5.49: Examples of the application of two-component polyurethane coatings
This development was preceded in 1965 by the first use of lightfast two-component
polyurethane coatings on the exterior of airplanes and rail vehicles. Polyurethane
coatings now dominate the transportation sector (including trucks and buses)
worldwide [74]. The reason for this success is the high resistance properties of
polyurethane systems compared to the previously used coatings based on nitrocel-
lulose and alkyd resins.
The use of polyurethane systems on rail vehicles meant that the intervals between
necessary repair finishing and complete recoating could be prolonged. Compared
to coatings based on nitrocellulose or alkyd resins, polyurethane systems display
much higher resistance to both alkaline and acid cleaning agents, which are used
Figure 5.51: Comparison of the weather stability of various clearcoats for automotive
refinishing (here: UV-A weathering)
to remove brake dust and insect remains, as well as better weather stability (UV
radiation, Figure 5.51). German railway operator Deutsche Bahn, for example,
chose polyurethane systems for its vehicles not only because of the extended main-
tenance intervals, but also because the rail vehicles retain their new appearance
much longer, which has a positive impact on the company’s image.
In addition to the typical two-component polyurethane systems which dominate as
primer surfacers, topcoats and clearcoats in automotive refinishing, there are coat-
ings based on other types of resins for use in special applications. These include,
for example, solventborne one-component basecoats formulated with cellulose
acetobutyrate (CAB) and co-resins. Another example is found in the high-grade
corrosion protection primers (wash primers) based on polyvinyl butyral (PVB)
combined with phosphoric acid. Lastly, alkyd and nitrocellulose resins are used to
formulate one-component primer surfacers and topcoats of medium quality.
high quality also applies to transportation coating. In this sector, too, polyurethane
systems have set benchmarks and in many cases already yield the same high qual-
ity as automotive OEM coatings.
However, a refinish coating must not only provide optimum surface protection, it
must also be economical, i.e. fast-drying, so that bodyshop capacity can be used
efficiently. Guide values for drying times are maximum 30 minutes at 60 °C or 4
hours at room temperature.
Figure 5.52 shows the typical sequence of automotive refinishing. The damaged car
body component is hammered out and sanded to improve the adhesion of the sub-
sequent functional coats. Dents deeper than 1 mm can be covered with a polyester
knifing filler, which is then sanded to give a smooth surface. A one-component anti-
rust primer, known as a wash primer, is then applied in a thickness of about 10 µm
to prevent the corrosion of any areas of metal that may have been laid bare by sand-
ing. This primer is based on polyvinyl butyral and contains phosphoric acid.
The resulting system has an average total film thickness of about 200 μm (exclud-
ing knifing filler) in the case of refinishing and about 300 μm in the case of OEM
coating, making it much thicker that an automotive refinish coating. The main
reason for this is that the system does not include a CED primer so corrosion
protection has to be ensured mainly by application of a higher film thickness
(Figure 5.54).
On account of the larger coating volumes that are processed in transportation coating,
stirring units (rail vehicles, buses) or even two-component mixing equipment (OEM
truck coating) are often used. The application is usually performed using the airless
or airmix method. The ideal mixing ratio for topcoats is 2 : 1 (mill base : hardener),
but for primer surfacers it is usually 4 : 1 due to the lower hardener requirement.
In the transportation sector, drying is often done at room temperature. When coat-
ing rail vehicles, the maximum oven temperature is 60 °C. Only truck cabins are
finished with baking coatings that are dried at temperatures similar to those used
in automotive OEM finishing (130 to 160 °C). However, the trend here is also
towards lower drying temperatures. Table 5.16 summarizes the typical character-
istic data of a refinish coating dried at low temperature. The key features are out-
standing optical properties (gloss, leveling), the retention of these optical properties
over long periods, mechanical resistance (resistance to scratching and stone chip-
ping), gasoline resistance and resistance to chemicals and etching (acid rain, caus-
tic cleaning agents). The coatings are formulated to yield blister-free films at the
high film thicknesses (more than 100 μm) which may occur in refinishing.
Mill base
The resins used have a hydroxyl content between 2 and 8 % by weight (calculated
on the solid resin) and an average molecular weight between 5,000 and 20,000 g/
mol. The relationship between the molecular weight and specific coating properties
is of particular significance when drying at room temperature. Although resins with
a high molecular weight produce the fast drying required, a correspondingly large
amount of solvent is needed to adjust the coating to spray viscosity (flow time).
This is not compatible with the demand for environmentally friendly coatings (see
VOC problems). In principle, the solvent content of a ready-to-spray coating can
be more easily reduced when using polyester resins than when using polyacrylates.
However, polyacrylates generally exhibit much faster drying and better weather
stability than polyesters, which has made polyacrylates the dominant binder type
in automotive refinish clearcoats. The conflict between achieving fast drying and
a high solid content remains the focus of intense research activity, which has led
to the development of high solid systems and reactive thinners such as aldimines,
ketimines and aspartic esters.
Table 5.17: Aliphatic polyisocyanates and polyols for automotive refinishing systems
Type Typical NCO con- Glass Properties and
solids tent [%] 1) transition applications
content [%] tempera-
and solvent ture Tg [°C]
HDI biuret 3) 75 MPA/X 16.5 approx. – 60 Standard grade for
primers, primer surfac-
ers and topcoats
1) Calculated on supply form; 2) Calculated on solid resin; 3) e.g. “Desmodur N75 MPA/X”; 4) “Desmodur
N 3390 BA/SN”; 5) “Desmodur Z 4470”; 6) “Desmophen A 450 BA/X”; 7) “Desmophen 650 BA”
coatings) are preferred for automotive refinish coating because they are easier to
handle and because statutory VOC threshold values are higher. In many ways, high
solid coatings perform similarly to their conventional counterparts, e.g. in terms of
process reliability for the applicator. Only in the case of basecoats are there no
alternatives to waterborne systems due to their solids content of about 20 to 30 %.
High solid, solventborne basecoats make little technical sense, since the aluminum
particles (flakes) contained in metallic systems require a large liquid content (water
in the case of waterborne basecoats) to ensure their uniform alignment as the coat-
ing dries. Waterborne basecoats already have a market share of about 50 % in
Europe (2006). Waterborne primer surfacers and clearcoats are also already on the
market, but as yet with limited success.
The situation in the case of transportation coating is totally different (Solvent
Emissions Directive 1999 /13/EC). The legislator has set much lower thresholds
than those for automotive refinishing, depending on the metal surfaces being coated.
Moreover, transportation coating is often a (semi-) industrial process, which per-
mits better control during the preparation and application of the coatings. In the
past, certain companies (e.g. Deutsche Bahn) switched to the use of waterborne
coating systems to better protect their employees from solvent emissions and to
promote their (green) image. In their function as opinion leaders, these compa-
nies significantly furthered the market penetration of waterborne formulations in
transportation coating. Germany, the largest Western European market, often uses
waterborne two-component polyurethane primers and almost always waterborne
two-component polyurethane topcoats in refurbishing passenger rail vehicles and
locomotives. These systems are being tested in France, Austria and the United
Kingdom, and are already used to a certain extent. Waterborne two-component
polyurethane topcoats have been used with great success in the OEM coating of
truck chassis for some years.
are used for buses and airplanes, waterborne topcoats and, more recently, water-
borne basecoat/clearcoat systems have been used increasingly, especially for rail
vehicles and trucks. Waterborne primers (direct-to-metal) and primer surfacers are
already available and in use.
5.4.5.1 Two-component polyurethane high solid coatings
Two-component high solid polyurethane coatings are based on the same chemistry
as the established solventborne two-component polyurethane coatings. However,
the coreactants used are lower molecular weight products with a narrow molecular
weight distribution that ensure that less solvent is required to adjust the coatings to
application viscosity. A large range of polyisocyanates and polyols is available to
achieve that goal (Table 5.19). The end properties of the paint films are of the high
quality required.
In the case of high solid acrylates, the average molecular weight is only half that
of conventional acrylates. Various polyols are available depending on the required
property profile of the film. As automotive refinish coatings are also expected to
yield scratch-resistant paint films, suitable polyols have been developed. One
approach is to formulate self-healing clearcoats via an increased crosslinking den-
sity and a low glass transition temperature (Tg) [60, 61].
Compared to the conventional system, the molecular weight of low viscosity HDI
isocyanurate is also about 20 % lower (Table 5.19). The viscosity of the supply form
is thereby reduced from 3,000 to 1,200 mPa·s. Using a special catalyst technology,
the trimerization of hexamethylene diisocyanate can be made to produce predom-
inantly asymmetric trimers (iminooxodiazine dione). This molecular structure
greatly reduces the viscosity of the HDI isocyanurate to 700 mPa·s, while the
functionality of less than 3 is retained [76]. Coatings based on the high solid products
described above yield VOC values of less than 420 g/l. They thus meet the require-
ments of the Decopaint Directive 2004/42/EC.
5.4.5.2 Two-component very high solid polyurethane coatings
Low emission two-component polyurethane coatings with a VOC value of less than
250 g/l require the use of additive resins, such as reactive thinners, which have a
strong viscosity-reducing effect. These substances are mixed with the polyols or
can be used without polyols. Special, extremely low viscosity polyisocyanates are
used as hardeners. Suitable reactive thinners such as aldimines, ketimines and
aspartates are shown in Table 5.20 [77] (page 164). These amine reactive thinners
crosslink via secondary amino groups. They are sterically hindered to reduce their
reactivity, making them easy to handle.
The low viscosity symmetric and asymmetric HDI trimers described above are used
as the polyisocyanates in very high solid (VHS) coatings. Also suitable are HDI
allophanates and uretdiones adjusted to extremely low viscosities (Table 5.19).
Table 5.19: Coating raw materials for low emission two-component polyurethane
high solid topcoats
Type Typical NCO Vis- Glass Properties and
solids content cosity transition applications
content and func [mPa·s] tempera-
[%] and tionality 23 °C ture Tg [°C]
solvent [%] 1)
HDI isocyan- 100 23.0 / 3.1 1,200 approx. -60 Standard for all
urate 3) applications
HDI iminooxa- 100 23.5 / 3.1 700 approx. -60 HDI trimers
diazine dione 4) with the lowest
viscosity at a
functionality > 3
HDI allophan- 100 19.8 / 2.5 350 approx. -60 Low viscosity
ate
HDI uretdione 5) 100 21.8 / 2.5 150 approx. -60 Low viscosity
HDI uretdione 100 22.5 / 2.3 80 approx. -60 Polyisocyanate
with the lowest
viscosity
1) Calculated on supply form; 2) Calculated on solid resin; 3) e.g. “Desmodur N 3600”; 4) “Desmodur
XP 2410”; 5) “Desmodur N 3400”; 6) “Desmodur XP 2565”; 7) “Desmophen A XP 2594”
• Greater hardness and toughness (Tg: 10 to 30 °C) with a low minimum film-
forming temperature (< 0 °C)
• Improved pigment wetting
• Improved substrate adhesion
• Improved elasticity and thus increased stone-chip resistance
The particular advantage of waterborne basecoats lies in the reduced organic sol-
vent emissions. If the application process is included in the emission calculation,
a reduction of up to 60 % can be achieved. In addition, the better hiding power of
these materials means that two spray passes instead of the usual three are sufficient
to ensure good coverage.
Experience has shown that the quality (storage stability, effects, shade matching)
and cost-effectiveness (spray passes, coating times, drying cycles) of waterborne
basecoats are equivalent to those of solventborne basecoats. In the case of special
colors or when working with solvent-sensitive substrates, their performance is in
fact superior to solventborne systems.
Especially suitable on the polyisocyanate side are low viscosity hardeners, which
may be matched to the viscosity of the waterborne polyol component by dilution
with organic solvents, making them easier to incorporate. These hardeners are based
on low viscosity isocyanurates and iminooxadiazine diones of hexamethylene
diisocyanate (HDI), HDI and IPDI allophanates, and HDI uretdiones (Table 5.19).
Iminooxadiazine diones (asymmetric HDI trimers) in particular are excellent hard-
eners for waterborne two-component polyurethane coatings due to their high iso-
cyanate functionality (>3) and their good dispersibility in waterborne systems (as
a result of their very low viscosity). On the other hand, polyisocyanates modified
with emulsifiers (hydrophilically modified polyisocyanates) are also used in the
formulation of waterborne two-component polyurethane coatings for automotive
refinish and transportation coating due to their easy incorporation in waterborne
systems (Table 5.22, page 170).
The products yielded by reacting hydroxyfunctional polyethers with an excess of
HDI or IPDI trimer are characterized by good miscibility with polyol dispersions
on application of low shear (manual processing). In the polyether allophanate-
modified polyisocyanates, the hydrophilic polyether segments are connected to
the base polyisocyanate via allophanate structures, resulting in a higher isocya-
nate functionality and a reduced emulsifier content with reduced hydrophilicity of
the hardener. Such hardeners are particularly suitable for transportation coating,
where good hardness and high resistance properties are required. The polyiso-
cyanate hardeners of the third generation, which are hydrophilically modified
with ionic amino sulfonate units, are characterized by a significantly reduced
content of hydrophilic groups – with a comparably good dispersibility. The
chemical resistance, the drying and hardness development of films cured with
this new type of hardener offer scope for further significant improvement. On
account of the fast drying and excellent optical film properties, these hardeners
are particularly suitable for formulating clearcoats and topcoats for automotive
refinish and transportation coating, which make very high demands in terms of
film resistance properties.
When selecting a polyisocyanate hardener, it is important to find the best com-
promise between easy and reliable incorporation in the polyol dispersion on the
one hand (possibly considering manual mixing) and achieving the necessary
coating properties (especially hardness, gloss/haze, water resistance) on the other
hand. Good compromises can be achieved by mixing low viscosity with hydro-
philically modified hardeners, typically in a ratio of 1 : 1. Also, as is common in
the formulation of solventborne coatings for automotive refinish and transporta-
tion coating, mixtures of an HDI trimer with an IPDI allophanate or trimer can
be used to accelerate drying. One of these two components is hydrophilically
modified.
Industrial coating quality 48.5 3.0 1,600 PnB/SN 4 8.5 + 35 – Fast drying. low VOC
7)
45 3.9 2,000 PnB/SN 8 7.8 + 50 – Fast drying. very good perfor-
8)
High quality mance level achieved rapidly
41 4.8 < 200 – – 7.5 – Two-component primer surface
Early sandability 9) with early sandability
1) BG = butylene glycol; BDG = butylene diglycol; PnB = propylene glycol n-butyl ether; SN = solvent naptha 100; 2) “Bayhydrol LS 2139/2”; 3) “Bayhydrol
LS 2290”; 4) “Bayhydrol XP 2469”; 5) “Bayhydrol A 145”; 6) “Bayhydrol XP 2470”; 7) “Bayhydrol XP 2620”; 8) “Bayhydrol 2601”; 9) “Bayhydrol XP 2546”
169
6)
Medium hydrophilicity 100 3,500 21.2 with comparable dispersibily
IPDI / standard 7) 70 (BA) 600 13.4 3.0 – High glass transition temperature for
fast drying and high hardness
– Excellent weather stability
1) “Bayhydur 3100”; 2) “Bayhydur 304”; 3) “Bayhydur 305”; 4) “Bayhydur XP 2547”; 5) “Bayhydur XP 2487/1”; 6) “Bayhydur XP 2655”;
7) “Bayhydur 401-70”
The first two targets will only be achieved through intensive cooperation between
the manufacturers of raw materials, equipment and coatings. New mixing, drying
and application concepts could be the key to boosting market penetration of water-
borne two-component polyurethane systems in the automotive refinish and trans-
portation coating segments. It is anticipated that greater efforts will made in these
directions with the entry into force of European VOC legislation in 2007. Raw
material manufacturers are already currently working intensively on further reduc-
ing the co-solvent content in dispersions.
7 d at RT 1 1
7 d at RT + 16 h at 50 °C 0 0
Water resistance1)
7 d at RT 0 0 –1
7 d at RT + 16 h at 50 °C 0 0
Pendulum hardness
7 d at RT [s] 100 160
7 d at RT + 16 h at 50 °C [s] 180 160
Outdoor weathering,
24 months in Florida 88 / 86 87 / 85
Gloss 20° before/after
1,000 h QUV (313 nm)
Gloss 20° before/after 88 / 86 87 / 85
1) Rating: 0 = good, 5 = unsatisfactory
capped with IPDI or H12MDI. These products, in combination with aliphatic diami-
nofunctional or triaminofunctional resins, produce instant-set durable polyurea
coatings with excellent physical properties. These aliphatic isocyanate prepolymer-
based polyurea systems are relatively expensive and can entail other problems. For
instance, sometimes they cure too quickly for certain applications. The cure speed
and cost of these systems can be reduced by replacing the aliphatic amines with
amine-terminated polyethers or aromatic amine chain extenders. However, this
often lowers resistance to UV exposure. Nevertheless, the UV resistance of these
“light-stable” systems is still significantly better than in corresponding systems
based on aromatic polyisocyanates.
Recently, newer approaches have been taken which have used aliphatic polyisocya-
nate adducts or prepolymers. These products (based on HDI or IPDI) are currently
used in standard, high-performance polyurethane coatings in the automotive OEM,
refinish, construction, and general industrial markets (e.g. “Desmodur N 3400”,
“Desmodur XP 2410”, “Desmodur XP 2580”).
These products are generally already stripped of monomeric diisocyanate, yet
have relatively low viscosities. They are commonly used in spray coatings within
well-established industrial hygiene guidelines. They usually have more than three
isocyanate groups per molecule, which can lead to more rigid polymers with
plastic-like physical properties, rather than the true elastomeric character required
for this application.
Polyester polyols often serve as coreactants for aliphatic isocyanate adducts. The
molecular design possibilities for these polyesters are very broad and easily custom-
ized to compensate for the higher functionality of the aliphatic polyisocyanate adducts
used. This is achieved by selecting polyesters with the appropriate molecular weight,
functionality, and glass transition temperature (Tg). Polyesters can, however, suffer
a weakness toward hydrolysis. One way to improve the hydrolysis resistance of
polyester-based elastomers is to incorporate urea linkages into the polymer.
Commonly, urea linkages are formed when amines are introduced as coreactants
along with the polyester in the formulations. There are several amine choices avail-
able. Aromatic amines can be used here with some sacrifice in color stability. The
use of primary and secondary aliphatic di- and triamines can help here as well, but
the difference in reactivity between these amine (NH2) reactive groups and the poly-
ester (OH) is very large. If too much of these highly reactive amines are used, they
will react preferentially and the resulting urea can precipitate from the reacting mass,
bringing with it unreacted isocyanate. This in turn leaves an excess of polyester in
the system that can later exude from the elastomer. Therefore, it may be critical to
catalyze the polyol/isocyanate reaction to match that of the amine/isocyanate reaction
to obtain complete polymer curing and optimum physical properties.
An alternative aliphatic amine type is polyaspartic ester (see also 3.7.7 and 5.2.5.6).
This relatively new class of amino coreactants consists of hindered secondary
amines, produced by the reaction of primary amines with maleic acid esters [85].
The reactivity of polyaspartic acid esters (polyaspartics) varies depending on the
structure of the base amine. Slower reactivity is due mainly to steric hindrance
from pendant groups on the amines [86]. Polyaspartics can be combined with pri-
mary amines and polyesters to provide a balanced reactivity profile, leading to
excellent physical properties when combined with the aliphatic isocyanates.
The physical properties of several aliphatic isocyanate-based spray elastomer sys-
tems using different polyesters with polyaspartics can be seen in Table 5.25. All
of them have lower elongation properties than the traditional MDI-based hybrid
elastomers. The user has to define adequate physical properties for the applica-
tion. If the system is to be applied on a rigid substrate, like painted steel for truck
bedliners, it is doubtful that 500 % elongation is needed in the polymer. If the glass
transition temperature of the cured aliphatic elastomeric coating is centered to the
service temperature range and has a broad enough transition phase, it should meet
the needed performance goals.
Although a smooth reaction profile can be achieved with these new aliphatic poly-
urethane/polyurea elastomers, the gel times are still not adequately fast to con-
sistently provide the necessary sag resistance at 1 to 2 mm per coat. One way to
improve sag resistance is to increase the system viscosity by using thixotropic
additives. These cause the system viscosity to be high when no shear is applied.
The viscosity drops dramatically when shear is applied by means of agitation or
by forcing the material through an orifice (e.g. a spray gun).
High-pressure/high-output equipment
(1,000 to 4,000 psi) can also be used
for production and large trials. It can be
equipped with fixed or varying ratios,
heating capabilities and generally use
impingement-style spray guns. These
spray guns can produce a coarse to Figure 5.62: Examples of spray-applied
aliphatic polyurethane/polyurea
fine finish. A higher volume of mate- elastomeric coatings showing possible
rials is normally required when using colors and surface textures.
A large number of systems are suitable for coating plastics. Acrylic coatings, for
example, have proved particularly suitable for finishing rigid plastic components
such as housings for home stereo equipment. The choice of suitable coating systems
becomes more restricted with increasing flexibility of the substrate and stringency
of the quality requirements.
Coatings based on polyurethane raw materials satisfy the technical requirements
to a high degree [96]. In the automotive industry, which has always set very high
standards in terms of lightfastness, weather stability, flexibility, chemical resistance
and scratch resistance, polyurethanes have become the systems of choice for coat-
ing plastics. In analogy to its use in automotive applications, polyurethane technol-
ogy is being used increasingly in industrial plastic coating.
5.5.1 Market evaluation
Plastic substrates
The world market for plastics currently stands at about 215 million tons. About 8 %
(17 million tons) is used by the automotive industry [97–99], around 70 % of which
are coated. Thermoplastics (mostly with low heat resistance) are used in the man-
ufacture of both exterior and interior automotive components such as fenders,
mirror housings and instrument panels. These plastics include polypropylene (PP),
polycarbonate (PC), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polybutylene tere-
phthalate (PBT) and their blends. Polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and
polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are also used.
Plastic coatings
In 2005, some 95,000 tons of coating raw materials were used for coating plastics.
More than half of this amount was used in the automotive industry. Coating systems
with a high baking temperature (above 120 °C) are not suitable for use on plastics
with low heat resistance. In Europe nowadays, two-component polyurethane coatings
with drying temperatures around 80 °C are mainly used because of constantly increas-
ing quality demands. A comparable trend can also be observed outside of Europe.
Ultimately, the pressure to reduce solvent emissions, which has already been men-
tioned several times, will lead to a further increase in the use of waterborne coatings,
currently about 30 to 40 % for exterior and 60 % for interior components (Western
Europe). In 2005, polyurethane coatings (solventborne, waterborne and UV-curing)
accounted for more than 60 % of the formulations used in plastic coating worldwide,
with annual growth of about 10 %.
5.5.2 Coating process
When coating plastics, the formulation and application technology must be matched
to the substrate. Pretreatment, formulation design and the choice of raw materials
are therefore of great importance.
Pretreatment
As plastic surfaces are often contaminated with release agents, oil, grease or dirt,
they must be cleaned before coating, e.g. using an acid or alkaline medium in a
power washing unit (Figure 5.66).
A cleaning solution heated to 60 °C is pressure-sprayed onto the plastic components.
After rinsing with water, the components are dried and blown down with ionized
air to prevent dust contaminating the coating process. In the case of plastics with a
low surface tension (e.g. polypropylene = PP), additional surface activation may be
necessary [99, 101, 102]. Without this treatment, the coating may not adhere properly.
Surface activation can be achieved by flame [99], corona [103] or plasma [99, 101] pretreat-
ment or by fluorination.
Flame treatment involves passing a flame briefly over the component. Polar groups
form on the surface as the result of oxidation. In the corona method, a high voltage
electrode is passed over the earthed plastic component. The corona formed results
in a bombardment with ions or electrons that activates the surface in a similar way
to flame treatment. In the plasma process, usually performed in dilute gases, the
surface is activated by the effect of ions released from the gas, i.e. not only air ions
as is the case with the corona process. The plasma process is used less often due to
the high capital investment required.
Corona pretreatment is used above all to activate planar surfaces (e.g. films), while
flame treatment is the standard process for three-dimensional components such as
Table 5.27: Coating concepts for plastics
Film Application (all coats) Drying
thick-
ness
[µm]
Three-coat system - solventborne:
Primer 20–30 30–70 % rel. humidity at 10 min at RT, 30 min
15–30 °C at 80 °C
Basecoat 10–15 - waterborne: 45–60 % rel. 5 –10 min at RT, 5 min
humidity at 18–25 °C at 80 °C
Clearcoat 25–50 10 min at RT, 30 min
at 80 °C
Two-coat system I See above
Primer 20–30 10 min at RT, 30 min
at 80 °C
Topcoat 30–50 10 min at RT, 30–45
min at 80 °C
Two-coat system II See above
Basecoat 10–15 5 min at RT, 5 min at
80 °C
Clearcoat 25–50 5 min at RT, 30 min at
80 °C
One-coat topcoat 30–50 See above 10 min at RT, 30–45
min at 80 °C
fenders. The advantage of the corona and plasma processes is that the activation of
planar surfaces is largely uniform.
