LUST FOR ABSOLUTE POWER AND CONTROL

ADVOCACY FOR DIGITAL IDENTITY SYSTEMS

Klaus Schwab’s advocacy for digital identity systems has stirred significant controversy, particularly due
to concerns about privacy, security, and potential implications for social control.

Digital identity systems, especially those tied to biometric data or centralized databases, raise red flags
for privacy advocates. They fear that such systems could enable unprecedented levels of surveillance, with
governments and corporations monitoring individuals’ activities without their consent. The possibility of mass
surveillance leading to abuses of power and violations of civil liberties is a grave concern.

Moreover, the security of digital identity systems is a pressing issue. Centralized databases storing sensitive
personal information become prime targets for hackers and malicious actors, posing risks of identity theft
and fraud. The potential for data breaches not only undermines trust in the effectiveness and safety of digital
identity systems but also raises questions about their reliability.

Schwab’s ID agenda has also faced criticism for its potential to exacerbate existing inequalities and marginalize
vulnerable populations. Digital identity systems may disproportionately affect marginalized communities
lacking access to technology or facing barriers in obtaining official identification documents. Implementing
such systems without addressing these disparities could further disenfranchise these groups, widening
the digital divide and perpetuating social inequalities.

Furthermore, concerns have been raised about the potential for Schwab’s ID agenda to enable social
engineering and control. Centralized digital identity systems could grant unprecedented power to
governments and corporations to track and monitor individuals’ behavior, raising fears of authoritarianism
and oppression.

CRITICISM OF SCHWAB’S GLOBAL INFLUENCE

Beyond digital identity systems, Klaus Schwab’s broader influence and agenda, notably through the
World Economic Forum (WEF) and initiatives like Agenda 2030, have drawn criticism. Some perceive
Schwab and the WEF as representing the interests of a global elite, prioritizing corporate profits over
the well-being of ordinary people.

The annual meetings in Davos, Switzerland, symbolize this perceived disconnect between the elite attendees
and the challenges faced by the rest of the world.

Schwab’s promotion of concepts such as the Great Reset and stakeholder capitalism has also sparked
controversy. Critics view these ideas as attempts to consolidate power and impose a particular vision of
society. The Great Reset, especially, has been interpreted as a means for global elites to exploit crises like
the COVID-19 pandemic to advance their agenda, leading to suspicions of ulterior motives.

Moreover, Schwab’s advocacy for increased global cooperation and governance has drawn criticism from those
fearing the erosion of national sovereignty and individual freedoms. His proposals for digital identities, smart
cities, and surveillance technologies raise concerns about privacy rights and state control.

SPECIAL REPORT 2
Additionally, Schwab’s personal background and associations have fueled suspicion and conspiracy
theories contributing to a negative perception of him among certain groups.

DEBATE OVER URBAN DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS

Klaus Schwab’s concept of 15-minute cities has garnered criticism stemming from various concerns
about feasibility, implementation, and implications for urban development.

While the idea of creating neighborhoods where residents can access essential services within a short walk or
bike ride sounds appealing, retrofitting existing cities poses significant challenges.

Critics argue that existing cities are characterized by sprawl, uneven distribution of amenities, and
infrastructure designed around car-centric transportation systems. Transforming them into 15-minute cities
would require substantial investments in urban planning, transportation, and infrastructure, raising logistical
and financial hurdles.

Moreover, there are concerns about exacerbating socioeconomic inequalities and gentrification. Implementing
the 15-minute city model might prioritize affluent neighborhoods or areas already well-served by amenities,
neglecting marginalized communities. This could deepen divides between rich and poor, perpetuating
social exclusion.

Furthermore, some view Schwab’s advocacy for 15-minute cities as disconnected from urban realities. While
the concept holds promise in theory, achieving it on a large scale requires overcoming practical hurdles like
regulatory barriers, funding constraints, and resistance from entrenched interests.