In addition to the surface activation methods described above, it is also possible to
use adhesion primers or adhesion promoters based on chlorinated polyolefins [99, 104].
These also ensure good coating adhesion on non-polar polypropylene substrates [105].
However, the use of organochlorine compounds is being viewed increasingly criti-
cally. The application of primers is often combined with other methods of pretreat-
ment to enhance the general reliability of the plastic coating process.
Coating concepts
Three different coating concepts are normally used for plastics:
• three-coat systems (primer/basecoat/clearcoat)
• two-coat systems (primer/topcoat or basecoat/clearcoat)
• one-coat topcoats
Growing environmental awareness and increasingly stringent VOC legislation have
resulted in a general switch from solventborne to waterborne coating systems,
particularly in Europe. It can be assumed that waterborne coating systems will be
used increasingly in North America and the Asia-Pacific area as well. Typical film
thicknesses and application conditions are summarized in Table 5.27.
In a three-coat system (Figure 5.67), the primer is applied directly on the cleaned
and possibly pretreated plastic component. After a flash-off time of 5 to 10 min-
utes, the coating is dried for about 30 minutes at 80 °C. Dry film thicknesses of
20 to 30 μm can be achieved. The basecoat is applied on the primer to give a dry
film thickness of between 10 to 15 μm. After a flash-off time of about five minutes,
the clearcoat is applied and then force-dried together with the basecoat for 30 to
45 minutes at 80 °C. The target dry film thickness for the clearcoat is between 25
and 50 μm.
The three-coat system is mainly used in coating automotive components based on
PP blends, e.g. fenders. The two-coat system (normally system II shown in Table
5.27) is used in the coating of thermoplastic resins such as ABS and PC. This pro-
cess is widely used for the coating of automotive and motorcycle components,
especially in Asia. One-coat topcoats are used primarily on plastics in non-automo-
tive applications, e.g. electronic housings, household appliances and toys.
The impact penetration test according to DIN 53443 is suitable for investigating this
relationship. High-speed photographs of an impact penetration test of coated PBT/
PC show how a brittle topcoat results in splintering of the component. If a flexible
coating such as a two-component polyurethane formulation is used, the mechanical
properties of the plastic remain unaffected (Figure 5.68a and b).
On account of the major influence of temperature on the mechanical properties of
both coated and uncoated plastics, the impact penetration test is normally performed
in a temperature range of -40 to +30 °C. At temperatures down to -40 °C, uncoated
PBT/PC components show no significant change in their energy absorption, as can
be seen in Figure 5.69. The ability of the coated component to absorb energy with-
out fracturing is an indication of its splintering tendency. For example, a hard topcoat
on a flexible primer reduces the energy absorption to 40 Nm at 0 °C, which would
indicate a risk of brittle fracture in the plastic. In contrast, a flexible two-component
polyurethane topcoat retains its energy-absorbing properties at -20 °C.
Even better results are achieved using a waterborne polyurethane primer [107]. The
notching effect of a brittle topcoat is buffered by the polyurethane primer. It should
be emphasized that waterborne primers allow the use of relatively hard topcoats,
e.g. solventborne OEM clearcoats – an aspect which is important in the context of
online and inline coating of plastics.
Polyurethane systems for coating plastics are often based on aliphatic polyisocya-
nates such as “Desmodur N” (trimer or biuret). Adding a flexible polyester polyol
such as “Desmophen 670” allows the flexibility of the paint film to be matched to
the plastic substrate. Mixing with flexible polyacrylates (“Desmophen A575”) or
the use of flexible polyisocyanates (“Desmodur N 3800”) also yields coatings suit-
able for plastics. The transfer of solventborne two-component polyurethane tech-
nology to waterborne systems has been achieved with equivalent polyols such as
“Bayhydrol PT 241” and polyisocyanates such as “Bayhydur 3100”, as well as with
the latest generation of hydrophilically modified polyisocyanates such as “Bayhy-
dur XP 2487/1”.
Coating concept – primer
The use of primers is state of the art in plastic coating [108]. Primers cover defects
on the surface of the molded component and improve adhesion to the substrate.
Good sandability, stone-chip resistance and overcoatability are required here and
are achieved using polyurethane systems. “Desmodur N 75” combined with poly-
ester or polyether polyols is used for a solventborne formulation. Corresponding
waterborne primers are formulated using polyester polyols such as “Bayhydrol
PT 241” combined with a hydrophilically modified “Desmodur N” trimer, e.g.
“Bayhydur 3100”.
Conductive primers are required for the electrostatic coating of plastic components.
They are formulated using conductive pigments [99, 109]. The most important of these
is carbon black, not least because of its low price.
Coating concept – basecoat
The basecoats used on plastics are expected to meet similar requirements to those
used on metal bodies [99, 108]. The special aspects of matching color and effects have
already been discussed. Apart from greatly reducing the solvent content, the use
of waterborne basecoats has a further advantage. The parallel alignment of the
metallic flakes is more pronounced due to the greater shrinkage of waterborne
coatings and provides better reproducibility.
Coating concept – clearcoat
The clearcoats used on plastics must be of high quality and match the flexibility of
the substrate. These requirements are satisfied by two-component polyurethane sys-
tems, even at the low drying temperatures normally used in coating plastics. In
contrast to the mostly hard melamine-crosslinked systems (thermosetting acrylics =
TSA), the two-component polyurethane coatings are characterized by the fact that
their flexibility can be varied infinitely to match the flexibility of the substrate through
the choice of raw materials. Even a flexible two-component polyurethane system,
force-dried at just 80 °C, meets all standards for leveling, gloss (wet look) and resis-
tance to weathering, etching and chemicals. This is not true of one-component TSA
and one-component TPA (thermoplastic acrylic) coatings, even if they are baked at
higher temperatures.
Two-component polyurethane clearcoats are characterized by a more or less pro-
nounced reflow effect. This means that scratches heal due to a recovery effect [110].
As a result, there is relatively little scratching on components finished with this
kind of clearcoat, even after many years of use. In order to satisfy the demand for
higher flexibility coupled with good resistance properties, many two-component
polyurethane formulations are based on combinations of flexible polyester polyols
such as “Desmophen 670” with hard chemically resistant polyacrylates such as
“Desmophen A 665”. Suitable polyisocyanates are “Desmodur N” trimers and biu-
rets (e.g. “Desmodur N 3390” and “Desmodur N 75”).
Work is under way to develop special blocked polyisocyanates, which deblock at
low temperatures between 80 and 100 °C, thus facilitating one-component formula-
tions with high resistance properties for plastic coating [111]. The application condi-
tions for waterborne systems are more strictly defined than those for solventborne
coatings, in particular due to the differences in drying behavior [108].
• In an online process, the plastic components are fitted to the uncoated car body
and pass through the entire coating process. The plastic component has to with-
stand the relatively high baking temperature used for the CED coating without
deformation. Until now, this level of thermal resistance was found in only a few
plastics such as sheet molding compounds (SMC), polystyrene/polypropylene
oxide (PS/PPO) or reinforced reaction injection molded polyurethane (PUR-
RRIM). However, because of their mechanical properties, these plastics are of
only limited suitability for manufacturing components such as fenders.
Given the difference in conditions between offline and online coating, a difference
in shade is virtually unavoidable, even if it is only slightly visible in the best case.
In the case of online and inline coating, the differences in conductivity between
plastic and metal play a major role, even if a conductive primer has been applied
on the plastic component. Just slight variations in the electric field density may
cause variations in shade in an electrostatic coating.
Two-component polyurethane systems are widely used in the offline coating of
automotive add-on components. Inline and online coating are the object of ongo-
ing development work. Two-component polyurethane technology is also ideal for
these processes.
Due to further tightening of VOC legislation, especially in Western Europe, most
of the primer surfacers and basecoats used on car exteriors are now waterborne
Figure 5.70: Coating concepts for the automotive industry: online, inline, offline
systems. In 2006, a waterborne clearcoat was used for the first time in the OEM
finishing of automotive add-on components. Usage of waterborne coatings in auto-
motive applications is expected to grow.
are formulated with polyurethanes. The additional hydrogen bridge bonds of this
chemistry make it the only crosslinking technology capable of uniting elasticity
and robustness.
IMC in the narrower sense usually refers to the methods by which a liquid coating
system is applied to a plastic component still in the mold, produced immediately
prior to this in an injection molding method. This is “direct coating” in the case of
a coating application or “direct skinning” if polyurethane skins or foams are applied.
Possible applications for these technologies include:
• uses in the interior of automobiles (e.g. switches, glove compartment lids)
• uses on the exterior of automobiles (e.g. exterior mirrors, plastic lenses)
• electronics (e.g. cell phones, entertainment electronics)
• household appliances
• furniture, sports, leisure equipment
Compared to conventional manufacture in two separate steps, IMC methods
exhibit major advantages in terms of efficiency, surface design and ecology. In
particular, due to the omission of a spatially separate coating application, there are
cost advantages in terms of investment, operation and maintenance. Further sav-
ings potential results from the significantly reduced transport and logistics expen-
diture. In order to perform the IMC procedure economically, it is important to
synchronize the timing of the injection molding and coating processes.
As IMC represents an imaging coating method, the surface structure of the coating
can be adjusted reproducibly via the graining of the mold. Mold surfaces which
are polished to a high gloss yield high-gloss paint films. In contrast, a rough mold
surface produces matte films. In addition, the haptics of the coating can be varied
specifically over a wide range using different surface structures. Grained surfaces,
for example, in combination with soft polyurethane coatings produce soft-feel
haptics. The film thickness of the coating is determined via the mold gap. It can
be varied from a few millimeters in the case of polyurethane skins and foams to
around a hundred micrometers in the case of polyurethane coatings.
In IMC methods, where the liquid coating is cured in a closed mold, only solvent-free
coating systems can be used. This avoids the emission of solvents and the development
of overspray, representing a clear ecological advantage over conventional coating
methods. Suitable coating systems are low viscosity two-component polyurethane
systems with a solids content of 100 %, as well as radically curing one-component
systems. Depending on the required property profile, polyacrylate, polyether, poly-
ester or polycarbonate can be combined with aliphatic or aromatic polyisocyanates.
The coating components can be preheated to reduce the viscosity. To avoid pot
life problems with the highly reactive coating systems, reaction injection molding
(RIM) equipment has proven reliable for the homogeneous mixing of the coating
components and injection of the coating. Curing times of less than 60 seconds can be
achieved at temperatures of about 80 ºC with suitably catalyzed polyurethane systems.
The wide variety of polyurethanes makes it possible to control the properties of IMC
coatings over a broader range. Depending on requirements regarding resistance and
haptics, hard coatings with good chemical resistance or soft coatings can be formu-
lated which are very flexible even at low temperatures and yield more pleasant
haptics. Nevertheless, the method still has some limitations, which is why it has not
yet prevailed on the market. The following aspects require further development:
• process-oriented mold design at sliders and openings is not completely solved,
restricting design freedom
• depending on the method, sealing the tools from exit of the (thin) fluid coating
• creation of undercuts and shear edges
• refinishing (e.g. removal of coating sprue)
• process-dependent production of thin coats (less than 100 µm)
• control of a complex process
The advantages of IMC technology have led to increased interest in the market and
have initiated intense development activity. Raw material and coating manufacturers,
plastic processors and tool producers are
involved in interdisciplinary projects.
Test and prototype tools are seeing increasing
investment. Figure 5.76 describes the two-
cavity process. The plastic component is manu-
factured by injection molding in the first cavity
(1 to 3). It is then pushed into a second cavity
(3 to 5), where it is coated (6) with a two-com-
ponent polyurethane system. With optimal
coordination of the processing properties of
both plastic and coating and corresponding pro-
cess timing, it is possible to produce a plastic
component in one cavity while a second com-
ponent, molded before, can be coated at the Figure 5.75: Two-cavity tool for
same time in the second cavity, thereby enabling the in-mold coating process
Figure 5.76: The two-cavity process: the component is produced by injection molding in the
first cavity (1–3). It is then pushed into the second cavity (3–5), where it is coated with a two-
component polyurethane system (6).
the highest possible productivity (see Figure 5.75). It can be assumed that the IMC
method in combination with polyurethane coatings will become increasingly impor-
tant in the production of coated plastic parts due to the economic, ecological and
qualitative advantages.
5.5.9 Polyurethane gelcoats
Introduction
In recent years, the composites market has grown to a volume of 2 million tons.
Gelcoats play an essential role in that market by representing a unique methodology
to decorate composites in ways that would not otherwise be possible with conven-
tional coating systems. Gelcoat processing, performance and application techniques
are all very specialized. To better understand the partnership shared by gelcoats and
composites, a fundamental understanding of composite technology is useful.
Composites overview
Many products have component structural parts that are required to exhibit a com-
bination of light weight and high strength. The wing of an aircraft is a classic exam-
ple of just such an application. Conventional building materials typically provide
strength at the price of weight and mass. Lightweight materials, on the other hand,
are often incapable of meeting rigorous performance demands. Fortunately, this
strength/weight dilemma can be successfully addressed through the use of compos-
ites. By definition, composites are materials made up of at least two components
whose combined physical strength is greater than that of either component individu-
ally. They are also typically lighter and stronger than alternative materials that could
be selected for a particular structural application. Composites are often referred to
as “reinforced plastics” because they consist of a fibrous reinforcing network that is
embedded in a cured resin matrix. The resin is typically polyurethane, polyester or
epoxy, and the reinforcing fibers can be glass strands (fiberglass) or carbon fiber.
Gelcoat history
Due to the way in which they are processed, glass-reinforced composites cannot
always be decorated in a manner typically associated with conventional coatings.
Production processes used to manufacture composites, as well as other physical
and performance requirements demand that alternative methods be employed.
Therefore, when there is a need for a pleasing aesthetic appearance to a structural
composite part, gelcoats are the technology of choice (see Figure 5.77). In addition
to appearance, gelcoats are expected to:
• provide a low-maintenance protective surface finish
• enhance durability appropriate to the part end use
• reduce fiber pattern on the surface of the component
• provide a finished surface of sufficient quality out of the mold so that the need
for coating is eliminated
When the composites industry was in its early stages, laminating resin was mixed
in the shop with thixotropes to provide a resin-rich surface on the part. However,
these proved to be inadequate when demands grew for reduced air entrapment and
colored finishes. This led to the development of more sophisticated gelcoats based
on unsaturated orthophthalic polyester reacted with styrene, and catalyzed with
peroxides [120]. The advantages they offered include:
• reduction of the number of components mixed at the manufacturing site (only
peroxide needs to be added to a pre-formulated batch)
• correct dispersion of additives such as surfactants and pigments
• excellent air release characteristics
• exacting color match [121]
Although there were cost penalties associated with these newer style gelcoats,
they were offset by savings realized in labor and waste elimination of improperly
mixed materials.
The marine industry was among the first markets to adopt this technology on a large
scale for structural component construction. Therefore, early gelcoat development
efforts focused on systems that could function well in environments where resistance
to water is essential. This eventually led to the use of isophthalic-based polyesters.
The formulation change provided greater water resistance, lower rates of water
absorption, and improved blister resistance. Toughness was also enhanced as the
tensile elongation at break of isophthalic-based polyesters is greatly improved.
As the use of composites grew for other applications, gelcoat development also
evolved to meet the performance and application demands for those markets.
Improved resins and UV-resistant additives were introduced that provided gelcoats
with the ability to better maintain color and gloss retention, even when subjected
to severe weathering conditions. Today’s gelcoat systems, which can be applied by
brush, roller or spray, can even be formulated to provide fire resistance.
Gelcoat challenges
Although gelcoat technology has made significant technological strides and has
grown to an 80,000 ton market in North America, it faces serious new challenges.
Among the most critical are those related to the use of styrene in gelcoat formula-
tions. Health and environmental concerns have led to legislation that demands
reduced styrene emission levels, forcing gelcoat manufacturers to develop systems
that contain in the range of 30 % styrene. The emission issue poses significant chal-
lenges to both gelcoat formulators and gelcoat end users alike. No substitute for
styrene has yet been found to act as an acceptable coreactant for unsaturated poly-
ester. This severely limits the options formulators have at their disposal in develop-
ing a gelcoat that will meet government regulations and performance and applica-
tion requirements. Some end users even face the prospect of a mandatory shutdown
of their production lines if they exceed defined styrene emission limits.
Polyurethane gelcoat technology
The problems noted are forcing the gelcoat industry to look in new directions.
Poised to meet these challenges and ready to take the industry on its next evolution-
ary step are polyurethane gelcoats. Unlike conventional gelcoats, polyurethane
gelcoats are based on a near-zero VOC formulation. Thus, not only are concerns
about styrene emissions eliminated, but the technology offers an overall environ-
mentally friendly product.
Health and environmental issues are not the only reasons to consider polyurethane gel-
coats. High performance is inherent to the nature of polyurethanes, and systems based
on aliphatic isocyanates offer outstanding weathering characteristics and long-term
durability. This is critically important for markets such as marine, wind turbines and
transportation that use gelcoats for outdoor applications. Those gelcoats must be resis-
tant to chalking, down-glossing, fading, and yellowing. The latter is especially impor-
tant to the marine market where white is the predominant color used (see Figure 5.78).
Another benefit to the high performance of polyurethane gelcoats is the potential
for reduced warranty costs. Whether the gelcoat application is marine pleasure craft
or tub and shower surrounds, the use of
higher quality materials results in the likeli-
hood of fewer field problems or failures.
Polyurethane gelcoats bring a toughness that
cannot be matched by polyester/styrene
chemistry. This may result in fewer field war-
ranty claims and increased customer satisfac-
tion. Not to be forgotten is the potential for
reduced in-plant warranty claims. For exam-
Figure 5.78: Marine gelcoats offer ple, damage can occur when a boat hull gel-
outstanding water resistance coated with a conventional polyester/styrene
the toxic salts of heavy metals such as cadmium and cobalt, or with very expensive
additives such as gold. Ecological and economic considerations therefore make it
virtually impossible to use glass colored in these ways in the food industry.
It is estimated that, during the processing and especially shaping of glass, there is a
breakage rate of about 40 %. Such material must be sorted by color so that it can be
remelted separately and reused – a costly and laborious process. The same problem
is encountered with the different-colored disposable containers for beverages. They
have to be sorted into clear, green and brown glass for recycling [124].
Coating glass
Coating glass with pigmented organic materials has considerable advantages com-
pared to pigmenting. For example, glass objects coated in different colors can be
recycled without sorting by melting and burning off the organic layer at tempera-
tures between 400 and 600 °C. This process yields clear glass.
Moreover, the coatings impart new properties which enhance the usefulness of the
glass. They provide improved resistance to mechanical and chemical influences and
protection against shattering. They also give designers new scope for using color
and special effects. Glass can be coated with UV-curing acrylates [125] or high viscos-
ity solvent-free or solventborne polyurethane systems [126]. Each of these technolo-
gies requires specific coating units and equipment. Examples here are special spray
coating equipment, UV lamps, and off-gas incinerators. Apart from differing in the
application processes, the coatings also vary particularly in terms of their service
properties, e.g. chemical resistance, weather stability and mechanical stabilization
of the glass.
In addition to the systems described here, environmentally friendly, waterborne
polyurethane systems are available. These consist of hydrophilically modified
blocked polyisocyanates (“Bayhydur BL”) and hydroxyl-bearing polyurethane
dispersions (“Bayhydrol”) [127]. The formulations have a co-solvent content of less
than 10 %. Conventional application processes such as dipping or spraying are used.
The coatings are baked for 30 minutes at about 170 °C.
These formulations have proved to be highly resistant to the heavy wear associ-
ated with the sterilization, repeated rinsing (alkali resistance) and weathering
of returnable bottles, and are thereby very suitable for glass coating. With their
combination of hardness and durability, the coatings ensure excellent protection
of the glass over a long period of time. As the coatings can be pigmented easily,
different colors and effects can be achieved economically and ecologically.
This waterborne technology has opened up new perspectives for glass coating,
because it is environmentally friendly and at the same time satisfies the perfor-
mance requirements specified by the industry (see Figure 5.80, page 202).
Sizing application
Glass fibers are produced in the melt.
Individual glass filaments are drawn out,
coated and then combined into a single
fiber. This application process and the
coatings used as referred to as ‘sizing’.
The sizing protects the fibers against
abrasion and breakage and gives them
special product-specific properties.
Figure 5.80: Decorative glass coating with These include stiffness, cutting proper-
waterborne one-component polyurethane ties, and in the case of chopped strands,
systems flow properties (see Figure 5.81).
The chopped strands with a length of
3 to 5 mm are incorporated by extru-
sion into the plastic to be reinforced.
Temperatures of more than 250 °C are
reached for short periods during this
process. The sizing essentially consists
of a polymer (binder), an adhesion pro-
Figure 5.81: Chopped strands with a moter, slip agents, antistatics, and other
“Baybond” polyurethane dispersion sizing additives. Water serves as the dispersion
medium.
The reinforcing properties depend on
how well the glass filaments adhere to
the plastic matrix. The binder used in
the sizing must therefore be compat-
ible with the plastic so as to ensure an
adequate bond. Depending on the appli-
cation of the glass fibers, various poly-
mers, e.g. polyvinyl acetates, polyester
resins, epoxy resins and polyurethane
dispersions, can be used in the sizing
formulation. For example, polyure-
Figure 5.82: High-performance, glass fiber
reinforced plastic in engine construction;
thane-sized glass fibers are preferred
component of an intake manifold made using for reinforcing thermoplastics such as
a “Baybond” polyurethane dispersion sizing polyamide.
Polyurethane-based glass fiber sizings are stable to the shear forces that occur
during the application process. They also have outstanding film-forming properties
and very good colorfastness on exposure to heat.
Polyether and polyester polyurethane dispersions based on aliphatic diisocyanates
are mainly used to formulate polyurethane glass fiber sizings. Both non-functional
and crosslinkable dispersions are available [128, 129]. Thanks to their good compatibil-
ity with the plastic matrix, polyurethane sizings ensure very good adhesion and
thus positively influence the reinforcing properties in the end product, such as
impact strength, tensile strength and flexural strength. The main applications for
glass fiber reinforced thermoplastics are in the automotive and electrical industries
(see Figure 5.82). Some of the binders used for glass fiber sizings are also used to
formulate sizings for carbon fibers.
Applications
With the introduction of one-component polyurethane systems and the transfer
coating process, new applications were found in the early 1970s, for example the
production of articles with a leather-like appearance. In the transfer coating process,
process. It is even possible to produce softer articles in this way. Now, the napping
of a cotton fabric can be substituted by a foamed polyurethane intermediate coat. For
many years, it was standard to use PVC, latex and acrylate for this purpose. Poly-
urethane systems are foamed by the addition of blowing agents (chemical compounds
which split off nitrogen on exposure to heat) [136] or, in the case of dispersions, by the
mechanical incorporation of air (mechanical foaming). Polyurethane-coated cotton
fabrics without napping are used to manufacture, for example, light coats for men
and women. Similarly produced light to heavy polyamide fabrics are used to manu-
facture work clothing, backpacks and camping equipment. Polyester and polyamide
fabrics coated with polyurethanes are suitable for tarpaulins and technical articles.
Products and methods
As any chain branching caused by triols, amines or isocyanates on the polyurethane
structure can result in undesirable hardening of the coating film and a reduction in
the flexibility and softness of the coated fabric, the polyurethanes developed for
textile coating applications have a largely linear chain structure [137-139]. On the other
hand, greater chain branching improves the resistance to solvents and water.
The polyurethanes developed for textile coating differ not only in their technical
properties, but also in their preparation. Figure 5.86 shows that there are four types
of product on the market: granules, solutions (one- and two-component systems), high
solids and waterborne dispersions.
Solventborne systems
After being dissolved, granules are either processed directly from solution, or films
are made from solution and then applied on textiles by lamination. One-component
polyurethanes yield films with the desired properties without chemical crosslinking,
i.e. solely as the result of physical interactions such as hydrogen bonds. These films
are of medium hardness, highly elastic, relatively difficult to dissolve and thermo-
plastic. As they are based on aromatic isocyanates, the one-component systems
require the use of highly polar solvents or solvent mixtures such as dimethyl for-
mamide/methyl ethyl ketone [140, 141].