ADDRESSING CLAIMS ABOUT SCHWAB’S TIES TO NAZISM

Claims about Klaus Schwab’s ties to Nazism cast a long and chilling shadow over his legacy, raising
troubling questions about his true intentions and motivations.

Born into a world ravaged by war and upheaval, Schwab emerged unscathed, his privileged upbringing
shielding him from the horrors of the battlefield. But beneath the facade of wealth and privilege, a darker
truth lurked—a truth that would come to define Schwab’s legacy for decades to come.

It was during his formative years that Schwab first encountered the intoxicating allure of power—the
intoxicating allure of control. Surrounded by the remnants of a shattered world, he became enamored with
the idea of shaping its destiny, of bending it to his will. And so, with a ruthless determination, Schwab set out
on a path that would lead him to the very pinnacle of power.

But it was not until his fateful encounter with the dark forces of Nazism that Schwab’s true nature was
revealed. Drawn into the web of intrigue and deceit that surrounded the Nazi regime, he became ensnared
in its malevolent embrace, a willing participant in its campaign of terror and oppression. In the shadows of
the Third Reich, Schwab’s ambitions found fertile ground, his thirst for control matched only by his
willingness to do whatever it took to achieve it.

SPECIAL REPORT 3
In the aftermath of the war, as the world recoiled in horror at the atrocities committed in the name of the
Third Reich, Schwab retreated into the shadows, biding his time, waiting for the moment to strike. And strike
he did, with a vengeance—a vengeance fueled by a burning desire for control, for domination.

It was against this backdrop of fear and uncertainty that Schwab founded the World Economic Forum—a
seemingly innocuous organization dedicated to fostering dialogue and cooperation among the world’s
leaders. But beneath its lofty rhetoric lay a darker truth—a truth that would send shockwaves through
the corridors of power.

For Schwab’s vision extended far beyond mere dialogue and cooperation. It was a vision of total control, of
absolute domination—a vision that would see him emerge as the undisputed master of the world stage.
And so, with a cunning and ruthlessness that belied his outward demeanor, Schwab set about laying the
groundwork for his grand design.

Central to Schwab’s plan was his Agenda 2030—a sweeping blueprint for reshaping the world in
his image. At its core lay a series of initiatives aimed at achieving sustainable development goals
worldwide—a noble cause, to be sure, but one that masked a darker agenda.

For woven into the fabric of Agenda 2030 were the seeds of tyranny—the seeds of oppression and control.
From his proposal for “digital identities” to his vision of “15-minute cities,” Schwab’s agenda was a chilling vision
of a world enslaved by technology and surveillance, a world where freedom and autonomy were but distant
memories.

But perhaps most chilling of all was Schwab’s embrace of stakeholder capitalism—a sinister ideology
that placed the interests of the collective above those of the individual. Under the guise of social
responsibility, Schwab sought to dismantle the very foundations of capitalism itself, replacing it with a
soulless and oppressive system of state control.

And yet, for all his cunning and ruthlessness, Schwab underestimated the power of the human spirit—the
power of resistance. For even as his grip tightened around the throat of the world, there were those who
refused to bow to his will, who dared to defy his tyranny.

From the depths of the underground resistance to the halls of power, a movement began to take shape—a
movement fueled by a burning desire for freedom, for justice. And as the flames of revolution spread, Schwab
found himself facing a foe unlike any he had ever encountered—a foe determined to tear down the walls of
oppression and reclaim the world for the people.

In the end, Klaus Schwab’s legacy will be one of tyranny and oppression—a legacy built on the bones of
the innocent and the blood of the oppressed. But as long as there are those who dare to defy his will,
who refuse to bow to his tyranny, there will always be hope—a hope that one day, the world will be free
from his malevolent grasp, and justice will prevail.