Using cycloaliphatic isocyanates such as isophorone diisocyanate, lightfast one-
component polyurethane ureas were developed in the 1970s. Soft solvents such as
alcohols and toluene are normally used with these systems. The aliphatic polyure-
thanes not only have good lightfastness, but can be processed easily and safely to
yield coatings with outstanding flexibility. Special, usually harder polyurethane
ureas are used as finishes on polyurethane coatings when necessary. These finish
films, normally 5 to 8 µm thick, improve the feel, appearance, and fashion aspects
of the coating, as well as its scratch resistance. They are applied by spraying, print-
ing or knifing by doctor blade. The high solid systems mentioned are two-component
polyurethanes consisting of blocked polyisocyanate prepolymers reacted with cyclo-
aliphatic diamines. 1-Methoxypropylacetate-2 is normally used as the solvent [142].
A well-known example of a multilayer system of polyurethane solutions and high
solids based on “Impranil” is the “+Teamgeist” ball used in the 2006 Soccer World
Cup (see Figure 5.87).
1. Aliphatic topcoat made from polyurethane solution:
Print protected underneath clearcoat, prevents abrasion of the printed surface.
2. Aliphatic intermediate coat based on two-component high solid polyurethane:
Protects the ball from exter-
nal influences and ensures
exceptionally high elasticity.
3. Syntactic foam based on two-
component high solids:
Consists of polyurethane con-
taining millions of gas-filled
microspheres. This gives the
ball its outstanding resilience,
which significantly improves
the flight properties.
4. Adhesive coat made from
polyurethane solution:
Bonds the various layers to
the textile substrate
5. Special polyester/cotton fabric: Figure 5.87: Multilayer “Impranil” finish on the
Serves as the substrate “+Teamgeist” ball used in the 2006 Soccer World Cup
ance and properties of leather started some 45 years ago [147]. About ten years later,
“Corfam” (DuPont) was the first poromeric synthetic leather on the market [148]. The
manufacture of this product was later licensed to Clarino in Japan where develop-
ment continued to enhance the product with a microfiber non-woven. Brands such
as “Alcantara”, “Amara” and “Amaretta” are now of importance worldwide.
One of the first steps in this development was the polyurethane/dimethyl formamide
(DMF) coagulation process [149, 150]. The substrate – a woven fabric, a non-woven, or
in special cases a knitted fabric – is coated with a solution of polyurethane that has
already started to gel. It is then passed through a number of baths containing DMF
in decreasing concentrations and lastly through a bath of pure water. As the result
of phase transfer, a polyurethane sponge forms from the polyurethane solution in
DMF. The precipitation reaction is slow and occurs from the outside inwards. The
non-solvent water penetrates the layer and displaces the solvent DMF. Once the
DMF has been fully replaced by water, the product is dried.
As the result of the heat which is generated by mixing DMF and water, the product
is voluminous and porous but, although it has a pleasant feel, it does not yet look
like leather. Additives (e.g. cellulose powder), pigment pastes and emulsifiers can
be mixed into the polyurethane to control the microporosity. Silicones serve as
antifoamers, and flow promoters can also be added. Depending on the method of
application, only the top side of the product is coated, or it is dipped to coat it on
both sides [151]. The DMF can be recovered from the process water (i.e. water/DMF
= 75 : 25) by distillation.
Depending on the intended end-use, the product can be printed, embossed, buffed,
transfer-coated, impregnated or tumbled. In this way, materials with a micropo-
rous structure can be produced for the manufacture of shoe uppers, shoe linings,
upholstery, bags and luggage, clothing, cleaning and polishing cloths and filters
(see Figure 5.88). An overview of the production of porous textile structures is
referred to in the literature [152].
There have been various efforts to pro-
duce thick, porous textile structures
as synthetic leather without the use
of solvents. The development of new,
high solid and fine polyurethane disper-
sions has made it possible to produce
mechanical foams and apply them on a
textile substrate in a thickness of some
millimeters in just one process step [153].
If high-quality raw materials such as
polycarbonates and polytetramethylene Figure 5.88: Shoe uppers – a typical appli-
glycols (PTMG) are used as the polyol cation for polyurethane synthetic leather
components, synthetic leathers with high resistance properties can be produced [154].
The advantage of this method is that it can be run on conventional textile coating
units and, in contrast to the DMF coagulation method, does not require solvents.
High solid polyurethane dispersions make it possible to economically produce
synthetic leather by this process (see Figure 5.89).
Methods of coagulation
There are other processes for generating microporosity. These include the removal
of salts from films or the spray application of polyurethane solutions in highly
volatile solvents. However, neither method has been adopted by industry [155]. The
selective vaporization coagulation process has been more successful [156]. In this pro-
cess, a non-solvent with poor vaporization properties, such as water, is mixed into
a polyurethane solution in, for example,
methylethyl ketone. The result is a paste
which can be used to coat the substrate.
As the coated substrate passes through
the drying tunnel, the solvent evapo-
rates first. The amount of non-solvent
increases steadily, with the result that
the polyurethane coagulates and then
precipitates as a microporous product.
Finally, the non-solvent evaporates and
leaves a microporous coating. How-
Figure 5.89: Structure of a synthetic leather ever, the application rate is limited to
based on a waterborne, solvent-free system. about 20 to 50 g/m². The end products
From bottom to top: textile substrate; inter- are mainly used in the clothing industry
mediate foam coat based on a 60 % “Impra- (see Figure 5.90). There are other appli-
nil DLU” dispersion; compact, waterborne
topcoat with visible grain cations for polyurethanes in the textile
and clothing segments. These include
textile finishes [130, 157, 158], binders for
pigment printing [164], and the tanning [130,
159–163]
and finishing [130, 164–168] of leather.
collagen or a polypeptide obtained from animal hides. The soaked hides are fixed
by tanning to stabilize the collagen fibers and ensure that the leather remains flex-
ible at the temperatures of use. The tanning quality depends on the temperature at
which a leather dries, shrinks and cures. Above 90 °C, most tanned leathers cure
irreversibly to brittleness.
In nearly all cases, leather is too thick for processing. For this reason, it is separated
into two layers. While the top layer still shows the natural grain, the bottom layer or
split leather has a rough surface and is often used to produce suede. Leather is coated
for different purposes. Generally, the surface treatment of dry leather is called
finishing. This may result in coloring, altered haptics, water and dirt resistance,
and improvements of abrasion and scratch resistance. Starting from the leather
substrate, the finishing layers are the impregnation, primer and finish. The drying
temperatures for the individual coats should not be too high to avoid damaging the
leather (see above).
In addition to polyacrylates, butadiene copolymers and nitrocellulose, one- and
two-component polyurethanes are used when particularly good performance is
required. Polyurethane dispersions are usually crosslinked either with water-dis-
persible polyisocyanates, polyaziridines or methylol compounds [169]. The best prop-
erties are yielded by two-component polyurethane finishes. Isocyanate prepolymers
crosslinked with diamines have a short pot life and therefore have to be mixed by
a special method. Both the products and the mixing method are known by the name
“Levacast” [170].
Standard methods of applying the leather finishing products are spraying, curtain
coating, transfer coating (analogous to textile coating), and film lamination. The
demand for suede depends on prevailing fashion trends. However, since large amounts
of split leather are produced, methods have been developed to produce artificial
graining on the surface of split leather.
One method is direct coating followed
by embossing. Alternatively, a grain pat-
tern can be produced by reverse coating
with negative graining on the release
paper, lamination and removal of the
paper (see Figure 5.91). In a third
method, a matrix of silicon rubber is
used as the negative pattern. The artifi-
cial grain produced by one of these
methods has the advantage that there are
no defects (e.g. scars caused by barbed
wire or damage from skin parasites that
are found on natural grained leather). Figure 5.91: Steering wheel with polyure-
Also, it is uniform and entirely reproduc- thane transfer coating on split leather
ible. These artificially grained split leathers are hard to distinguish from natural
grained leather.
this application. They are applied by roller coating and by flexographic and rotogra-
vure printing. The coatings are dried in heat and air, e.g. in infrared, jet or float
dryers. In order to ensure high production rates, the two-component systems are
formulated such that physical drying takes place in the drying unit and chemical
crosslinking occurs once the coated products are stacked or rolled. This process is
used to apply HDI-based aliphatic polyisocyanates combined with physically drying
polyacrylate polyols, especially for lightfast coatings. On account of their high
curing speed, radiation-curing polyurethane systems in particular are established as
binders for overprint varnishes. Many of the raw materials used in polyurethane
overprint varnishes are also suitable for the formulation of printing inks [179].
The coating of packaging materials
To a large extent, flexible packaging materials, prefabricated as films, have
replaced rigid packagings made from glass or metal. Coatings play an important
role in printing, coating, laminating and embossing the film substrates [179-183]. Poly-
urethane raw materials are normally used to formulate the coatings, printing inks
or lamination adhesives. For example, polyurethanes are added to nitrocellulose
in the production of composite packaging [182]. Two-component systems, e.g. two-
component white, are also used in high-quality laminates.
In general, the statements made with
regard to printed products also apply to
the coating of packaging materials made
from plastic films or aluminum foil. In
this segment, the following properties
are exploited or optimized:
• high scrub resistance
• high chemical resistance
• broad variability of flexibility
• good adhesion, although polyolefin
films should be pretreated
e.g. by corona discharge
• resistance to sterilization
• resistance to freezing
• sealability
• diffusion barrier properties
In order to satisfy this wide range of
requirements, the broad variety of prod-
ucts available – both polyols and poly-
isocyanates – can be exploited, as can Figure 5.92: High-quality applications for
the many combination options. In the thermal paper
• chemical resistancea
• electrical resistanceb
• thermal resistancea (long-term and short-term)
• colorfastness and weather stabilitya
• insulation propertiesa (acoustic and thermal)
• evenness (DIN 18 202) [186]
• non-slip propertiesc
• ease of care, cleanabilitya, c
• ease of repaira
• service life, cost/benefit ratio
Many of these properties are defined in, for example, Germany’s DIN 28 052 [187]
and in sum make up the service profile of a floor. The primary function of floors is
to absorb and distribute static and dynamic loads. Irrespective of its actual structure,
a floor can be defined as consisting of two layers:
1. A load-bearing layer such as a monolithic concrete slab or a combination of a
concrete slab and screed floor overlay
2. A wear layer which is rigidly bonded to the load-bearing layer. This must
withstand chemical and mechanical influences and satisfy other user-specific
demands, e.g. non-slip properties, ease of cleaning and optical properties as
listed in more detail above
A floor coating is such a wear layer. In order to achieve a fully functional bond,
the properties of the individual layers must be harmonized. The wear layer is often
based on synthetic resins, particularly reactive systems, such as polymethyl meth-
acrylate (PMMA), epoxy resin (EP) or polyurethane. Figure 5.93 shows the current
market situation for these binders. Epoxy resins hold the largest share at 65 %,
followed by polyurethane coatings with 25 %.
The floor coating may be in the form
of a sealant, a thin coating of up to
0.3 mm or a covering of up to 3 mm
thick. Other options include syn-
thetic resin mortars or decorative
synthetic resin screeds applied in
thicknesses of 3 to 10 mm (colored
sand mortar). In the latter case, the
wear layer additionally has a load-
bearing capacity. Sealers, thin coat-
Figure 5.93: World floor coatings market,
2005, total: 275,000 tons raw materials
ings and coatings are formulated
solvent-free or with a low solvent
Primarily dependent on the raw materials
content. Synthetic resin mortars are
a
b
Primarily dependent on the formulation
c
Primarily dependent on the application always formulated solvent-free.
colors, patterns, and motifs required. The applicators walk across the liquid coating
wearing spiked shoes (see Figure 5.96).
The coating is then topped with a highly abrasion-resistant, transparent polyure-
thane sealer.
Polyurethanes
Like EP systems, polyurethanes cure to form a three-dimensional network yielding
thermoset films. However, in contrast to the EP systems, one-component systems
that cure by reaction with atmospheric humidity can be formulated. The systems
available on the market also include solventborne, solvent-free and waterborne
two-component formulations. The raw materials used are polyesters, polyethers and
polyacrylates, which are combined with a polyisocyanate crosslinker. Polyesters
include “Desmophen 651” or similar products. “Desmophen A 160” or equivalent
products are among the polyacrylates used. Preferred polyisocyanates are “Des-
modur N” or comparable crosslinkers from other manufacturers. In recent years,
waterborne two-component polyurethane systems also achieved greater market
acceptance. They are formulated with hydroxyl-bearing polyacrylates such as
“Bayhydrol A 242” and hydrophilically modified polyisocyanates such as “Bay-
hydur 3100” or comparable products.
Polyurethane coatings have good resistance to solvents, graffiti and chemicals,
as well as very good weather stability and colorfastness. They are hard yet have
a distinct degree of elasticity. From the construction physics aspect, they provide
mineral substrates with optimum protection, have adequate water vapor permeabil-
ity and are effective barriers to acid gases such as carbon dioxide. Critical features
of polyurethane coatings that might be considered disadvantages include:
• higher material costs compared with vinyl copolymers
• a certain sensitivity to high moisture levels in the substrate - varies widely among
the polyurethane systems available on the market
• the need to maintain a maximum film thickness on application to prevent film
defects such as blistering
On account of their higher price, high-quality polyurethane systems are only used
when special requirements are made in terms of the resistance properties that cannot
be satisfied by “normal” emulsion paints. This may be of particular interest if, for
example, high secondary costs (scaffolding) make long-term protection properties
an important requirement [218]. Typical applications of polyurethane coatings are
therefore on the exterior of apartment blocks, towers and stacks; on the interior
walls of pharmaceutical and food-processing plants with their high demands in
terms of cleaning properties; on the interior walls of schools, hospitals and other
buildings with a high visitor frequency. There is also growing recognition of the
suitability of polyurethane systems as anti-graffiti coatings.
5.9.2.2 Polyurethane wall coatings
To ensure the durability of a coating on interior or exterior walls, the careful selec-
tion and application of a multicoat concept is essential. A typical polyurethane coat-
ing concept consists of three coats: a penetration primer, a basecoat and a topcoat.
Basecoat
The pigmented basecoat must be matched to the roughness of the substrates in terms
of its flow properties, body and hiding power. It must also have good adhesion to
the penetration primer and to the topcoat. The application rate of the basecoat is
150 to 200 g/m2 for solventborne systems, 60 to 120 g/m2 for solvent-free formula-
tions and 60 to 100 g/m2 for waterborne coatings. The topcoat can be applied on the
basecoat after about one day.
Topcoat
The pigmented topcoat is usually a lightfast aliphatic polyurethane system cross-
linked with “Desmodur N” or a similar product. The application rate is 60 to 200 g/m2
for solventborne systems, 60 to 120 g/m2 for solvent-free systems and 60 to 100 g/m2
for waterborne formulations. Depending on the system used, the topcoats achieve
Table 5.30: Formulation for a one-component liquid polyurethane roof membrane for
manual application
Bifunctional TDI prepolymer, Binder approx. 37 %
e.g. “Desmodur E 15”
IPDI isocyanurate Binder approx. 2 %
Bisoxazolidine Latent curing agent approx. 3 %
Barytes Filler approx. 36 %
Diphenyl cresyl phosphate Flame-retardant plasticizer approx. 10 %
Aluminum paste Light stabilizer approx. 4 %
Methoxypropyl acetate Solvent approx. 5 %
Pyrogenic silica Thixotropic agent approx. 0.5 %
Dibutyl tin dilaurate Catalyst approx. 0.1 %
Deaeration agent Deaeration agent approx. 0.4 %
Monofunctional aliphatic isocyanate Dryer approx. 2 %
Table 5.31: Formulation for a two-component liquid polyurethane roof membrane for
machine application
Component A:
Polyether polyol Binder approx. 53 %
Amine Binder approx. 16 %
Diphenyl cresyl phosphate Flame-retardant plasticizer approx. 17.6 %
Dibutyl tin dilaurate Catalyst approx. 0.2 %
Diazabicyclooctane Catalyst approx. 0.2 %
Carbon black paste Light stabilizer approx. 13 %
Sum of component A: 100 %
Component B:
MDI polyisocyanate Binder approx. 27 %
Bifunctional TDI prepolymer Binder approx. 66 %
Diphenyl cresyl phosphate Flame-retardant plasticizer approx. 7 %
Table 5.32 Types and properties of liquid polyurethane membranes for sealing flat roofs
Binder Type of Raw materials Remarks
application
One-component, Manual TDI polyether Systems must be made
aromatic prepolymers and weather-stable by addition
oxazolidines of aluminum pigments or
carbon black
One-component, Manual IPDI polycarbonate Systems can be pigmented
aliphatic systems and oxazoli- in any color
dines
Two-component, 2K spraying TDI and MDI prepoly- Systems must be made
aromatic mers, polyethers and weather-stable by addition
amines of aluminum pigments or
carbon black
Table 5.33 Standard primers for liquid polyurethane membranes on various substrates
Substrate Primer
Concrete MDI polyether prepolymers, e.g. “Desmodur E 21”
Asbestos MDI polyether prepolymers, e.g. “Desmodur E 23”
Roof sheeting MDI
Highly reactive two-component formulations can also be used for this application.
They are fast-drying and can therefore only be applied using special equipment.
These products may consist of, for example, a mixture of a TDI prepolymer and an
MDI polyisocyanate that is cured with a polyol/amine combination (Table 5.31,
page 230).
In this formulation, light stabilization is achieved by the addition of carbon black or
aluminum powder. Table 5.32 gives a summary of the types and properties of liquid
polyurethane membranes. One- and two-component roof sealing systems that can be
pigmented in any color and applied manually can be formulated on the basis of ali-
phatic isocyanate prepolymers such as “Desmodur I” and polycarbonate polyols.
Roof sealing concepts
If refurbishing a roof with liquid polyurethane membranes, the old sealing materi-
als which have become leaky, usually bituminous roofing felt, do not have to be
removed first. Depending on how the liquid membrane is to be applied, there are
two alternative concepts:
One-component systems for manual application:
a) primer (undercoat to strengthen substrate and bind dust)
b) basecoat (approx. 1.5 kg/m2 of liquid polyurethane membrane, applied by roller)
c) polyester matting (approx. 100 g/m2, pressed into the liquid membrane to provide
mechanical reinforcement and ensure achievement of the desired film thickness)
d) topcoat (approx. 1 kg/m2 of liquid polyurethane membrane, applied after the
basecoat has dried to cover the polyester matting)
Two-component systems for machine application:
a) primer
b) two-component polyurethane spray formulation (minimum film thickness 2 mm)
Before application of the liquid polyurethane membrane, the following conditions
must be satisfied:
• the substrate must be clean and strong enough
• the residual moisture content of the substrate and the underlying insulation
materials must not exceed four percent
The highly reactive two-component systems are applied using 2K units with gear
or piston pumps. Table 5.33 summarizes the primers normally used with liquid
polyurethane membranes. The primers and one-component liquid membranes are
applied by brushing, rolling, or 1K airless spraying.
5.9.3.2 Sealing balconies with polyurethane membranes
Balconies, terraces and galleries on the outside of buildings are highly exposed to
weathering and mechanical wear. The load-bearing concrete substrate therefore
requires a high level of protection, particularly against the penetration of moisture.
If this protection is absent, the moisture may migrate into adjacent floors and cor-
rode the rebars of the concrete balcony slab or the balcony railing anchorages
embedded in the concrete or the concrete may be spalled by freeze/thaw cycles.
The result is a reduction in the load-bearing capacity of the balcony slab with the
ultimate consequence that the balcony can no longer be used.
Liquid polyurethane membranes can provide the necessary protection and fulfill a
decorative function at the same time.
Standards and regulations
There are no special regulations covering the use of liquid membranes for sealing
balconies and galleries. The following general standards should be observed:
• “Richtlinien für Schutz und Instandsetzung von Betonbauteilen” (Guidelines for
the Protection and Refurbishment of Concrete Structural Elements) issued by the
“Deutsche Ausschuß für Stahlbeton” (German Committee for Steel-Reinforced
Concrete) in Berlin/Germany [193]
• Building regulation list B/part 1 [224]
Chemical structure
Liquid membranes used to seal balconies must display a high degree of lightfastness
and weather stability and remain elastic in fluctuating temperatures. Polyurethane
materials fully satisfy these requirements. Formulations based on IPDI polycarbon-
ate polyol prepolymers and HDI polyisocyanates are adequately lightfast and can
be used as transparent sealing systems. TDI prepolymers yield highly flexible,
two-component membranes that may either be combined with topcoats based on
IPDI or HDI polyurethane prepolymers or used as sealing systems underneath
ceramic tiles (see Figure 5.100).
As far as the coreactants are concerned, the use of polycarbonate polyols in the
polyurethane prepolymers yields particularly weather-stable, flexible membranes.
Table 5.34: Polyurethane raw materials for balcony sealing systems
Binder Raw materials
One-component, IPDI polycarbonate prepolymers such as “Desmodur XP 2406”,
aliphatic IPDI polyisocyanates, bisoxazolidines such as “Hardener
VP LS 2959”
Two-component, HDI polyisocyanates, IPDI/HDI polyisocyanates, such as
aliphatic “Desmodur N 3600” or
“Desmodur NZ1”
Polycarbonate/polyether/polyester polyols such as
“Desmophen C 1200” or
“Desmophen XP 2501”
Two-component, TDI polyether prepolymer/amines such as
aromatic “Desmodur E 15”/“Ethacure 300”
Table 5.35: Guide formulation for a one-component liquid polyurethane membrane for
manual application as a balcony sealing system
IPDI polycarbonate polyol prepolymer Binder approx. 64 %
IPDI isocyanurate Binder approx. 17 %
Bisoxazolidine Latent curing agent approx. 13 %
Methoxypropyl acetate Solvent approx. 3.5 %
Deaeration agent Deaeration agent approx. 0.8 %
Dibutyl tin dilaurate Catalyst approx. 0.1 %
Methylhexahydrophthalic anhydride Catalyst approx. 0.4 %
Additives approx. 1.2 %
Application techniques
Before commencing refurbishment, it must be checked that the load-bearing capac-
ity of the concrete balcony slab is still intact. Old coverings must either be removed
or well roughened before application of the polyurethane system. The concrete
surface should be shotblasted and very smooth surfaces roughened by some other
means. Greasy or oily contamination must be removed. It is important that the
residual moisture content of the substrate does not exceed 4 %.
As already mentioned, the primer serves to strengthen the substrate and bind any
dust. This ensures the good adhesion of the subsequent coats. Solvent-free epoxy
resin systems are normally used as primers. Solventborne one-component and low-
solvent two-component polyurethane formulations are also used as coating materi-
als. They are scattered with sand to improve adhesion.
Plastic chips can be scattered into the still wet sealing system for decorative pur-
poses and to ensure non-slip properties. The surface is then finished with a transpar-
ent, lightfast liquid polyurethane topcoat. Another decorative option is the incor-
poration of colored quartz sand in the transparent membrane. Generally speaking,
liquid polyurethane membranes can be applied by roller, brush or notch trowel. The
freshly applied membrane is deaerated using a spiked roller.
References
[1] Bayer MaterialScience, estimation (2006)
[2] K. K. Dietliker, Chemistry & Technology of UV & EB Formulation for Coatings, Inks
& Paints, P. K. T. Oldring, (Ed.), Volume 3, SITA Technology Ltd., London 1991
[3] N. S. Allen, M. A. Johnson, P. K. T. Oldring, M. S. Salim, Chemistry & Technology of
UV & EB Formulation for Coatings, Inks & Paints P. K. T. Oldring (Ed.), Volume 2,
SITA Technology Ltd., London 1991
[4] C. Irle, R. Roschu, E. Luehmann, S. Feng, PCI Magazine, February 2002, 28 ff.
[5] C. Irle, M. Bayona, Surface Coatings International, Part A, 2005/06, 21
[6] New Coatings Technology Trends – a VOC-Voice of the Customer – Study 2007–2012,
Irfab Chemical Consultants Scrl, Brussels 2005
[7] B. Meuthen, A.-S. Jandel, Coil Coating, Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden 2005
[8] European Coil Coating Association (org.): 40th General Meeting (Maastricht 2006),
Maastricht: ECCA, 2005. – F. Carrara: ECCA Statistics 2005
[9] Fachhochschule für Technik: Seminar Coil Coating (Esslingen 2006), Esslingen: Fach-
hochschule für Technik, 2006. – B. Baumbach: 1K-PUR-Systeme für Coil Coating
[10] Fachhochschule für Technik: Seminar Coil Coating (Esslingen 2006), Esslingen:
Fachhochschule für Technik, 2006. – K. H. Stellnberger: Flansch-Korrosion – Die
gefährlichste Korrosionsart am Automobil?
[11] Glasurit-Handbuch: Lacke und Farben, BASF Farben und Fasern AG (Hrsg.), 11. Aufl.
Vincentz Verlag, Hannover 1984, 507–512
[12] Irfarb (Ed.): Waterbornes 2000 Trends in Waterborne Coatings Western Europe 1999
– 2009 (Brussels 2001)
[13] Irfarb (Ed.): New Coatings Technology Trends – a VOC-Voice of the Customer – Study
2007–2012 (Brussels 2005)
[14] Powder Coatings Europe 2001–2010: A Global Comparison: Europe, Americas and
Asia IRFAB Chemical Consultants Scrl, Brussels, published 2002
[15] Pieter Gillies de Lange, Powder Coatings, Chemistry and Technology, Vincentz Net-
work, Hannover 2004
[16] Various authors, 1. Internationale Konferenz: Das Pulverbeschichten von Automobil-
Karosserien, June 1998, Berlin
[17] H.U. Meier-Westhues, M. Bock, W. Schultz, Farbe und Lack 99 (1) (1993) 9
[18] M. Bock, H.-U. Meier-Westhues, 19th Intern. Conference in Org. Coatings, Science
and Technology, Athens 1993
[19] Michael Grahl, Württemberger Lacksymposien 2006, Pulverlacke für Niedertempe
raturhärtung – Möglichkeiten und Perspektiven für PUR-Pulverlacke, FH Esslingen,
March 2006
[20] P. Thometzek, H. Basten, K. Köhler, H.-U. Meier-Westhues, Farbe und Lack 104 (2)
(1998) 22
[21] H.-U. Meier-Westhues, P. Thometzek, H. J. Laas, Farbe und Lack 103 (4) (1997) 140
[22] D. Brand, S. Molitor-Limberg, DFO-Tagung June 1998, Boppard, Berichtsband 37
[23] R. Destexhe, Pulverlackkongress 1996, Hamburg, Tagungsband der DFO, 33
[24] K. P. Yonek, H.-U. Meier-Westhues, U. Freudenberg, H. J. Laas, Intern. Waterborne,
High Solids and Powder Coatings Symposium, New Orleans, February 1998
[25] T. Iwasaki, W. Henning, H. Morita, H.-U. Meier-Westhues, Journal of the Japan Society
of Colour Material 69 (7) (1996) 27
[26] E. Bodnar, European Coatings Journal (1–2) (1997) 44
[27] IRFAB, Irfab Chemical Consultants Scrl, Brussels; Bayer MaterialScience, BU CAS
own research
[28] A. Kaplan, Fatipec Congress, Interlaken 1998
[29] P. G. Gottis, J.A. Cotting, Fatipec Congress, Brussels 1996
[30] C. Goemans, J. Oberflächentechnik (2) (1998) 32
[31] P. Thometzek, U. Freudenberg, M. Grahl, Powder Coatings Europe, Amsterdam,
January 2000
[114] C. Kobusch, J. Petzoldt, M. Bock, Polymers Paint Colour Journal (PPCJ) 188 (4404)
(1998) 16
[115] Softfeel coatings for plastics, Bayer Inform, publication of Bayer AG, Leverkusen,
VS 4564-67e, 1993
[116] C. Kobusch, J. Petzoldt, M. Bock, Aqueous 2K-PUR softfeel coatings for use in car
passenger compartments, Surplast VI, 1997
[117] C. Kobusch, J. Petzoldt, M. Bock, VDI Berichte Nr. 1398, (1998) 357
[118] R. Maul, S. Kurz, European Coatings Journal (2005), (3), 76–79
[119] A. Lockhart, L. Gindin, P. Schmitt, P. Lunney, “Development of UV-curable waterborne
polyurethane dispersion for soft feel application” RadTech Report (2004), 18(6), 46–54
[120] Author unknown, CCP Polyester Products Application Manual, 9th Edition (2000)
[121] www.netcomposites.com/education, Guide to Composites, Introduction to Coatings
[122] www.bayermaterialsciencenafta.com.
[123] Römpp Chemie Lexikon, J. Falbe, M. Regitz (Hrsg.), 9. Auflage. Georg Thieme Verlag,
Stuttgart 1990, 1575 ff.
[124] Glasverpackungen und Umwelt, Bundesverband der Glasindustrie und Mineralfaser-
industrie e.V., Düsseldorf, (Ed.), Issue 02/93
[125] WO 97/05077 (1995) BASF Lacke und Farben AG. WO 90/05031 (1988) Brandt
Manufacturing Systems Inc.
[126] EP 0 025 992 (1979) Chemische Werke Hüls AG; EP 0 133 090 (1983) Saint-Gobain
Vitrage
[127] B. Baumbach, M. Bock, R. Dearth, W. Küttner, Waterborne polyurethane resins for
glass coatings, European Coatings Journal (9) (1997) 792–794
[128] EP 137 427 (1984) Bayer AG
[129] EP 1 375 550 (2004) Bayer MaterialScience AG
[130] H. Träubel et al. in: Kunststoff-Handbuch, G. W. Becker, D. Braun (Hrsg.), Band 7:
Polyurethane, Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien 1993, 621–641
[131] Druckschrift FB-V Le 1310/1, Bayer AG, Feb. 1973
[132] H. Bergs, R. Quack, DOB + Haka-Praxis (1971)
[133] W. Schröer, D.-L. Schütze, W. Thoma, Wasserdampfdurchlässige, kompakte Textilbe-
schichtung mit Polyurethanen, paper given at the Textiltagung, Aachen, Nov. 26–27,
1991, published in “Coating” 9 (1992) 290–296
[134] H. Träubel, D.-L. Schütze, J. Pedain, Bessere Tragehygiene durch wasserdampfdurchläs-
sige Materialien, Textilveredelung June 29, 1994, 171–177
[135] D.-L. Schütze, H. Träubel, J. Pedain, Improving wear comfort with water-vapour per-
meable polyurethanes, paper given at the AATCC Symposium, Coated and Laminated
Fabrics: New Processes and Products, in Danvers, Massachusetts, April 3, 1995
[136] H. J. Koch, Melliand Textilber. 58 (1977) 319, Bayer Farben Revue 28 (1977) 35
[137] H. J. Koch, Textil-Praxis Int. 3 (1977) 311
[138] W. Thoma, Bayer Farben Revue 25 (1974) 70
[139] J. Gillibrand, J. Coated Fabr. 3 (1974) 153: J.S. Maddams, J. Coated Fabr. 3 (1974)
164; D. A. Atkinson, Eur. Rubber J. (6) (1976)
[140] H. J. Koch, Melliand Textilber. 52 (9) (1971) 1094
[141] H. J. Koch, Melliand Textilber. 53 (11) (1972) 1272; H. Neumaier, J. Coated Fabrics
3 (1974) 181
[142] H. J. Koch, Melliand Textilber. 51 (11) (1970), 1313; J. Coated Fibrous Mater. 1 (1971) 118
[143] DE 2 754 593 (1977) Bayer AG; DE 2 754 603 (1979) Bayer AG
[144] H. Giessmann, Melliand Textilber. 51 (11) (1970) 1348
[145] W. Schröer, Textilveredlung 22 (1987) 459-467
[146] W. Wittke, Coating (1988) 340-345
[147] H. Träubel, Das Leder (1975) 1; T. Hayashi, Chemical Economy and Engineering
Review (1974) 25
[148] DuPont brand: “Corfam”
[149] DE 888 766 (1951) Bayer AG
[150] DE 1 110 607 (1958) Du Pont
[151] B. Zorn, Textil Praxis International 29 (1974) 1706, 1711, 1712
[152] H. Träubel, New Materials Permeable to Water Vapor, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Hei-
delberg, New York, 1999
[153] EP-A 1 669 382 (2004) Bayer MaterialScience AG
[154] US-A 6 642 303, EP-A 1387859 (2000) Bayer AG
[155] DE 1 225 380 (1964) Bayer AG
[156] DE 1 694 059 (1966) Bayer AG
[157] F. Reich, Textilveredlung 11/13 (1978) No. 11, 454
[158] M. Geubtner, Internationale Chemiefasertagung, Dornbirn, Sep 20–22, 1989
[159] P. Rasche, H. Wigger, Deutscher Färberkalender 1983, 98–111
[160] DE 2 457 972 (1974) Akzo GmbH
[161] K. Eitel, Das Leder (1953) 234
[162] DE 853 438 (1942/52) Bayer AG
[163] H. Träubel, Das Leder 28 (1977) 150, 182
[164] H. Träubel, R. Goffin, J. Am. Leather Chem. Ass. 80 261; H. Träubel, R. Goffin in:
Ullmanns Encyklopädie der technischen Chemie, Band 16, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim,
New York 1979; Th. C. Thorstensen, Practical Leather Technology. Litton Educational
Pub. Inc., New York 1969, 222
[165] W. Schröer, Das Leder 25 (1974) 185
[166] W. Würtele, Leder- und Häutemarkt 24, Techn. Beilage 18 (1972) 100
[167] W. Schröer, Das Leder 20 (1969) 102
[168] H. Träubel, L. Tork, B. Zorn, W. Wenzel, Das Leder 38 (1987) 177; J. Soc. Leather
Trade Chemists 74 (1990) 7
[169] Polyurethane, Kunststoffhandbuch Bd. 7, 575 ff., G. Örtel (Hrsg.), Hanser Verlag 1983
[170] H. Träubel in: New Materials Permeable to Water Vapor, 159 ff., Springer Verlag 1999
[171] G. Oertel in: Kunststoff Handbuch, G. W. Becker, D. Braun, (Hrsg.), 3. Auflage, Band
7: Polyurethane, Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien 1993
[172] E. Wenderoth, J. Kopp, H. Träubel, H. A. Burkhart, Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation
(9) (1996) 379–383
[173] J. Kopp, H. Träubel und E. Wenderoth, Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation (7)
(1996) 294–297
[174] B. Thiele, B. Hauschel, Pulp & Paper Europe October/November 2002
[175] US 2005/70 008 794 (2005) Arkwright, Inc.
[176] US 6 866 383 (2005) Avery Dennison Corporation
[177] US 6 312 858 (2001) Eastman Kodak Company
[178] EP 1 116 713 (2001) Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha
[179] Technik des Flexodrucks, 5. Auflage 2006, St. Gallen: Rek & Thomas Medien AG,
K. Heger/F. Reichert, Druckfarben im Flexodruck, Chap. 9, 341
[180] H. Klein, Coating (4) (1989) 112 –113
[181] EP 0 738 750 (2000) BASF AG.
[182] B. Magee, American Ink Maker (79) (2001) 70–72
[183] D. Kummer, “Veredelung von Verpackungen am Beispiel von Faltschachteln”, DRUPA
2004, compass sessions “Verpackungsdruck”
[184] DIN 68861: Möbeloberflächen
[185] Polyurethane in der Bauwirtschaft und Umwelt, Sachstandsbericht, Deutsche Bauche-
mie 2003
[186] DIN 18 202: Toleranzen im Hochbau, 2005
[187] DIN 28 052-2: Oberflächenschutz mit nichtmetallischen Werkstoffen für Bauteile aus
Beton in verfahrenstechnischen Anlagen; Anforderungen an den Untergrund (edition
of August 1993)
[188] US 5 126 170 (1995) Bayer Corp.
[189] K. H. Wührer, Internationales Kolloquium Industriefußböden, Esslingen 2007,
to be published soon
[190] DE 1 719 121 (1967) Bayer AG; DE 2 125 247 (1971) Schering AG
[191] H. Gruber, Beschichtungsstoffe auf Polyurethanbasis, Zentralblatt für Industrie 3/75
[192] A. Fehlbier, Internationales Kolloquium Industriefußböden, Esslingen 1987,
523–530
[193] Richtlinie für Schutz und Instandsetzung von Betonbauteilen, Deutscher Ausschuss
für Stahlbeton (DAfStb), Berlin, October 2001
[194] DIN 18 032/1–6: Sporthallen
[195] Sportstättenbau und Bäderanlagen. sb, Jg. 20 (1986)
[196] Bautenschutz Bausanierung, Jg. 12 (1989), No. 2, 1–42
[197] AIT. Architektur, Innenarchitektur, Technischer Ausbau, Jg. 104 (1996), Nr.7/8, 8–101
[198] O.Fleck, R. Utsch, Internationales Kolloquium Industriefußböden, Esslingen 2003,
221–223
[199] www.artwalk-bayer.de
[200] DIN 1045: Tragwerke aus Beton, Stahlbeton und Spannbeton
[201] Parkhäuser – aber richtig, Ein Leitfaden für Bauherrn, Architekten und Ingenieure, 2.
Auflage 2000, Verlag Bau und Technik
[202] G. Ruttmann, industrieBau, Jg. 46 (2000), Nr.1, 4–28
[203] F. Stöckl, Internationales Kolloquium Industriefußböden, Esslingen 2003, 205–212
[204] AGI-Arbeitsblatt S 10 Teil 3: 1995–11 zu beziehen bei: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Indus-
triebau e.V., Ülsdorfer Straße 106, 51143 Cologne
[205] DIN ISO EN 13 813: Estrichmörtel, Estrichmassen und Estriche – Estrichmörtel und
Estrichmassen – Eigenschaften und Anforderungen; EN 13813:2002
[206] Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zum Wasserhaushaltsgesetz über die Einstufung
wassergefährdender Stoffe in Wassergefährdungsklassen – VwV wassergefährdende
Stoffe (VwVws) – of May 17, 1999, Bundesminister für Umwelt, Naturschutz und
Reaktorsicherheit
[207] Bau- und Prüfgrundsätze für den Gewässerschutz, Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik
(DIBt), Berlin, July 2005
[208] Zulassungsgrundsätze Beschichtungssysteme für Beton in LAU-Anlagen (edition of
October 2001) available from Deutschen Institut für Bautechnik, Kolonnenstraße 30
L, 10829 Berlin
[209] DIN 28 052-2: Oberflächenschutz mit nichtmetallischen Werkstoffen für Bauteile aus
Beton in verfahrenstechnischen Anlagen; Anforderungen an den Untergrund (edition
of August 1993)
[210] DIN 28 052-6: Oberflächenschutz mit nichtmetallischen Werkstoffen für Bauteile aus
Beton in verfahrenstechnischen Anlagen; Eignungsnachweis und Prüfungen (edition
of August 2001)
[211] Dr.-Ing. W. Kanning, neue Aufgaben des DIBt auf dem Gebiet der Anlagen zum Lagern,
Abfüllen und Umschlagen wassergefährdender Stoffe, Mitteilungen des Deutschen
Instituts für Bautechnik 4/1997, 84–89
[212] Musterübereinstimmungszeichen-Verordnung (ÜZVO), Mitteilungen des Deutschen
Instituts für Bautechnik, Heft 5/1994, 72
[213] Notes on implementing the Übereinstimmungszeichen-Verordnungen (ÜZVO) based
on the Muster-ÜZVO of April 1994, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Instituts für Bau
technik, Heft 6/1997, 86
[214] H. Schuhmann et al., Handbuch Betonschutz durch Beschichtungen, Expert Verlag,
Ehningen 1992
[215] K. Weinmann et al., Moderner Bautenschutz, Lexika-Verlag Grafenau, Würzburg 1976
[216] R. Engelfried, Diffusionswiderstandszahlen für Kohlendioxid und Wasser und deren
praktische Anwendung, Farbe und Lack 6 (1983) 513
[217] W. Barthlott, Z. Cerman, A. K: Stosch: Der Lotus-Effekt: Selbstreinigende Oberflächen
und ihre Übertragung in die Technik. Biologie in unserer Zeit 34 (5), 290–296 (2004),
ISSN 0045-205X
[218] DD-Lack – Wirtschaftlicher Langzeitschutz im Bauwesen, publication of Bayer AG,
Leverkusen, 1985
[219] W. Kubitza, Polyurethan-Anstriche auf Beton unter Berücksichtigung der bauphysi-
kalischen Eigenschaften, Bautenschutz & Bausanierung 2 (1980) 55–58
[220] Abdichtungen mit Flüssigkunststoffen nach ETAG 005, Deutsche Bauchemie, 2005
[221] Flachdachrichtlinie – Fachregel für Dächer mit Abdichtungen, Zentralverband des
Deutschen Dachdeckerhandwerks – Fachverband Dach-, Wand- und Abdichtung-
stechnik e.V., 2003
[222] DIN 4 102-1/7, DIN EN 13 501-1/5 – Klassifizierung von Bauprodukten und Bauarten
zu ihrem Brandverhalten (2002)
[223] ETAG 005, Bekanntmachung der Leitlinie von flüssig aufzubringenden Dachabdich-
tungen, Teile 1–8, BAnz. Nr. 200a, (2001)
[224] Bauregelliste A, Bauregelliste B und Liste C, Ausgabe 2002/1 zu beziehen bei: Ernst
& Sohn, Verlag für Architektur und technische Wissenschaften GmbH, Mühlenstraße
33–34, 13187 Berlin
6 Polyurethane adhesives
6.1 Introduction
Adhesive bonding: Comparison with other joining methods
Adhesive bonding is an essential technique, without which many products could not
be manufactured economically or with reproducible properties. It is [1, 2], however,
only one of many possibilities for joining materials to one another and competes
with other joining methods such as welding or screwing. The process used is the
one that delivers the best benefit/effort ratio, after consideration of all costs and risks.
Several advantages of adhesive bonding are immediately apparent. The parts to be
joined are not damaged by thermal stress (welding), nor are they weakened by holes
(screwing). Very different materials can be joined together. The forces acting on the
bonded surface are spread across the whole area, and adhesion bonding only margin-
ally increases the weight of the material combination. However, adhesive joints can
also entail disadvantages. Generally they cannot be separated without damage, and
combinations of different materials make recycling difficult.
Basically, adhesive bonding is not a particularly inexpensive joining method. Its
real advantages are often first realized by considering the overall value-added pro-
cess, for example, by factoring weight savings or better construction variants into
the overall equation [3]. The possibility of joining different materials yields products
that benefit from the interaction of the specific properties. Another example is shoe
manufacture. Without heat-activated polyurethane adhesives, fashion and sports
shoes would look completely different, and today’s diversity of complexly struc-
tured sports shoes would certainly not exist.
Properties of polyurethane adhesives
Polyurethane adhesives [4–7] adhere well to many substrates. This is not solely due
to physical bonding forces arising from the close contact between the adhesive film
and the substrate. The adhesion can be reinforced by hydrogen bridge bonds, which
the polymerizing polyurethane can develop to many substrates. Moreover, free
isocyanate groups present in the adhesive film can react with slight traces of mois-
ture in or on the substrate surface.
Every adhesive must be capable of flow for a certain time, so that it can be applied
to the parts to be joined. It wets the substrate surfaces and yields initial adhesion
that is not yet a load-bearing bond between the two parts. The adhesive joint attains
the necessary cohesion by subsequent hardening. This sequence also applies to
polyurethane adhesives. While they are very different in structure and use, they
have the common trait that urethane groups are either already present or are formed
during application.
6.2 Classification
Polyurethane adhesives are differentiated as follows:
Polyurethane reactive adhesives
As the raw materials used are of low molecular weight, at most oligomeric, poly-
urethane reactive adhesives have good flow properties. After application of the
adhesive and joining, the polymer is formed by the reaction of free isocyanate
groups (see Chapter 6.3).
The polyisocyanates used in two-component systems are of low molecular weight
or may be pre-reacted. The polyols likewise have a relatively low molecular
weight. After mixing, they set in a polyaddition reaction that forms urethane
groups. The setting rate is determined by the reactivity of the components used
and the processing conditions.
One-component systems consist of a liquid polyisocyanate polyurethane (NCO
prepolymer) that may have been prereacted to make it oligomeric. It sets by the
reaction of its free isocyanate groups with atmospheric moisture or with the mois-
ture in the substrate, resulting in the formation of urea groups. The setting rate is
not solely dependent on the reactivity of the components. The availability and dif-
fusion rate of the moisture are also determining factors.
Solventborne polyurethane adhesives based on hydroxyl polyurethanes
Solventborne polyurethane adhesives contain a usually flexible polyurethane poly-
mer dissolved in an organic solvent. In this way, the solid polymer can be applied to
the substrate. The solvent promotes the wetting properties and then evaporates, caus-
ing the adhesive to physically set. Linear hydroxyl polyurethanes based on crystalline
polyester segments are generally processed as heat-activated adhesives.
Heat activation: By briefly heating to a temperature above the softening point of
the crystalline polyester segments, the dry (not tacky) film that remains after evap-
oration of the solvent retains the tackiness and flowability required for the joining
process. In this state, the adhesive layer can be bonded to a second one using rela-
tively little pressure to form a homogeneous adhesive joint that subsequently sets
physically due to recrystallization of the polymer.
Isocyanate crosslinking: In order to prevent the thermoplastic adhesive film from
softening on exposure to heat, these adhesives are often two-component formulations
incorporating crosslinking isocyanates of higher functionality. They significantly
increase the softening temperature of the adhesive bond and enhance substrate adhe-
sion. First, the adhesive film physically sets. Chemical crosslinking follows a short
while later. The softening temperature of the crosslinked adhesive film is significantly
increased, as is its resistance to solvents, plasticizers, oil and fat migration.
However, polyester polyols increase the viscosity and application temperature of the
adhesives. The polarity of the polyester polyols (e.g. resulting from integrated aro-
matic moieties) affects substrate adhesion and increases the barrier effect of the
adhesive film to gases.
Isocyanates
The isocyanate components can be selected from a great variety of aromatic and
aliphatic polyisocyanates. Difunctional MDI monomers (4,4’- and 2,4’-diphenyl-
methane diisocyanate) are used in the manufacture of prepolymers, laminating
adhesives, reactive hot-melt adhesives and sealants. Some monomers have been
specifically modified to yield an easily manageable liquid form at temperatures
above 20 °C. Other MDI monomers are isomeric mixtures with a high content of
2,4’-isomer in addition to the 4,4’-isomer. Given the different reactivity of the
isocyanate groups in the 2,4’-isomer, they yield prepolymers with a lower viscosity
and improved storage stability but lower reactivity than 4,4’-MDI.
Polymeric MDIs contain oligomeric fractions of higher functionality in addition to
difunctional diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI). They are used in two-component
reactive adhesives and for manufacturing NCO prepolymers. Polymeric MDI types
of defined and elevated acidity are particularly suitable for the prepolymer reaction.
In addition to the MDI types, toluene diisocyanate (TDI) types and aliphatic isocya-
nates are used for special applications, mainly as building blocks for special oligo-
meric hydroxyl polyurethanes. Due to their high vapor pressure and the dangers
associated with their toxicity, the use of the monomers is avoided. Low-monomer
derivatives or low-monomer NCO prepolymers of these isocyanates are used instead.
Isocyanate-terminated polyurethanes (NCO prepolymers)
NCO prepolymers [11], i.e. prepolymers containing free isocyanate groups, play a
major role in polyurethane chemistry. They occupy an important position between
the monomeric isocyanates and the polyurethane polymers. An NCO prepolymer
is a polyol reacted with an excess of polyisocyanates. If this excess is very large,
the products are referred to as semi-prepolymers. There are many reasons for using
prepolymers:
• A liquid prepolymer is easier to handle than solid monomeric isocyanates, e.g.
4,4’-diphenylmethane diisocyanate which is crystalline at room temperature.
The monomer content of the prepolymer is lower and hence also the vapor
pressure, e.g. in TDI or hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) prepolymers.
• The advance prepolymer reaction allows the formation of a defined polymer
structure. This is advantageous, for example, when coreactants of very different
reactivities, such as polypropylene glycol ethers containing primary and secondary
hydroxyl groups, are reacted, not simultaneously as a mixture, but consecutively.
an excess of isocyanate causes a deviation from the stoichiometric ratio. This iso-
cyanate excess (5 to 15 %) results in additional crosslinking, compensates problems
due to substrate moisture and improves adhesion to suitable substrates.
Pot life: After adding and mixing the OH (polyol or prepolymer with terminal
hydroxyl groups) and NCO components, the setting reaction commences with the
formation of urethane groups. The pot life is essentially determined by the reactiv-
ity and functionality of the starting materials, the fillers present in the formulation,
and the processing conditions (temperature, mixing technology). Tertiary amine
compounds and metal salts are normally used as the catalysts [14]. Metal salts in
particular, even in small amounts, reduce the pot life, sometimes considerably.
Setting and curing: The same parameters also determine the setting rate. At room
temperature, complete curing takes anything from several hours to days. This
process can be accelerated by heating and catalysis, which often also increases the
final bond strength.
Additives: Fillers such as chalk, talc, barites, quartz powder or ground shale are often
used. They increase the stiffness, but often reduce the elongation at break and the
peel resistance. Moreover, they reduce the exothermia and shrinkage on setting – and
make the adhesive less expensive. They are used above all in adhesives for rigid
materials, such as wood, plastics or metals. When bonding highly absorbent materi-
als, any unwanted penetration into the material can be prevented by adding finely
dispersed silica as a thixotropic agent. On mixing both adhesive components, small
quantities of reactive amine compounds (e.g. isophorone diamine, IPDA) in the
polyol component instantaneously form highly dispersed polyurea particles that act
as in situ or chemical thixotropic agents. This type of thixotropic modification has
the advantage that it does not increase the viscosity of the OH component. Thixo-
tropic additives ensure the adhesive’s stability when applied in beads and prevents
run off from vertical surfaces. The additives are usually incorporated into the polyol
(OH) component. They must always be carefully dried. In order to remove traces
of moisture that may remain even after drying, the addition of a drying agent to the
polyol component is recommended, e.g. zeolite (UOP (“Baylith”) L Paste, Kurt
Obermeier GmbH & Co. KG; D-57319 Bad Berleburg, Germany).
End properties of the cured adhesive: Structure, chain length and functionality of
the coreactants and the fillers used determine the characteristic properties of the
crosslinked polymer via the concentration of urethane groups and possibly urea
groups, as well as via the chemical crosslinking density. These properties are the
tensile strength, modulus, elasticity, softening temperature and chemical resistance.
Catalysis and processing temperature can also have a considerable influence.
Mixing ratio [15]
Practical experience suggests the use of about a 15 % isocyanate excess above the
calculated stoichiometric ratio.
Processing technology
Two-component reactive adhesives are preferably processed using two-component
metering and mixing units (Figure 6.1).
Filler-free two-component reactive adhesives can be metered with gear pumps as
there is no danger of abrasion. Plastic static mixers make processing particularly
economical. Gear pumps cannot be used to process systems containing fillers
because abrasion (grinding action of the filler) would quickly make them unusable.
Reciprocating piston pumps are far less sensitive for this type of formulation.
The use of double cartridges with static mixers (Figure 6.2, page 251) is suitable
for trade application of small quantities. A pre-condition is a mixing ratio of both
components that matches the specification of the double cartridges. The pot life of
reaction to form oligomers. They set by reaction of the free isocyanate groups with
atmospheric moisture or with moisture contained in the substrate to form polyurea
groups. Through-curing of the adhesive layer with atmospheric moisture proceeds
from the outside to inside at a rate determined by the reactivity of the isocyanate
groups, the catalyst and the diffusion rate of the water into the adhesive layer. Small
amounts of carbon dioxide are formed during this reaction but these do not interfere
with the adhesion process provided the free isocyanate content of the adhesive is
not too high (less than four percent NCO). The slow curing which is essential for
such adhesives means that they may only be used if the pieces to be joined can be
mechanically fixed in the required position until setting. It should also be noted
that, with the onset of curing, a skin may form on the surface of the adhesive where
it has contact with the moist ambient air. This may prevent the wetting and bonding
of the second piece to be joined. These adhesives cure to yield layers with a shear
modulus in the range of about 1 to 10 MPa.
Since they are based on the same principle, the NCO-reactive hot melts, one-com-
ponent laminating adhesives and one-component moisture-curing polyurethane seal-
ants also belong in this section. However, the first two product groups are so specific
in their formulation and processing that they will be discussed in more detail in
separate sections (see 6.3.4 and 6.6.2). One-component moisture-curing polyurethane
sealants are also described in a dedicated chapter (see Chapter 7).
Manufacturing NCO prepolymers
The description of the manufacture of NCO prepolymers falls outside the scope of
this publication. Nevertheless, some general observations will be discussed.
Prepolymer suitability of the raw materials
With unknown formulations and new raw materials, preliminary trials must be
carried out to test the prepolymer suitability. In all prepolymer reactions, care has
to be taken that the component in excess is actually present in excess throughout
the whole reaction. The component in excess must always be present, i.e. in the
case of NCO prepolymers containing free isocyanate groups, the polyisocyanate
must be initially present; in the case of OH prepolymers containing free hydroxyl
groups, the polyol must be initially present.
Water content of the raw materials
The molecular weight of water is very low: one mole (18 g) reacts with two moles
NCO groups. Therefore, the water content of the raw materials used for manu-
facturing NCO prepolymers must be very low (< 0.05 %). In the case of NCO
prepolymers containing fillers, the moisture content of the fillers has also to be
minimized. The water content of the raw materials consumes some of the isocyanate
in the prepolymer. Above all, the stability of the prepolymer is negatively affected
by the urea groups formed with the water. During storage, particularly in warm
conditions, these produce higher functional groups that greatly increase viscosity
via the formation of biurets. Consequently, the polyols and fillers should be dried
before they are used in the reaction. Polyisocyanates can also be damaged by the
action of moisture. This is evidenced by an increased content of dissolved carbon
dioxide. Dissolved gases are easily removed by applying a vacuum in the initial
phase of prepolymer manufacture. If this is not done, apparently inexplicable foam-
ing may occur during subsequent application of the prepolymer.
Stability of NCO prepolymers
Stable prepolymers are products that can be stored at room temperature for a long
period and which can also be handled for short periods above the recommended
storage temperature, without any extensive change in the NCO content and the vis-
cosity. In the case of unstable prepolymers, a large decrease in the NCO value and a
marked increase in viscosity are observed. Aromatic polyisocyanate-based NCO
prepolymers should not be subjected to temperatures above 90 °C during production,
because higher temperatures trigger side reactions (formation of allophanates and
biurets, trimerization reactions), which can negatively affect the storage stability of
the prepolymers, the viscosity and the molecular structure of the systems.
Applications
The viscosity of these moisture-curing one-component adhesives which are liquid
at room temperature is in the range of 2,000 to 10,000 mPas. There are also prod-
ucts in paste form. The adhesives can be applied manually with a spatula or using
cartridge guns, or mechanically, e.g. using a bead applicator. They can be used to
bond a wide variety of substrates and substrate combinations, e.g. in the manufac-
ture of windows, doors and sandwich elements.
For a number of years now, moisture-curing one-component polyurethane adhe-
sives have been used in an interesting field of application: structural wood construc-
tion (Figures 6.4 and 6.5). This technology has achieved great significance in
Figure 6.4: Application of adhesive in the Figure 6.5: Hall construction using
manufacture of structural wood [17] structural wood [18]
and pressed together with the adhesive-coated film surface by pressure rolls (Figure
6.6). The laminate is wound onto rolls and must be stored for some time until curing
is completed. Only then can the film be utilized.
Three performance classes for laminated films
Laminated films for food packaging are classified into three performance classes
based on the property profile required for the intended use (Table 6.1).
Table 6.2 (page 256) shows the typical requirements for these three perform-
ance classes and the formulation principles used for adhesives that fulfill these
requirements.
Chemistry of laminating adhesives
The popularity of solvent-free systems has been growing for years. Nevertheless,
solventborne systems are still strongly represented in the manufacture of laminated
films for medium and maximum requirements. The reasons for this are easy to under-
stand. Solventborne systems can be applied in thicker layers. At layer thicknesses of
Table 6.2: Requirements for laminated films in the different performance classes
Performance Laminate/application Adhesive chemistry
classes
>3 g/m2, solvent-free systems often have poorer optical properties (orange peel).
Prepolymers with high molecular weight can be used in solventborne adhesives
without causing viscosity problems. After evaporation of the solvent, the adhesive
film is much more viscous and thus exhibits greater cohesion than would be possible
with solvent-free systems. Freshly bonded film webs do not slip so easily against
each other and the risk of freshly manufactured film rolls telescoping is lower. The
solvent also allows the use of higher proportions of high viscosity aromatic polyes-
ter diols which lend greater strength to the crosslinked adhesive film. Lastly, solvent-
borne adhesives also facilitate the use of slow-reacting aliphatic isocyanates. As the
synthesis process is performed in solution, a large proportion of the polymer structure
at higher molecular weights can be yielded by prepolymerization. Any viscosity
problems can be corrected by the choice and amount of solvent used.
Due to the large number of different adhesive formulations and because the formu-
lations available on the market represent the manufacturer’s confidential proprietary
know-how, this chapter can only provide an overview of the chemical compositions.
Viewed across all systems and performance categories, laminating adhesives gen-
erally consist of approx. 30 % polyether polyols, approx. 40 % polyester polyols
and approx. 30 % polyisocyanates.
Raw material selection
Because laminated films for food packaging are in contact with the packaged food,
the materials, raw materials and adhesive formulations used have to meet appli-
cable statutory requirements and regulations.
In this context, it is not only the chemical structure of the raw material that is of
importance. When selecting auxiliaries such as stabilizers, antioxidants or catalysts,
the permissibility of their use must also be considered. Therefore, raw material
manufacturers frequently offer special product grades for this application.
Technical selection criteria are product properties such as:
• viscosity
• compatibility of the polyol when mixed with other polyols
• compatibility with the additives in the films
• strength and elasticity of the crosslinked polymer
• specific adhesion characteristics and resistance to hydrolysis
PE films contain slip agents to reduce the frictional resistance on fast-running
machines. This is why the slip agent compatibility of the adhesive is important in
producing polyethylene laminates. If it is insufficient, the laminate stability may
decrease during storage, going as far as complete failure of the laminate bond. Poly-
ether polyols and neopentyl glycol adipic acid polyester diols are highly compatible
with slip agents. Polyester diols based on diethylene glycol/adipic acid and butane
diol/adipic acid have poor compatibility. The boiling resistance is a further important
property for laminates used in high-performance applications. Here, hydrophobic
polyester diols are advantageous.
Both aromatic polyisocyanates (based on 4,4’-MDI, liquid MDI types and TDI)
and aliphatic polyisocyanates such as isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), modified
HDI products and dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (H12MDI) are used as iso-
cyanate components. The universally applicable rules of structure/property rela-
tionships are also valid here. Higher functionality yields an increased polymer
crosslinking density, resulting in greater stiffness but also increased brittleness of
the adhesive film. Moreover, a higher functionality reduces the gel time of the
adhesive. The film therefore sets more quickly. However, the application window,
i.e. the pot life or open time of the liquid adhesive, is also reduced, which generally
makes processing more difficult.
Processing problems
There are at least five different stations involved in the long processing chain from
adhesive to filled packaging: the raw material supplier, the adhesive manufacturer,
the film manufacturer, the laminate manufacturer and the packer. It is obvious that
mistakes are possible in this chain consisting of many complex individual steps.
The following points are limited to the adhesive development, manufacturing and
processing (laminate production) steps:
Table 6.3: Typical waiting periods for the further processing of laminated films
Typical waiting periods before:
Cutting the Sealing the The residual iso- Filling the
roll film cyanate monomer packaging
has disappeared
Solventborne 12–24 h 3–5 d 7–14 d 7–14 d
adhesives
Solvent-free 1–2 d 5–7 d 1–7 d 5–7 d
adhesives
• Insufficient laminate adhesion: One cause can be in the formulation, for example
the polyester content is too low. The problem can also be caused by an unsuit-
able or incorrectly adjusted NCO/OH ratio, e.g. due to a malfunction of the
two-component metering unit.
• Poor heat-sealability of the laminated film during heat sealing can be caused by
the use of an adhesive formulation with an excessively high content of mono-
meric isocyanate (MDI or TDI). In this case, the isocyanate migrates onto the
surface to be sealed where it reacts with atmospheric moisture to form polyureas.
These have a very high softening point and prevent the surfaces to be sealed
from melting.
Formation of aromatic amines by migration of aromatic polyisocyanates
The decisive criterion for utilizing the laminate as packaging film is the certainty
that the detection limit for aromatic amines [21] in a test foodstuff is not exceeded
under statutory test conditions. A film that does not meet these conditions is unus-
able. The cause of the problem may only be that the time between laminate produc-
tion and testing is too short. This period must then be increased. However, it may
also be that the adhesive is fundamentally unsuitable because either the reactivity
of the polyols it contains is too low, or the monomeric aromatic isocyanate content
is too high. This problem may be solved by using adhesive formulations with the
lowest possible content of residual migratable aromatic isocyanate monomers, i.e.
containing low-monomer NCO prepolymers or aliphatic isocyanates as the iso-
cyanate components.
The adhesives are prepared by simply dissolving the raw materials supplied as
granules in suitable organic solvents. The granules are stirred into the solvent to
avoid any agglomeration of the readily soluble components.
With regard to the flammability of the solvent used, suitable measures must be
taken to prevent ignition caused by electrostatic charging of the solid when emp-
tying the packaging container. The flammability of the solvents themselves and
the danger that solvent vapors form explosive mixtures with air must be kept in
mind and the corresponding equipment must be used. Moreover, the physiological
action of the solvents must be considered. The use of many solvents is restricted,
e.g. by labeling requirements, or is completely forbidden. The relevant legislation
must be observed (in Germany, the Ordinance on Hazardous Substances – Gefahr-
stoffverordnung or GefStoff V).
To ensure optimal storage stability of the adhesive, the solvents used must be of high
quality. Their water and alcohol content must not be higher than 0.1 %. Ketones and
esters in particular can contain peroxides. An increased peroxide concentration causes
oxidation reactions that are evident from a discoloration of the adhesive solution.
6.5.1 Products
These aqueous products [30], e.g. “Dispercoll U”, closely correspond in their proper-
ties to the conventional hydroxyl polyurethanes used in solventborne applications
that are gradually being displaced for reason of environmental impact and occupa-
tional safety. Since most of these products are based on aliphatic isocyanates, the
adhesive films yielded are highly resistant to UV yellowing. The heat-activated
types produce very strong adhesive bonds, especially on substrates containing plas-
ticizer. They differ in their crystallinity or rate of crystallization and their activation
temperature. Products that crystallize faster after heat activation are able to absorb
the resulting stresses in the adhesive joint more quickly after bonding. This property
is of interest, for example, in the lamination of furniture, which normally involves
three-dimensional structures rather than flat surfaces. After removal from the lami-
nation press, the adhesive joint must absorb the recovery forces of the decorative
film that has been severely stretched in some areas.
Products that crystallize less rapidly after heat activation have a somewhat longer
open time (hot tack life) compared with the fast-crystallizing types, with the result
that somewhat more time is available for positioning and joining the components
being bonded. This is a useful property for shoe manufacturing.
Polyurethane dispersions with low activation temperatures (approx. 40 to 50 °C)
are used to bond heat-sensitive substrates. Products with a high activation tem-
perature (80 to 100 °C) due to their amorphous polymer structure are mainly suit-
able for wet-on-wet bonding.
6.5.2 Formulation
Polyurethane dispersion adhesives are used pure or in combination with other poly-
mer dispersions. They can be easily applied by spraying, knifing or brushing. Their
low viscosity and high solids content provide the adhesive manufacturer with a
high degree of freedom in formulation.
Thickening
The rheological properties of aqueous adhesives are highly important for their
application behavior. The adhesive should be easy to apply, for example by spray-
ing. It should also wet the substrate surfaces as well as possible, i.e. penetrate porous
substrates to a certain extent, but not too much. The viscosity depends on the shear
stress. Thickeners based on hydrophilically modified polyurethanes (e.g. “Borchi
Gel L 75 N”) have proven suitable for adjusting the application viscosity. They can
be easily incorporated into the dispersion and are highly effective.
Addition of polymer dispersions
Dispersions with different polymer structures can be combined. However, several
points must be taken into account. Dispersions containing different stabilizers
(anionic/cationic) are incompatible and would coagulate on mixing. The stability
of the polymer dispersion can be highly dependent on the pH. Therefore, the pH of
the components should be matched to each other before mixing. Since the polymer
backbone of the “Dispercoll U” products consists of polyester polyurethanes, the
pH of the adhesive formulation should be between 6 and 9 to avoid hydrolysis of
the polymers. The long-term stability of the formulations must be carefully tested
because the appearance of the formulated adhesive dispersion (fish eye formation,
coagulation, phase separation) and its application properties can change.
Conservation
In principle all aqueous dispersions are at risk of bacterial contamination. Conse-
quently, the polyurethane dispersions contain a bactericide that prevents the repro-
duction of microbes. Depending on the type and amount of components used,
additional stabilization may be required when formulating the finished adhesive.
6.5.3 Isocyanate crosslinkers for dispersion adhesives
The full potential of the adhesives’ properties can only be exploited in two-com-
ponent formulations using emulsifiable isocyanate crosslinkers [31]. These are mainly
hexamethylene diisocyanate isocyanurates modified with hydrophilic ether chain
segments. The isocyanate groups react with reactive groups in the adhesive polymer
to yield a chemically crosslinked structure of high molecular weight. This is evident
from, for example, the change in the storage modulus (Figure 6.7).
The hydrophilically modified isocyanate crosslinkers are usually processed without
other additives. If, however, an additive is to be used, it must not contain any groups
that react with isocyanate or contain secondary components that react in this way.
In particular, the additive must be free of basic or other secondary components that
have a catalytic effect on isocyanate groups. Unsuitable additives, even in very low
concentrations, can cause an increase in viscosity or even solidification.
Crosslinking increases the softening temperature of the adhesive film and improves
its resistance to solvents, plasticizers, oil and fat migration, and hydrolysis. The
isocyanate groups also promote the adhesion to some surfaces. The influence of
crosslinking on the softening behavior of an adhesive film, as determined by ther-
momechanical analysis (TMA), is shown in Figure 6.8. The lower the softening at
increasing temperature, the lower the penetration depth of the probe.
Figure 6.7: Storage modulus of an adhesive film with and without isocyanate crosslinker
Figure 6.8: TMA of an adhesive film yielded by a polyurethane dispersion with and
without isocyanate crosslinker
rate of the reaction with water depends on the pH, among other factors. When using
dispersions with a neutral pH, the NCO content declines relatively slowly. After
about 8 to 10 hours, the NCO content has dropped so much that the properties (e.g.
thermal stability) of the resulting adhesive bond are no longer attained. Here, in
contrast to two-component solventborne adhesives based on hydroxyl polyurethane
and processed with isocyanate crosslinkers, the end of the pot life is not usually
indicated by gelling of the adhesive mixture.
6.5.4 Drying
After evaporation of the water, the dispersion yields a solid and homogeneous
adhesive film on the substrate. In the case of dispersion adhesives, the drying costs
are often regarded as problematic. However, if the dryer has the correct layout,
drying rates comparable to those for solventborne systems can be achieved. The
drying units can also be utilized for heat activation of the adhesive layers. The
extensive and reproducible drying of the adhesive film must be carefully controlled,
especially at high relative humidity of the ambient air. A high residual moisture
content in the adhesive film would produce poor-quality bonds. Any moisture
trapped between impermeable substrates can damage the adhesive layer after a
while due to hydrolysis.
Open time of the adhesive film
The NCO groups of the isocyanate crosslinker slowly crosslink the polymer in the
dried adhesive film. This results in a slowly progressive decrease in tack and flow-
ability of the (heat-activated) adhesive film, with the result that the temperature
required for activation slowly increases during storage. In general the adhesive
layer should be heat-activated and processed at most 8 hours (end of the open time)
after application of the adhesive dispersion.
6.5.5 The principle of heat-activated adhesive bonding
Dispersion adhesives based on crystallizing polyester polyurethanes are generally
processed as heat-activated formulations [32]. After application, drying and cooling,
the adhesive forms a non-blocking film. Heat activation makes it tacky; the crystal-
line polyester segments of the polymer are melted in a heating tunnel or by infrared
radiation at a temperature above the minimum activation temperature. The activa-
tion process is illustrated in Figure 6.9 showing the change in modulus as a func-
tion of the temperature of the adhesive film.
1st step: Application of the adhesive and subsequent drying. A dry, non-tacky surface
is obtained. The modulus is high (low penetration).
2 step: Immediately prior to joining, the adhesive film is rapidly heated to a tem-
nd
perature above 50 °C. This melts the crystalline polyester segments and
the modulus decreases markedly (high penetration). The film becomes
flowable and the tack increases.
Heat activation is best done by rapid (short) heating (shock activation, e.g. by IR
radiation) because the substrate thus remains virtually unheated. Only a small
amount of heat is applied and the adhesive joint cools rapidly after joining. The hot
tack life is the period of time after the end of heat activation in which the film
exhibits sufficient tack and flowability for bonding. The substrate must be joined
during this time, which may be anything from seconds to minutes depending on
the polymer structure.
Figure 6.9: Heat activation of polyurethane adhesives containing crystalline polyester soft segments
Figure 6.10: Three phases of modulus development after heat activation and cooling of
the adhesive film
The processes that follow activation and bonding are illustrated in Figure 6.10. The
change in modulus is shown as a function of time. Three phases of modulus develop-
ment are observed. First, the adhesive cools shortly after activation, then the polymer
recrystallizes and, finally, the adhesive crosslinks in the presence of an isocyanate.
• Phase 1: The adhesion joint cools immediately after joining. Thus, in this phase,
the viscosity of the adhesive and the cohesive strength of the adhesive film
rapidly increase.
• Phase 2: The polyester segments of the polymer begin to recrystallize, so the
fresh adhesion joint quickly achieves such a high strength that it holds the part
being joined in the joining position until the final strength is attained.
• Phase 3: When using two-component formulations with an isocyanate crosslinker,
the strength increases further as a result of subsequent chemical crosslinking of
the adhesive film.
6.5.6 Applications and
application technology
Polyurethane dispersion adhesives have
found their way into a multitude of
industrial applications [33], e.g. in the
furniture industry, the automotive
industry, shoe manufacturing or in the
textile industry for manufacturing lam-
inated fabrics. The heat activation pro-
cess is easily implemented and suitable
for many materials as long as they are
not heat-sensitive. Depending on the
type of adhesive used, the activation
temperatures are in the range of 50 to
Figure 6.11: Three-dimensional compres- 80 °C. Special polyurethane dispersions
sion molding process for laminating are applied mainly in the wet bonding
decorative PVC films onto MDF process. The material to be bonded is
placed on the wet adhesive layer, which
is then dried to produce the bond. The
process is ideal for textiles or substrate
combinations in which at least one sub-
strate is permeable to water vapor.
An important example of the use of the
heat activation process in the furniture
industry is the production of three-
dimensional furniture front panels
Figure 6.12: 3aD press [34] by laminating decorative films onto
Figure 6.15: Principle of shoe sole bonding with polyurethane dispersion adhesives
Outlook
In addition to their use as aqueous adhe-
sive dispersions, further forms of appli-
cation are of interest: storage-stable,
latently reactive crosslinkable pre-coats
of substrate surfaces and latently reac-
tive crosslinkable adhesive films [39]. An
important precondition for these appli-
cations is of course the storage stability
of the dried adhesive film. During stor- Figure 6.16: Applying dispersion adhesive
age, if only some of the deactivated iso- to a shoe sole
cyanate reacts, i.e. the polymer cross-
links, then the activation temperature increases. A slow crosslinking reaction of the
polymer would mean that, after a time, the adhesive film or the adhesive pre-coat
would no longer be activatable and would therefore be unusable. Experiments have
been successful in formulating mixtures that yielded pre-coats and adhesive films
with a storage stability of several months at 23 °C.
Latently reactive pre-coats or adhesive films are of interest for applications that
profit from the following typical properties:
• low activation temperature of 60 to 90 °C
• high heat stability and laminate strength
• fast activation process with short cycle times
• no release of condensation products during activation
• relatively low compression pressures needed for joining
• non-blocking adhesive film surface
• good adhesion to a large number of synthetic or metal surfaces
• non-discoloring adhesive layers
In addition to the latently reactive pre-coating of webs or the production of latently
self-crosslinking adhesive films, processing can also be done by screen or pad
printing on defined areas or three-dimensional components, e.g. in the electronics
industry.
Granular and powder types are available. The granular types for extrusion pro-
cessing must be essentially free of gel particles. Powder types with a particle size
of < 600 µm are manufactured by low-temperature grinding and are applied by
scatter coating.
Chemically speaking, they are strictly linear hydroxyl polyurethanes based on
crystallizing polyester diols and aromatic diisocyanates, i.e. products with struc-
tures that correspond to the hydroxyl polyurethanes used for heat activatable
solventborne adhesives. The following technical advantages are significant for
their use:
• low activation temperature in comparison with normal hot-melt adhesives,
therefore suitable for heat-sensitive substrates
• very good adhesion like all heat-activatable hydroxyl polyurethanes
• no penetration of the adhesive into porous substrates because of its viscoelastic
properties (textile laminates retain their soft grip)
• high initial strength;
• practically unlimited shelf life of the coated substrates prior to bonding
One of the most important applications is the lamination of textiles. The adhesion
is achieved by heat activation of the scatter-coated powder, the extruded adhesive
film or the adhesive nonwoven and subsequent pressing together of both sub-
strates.
Granules
The granules are used for the extrusion of adhesive films and adhesive nonwovens
or for direct coating. The adhesive film extruded onto a substrate or the heat-activat-
able adhesive film or nonwoven between two substrates can be processed with
typical hot-melt bonding technology, such as heated calendars, membrane presses
or continuous presses. Grades with low
thermoplasticity and fast to very fast
recrystallization are available.
Despite their rapid recrystallization, the
products exhibit good activation prop-
erties. However, there is no danger of
the adhesive layer penetrating too
deeply into the fabric. The scanning
electron micrograph (SEM) below
(Figure 6.17) shows that the adhesive
film only surrounds the directly adja-
cent fiber and does not penetrate the
Figure 6.17: SEM of textile layers bonded
with hydroxyl polyurethane hot-melt adhe- fabric structure. The soft grip of the tex-
sive film tile is thus retained.
Powders
Hot-melt adhesives in powder form are an interesting alternative to adhesive films
or for direct coating, especially for textile lamination. In addition to the general
features of hydroxyl polyurethane hot-melt adhesives, it should also be mentioned
here that the powders can be mixed if they have similar particle size distributions
and morphologies. Spray application can be used for bonding porous substrates in
the manufacture of breathable textile composites. Moreover, spraying is a simple
application method for large-scale applications.
Table 6.4: The function of the starting materials and their significance for the properties
of the adhesive
Starting material Function/effect on the
properties of the prepoly-
mer
Polyester diol crystalline Melting point: > 50 °C • Low melt viscosity
• High initial cohesion,
depending on the crystal-
lization rate
• Significant effect on the
open time
Polyester diol amor- glas transition tempera- • High melt viscosity
phous ture: > 20 °C • High tackiness
• Short open time / high
initial tack
Polyester diol liquid Glass transition • Low melt viscosity
temperature: < 30 °C • Lower initial cohesion
Polyether diol liquid – • Longer open time
Now available are reactive polyurethane hot-melt adhesives based on new types
of raw materials with significantly reduced contents of free MDI monomer [44].
These are made possible by the use of low-monomer MDI-based NCO prepoly-
mers as the isocyanate building block. The lower content of free – i.e. volatile –
monomeric isocyanate is a key requirement in lowering emission values. The
processing temperature of these products is not restricted to below 150 °C solely
because of the viscosity stability, but also because the lability of the urethane group
from 150 °C causes cleavage of the volatile monomeric isocyanate content at higher
temperatures.
Polyester diol components
Several polyester diols used to manufacture reactive hot-melt adhesives are sum-
marized in Table 6.5.
Figure 6.19: Temperature-viscosity curves of polyester diols for reactive hot-melt adhesives
Moreover, the adhesive film with a high amorphous content has a relatively high
cold flow and is relatively brittle.
Formulation development thus requires a careful balance between the adhesive
properties and the specific processing conditions and final properties for the given
application, with the result that customized solutions are frequently needed.
Processing
When processing reactive polyurethane hot-melt adhesives, it is absolutely essential
that the necessary technical requirements are fulfilled and the user knows how to
safely handle these materials. In the melt, the products have an increased vapor
pressure of toxic monomeric diisocyanates. All necessary measures must be taken
to prevent emission of monomeric diisocyanates and all processing steps must be
reviewed in respect of occupational safety. NCO reactive hot melts must be deliv-
ered in absolutely moisture-proof containers, e.g. in drums, hobbocks or cans or in
moisture-proof film pouches, pots or cartridges.
Special melting units are used, preferably operating continuously, to melt the
amounts required for immediate use at 100 to 150 °C. The limited thermal stability
of the adhesive must be borne in mind, which restricts the processing temperature
and prolonged exposure to thermal stress. The principle of such a processing unit
is shown in Figure 6.21. The melt is applied to the substrate by spraying, roller
coating or extrusion through a slot die, as shown in Figure 6.22.
The initial strength of the bond depends on the substrate temperature, because the
increase in viscosity or the recrystallization of the adhesive film in the adhesive
Figure 6.21: Principle of a processing unit for reactive polyurethane hot melts [45]
joint is dependent on the temperature. If the substrate is too warm then the initial
strength will possibly be too low. If the substrate is too cold or rapidly conducts the
heat away, then the adhesive may solidify too quickly. It will then not adhere to the
cold carrier material or it can no longer wet the part being joined. The presence of
moisture is required to develop the final strength. The reaction therefore depends
on atmospheric and substrate humidity, as well as on the rate of diffusion of the
moisture in the adhesive film. Three to seven days are needed for complete curing,
depending on these factors.
After joining, the initial strength is produced by the increase in viscosity and recrys-
tallization when the adhesive layer cools. The crosslinking reaction with moisture
ultimately yields a heat-stable bond with good chemical resistance (e.g. resistance
to washing or chemical cleaning in the case of textile bonding). The moisture has
to be able to diffuse to the reactive NCO groups. Chemical post-curing therefore
occurs significantly more slowly than the physical setting process. Figure 6.23
shows a schematic illustration of the increase in adhesive bond strength of a reac-
tive hot-melt adhesive. The rapid increase (b) of strength in the adhesion joint is
produced by the increase in viscosity and/or recrystallization on cooling. Final
chemical curing by the isocyanate/water
reaction follows with some delay (c).
Applications
Customized reactive polyurethane hot-
melt adhesives are used in many differ-
ent applications: bookbinding, assembly Figure 6.22: Application variants for
and profile wrapping in furniture reactive polyurethane hot melts [45]
Figure 6.23: Schematic illustration of the increase in adhesive bond strength of a reactive
hot-melt adhesive
production, textile composites and laminates, production of metal doors and parti-
tion walls for offices, production of sandwich panel assemblies for camping vehicles,
production of window frames, manufacture of automotive lighting elements.
References
[1] C. A. Dahlquist, An Overview of Adhesive Technology, Kautschuk + Gummi Kunst-
stoffe, 38, 617, 1985
[2] Gerd Habenicht, Kleben, Grundlagen, Technologien, Anwendung. 4. Auflage, Springer
Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2002
[3] J. Sauer, Composite-Kleben im Sportgerätebau. Adhäsion Kleben & Dichten 44, 7,
2000, 16
[4] K. C. Frisch Jr., Chemistry and Technology of Polyurethane Adhesives, in Adhesive
Science and Engineering Vol. 2, 759 ff, 2002
[5] D. G. Lay, P. Cranley, Polyurethane Adhesives, in Handbook of Adhesive Technology,
2nd edition, 695, 2003
[6] G. Oertel (Hrsg.), Polyurethane, Becker/Braun Kunststoffhandbuch Bd. 7, 3. Auflage.
Hanser Verlag, München, 1993. see: M. Dollhausen, Polyurethan-Klebstoffe, 643 ff
[7] Polyurethanes in general: Polyurethanes World Congress 1987. “50 Years of Poly-
urethanes”, Proceedings of the Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc, New York and
Fachverband Schaumkunststoffe e.V., Frankfurt 1987; Technology Polyurethanes,
March 1987
[8] S. L. Reegen, Adhesion of Urethanes from Oxypropylen Polyols in Advances in
Urethane Science and Technology, Vol. 2, Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., 1973, 56 ff
[9] D. Dieterich, K. Uhlig, Polyurethanes, 665–716 in Ullmannn’s Encyclopedia of
Industrial Chemistry, VCH Publishers Inc., Vol. A 21, 1992
[10] B. D. Lawrey, N. Barksby, Improved Processability and Performance in MDI Elas-
tomers based on Ultra-Low Monol Polyols, special reprint of Bayer Polymers LLC,
Pittsburgh, PA USA. Paper delivered at POLYURETHANES EXPO 2003
[11] D. Dieterich, K. Uhlig, Polyurethanes, p. 665–716 in Ullmannn’s Encyclopedia of
Industrial Chemistry, VCH Publishers Inc., Vol. A 21, 1992, see 683
[12] Z. Aggias, R. Karrer, L. Thiele, 25 Jahre PUR-Klebstoffe für Schiffbau und Kälteiso-
lierung (Teil 2). Adhäsion Kleben & Dichten, 40, 7, 1996, 26
[13] H. Schenkel, Von der Großserie bis zur Reparatur Plastverarbeiter, 47, 6, 1996, 99
[14] S. L. Reegen and K. C. Frisch, Catalysis in Isocyanate Reactions in Advances in Ure-
thane Science and Technology, Vol. 1, Technomic Publishing Co., Inc.,1 ff., 1971
[15] D. Dieterich, K. Uhlig, Polyurethanes, 665–716 in Ullmannn’s Encyclopedia of Indus-
trial Chemistry, VCH Publishers Inc., Vol. A 21, 1992, see 685
[16] MIXPAC SYSTEMS AG; www.mixpac.com
[17] Courtesy of Purbond AG; www.purbond.com
[18] Courtesy of Purbond AG; www.purbond.com
[19] Flexible packaging- adhesives, coatings and processes, Rapra Review Reports, 11,
3–34, 2000
[20] P. A. Voss, Novel Water Borne and 100 % Solids Adhesive Systems for Flexible Pack-
aging, Adhesives, Sealants and Coatings, 1997, 359
7 Polyurethane sealants
s pectrum. NCO groups and alkoxysilane groups react differently with the OH or
NH groups of substrates and consequently the adhesion mechanisms of silane-
modified polymers differ greatly from those of the one-component polyurethane
sealants on the same substrates.
Silane-modified polymers are used in flexible sealants, as well as increasingly in
flexible adhesives, and find applications in automotive construction, machine con-
struction, in the container industry, electronics and in the construction industry.
They can be overcoated with many common types of paints and exhibit good UV
and weathering stability as well as high elasticity even at low temperatures. Depend-
ing on the type of polymer backbone, the silane-modified polymers are subdivided
into two structurally different systems (see Table 7.1).
This structural distinction is reflected in the application and end properties of the
sealants formulated with these products.
Silane-modified polyethers:
The polymer backbone of silane-modified polyethers [6] (see Figure 7.3) is polyoxy-
propylene, which is also an important building block for polyurethanes. However,
silane-modified polyethers do not contain any urethane structures; consequently they
do not actually belong in a description of polyurethane sealants. Nevertheless, due
to their close relationship to the silane-terminated polyurethanes, comparison of the
two systems is indispensable in providing a complete representation.
Silane-terminated polyurethanes:
Silane-terminated polyurethanes [7, 8] have also been available on the market for
several years. The basic structure is shown in Figure 7.4 (page 285). Of the various
production methods, essentially two processes are established:
• The reaction of NCO prepolymers based on high molecular weight polyether
polyols (e.g. “Acclaim”) and diisocyanates (e.g. isophorone diisocyanate) with
secondary aminoalkyl alkoxysilanes [9, 10]
• The reaction of long-chain polyether polyols with an alkoxyl-bearing isocya-
natosilane [11, 12]
The combination of polyurethane building blocks with the crosslinking and adhe-
sion mechanisms of silicones combines the strengths of both chemistries: the
cohesion strength and elasticity of the polymer backbone’s polyurethane structure
with the blister-free moisture curing and adhesion strength of trifunctional alk-
oxysilane end groups.
Thus, silane-modified polyethers consist of a highly flexible polyether chain with
two reactive alkoxysilane groups at each end. In contrast, the silane-terminated
polyurethane has a more rigid polyether-polyurethane chain as the polymer back-
bone, and at each end, there are three reactive alkoxysilane groups. In principle,
the crosslinking mechanism of both product groups is identical, but the higher
functionality of the silane-terminated polyurethanes yields greater reactivity and a
higher crosslinking density in the resulting polymer.
Some of the differences that result from the various polymer backbones and func-
tionalities are summarized in Table 7.2. The more rigid polymer chains of the
silane-terminated polyurethanes have a markedly higher viscosity at the same chain
length and tend to yield crosslinked end products with a higher shear modulus and
hardness. It is thus possible to use them in formulating both sealants and flexible
adhesives (harder than sealants). The flexible silane-terminated polyethers are
lower in viscosity (yet have the same chain length), are less reactive as a result of
their lower functionality, and yield less highly crosslinked sealants that tend to be
softer and have a higher elongation at break.
7.3 Formulation
7.3.1 NCO-reactive one-component polyurethane sealants
The typical composition of a one-component polyurethane sealant is shown in the
following Table 7.3. In such a formulation, the simpler ground chalk powders can
be used as fillers. Silane-terminated polyurethanes, on the other hand, require rein-
forcing fillers (with a large surface area) to develop adequate strength. However,
this advantage of the NCO-terminated products is countered by the disadvantage
that their NCO groups can react with many antioxidants, meaning that the design
of the formulation has to take into account the storage stability of the uncrosslinked
sealant mixture and the stabilization of the crosslinked product.
7.3.2 Silane-terminated polyurethanes
The formulation of sealants or adhesives requires harmonization of a large number
of additives that all play a significant role in optimizing the processing and end
properties [14].
The storage stability of the formulations depends greatly on achieving the lowest
possible moisture content. The amount of silane added as a water scavenger is
important for the elimination of any possible traces of moisture. However, an excess
can be detrimental, because these silanes interfere with the subsequent crosslink-
ing process and, after crosslinking, can cause an increase of the modulus. The
aminosilanes, added as adhesion promoters, also have a stabilizing effect, because
their alkoxysilane groups are present in the mixture in much higher proportions
than those bonded to the silane-terminated polyurethane. This excess consequently
prevents the alkoxysilane groups bonded to the polyurethane from reacting with
trace quantities of reactive components.
The viscosity and rheological properties of the formulations are determined by the
addition of thixotropic agents, fillers, plasticizers and, if necessary, solvents. The
mechanical properties of the crosslinked formulations are determined by the silane-
terminated polyurethane, plasticizers, fillers and silanes. Their adhesive properties
depend on the aminosilane adhesion promoter. It should be noted here that the basic-
ity of these aminosilanes can increase the crosslinking rate. Plasticizers, fillers, the
amount of catalyst, and light stabilizers [15, 16] also affect the adhesive properties.
Silane-terminated polyurethane prepolymers (“Desmoseal S”) can be used to pro-
duce low-modulus sealants with a high elongation at break or high-modulus adhe-
sives, depending on the formulation.
7.4 Processing
The ready-to-use, normally solvent-free sealant is supplied in cartridges or flexible
pouches and applied to the joint using a manual or compressed-air spray gun. Seal-
ants are also supplied for the DIY home improvement market in special cartridges
that can be emptied without the use of spray guns. In industrial applications, e.g.
on a production line, the sealants are supplied in large containers and pumped
through hose lines to metering and application units.
References
[1] E. Baust, W. Fuchs, Praxishandbuch Dichtstoffe, Herausgeber: Industrieverband
Dichtstoffe e.V. (IVD). Public Relations Verlag und Werbung GmbH, 2004
[2] A. Damusis (Editor), Sealants. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, Amster-
dam, London, 1967
[3] J. Panek (Editor), Building Seals and Sealants. ASTM Special Technical Publication
606, 1976
[4] I. R. Panek, I.-P. Cook, Construction Sealants and Adhesives. John Wiley and Sons,
Inc., New York 1984
[5] W. Endlich, Kleb- und Dichtstoffe in der modernen Technik, Verlag W. Giradet, Essen 1980
[6] K. Isayama, I. Hatano (Kanegafuchi Kagaku Kogyo, Kabushiki Kaisha, Japan) Vul-
canizable silylether terminated Polymer, Patent Application, US 3,971,751, 1976
[7] G. L. Brode, L. B. Conte Jr. (Union Carbide Corporation), Vulcanizable silicon ter-
minated Polyrethane Polymers, Patent Application, US 3,632,557, 1972
[8] B. A. Ashby, (General Electric Company), Moisture curable siloxy terminated polyether,
Patent Application, US 3,408,321, 1968
[9] Ch. Zwiener, L. Schmalstieg, J. Pedain, (Bayer AG), Alkoxysilan- und Aminogruppen
aufweisende Verbindungen, Patent Application, EP 0 596 360 A1, 1993
The most important areas of application for polyurethanes in the coating, adhesive
and sealant segments have been demonstrated in the foregoing chapters. This list
could certainly be continued, but the aim here is not to provide a detailed descrip-
tion of all the areas of application. Rather, it is to illustrate the wide variety of
possible uses of polyurethanes as starting points for new applications, including
those outside established areas of use. This spin-off effect will be described below
on the basis of selected examples.
Polyurethane as a latex substitute
The prophylactic measures taken worldwide in the early 1990s to guard against
HIV, hepatitis B and C, and later also bird flu, led to a sharp rise in the use of latex-
based protective gloves. However, glove users frequently complained of allergic
reactions. Latex contains allergens that lead to skin hypersensitivity. This fact trig-
gered an intensive search for alternative materials.
Such allergic reactions are not known to be caused by films based on polyurethane
dispersions. These can be processed in a similar way to latex, and today are widely
used in the manufacture of gloves for laboratory and medical applications. The
gloves are produced by application and coagulation of the polyurethane dispersion
on a ceramic hand mold. They are dipped into hot water to remove the salts formed
and then oven-dried at elevated temperatures.
Apart from their non-allergic properties, polyurethane gloves are comparable to
latex gloves in terms of wearing comfort. They are characterized by high tensile
strength and stress resistance, and are odor-free. In recent years, targeted optimiza-
tion of polyurethane dispersions has produced a significant rise in the resistance of
such gloves to alcohol-based disinfectants.
The advantages of polyurethane dispersions have made them clear alternatives to
latex. Polyurethane dispersions are also widely used in the manufacture of condoms.
The advantage of polyurethane condoms is that they cause practically no allergies,
and in contrast to latex condoms can also be used with oil-based products.
Polyurethanes for medical applications
Polyurethanes have played a significant role in medical technology for a long time.
The excellent mechanical properties of polyurethanes are also valued in this special-
ized area of use. For example, the suitability of polyurethanes for artificial heart
valves was already being investigated by the end of the 1950s. Moreover, many
polyurethanes exhibit very good biocompatibility, which is a basic requirement for
use on injured skin. They can also be used in implant materials which can remain
in place over several hours, but could last for weeks or even years.
Today, polyurethane coatings are also found, for example, in modern wound treat-
ment. Certain polyurethane gels are used in many products for this application, wich
exhibit a remarkable degree of adhesion on uninjured skin but are completely non-
sticky on contact with the moist wound. Such dressings can therefore be removed
easily and painlessly, without causing any new damage to the healing wound [1].
However, the potential uses of polyurethanes in medical technology are far from
being exhausted. In particular, one- and two-component polyurethane coating sys-
tems offer an unlimited structural variety that is not accessible using thermal man-
ufacturing processes such as extrusion. There is an enormous demand for improved
materials in the field of medical technology.
Polyurethanes for cosmetic applications
Aqueous polyurethane dispersions also came into use in the cosmetics industry at
the end of the last century. The film-forming and gentle properties of polyurethane
dispersions made possible their use on hair. With the reduction in the amount of
organic solvents added, the hair care product segment (hairsprays, hair styling prod-
ucts, etc.) has been developed as a new area of application for polyurethanes [2].
The good compatibility of polyurethanes has recently made it possible to develop
systems for use on human and animal skin. Although polyurethane polymers still
play a subordinate role to the other polymers used in the cosmetics segment, such as
polyvinylpyrrolidones, polyvinyl alcohols, polyacrylates and silicones, their market
share is expected to grow significantly in view of the increasingly demanding require-
ments, e.g. elastic properties, shape memory effects, surface feel, gloss, water resis-
tance, reduction of organic solvent content, etc. Polyurethane dispersions in the form
of spray-dried powders are also being used increasingly in development work.
Polyurethanes for
holographic applications
The concept of holographic data stor-
age is already 40 years old. However,
its technical implementation had failed
until now due to a lack of available and
affordable materials. Only very recently
have polymer materials been developed
that are suitable for data storage and for
the recording of visible holograms. Poly- Figure 8.1: Cosmetics – a new area of
urethanes are also viewed as promising application for polyurethanes
materials in this regard, and it is expected that such affordable holographic materials
will find use in a broad range of applications in the future by virtue of their unique
optical properties.
References
[1] Bayer scientific magazine “research” 1999, 11: “A gel for severe wounds”
[2] C. Wood, et al., SÖFW-Journal, 126. Jahrgang, 11-2000, 26–34
Figure 9.1: More than 100 coatings can be formulated per day in the high-throughput
testing laboratory and their films can be tested for various resistance properties
Figure 9.2: Principle for determining the relative degree of crosslinking of polymer films
by the elution of a fluorescent dye incorporated in the polymer
This test was carried out for one-component polyurethane coatings baked at vari-
ous temperatures. The dependence of the fluorescence signals on the baking tem-
perature for each individual coating is depicted in Figure 9.3. At baking tempera-
tures below the crosslinking temperature, the coatings swell severely, and a high
dye concentration is measured. At baking temperatures above the crosslinking
temperature, the swellability of the polyurethane films and thus the eluate con-
centration are correspondingly lower. An easily split off blocking agent shifts the
crosslinking temperature to a lower value without affecting the pronounced step
in the signal plot.
The crosslinking temperatures measured by this method correlate well with the
results yielded by traditional techniques such as dynamic mechanical analysis
(DMA) [8], although not necessarily in absolute values but rather relative to a refer-
ence value (e.g. a formulation with a blocking agent that has been established as
the standard). The absolute values for the crosslinking temperatures are method-
specific, since they depend very much on experimental conditions such as the
baking time, and to a significant extent on the substrate used. The minimum cross-
linking temperature is defined as the temperature at which a significant drop in the
extracted dye concentration is observed. This is analogous to the procedure using
DMA, where this temperature is attributed to the rise in elastic modulus.
As an example, Figure 9.4 shows some of the results from a study to test novel
blocking agents [4]. The blocking agents tested included hydroxyfunctional com-
pounds (alcohols), aminofunctional aromatic compounds (heterocycles) and ami-
nofunctional aliphatic compounds (amines).
Figure 9.3: Determination of the crosslinking temperature for baking coatings by means
of the elution method
In this study, coating formulations were prepared from the polyacrylate polyol
“Desmophen A 870” and blocked polyisocyanates at an NCO/OH ratio of 1:1 and
catalyst loading of 1% by weight DBTL or bismuth 2-ethylhexanoate, calculated
on the solids content. As a control, the reaction was also performed without a
catalyst, using the hexamethylene diisocyanate trimer “Desmodur N 3300” as the
isocyanate component and the polyacrylate polyol “Desmophen A 870” as the
polyol component. Figure 9.1 (page 295) shows a typical layout for a single matrix
of coating formulations as a test unit used in this study.
For the systematic investigation of blocking agents, more than 60 blocked isocya-
nates based on “Desmodur N 3300” were prepared. For comparison, these same
isocyanates blocked using known standard blocking agents such as 3,5-dimethyl-
pyrazole (DMP), diisopropylamine and caprolactam were also tested.
High-throughput screening as described was completed for all the polyurethane
coatings prepared within a few days. The results provided by this study made
important contributions to understanding structure-property relationships in the
crosslinking and catalysis of one-component polyurethane coatings based on
blocked polyisocyanates (see Chapter 3.5).
Figure 9.4: Test results for the baking behavior from high throughput tests of one-
component polyurethane coatings with various blocking agents and catalysts
References
[1] For overviews of combinational material research, see: R.F. Service, Science 277, 474
(1997). B. Jandeleit, D. J. Schaefer, T. S. Powers, H.W. Turner and W. H Weinberg,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 2494 (1999). R.A. Potyrailo, E. J. Amis (eds.), High-
Throughput-Analysis, Kluwer Academic New York 2003
[2] J. N. Cawse (ed.), Experimental Design for Combinatorial and High Throughput
Materials Development, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2003
[3] E.g. the software packages JMP® (SAS Institute Inc.), STATISTICA® (StatSoft® Inc.),
Design Expert® (Statease®), MODDE® (Umetrics®), and others
[4] H. Bach, Ch. Gürtler, S. Nowak, European Coatings Journal 03, 22 (2004)
[5] H. Bach, Ch. Gürtler, S. Nowak, Farbe &Lack, 108, 30 (2002)
[6] S. Nowak et al., Increasing Efficiency in Coatings Development Using High- Through-
put-Testing, talk given at ACHEMA 2006, May 18 (2006)
[7] Test method for optimizing film forming polymers, PCT Int. Appl. WO 02/42745 A2
20020530, (2002)
[8] T. Engbert, E. König, E. Jürgens, Farbe&Lack, 7/1996, 51, (1996)
[9] Defined in ANSI/SBS 1-2004, 3-2004, 4-2004
Generally speaking, polyisocyanate coating and adhesive raw materials are prod-
ucts of higher molecular weight manufactured by polyaddition or polymerization
reactions from low molecular weight monomeric diisocyanates. These starting
materials are toluene diisocyanate (TDI), 1,6-diisocyanatohexane (hexamethylene
diisocyanate, HDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), diphenylmethane diisocyanate
(MDI) and 4,4’-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (H12MDI).
In contrast to the non-volatile polyisocyanates they are used to manufacture, all these
compounds have a measurable vapor pressure. With its particularly low vapor pres-
sure, diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) and the group of products based upon it
occupy a special position in terms of occupational safety, which is why their process-
ing will be discussed separately. Table 10.1 shows the vapor pressure and other
physical data of the monomeric diisocyanates named above. On account of the health
risks ascribed to monomeric diisocyanates, efforts are made during manufacture to
ensure the lowest possible residual monomer content in the polyisocyanates for
coatings and adhesives. This applies particularly to products based on TDI, HDI and
IPDI because of the relatively high volatility of these monomers.
The vapors of these diisocyanates have an irritant effect on the eyes, nose, throat
and respiratory tract. Depending on the concentration and the duration of exposure,
a hypersensitivity (sensitization) to diisocyanates may result. On renewed exposure
to diisocyanates, this may trigger breathing difficulties of varying severity or even
asthma-like attacks (isocyanate asthma), the latter even at diisocyanate concentra-
tions far below the occupational health exposure limits.
Prolonged exposure of the skin usually results in tanning and irritant effects. Skin
sensitization and the occurrence of allergic symptoms (reddening of the skin,
swelling, inflammation) are also possible, especially in the case of cycloaliphatic
diisocyanates.
ane diisocyanate,
MDI
4,4’-Dicyclohexyl- cycloaliphatic 262.4 Decomp./1,013 approx. 25 2.1 x 10-5 0.02 0.23
Table 10.1: Physical data of monomeric diisocyanates
methane diisocya-
nate, H12MDI
301
10.1.1.1 Labeling
Labeling of a substance is composed of the hazard symbol and numbered phrases,
referred to as risk phrases, which draw attention to the hazard potential inherent in
a substance that requires labeling. There are also safety phrases which indicate ways
of avoiding these risks and suitable preventive measures.
The monomeric diisocyanates HDI, IPDI, H12MDI, TDI and MDI are listed in
Annex I of EU Directive 67/548/EEC (Dangerous Substances Directive) [1]. They
are thus subject to standardized mandatory classification and labeling EU-wide.
Changes to the classification of Annex I substances are possible via an ATP (Adap-
tation to Technical Progress), if required by new scientific findings or as the result
of politically motivated reevaluations. Adaptations to directives are published in
the Official Journal of the European Union. They enter into force shortly after their
publication but require adoption into the national legislation of the member states
within the time limits defined in the Directives.
This caveat also applies to all the labeling requirements, exposure limits and regu-
lations mentioned below, which can change due to new toxicological evaluations,
amendments to the laws or the adoption of new EU Directives. Directive 67/548/
EEC (as at 2006, including the 29th ATP) classifies TDI as very toxic (hazard
symbol: T+, skull and crossbones), HDI, H12MDI as toxic (hazard symbol: T, skull
and crossbones), IPDI as toxic (hazard symbol: T, skull and crossbones) and dan-
gerous to the environment (hazard symbol: N, tree and fish) and MDI as harmful
(hazard symbol: Xn, St. Andrew’s cross).
All the above listed diisocyanates are labeled the same with respect to their irritant
effects (R 36/37/38: Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin). Moreover, atten-
tion must be drawn to the risk of sensitization. The phrases “May cause sensitization
by inhalation” (R 42) and “May cause sensitization by skin contact” (R 43) are used
for this purpose. In the case of IPDI and TDI, there are differences in the classifica-
tion with respect to the acute inhalation toxicity and risks to the environment. The
requirement in force since 1998 to indicate the carcinogenic potential of TDI (R 40:
“Limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect”) is not based on new toxicological find-
ings. Instead, the positive results obtained some years ago in feeding studies that
were controversial in terms of their quality and conclusive value are now weighted
more heavily than the negative findings of more recent inhalation studies.
In February 2007 the EU Technical Progress Committee (TPC) approved the pro-
posed labeling changes of the 30th ATP to Directive 67/548/EEC. Accordingly, like
TDI, MDI will also carry the phrase R 40. The hazard symbol remains unchanged
as Xn. The labeling change is not based on any new toxicological findings but
results on purely formal grounds with reference to the now 13–year-old study
results carried out with an artificially produced MDI aerosol (see Chapter 10.1.3.5).
However, the reclassification will not lead to changes in occupational health and
safety measures from those that are already good practice today. According to
industry association information, the amended directive is scheduled to be imple-
mented in June 2009.
Besides the labeling of the diisocyanates, Directive 67/548/EEC also specifies sub-
stance-specific concentration limits for labeling preparations that contain diiso-
cyanate.
Polyisocyanate products are classified analogously to preparations in accordance
with the provisions of the Directive 1999/45/EEC (Dangerous Preparations Direc-
tive) [2]. Thus, polyisocyanate products based on the aliphatic diisocyanates HDI,
IPDI and H12MDI, are labeled as harmful with the hazard symbol Xn if the residual
monomer content is above 0.5 %. In the case of preparations containing polyiso-
cyanate products based on the aromatic diisocyanates TDI and MDI, this labeling
is required above a residual monomer content of only 0.1 %. If results are available
from tests on polyisocyanate products, then these are to be regarded as more sig-
nificant than the conventional calculation method and are to be preferred for clas-
sification of the product. In principle, labeling with the phrase R 42 is required for
all isocyanates, even for polymeric isocyanates, unless there are indications that a
substance of this type does not cause any sensitization of the respiratory system.
Phrase R 43 must be applied if there are positive results from animal testing.
Authorities increasingly use the maximization test according to Magnusson and
Kligman [3] as the basis for the classification and labeling of substances and prepa-
rations with respect to their potential skin-sensitizing effect. In this special animal
test, aliphatic polyisocyanate products based on hexamethylene diisocyanate or
isophorone diisocyanate reveal slight skin-sensitizing potential, even when the
residual monomer content is below the threshold of 0.5 %. If no other labeling
requirement applies (e.g. Xn, harmful), such products are labeled with the hazard
symbol Xi and the hazard designation “irritant” as well as with the phrase (R 43)
“May cause sensitization by skin contact”.
In accordance with the requirements of the Preparations Directive 1999/45/EC, the
containers of all polyisocyanate coating and adhesive raw materials that contain
isocyanate groups must be specially labeled with the phrases “Contains isocyanates.
See information supplied by the manufacturer”. This requires the user to procure
all available safety information pertaining to the product to inform himself of the
risks that may be associated with the use of the product and what precautions to
take to minimize these risks. To this end, manufacturers provide safety data sheets,
product information sheets and, if appropriate, instructions for use.
To provide the user with fast information, the European Council of the Paint, Printing
Inks and Artists’ Colours Industry (CEPE) has developed the following text for label-
ing containers holding coating products containing isocyanate groups: “Contains
isocyanates. Hardeners and ready-to-use coatings may irritate the skin and respiratory
tract and cause sensitization and allergic reactions. Ensure constant ventilation with
fresh air during and also after handling the product. Do not inhale the vapors. Respi-
ratory protection must be worn when spraying. People with allergies and with respi-
ratory diseases should not be allowed to work with these coating materials.”
At the moment, the labeling regulations for chemicals differ widely around the
world. With the introduction of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification
and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), it can be expected that labeling will be harmo-
nized in the medium term.
10.1.1.2 Exposure limits
The European Union and its member states define maximum workplace exposure
limits for harmful gases, vapors and, increasingly, also for substances that form
dust. Such a limit gives the maximum permissible concentration of a substance in
ppm (milliliters of gas or vapor per cubic meter of air) or, in the case of suspended
particles, in mg/m³ which, in the light of available knowledge, does not constitute
a health risk or unreasonable burden during long-term work with the product, even
for many years, based on an average eight-hour working day. The exact definition
of the exposure limit can vary from country to country. In addition to the eight-hour
limit, there are also short-term exposure limits, which restrict the maximum expo-
sure levels, for example, in discontinuous processes.
Many European states have specified workplace exposure limits for monomeric
diisocyanates. A common exposure limit is 0.005 ppm (5 ppb). Sometimes, how-
ever, there are deviations from this. Due to the diverse molecular weights of the
diisocyanates, individual concentration thresholds resulted despite uniform expo-
sure limits in ppm, which are expressed in mg/m3 (see Table 10.2).
Notwithstanding the specification of individual substance-dependent air exposure
limits, some states have decided to specify an exposure limit for a generic isocya-
nates group. This exposure limit is based on the concentration of NCO groups in
the workplace air. A typical value is 0.02 mg/m3 NCO.
Table 10.2: Typical air exposure limits for diisocyanates
Diisocyanate Air exposure limit
ppm mg/m³
Toluene diisocyanate 0.005 0.035
Hexamethylene diisocyanate 0.005 0.035
Isophorone diisocyanate 0.005 0.046
4,4’-Dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate 0.005 0.054
4,4’-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate 0.005 0.05
Air exposure limits are valid only for individual substances but not for mixtures of
substances, as are usually found when working with polyurethane coating systems.
It is possible to make only a very limited assessment of the health effects of such
mixtures of substances based solely on the air exposure limits for the individual
components. Measurements of the concentration of monomeric diisocyanate in the
air during brush application of two-component polyurethane systems under stan-
dard working conditions either yield no values at all or, at most, values well below
the exposure limit. However, measurements of the concentrations of individual
hazardous substances in the air at the workplace – including solvents if present in
elevated concentrations – can serve only to check that levels are within the indi-
vidual air exposure limits; they cannot provide any indication of possible interac-
tions between the various substances in their effect on humans, e.g. synergisms.
Recently, what is referred to as the evaluation index was introduced to assess the
workplace situation. This sets the measured concentrations of the individual hazard-
ous substances in the air at the workplace in relation to their respective exposure
limits. This index (IEL) is defined as the sum of the quotients calculated from the
measured air concentrations (C) of the individual substances and the corresponding
exposure limits (EL) – in Germany, the workplace exposure limits (AGW, Arbeits
platzgrenzwert). This is expressed by the formula shown in Figure 10.1.
Of course, this evaluation index is only a rough basis for the assessment of the work-
place situation as it, too, represents a purely additive approach. It is unable to take
any potential synergisms or antagonisms between individual substances into account.
Therefore, if ventilation and extraction are inadequate to reduce the concentrations
of all the volatile substances to a harmless level, respiratory protection should
always be worn.
Apart from the solvents present and the minimal content of residual monomers,
the higher molecular weight polyisocyanates have no measurable vapor pressure,
i.e. during all processing steps – apart from spray application – the workplace air
concentration will contain no more than traces of monomeric diisocyanates (and
volatile solvents).
Due to the very low vapor pressure of polyisocyanates, so far no air exposure
limits have been established for individual polyisocyanates. However, during
spray application, even low volatile polyisocyanates are released into the air at
the workplace. In the past, many manu-
facturers of polyisocyanates therefore
recommended keeping a guide value of
0.5 mg/m3 polyisocyanate.
The generic approach for specifying
workplace exposure limits via the con-
centration of NCO groups can also be Figure 10.1: Evaluation index
are often not recognized for workplace measurements performed to determine con-
formity with legal requirements.
Provided that the appropriate expertise is available, measurements using trapping
reagent methods deliver reliable results for assessing the exposure situation in the
workplace down to levels of less than 0.5 ppb.
In Germany, measuring laboratories are accredited to perform workplace analyses
to meet the requirements of the hazardous substance law according to Article 9
Para. 6 of the German Ordinance on Hazardous Substances (GefStoffV) [10] by the
country’s Agency for the Accreditation of Measuring and Testing Installations
(DAR) [11]. Accreditation for measuring laboratories is voluntary. However, the
employer who commissions a measuring laboratory can assume that the results
determined by this measuring laboratory are correct if the measuring laboratory is
accredited as described here. On the European and international levels, the Multi-
lateral Recognition Agreement (MLA) of the European Coooperation for Accredi-
tation (EA) [12] supports the mutual recognition of accreditations of inspection
bodies and the certification of personnel in all MLA signatory countries.
10.1.2 Coreactants for polyisocyanates
The standard coreactants for polyisocyanate resins are polyols such as polyester or
polyether polyols that may be solvent-free, dissolved in the solvents commonly
used in coatings or supplied in the form of an aqueous dispersion. As a rule, these
products are largely harmless from an industrial hygiene standpoint. The classifica-
tion, packaging and labeling of these products are governed Europe-wide by the
relevant EU Directives, in Germany by the German Ordinance on Hazardous Sub-
stances and by the relevant legislation of other countries.
10.1.3 Processing of polyurethane coatings
10.1.3.1 General protective measures
Independently of whether national legislations require an assessment of the work-
place and documentation of the results, each workplace should be investigated and
assessed in terms of present or potential hazards to the skin and respiratory tract.
Valuable guidance for individual activities in this regard is offered by the catalog of
exposure scenarios [13] contained in the Technical Rules on Hazardous Substances
(TRGS) 430 “Isocyanates – Exposure and Monitoring” [4]. However, this catalog is
by no means suitable for replacing the necessary isocyanate exposure measurements.
The suitability of the various options for ensuring the best possible respiratory
protection depends on the object. In accordance with EU Directive 98/24/EC [14],
the employer has the obligation to ensure that the risk to the health and safety of
the employee from a hazardous chemical substance is eliminated or reduced to the
minimum. The directive specifies a ranking of the protective measures. The use of
individual protective equipment should only be mandatory if other measures such as
the appropriate design of the workplace, extraction and ventilation are not sufficient
to protect employees from contact with hazardous substances. It goes without saying
that operations such as spray coating, where excessive ventilation would go counter
to the aims of the process, cannot be performed without wearing personal protective
equipment. In such cases an exceptional regulation specifically applies.
The conditions governing the suitability of the individual safety measures and types
of equipment are described in the information provided by the manufacturers of
respiratory equipment.
In addition, the following requirements must be observed when handling reactive
polyurethane coating materials:
• As well as observing the general safety measures for coatings application, it must
be ensured that people with allergies – especially asthmatics – and those who
suffer from bronchial catarrh or other, particularly chronic respiratory diseases
are not involved in work that might additionally impair their respiratory function.
People with allergies must not be exposed to reactive polyurethane coatings. If
there are doubts as to the suitability of an individual to work with these coatings,
a medical examination must be required. If there are any problems, a physician
must be consulted.
• In the event of coughing, pressure in the chest or asthma-like symptoms during or
after work with the coatings, avoid any further exposure and consult a physician.
• The wearing of safety goggles is strongly recommended. If, nevertheless, the
spray mist gets into the eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and then
consult a physician.
• Skin complaints are not an occupational hygiene problem when working with
polyurethane coatings. However, careful cleaning of the skin is recommended. The
application of a barrier cream before starting work will allow the easy removal of
paint spatters with soap and water. Strong solvents are unsuitable for cleaning the
skin as they remove the natural moisture and may cause adverse skin reactions.
• To avoid exposure to solvents, freshly coated objects should be left to dry in
well-ventilated rooms.
• When baking thermally curing polyurethane coatings, the gases from the baking
oven must be extracted to prevent the build-up of harmful vapors in the work
area. If necessary, the exhaust gases from the oven must be scrubbed in accor-
dance with the air pollution control regulations (e.g. [15]).
Suitable respiratory protection includes filter masks, half-masks with replaceable
filter cartridges and air-fed hoods. It should be borne in mind that a filter mask pro-
vides protection for only a limited period, depending on the concentration of harmful
substances in the air. It has also been found that a filter for organic vapors does not
provide adequate protection against aerosols (spray mist) containing isocyanate [16].
Table 10.3: Air exposure limits for solvents and dusts (2006)
Substance Limit value [mg/m3]
Xylene 110–440
Ethylbenzene 220–440
C3-Alkyl benzene (cumene) 88–440
Ethyl acetate 525–1,400
Butyl acetate 480–960
2-Butoxyethanol 50–125
Methoxypropyl acetate 275
Methyl isobutyl ketone 83–410
General dust exposure limits
Breathable dust 10
Alveolar dust 3
means that personal safety measures must not be ignored, even when spray-applying
waterborne systems. Studies in rats of the subacute and subchronic inhalation toxic-
ity of polyisocyanate resins based on hexamethylene diisocyanate [19] showed that
aerosol concentrations of 3 to 4 mg/m3 of these substances were tolerated without
harm for both three and up to thirteen weeks (exposure for more than six hours per
day, five days per week). It was observed that much higher concentrations caused
an increase in lung weight and nonspecific inflammatory changes to the respiratory
tract. The latter are attributed to the primary irritant potential of the products. There
was no evidence of other organ damage.
Due to the many different components in spray mists, it is not yet possible to quan-
tify the concentrations of spray mists that may be harmful to man. It is therefore
essential to require the best possible protection against the inhalation of spray mists.
This requirement applies not only to spray mists of two-component polyurethane
coatings. It should also be made for all spray mists derived from coatings, even if
the hazard potential of the different coating systems varies.
10.1.3.3 Waterborne one-component and two-component reactive systems
It has already been stated that the novel waterborne reactive polyurethane systems
should be treated no differently from solventborne systems in terms of occupational
hygiene. Even though the risk presented by solvents has been eliminated or at least
minimized (most waterborne coating systems contain a small amount – usually just
a few percent – of a co-solvent), monomeric and polymeric diisocyanates present
the risk here, in the same way as they do in organic media. It is wrong to think that
there is no need to wear respiratory protection during spray application, just because
a waterborne system is being used.
The tests were therefore performed with an artificially produced aerosol that in
comparison with aerosols typically found in practice had a) a high MDI concentra-
tion (6 mg/m3) and b) a high fraction of inhalable particles (aerodynamic diameter:
95 % of the particles <5 µm).
The focus of animal testing and observations in humans still rests on the irritant
and sensitizing effects of MDI vapors and/or aerosols on the respiratory tract and
lungs. Medical knowledge at present shows that:
• a deterioration in lung function and the induction of respiratory tract sensiti-
zation is observed primarily when a concentration of 0.2 mg MDI/m³ (vapors,
aerosols) is exceeded
• if a maximum exposure limit of 0.1 mg MDI/m³ (vapors, aerosols) is not excee-
ded, such effects occur no more frequently than in unexposed control subjects
• if an exposure limit of 0.05 mg MDI/m³ (vapors) at the workplace is generally
observed, there is no increased incidence in respiratory complaints in people
with otherwise normal lung function, even if these people have worked in this
environment for ten years or more
During the course of the long-term inhalation study in rats described above, lung
tumors were found in the group exposed to the highest concentration (6 mg/m³).
These were linked to the massive exposure that also caused severe chronic irritation
of the respiratory tract and lungs of rats with partly degenerative and inflammatory
changes and the accumulation of yellowish deposits in the lung tissue. These obser-
vations allowed the conclusion that, in this case, the tumors were caused by the
irritant effect resulting from the deliberately high concentration used.
Humans would be unable to tolerate such high aerosol concentrations. Experience
shows that they would rapidly develop massive sensitization and would be forced
to avoid any further exposure. It is therefore highly unlikely for humans to be
exposed to such concentrations over a prolonged period. The classification of MDI
in the form of its inhalable aerosols as a category 3 carcinogen therefore has no
further consequences for the health of people who work with these products, pro-
vided MDI and products containing MDI are handled properly and the air exposure
limits are observed. The vapor pressure of MDI at room temperature is less than
10-5 mbar. On account of this very low vapor pressure, only negligible amounts of
MDI vapors are released into the environment during normal application of MDI-
based products or polyol/hardener formulations containing these products by roller
coating, brushing or curtain coating, even on large surfaces, or during application
in the form of knifing fillers or joint sealants. As a result, no hazardous concentra-
tions are likely to form in work areas. Workplace monitoring during the application
of coatings containing MDI also shows that, under these conditions and provided
there is minimal air circulation, the concentrations of MDI in the air will be below
the air exposure limit.
times and air excess must be ensured. Water vapor must not be used in the incin-
erator feed. The preparations shown in Table 10.4 are suitable for neutralizing
polyisocyanate residues.
Prolonged exposure of the polyisocyanate to these mixtures results in the formation
of insoluble solid polyureas that have no physiological effect. Complete reaction
of the diisocyanate residues with the neutralizing solution can be ensured by occa-
sionally shaking or rolling the containers over a period of about 48 hours. The
aqueous ammonia solutions can be used several times. Their pH value should not
be higher than 8. The generally stringent wastewater regulations of local and
regional authorities must be observed. The resulting polyurea can be incinerated.
Used containers are rinsed with one of the mixtures described in Table 10.4 and
then scrapped. In many countries a return system for certain used containers has
now been set up by the chemical industry. Spilled product should be taken up with
a non-flammable absorbent mineral material. In an emergency, sand, soil or bearing
in mind the fire hazard, sawdust or chippings may be used. The material is then
disposed of in an incineration facility. Any residues remaining on the floor can be
treated with one of the above described mixtures and removed.
Agency. So far, guidelines published by the agency include an Epoxy Resin Guide-
line [35]. This guideline is not a rule of law and is therefore non-binding. It represents
today’s state of scientific and industrial knowledge of the conditions, according to
which materials and substances made of epoxy resins for the preparation and dis-
tribution of water for human consumption comply with the requirements of Article
17 Para. 1 of the Drinking Water Ordinance of 2001.
Until now, there has been no specific drinking water recommendation for polyure-
thanes. In addition to the basic requirements cited above, it is also important to
ensure compliance with the requirements contained in the BfR Foodstuffs Recom-
mendation XXXIX (Polyurethanes). Special attention should be given to ensuring
that no aromatic amines are detectable. Polyurethane based coatings are approved
for use in various countries and are being used increasingly, particularly in the
rehabilitation of drinking water pipes.
References
[1] Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regu-
lations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and
labelling of dangerous substances; as amended; http://eur-lex.europa.eu; http://ecb.
jrc.it/classification-labelling/
[2] Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999
concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of
the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous pre-
parations; as amended; http://eur-lex.europa.eu, http://ecb.jrc.it/classification-labelling/
[3] B. Magnusson, A. M. Kligman, J. Invest. Dermatol. 52 (1969) 268–276; Council
Directive 67/548/EEC, Annex 5, Part B, Method B.6 “Skin Sensitization”; last amended
by Commission Directive 96/54/EC of 30 July 1996 adapting to technical progress
for the 22nd time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws,
regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and
labelling of dangerous substances. OJ L 248, 30.9.1996, 1.; http://eur-lex.europa.eu,
http://ecb.jrc.it/testing-methods/
[4] Technische Regel für Gefahrstoffe (TRGS) 430 “Isocyanate – Exposition und Über-
wachung”, http://www.baua.de/
[5] Helmut Greim (Hrsg.), Analytische Methoden zur Prüfung gesundheitsschädlicher
Arbeitsstoffe, Luftanalysen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG, Methoden-Nr. 2,
HDI, TDI, Band 1, Seite D 1, 6. Lieferung, 1988; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
KGaA, Weinheim, http://www.wiley-vch.de/books/info/dfg/index.html
[6] Helmut Greim (Hrsg.), Analytische Methoden zur Prüfung gesundheitsschädlicher
Arbeitsstoffe, Luftanalysen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Methoden-Nr. 1,
Polyisocyanate, Band 1, Seite D 1, 8. Lieferung, Ausgabe 1993; Wiley-VCH Verlag
GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, http://www.wiley-vch.de/books/info/dfg/index.html
[7] Helmut Greim (Hrsg.), Analytische Methoden zur Prüfung gesundheitsschädlicher
Arbeitsstoffe, Luftanalysen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Methoden-Nr. 2,
Polyisocyanate, Band 1, Seite D 1, 11. Lieferung, Ausgabe 1998; Wiley-VCH Verlag
GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, http://www.wiley-vch.de/books/info/dfg/index.html
[8] U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA),
Sampling & Analytical Method 42, Diisocyanates: 1,6-Hexamethylene Diisocyanate
(HDI), Toluene-2,6-Diisocyanate (2,6-TDI), Toluene-2,4-Diisocyanate (2,4-TDI),
http://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/index.html
[9] U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA),
Sampling & Analytical Method 47, Methylene Bisphenyl Isocyanate (MDI), http://www.
osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/index.html
[10] Hazardous Substances Ordinance (Gefahrstoffverordnung - GefStoffV) of December
23, 2004 (BGBl. I p. 3758); as amended; Committee on Hazardous Substances (AGS);
www, baua.de
[11] Deutscher Akkreditierungsrat (DAR) / German Accreditation Council (DAR), c/o
Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Unter den Eichen 87;
D-12205 Berlin, http://www.dar.bam.de/
[12] European Co-operation for Accreditation (EA), c/o Cofrac, 37 rue de Lyon, F-75012
Paris, http://www.european-accreditation.org/default_flash.htm
[13] Katalog der Expositionsszenarien zur TRGS 430 “Isocyanate – Exposition und Über-
wachung” http://www.baua.de/
[14] Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of
workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive
within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC); http://eur-lex.europa.eu
[15] E.g. Erste Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zum Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetz
TA Luft – Technische Anleitung zur Reinhaltung der Luft of July 24, 2002; GMBl.
Nr. 25–29 vom of July 30, 2002; 511
[16] C. Rosenberg, T. Tuomi, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 45 (2) (1984) 117–121
[17] A. Bürkholz et al., Farbe und Lack 82 (1976) 693–698
[18] MAK- und BAT-Werte-Liste, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Senatskommission
zur Prüfung gefährlicher Arbeitsstoffe. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA,
Weinheim; erscheint jährlich, http://www.wiley-vch.de/books/info/dfg/index.html
[19] J. Pauluhn, Interne Untersuchungsberichte 1985, 1987, Bayer AG, Institut für
Toxikologie
[20] P.G. Reuzel et al., Fundam. a. Appl. Toxicol. 22 (1994) 195–210
[21] Technische Regel für Gefahrstoffe (TRGS) 905 “Verzeichnis krebserzeugender, erb-
gutverändernder oder fortpflanzungsgefährdender Stoffe”, http://www.baua.de/
[22] G. Ballé, M. Kuck, W. Wellner, Polyurethanlackierungen - eine Emissionsquelle für
monomere Diisocyanate? ZurAnalytik monomerer Diisocyanate, insbesondere Toluy-
lendiisocyanat, in der Raumluft, Staub - Reinhaltung der Luft 51 (1991) 231–236
[23] M. Fischer, E. Böhm, Erkennung und Erfassung von Schadstoffemissionen aus
Möbellacken, Schriftenreihe Schadstoffe und Umwelt, Nr. 12, Erich Schmidt Verlag,
Berlin 1994
[24] The Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt); Indoor Air Hygiene; http://
www.umweltbundesamt.de/uba-info-daten/daten/irk.htm
[25] H. Kittel, Lehrbuch der Lacke und Beschichtungen, S. Hirzel Verlag Stuttgart Leipzig 1998
[26] A. Goldschmidt, J. Streitberger, BASF Handbook: Basics of Coatings Technology,
1st Ed., Vincentz Network, Hannover 2003
[27] Verordnung über Verbote und Beschränkungen des Inverkehrbringens gefährlicher
Stoffe, Zubereitungen und Erzeugnisse nach dem Chemikaliengesetz (ChemVerbotsV),
Bekanntm. 9.10.1996 (Bundesgesetzblatt 1996 1, S. 1498)
[28] Council Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws, regu-
lations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on
the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations; as amended;
http://eur-lex.europa.eu; http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/de/search/search_lif.html
[29] The European Aliphatic Isocyanate Producers Association (ALIPA); Avenue Van
Nieuwenhuyse Laan 4, B-1160 Brussels (Belgium); www.alipa.org
[30] Council Directive 89/109/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of the laws
of the Member States relating to materials and articles intended to come into contact
with foodstuffs; Official Journal L 040, 11/02/1989 P. 0038–0044
[31] Richtlinie über „Materialien und Gegenstände aus Kunststoff, die dazu bestimmt sind,
mit Lebensmitteln in Berührung zu kommen“ vom 23. Februar 1990 (Nr. L 75)
[32] Bedarfsgegenständeverordnung vom 10. 4. 1992 (BGBl. I S. 866)
[33] Veröffentlicht in den jeweils aktuellen Ausgaben des Bundesgesundheitsblattes
[34] Gesundheitliche Beurteilung von Kunststoffen und anderen nichtmetallischen Werkstof-
fen im Rahmen des Lebensmittel- und Bedarfsgegenständegesetzes für den Trinkwasser-
bereich, Mitteilung 1–6, alle Mitteilungen veröffentlicht im Bundesgesundheitsblatt
[35] UBA-Leitlinie zur hygienischen Beurteilung von Epoxidharzbeschichtungen im Kontakt
mit Trinkwasser vom 14.10.2005
11 Ecology
Paints and organic coatings are generally used to ensure the effective protection
of a substrate against corrosion, deterioration and mechanical damage. In this way,
they contribute to prolonging the service life of consumer goods, including vehi-
cles, industrial plant and buildings in particular. They thus help to preserve
resources. The latter also pertains to adhesives, which, in contrast to other joining
technologies such as welding or soldering, were the first to provide a method for
permanently joining even non-metallic substrates and the most disparate substrate
combinations. However, some unavoidable environmental impact does occur
during the life cycle of a coating or adhesive – from its manufacture through
application up to the recycling or disposal of the coated or glued object. This
impact and the strategies and legislative regulations for its control, reduction and
avoidance are largely independent of the chemistry of the binders or base polymers
used in the coating or adhesive. The information given here is largely general in
nature, and is not limited to polyurethanes.
Shoe manufactur- 25 g per pair The limit values for total emissions
ing (> 5) are given in grams of emitted
solvent for each completed pair
of shoes.
(1)
Adhesive coatings 5–15 50 (1) 25 When techniques that enable
(1)
(> 5) > 15 50 20 the reuse of recovered solvents
are used, the emission limit value
Table 11.1: Limit values for the maximum VOC content for various
Manufacture 100–1000 150 5 5 % of the The limit value for diffuse emis-
of coatings, solvent used sions does not include solvents
clearcoats, printing > 1000 150 3 3 % of the that are part of the coating
inks and adhesives solvent used material purchased in a sealed
(>100) container.
325
Table 11.2: Limit values for the maximum VOC content of coatings [2]
Product subcategory Type Phase I Phase II
[g/l (*)] [g/l (*)]
(from (from
Jan. 1, 2007) Jan. 1, 2010)
a Interior matt walls and ceilings Wb 75 30
(Gloss < 25 @ 60°) Sb 400 30
b Interior glossy walls and ceilings Wb 150 100
(Gloss > 25 @ 60°) Sb 400 100
c Exterior walls of mineral Wb 75 40
substrate Sb 450 430
d Interior/exterior trim and cladding Wb 150 130
paints for wood and metal Sb 400 300
e Interior/exterior trim varnishes and Wb 150 130
woodstairs, including opaque wood- Sb 500 400
stairs
f interior/exterior minimal build wood- Wb 150 130
stairs Sb 700 700
g Primer Wb 50 30
Sb 450 350
h Binding primer Wb 50 30
Sb 750 750
i One-pack performance coatings Wb 140 140
Sb 600 500
j Two-pack reactive performance coat- Wb 140 140
ings for specific end use such as floors Sb 550 500
k Multi-colored coatings Wb 150 100
Sb 400 100
l Decorative effect coatings Wb 300 200
Sb 500 200
(*) g/l, ready to use
(Wb) Waterborne coatings, the viscosity of which is adjusted with water
(Sb) Solventborne coatings, the viscosity of which is adjusted with solvent
Details about low-VOC coatings for use in various applications can be found in the
sections covering automotive finishes, wood and furniture finishes, plastic coatings,
commercial vehicle finishes, general industrial coatings, and coatings for cans, coils
and glass, etc. Table 11.1 (Page 325) lists various applications and their total emis-
sion values or solvent limit values for solventborne adhesives.
Shoe manufacturers that presented an emission reduction plan by a certain date
were permitted a total emission value of 37.5 g per pair of shoes (corresponding to
1.5 times the target emission value) until October 31, 2005. They too must achieve
the target emission of 25 g by October 31, 2007.
The so-called Decopaint Directive (2004/42/EC) [2] came into force in 2004, and had
the goal of reducing organic emissions from architectural and DIY paints and coat-
ings. Due to the special conditions for automotive refinishing, which does not con-
stitute an industrial process, the regulations concerning automotive refinishing were
included in 2004/42/EC and deleted from the current version of 1999/13/EC.
The deadline for adopting 2004/42/EC into national legislation ended on Octo-
ber 30, 2005. In contrast to 1999/13/EC, which provides the processor or user with
a certain amount of freedom in selecting the products used to achieve the target
emissions, 2004/42/EC already covers the manufacture. Products that exceed the
VOC limit values can no longer be marketed once the deadline has elapsed. More-
over, the two guidelines define the term “VOC” differently. 1999/13/EC defines
VOC in terms of the vapor pressure of the compound, while 2004/42/EC uses the
boiling point. However, the national implementations of 2004/42/EC are uniform
in their definitions and limit values throughout the European Union.
2004/42/EC defined different product subcategories and VOC limit values for the
different architectural coatings as at January 1, 2007, with stricter definitions to
come into effect on January 1, 2010 (Table 11.2). Thus, in all the categories, a further
differentiation is made between aqueous and nonaqueous systems, and respective
limit values are given (in g/l VOC).
These guidelines primarily pertain to all products that are used on site as coatings
for buildings. In addition, 2004/42/EC may apply to the industrial coating of con-
struction components (made of wood or metal), e.g. ready-to-lay parquet flooring,
window frames, doors, beams, steel girders, facade elements, etc., for example, if
VOC consumption at the application facility is below the limit value set by
1999/13/EC. In this case, even if it complies with 1999/13/EC, the coating material
must now also fulfill the specifications of 2004/42/EC. According to 2004/42/EC,
from January 1, 2007, a coating material manufacturer must identify all products
used to coat buildings and for automotive refinishing with:
• the product subcategory
• the VOC content in g/L at the application viscosity
Table 11.3 lists the technologies that can be used to ensure compliance with the
Decopaint Guideline 2004/42/EC in the areas of wood and metal coatings for the
construction sector.
For the automotive refinishing sector, 2004/42/EC contains a separate list with limit
values (in g/L VOC) for each individual coat (surfacer, primer, basecoat and clearcoat)
used in automotive refinishing, as well as for specialty products. In contrast to the
for unavoidable paint slurries and adhesive residues, provided the requirements
(see above) can be satisfied. Paint slurries and adhesive residues that cannot be
recycled must be disposed of in incinerators. Many contaminated solvents are
treated by redistillation and reused in other applications. If this is not possible
because of the nature of the contaminated solvents, they must be used in thermal
recycling or disposed of by incineration.
For economic reasons alone, the priority given to waste avoidance in German
legislation is a generally accepted goal. It is therefore a worthwhile exercise for
coatings and adhesives users to explore all options for systematically avoiding the
production of waste. Among these are various high-efficiency application tech-
niques such as dipping, curtain coating, airless spraying, HVLP spraying, electro-
static application, etc., which all yield vastly reduced amounts of paint slurry.
11.3 Wastewater
In the coatings and adhesives industries, wastewater results, for example, from
cleaning processes – particularly those associated with the manufacture and appli-
cation of waterborne coatings and adhesives – and from surface pretreatment, dip-
ping, and water-washed spray booths. This process water is polluted to a varying
extent with organic compounds and heavy metals.
The legislative regulations for wastewater are defined nationally, and even often
differ regionally within countries. In Germany, the Water Resources Act regulates
groundwater and surface waters. It also provides the basis for the requirements that
must be satisfied when discharging industrial process water. However, requirements
differ from place to place on account of the sovereignty of the individual federal
states in Germany and the different regulations imposed by the operators of munic-
ipal wastewater treatment plants.
Disposal
In the wastewater segment, too, an avoidance strategy should be pursued, primar-
ily by reducing process water volumes and increasing circuit usage. Unavoidable
wastewater from coating and adhesive lines can usually be purified using conven-
tional technologies (overspray separation, precipitation of heavy metals, coatings
and adhesives) to the extent that the limit values for heavy metals and adsorbable
organic halogen compounds (AOX) are not exceeded.
In contrast, the pollution of wastewater with solvents – measured as the chemical
oxygen demand (COD) – can be problematic. Especially in the case of waterborne
coatings and adhesives, the water-miscible cosolvents used – such as alcohols and
glycol ethers – increase the COD of the washing water in spray booths. Yet these
substances are readily biodegradable, which means that their controlled discharge
into municipal wastewater treatment facilities – generally at a higher price – is
widely accepted. Where this is not the case, the wastewater can be made suitable
for discharge by means of an on-site or external aerobic or anaerobic biological
pretreatment step. There are also other physical (adsorption, membrane technology)
and chemical (oxidation) processes for degrading organic pollutants.
References
[1] Council Directive 1999/13/EC of 11 March 1999 on the limitation of emissions of
volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain activities and
installations, OJ L 85, 29.3.1999, 1, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/search/search_lif.
html
[2] Directive 2004/42EC of European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2001 on
the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic
solvents in certain paints and varnishes an vehicle refinishing products and amending
Directive 1999/13/EC, OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, 87–96, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/
search/search_lif.html
12 Sustainable Development
The concept of Sustainable Development [1] gained public awareness following the
Earth Summit on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and was
addressed in more detail with regard to production and product politics at the World
Summit in Johannesburg in 2002. This concept strives for a balance between dis-
charge into the environment, the use of resources and socio-economic concerns.
However, implementation requires consensus – often difficult in practice – concern-
ing the minimization of the negative impact on humans and the environment.
Programs
The chemical industry has acknowledged its responsibility for sustainable future
development and has undertaken to follow the principles of Responsible Care in
its activities worldwide. Supplementary to this, the coatings industry has developed
its own special “Coatings Care” Program [2, 3]. The German coatings industry asso-
ciation has published its own guidelines that contain binding undertakings for its
members. These undertakings include, for example:
• according particular consideration to the preservation of resources and low
environmental impact in product development
• considering the recycling and subsequent disposal of coated objects at the product
design stage
• making efforts to reduce emissions and wastes in the manufacture of products
The German adhesive industry association (Industrieverband Klebstoffe e.V.) has
also formulated analogous guidelines [4].
Perspectives
In the future, the coatings industry will continue to be measured by its implemen-
tation of these undertakings. The need for ecological optimization of coatings and
coating processes in the context of Sustainable Development has been implemented
to a great extent by raw material manufacturers, coatings producers and users.
Through its own voluntary initiative, the industry has already set itself on course
to sustainably reduce environmental impact.
The industry is increasingly confronted with stricter controls on the manufacturing
and use of chemicals. The new European chemical legislation REACH (Registra-
tion, Evaluation, Authorisation of Chemicals) which came into force in 2007 is of
particular importance in this respect. The objective of REACH is to further improve
consumer safety and environmental protection and is supported by all stakeholders.
However, the industry has criticized the complexity, high costs and enormous
administrative effort associated with the new legislation. In the coming years,
manufacturers and users of chemicals will face many challenges that can only be
surmounted together. The coating, adhesive and sealant industry will have to adjust
to this and adapt its development programs accordingly. The polyurethane chemi-
cal industry will remain their partner in innovation for the future.
References
[1] http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/
[2] http://www.coatingscare.org/
[3] http://www.cepe.org/
[4] http://www.klebstoffe.com
13 General references
The priority year is given for all patents cited in the literature references at the end
of each chapter.
Bibliography
• G. Fettis, Automotive Paints and Coatings. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH,
Weinheim 1995
• A. Goldschmidt, H.-J. Streitberger: BASF Handbook on Basics of Coating
Technology: Vincentz Network, 2nd Edition, Hannover 2007
• Kittel, Lehrbuch der Lacke und Beschichtungen, Hirzel S. Verlag 2004
• P. Nanetti, Coatings from A to Z, Vincentz Network, Hannover 2006
• G. Oertel, Kunststoff-Handbuch, G. W. Becker, D. Braun (Hrsg.), 3. Auflage,
Band 7: Polyurethane. Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien 1993
• D. Stoye, W. Freitag, Paints, Coatings and Solvents. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 1998.
• Brock, Groteklaes, Mischke, European Coatings Handbook, Vincentz Network,
Hannover 2000
ONLINE
JOURNALS
BOOKS
EVENTS
European Coatings
www.European-Coatings.com
Index
Symbole B
α-Nylon 31 bactericide 264
ε-Caprolactam 37, 39 baking gases 311
1,2,4-triazole 42 balcony sealing 231, 233
1,2-propanediol 47, 49 banned chemicals directive 315
1,3-Bis(isocyanatomethyl)cyclohexan 27 barite 129, 249
3,5-Dimethylpyrazole 39, 40, 41, 149, basecoat 41, 127, 128, 130, 138, 155, 161,
298 162, 166, 185, 187, 188, 225, 226, 328
3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic BEBA 39, 41, 42
acid (CAPS) 44 bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methan
3-Isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcy- (H12MDI) 26
clohexyl-isocyanat 26 bisoxazolidine 229
4-Isocyanatomethyl-1,8-diisocyanatooc- biuret 29, 30, 95, 187, 188
tan 28 blister formation 165
blistering 70, 284
A blocking agent 35, 36, 38, 40, 41, 42, 76,
abrasion resistance 80 107, 112, 136, 296, 297, 311
acetone process 54 boiling resistance 258
acid resistance 147 bonding 243, 249, 260
acrylate/melamine system 145 bonding soles 270, 271
activation 184, 185, 266, 268, 272 bookbinding 15, 23, 280
adhesion promoter 139, 271, 287 breaking elongation 205
adhesion to aluminum 254 breathing apparatus 320
adhesive pre-coat 271, 273 burn 319
air exposure limit 309 butane diol 258
airmix method 157 butanone oxime 37ff, 42, 139
Aliphatic Isocyanate Producers Associa-
C
tion (ALIPA) 316
alkoxysilane 254, 284, 286, 287 calendars 272
allophanate 29, 30, 81, 168, 253 can coating 102, 115, 116, 117, 118
amino silane 287 capability for tin plating 135
amino sulfonate 168 caprolactam 38, 42, 76, 77, 120, 139,
anti graffiti 173, 226 298, 311
antioxidants 257, 286 carbamate system 149
aroma protection 254 carbodiimid 31
artificial leather 208 carbon nanotubes 85
asparaginic acid esters 51, 104, 130, 162, car refinish 151ff
164 catalog of exposure scenarios 307
automotive 44, 78, 86, 136 ff, 151ff, 185, catalysis 40, 77, 85, 120, 159, 249, 293,
190, 203, 222, 260, 269, 293 295, 298
incineration 313 M
increase in viscosity 264, 279, 280
indoor air quality 314, 315 malonic ester 37ff
marine 86, 125, 129
infrared 101, 266, 274
market analysis 17
inhalation toxicity 302, 310
MDF 83, 91, 214, 269, 271
initial strength 261, 272, 274, 279
MDI prepolymer 128, 284, 311
inline 187, 188, 189
medical technology 290, 291
intermediate coat 127, 129, 130, 226
melt dispersion process 262
ionically-modified polyisocyanates 44 melt viscosity 83, 120, 275
IPDI trimer 43, 151, 270 metal/thermoplastic adhesion 271
isocyanate asthma 300 metal coating 102ff
isocyanate crosslinker 262, 266, 268 metallic coatings 16
Isocyanato polyurethanes 247 Methyl ketone (2-butanone) 260
isocyanato silane 286 micaceous iron ore 128
Isocyanurat 31, 162 migration 85, 259, 317
isocyanurate 162 minimum activation temperature 261, 266
isononylphenol 37 mixed crosslinkers 148
isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) 15, 19, mixing quality 165
26, 258, 300 modulus of rigidity 286
isophorone diamine 249 moisture 75, 126, 210, 218, 219, 223, 227,
231, 252, 254, 266, 274, 279
J moisture-curing 65
jet spray dispersion 69, 85 monomer separation 33
multilateral 307
K
N
Kenics mixer 71, 146
nanoparticles 147
ketimine 53
nanotechnology 16, 85, 86, 87
knifing filler 154, 155
neutralizing amine 55
L nitrocellulose 17, 152, 153, 211, 213
NMP 98, 135
labeling 302, 303, 307, 315 non-blocking 261
laminate adhesive 204 nonionic emulsifiers 43, 52
lamination 211, 263, 269, 272, 273, 274 nonwoven 209, 272
lamination press 263 nozzle spray dispersion 148
large vehicle coating 51, 174 nylon 76
latently reactive 270, 271
latex substitute 290 O
leather 16, 203ff, 273, 319 ocupational health and safety 300 ff, 301,
legislation 44, 118, 161, 171, 185, 189, 318 303, 305, 307, 309, 311, 313
lightfastness 31, 207 offline 188
light stabilizers 287 offshore 125, 126
low-monomer NCO prepolymers 248, one-component baking coatings 105
259, 276 one-component polyurethane
low temperature flexibility 246 –, clearcoats 41, 148
low temperature grinding 272 –, baking coating 36, 42, 105
one-sided adhesion 261 polyester 19, 23, 35, 47, 48, 96, 105, 106,
open time 258, 272 110 ff, 122, 136, 142, 167ff, 187, 191,
overbake yellowing 41 203, 206, 220, 225, 246, 307
oxadiazintrione 30 polyester diol 277
oxazolidone 30 polyether 19, 23, 35, 44, 49, 52, 66, 96,
oximcarbamate 30 133, 187, 203, 225ff, 233, 246, 285
polyether allophanate 44, 168
P polyethylene 257
polyethylene oxide polyether alcohols 43
packaging 254, 279, 307
polyethylene terephthalate (PET) 182
pad printing 272
polyhydamtions 135
paper 16, 204, 212ff, 273
polyisocyanate 19, 23, 30ff, 69, 71ff, 94,
parquet 96, 98, 215
103, 128ff, 158ff, 187ff, 218ff, 244ff,
parquet flooring 90
300 ff, 314
part being joined 268, 279
blocked 35ff, 112ff, 117, 146, 295ff, 311
partially crystalline 260, 261 polyisocyanato polyurethane 244, 245,
peel resistance 249 251
PE film 257 plymeric MDI 247
penetration primer 225, 226, 227, 263 polyoxypropylene 285
peroxide 261 polypropylene (ethylene) oxide ether
Phenol 136 polyols 246
phosgenation 25 polypropylene (PP) 182
photocatalysis 86 polystyrene (PS) 182
photopolymerization 57 polyuretdione 122
pigmentation 128 polyurethane based flexible foams 260
pigment wetting 96, 106, 167, 227 polyurethane dispersion adhesives 270
pipe coating 131 polyurethane liquid film 228, 231
pipeline construction 126 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) 182
plasma activation 184 powder clearcoat 149
plastic 78, 83, 108, 121, 181ff, 190, 213, powder coating 76, 115ff, 131
234, 250, 316, 317, 324 powder primer surfacer 143
plastic coating 15, 47, 50, 64, 65, 181ff, precoating 272
214 preparation 210
plasticizer 66, 76, 229, 244, 264, 283, prepolymer 35, 54, 244, 247, 248, 249,
287 274, 275, 284
plastifying temperature 249 primer 91, 128, 155, 156ff, 185, 187, 219,
polyacrylate 46, 55, 69, 95, 157, 167, 220, 222, 233, 234, 328
227, 298, 329 primer surfacers 119, 141ff, 155
polyacrylnitryl butadiene styrene (ABS) print color 212
182 process
polyaddition 57, 80, 128, 244 integrated 150
polyamide 36, 115, 319 processing time (pot life) 65
polyamine 50, 51, 126 process technology 71, 73, 75, 150
Polyaspartic ester 51, 130, 164, 218, 221 product label 42
polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) 182 propylene oxide 49
polycarbonate (PC) 182 potective Coatings 125
polycondensation 47 protective equipment 308
X
xylylendiisocyanat (XDI) 27
Y
yellowing 41, 117
Z
zeolite 249
Dr. Ulrich Meier-Westhues, born 1955, studied Chemistry European Coatings Tech Files
at the RWTH Aachen, Germany. After four years with
Herberts, Wuppertal, he joined Bayer BU Coatings and
Colorants in 1989. Today he is responsible for Business
Development Polyisocyanates in the Coatings, Adhesives Ulrich Meier-Westhues
and Sealants BU of Bayer MaterialScience, Leverkusen.
Polyurethanes
Coatings, Adhesives and Sealants
ISBN 3-87870-334-1
ISBN 978-3-87870-334-1