SPECIAL REPORT 4
DISCLAIMER/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Introduction

We are paid advertisers through any one or several of the following entities, which entities are controlled by the same owners and other owners
in varying percentages: ) Future Money Trends, LLC, Gold Standard Media, LLC, ; Gold Standard Media, LLC, Wealth Research Group, LLC, Portfolio
Wealth Global, LLC, SHTFPlan.com, Wallace Hill Partners, Ltd (hereafter collectively referred to as “we”, “our”, “us”, or “FMT”). As advertisers, we
are publishers of publicly disseminated information on behalf of our clients that are , publicly traded companies, or non-affiliate third party
shareholders of various issuers. As reiterated below, do not base an investment decision on any of the contents of our Publications.

Conformity with Anti-Touting Statute – Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933

We receive either monetary or securities compensation for our services in conformity with the anti-touting statute under the federal securities
laws, Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), and requires publishers to provide full disclosure of their
compensation, as follows:

• Type of compensation (securities or cash) (if securities, whether common stock, preferred stock, warrants, or other type securities) received,
or to be received (distinguish whether such compensation has been received or to be received and when).

• Identify of the party who paid the compensation, including whether such party is the Issuer, a third-party shareholder, or any other person or
entity.

• Amount of securities or cash paid, and date paid or will be paid.

Do Not Use Any Information in Our Publications to Make an Investment Decision

There is no information on our website or distributed otherwise that should be used as the basis for an investment decision.

What We are Not

We do not act, directly or indirectly, in the capacity of any of the following and you should not construe our activities as involving any of the
following: (a) investment advisor; (b) broker dealer; (c) broker; (d) dealer; (e) stock recommender; (f) stock picker; (g) finder; (h) securities trading
expert; (i) financial planner; (j) engaging in the offer and sale of securities; (k) securities analyst; (l) financial analyst; (m) providing price targets or
buy or sell recommendations.

From Whom We Receive Compensation

We receive cash or stock consideration from Issuers or third-party shareholders. With respect to third party shareholders, please be advised that
the SEC has interpreted compensation paid to an investor relations firm from Third Party Shareholders, is considered to have emanated from
the Issuer itself. As such, any shares received from a Third-Party Shareholder under such circumstances must comply with the applicable holding
periods under Rule 144 of the Securities Act since such stock issuances would be considered an issuance by the Issuer and therefore restricted.

Conflicts of Interest

Our activities involve multiple potential and/or actual conflicts of interest, since we receive monetary or securities compensation in the very
securities we are promoting, and shortly after we receive the securities compensation, we may promote the securities and sell the securities.
The third-party shareholder from which we receive compensation also has an actual conflict of interest since he or she or it is paying us securities
compensation for promotion services and such non-affiliate third party shareholder may sell other shares held while we are promoting the issuer
that issues the stock held by such third-party shareholder.

Our Trading

Note the following regarding our trading activities, including securities compensation we receive:

• We routinely sell the securities before, during and after its dissemination of the Publication.

SPECIAL REPORT 5
• Selling of our securities may result in may result in substantial profits to us.

• Our buying and selling activities may result in increases in the total trading volume of the securities, which may prove advantageous to our
selling activities.

• Our buying and selling activities may result in the investing public having to sell at lower trading process, especially if we are selling material
amounts of shares.

No Warranties

There are no implied or express warranties regarding the contents of our Publications.

Distribution of the Information in our Publications

The contents of each publication may be distributed, as follows:

• Through our Publications as identified above.

• Sent directly to your email

• Sent to addresses on email lists

• YouTube Channels.

• Re-published by our entity, Gold Standard Media, and sent to select email lists and YouTube Channels booked and scheduled by Gold Standard
Media

Mining Disclosure

The Company’s publications often pertain to gold and mining stocks, which discuss a direct relationship between the price of gold or silver and the
stock price of a gold or silver mining stock. We discuss with respect to certain issuers that there is a relationship between the price of gold or silver
to the stock price of a gold or silver mining stock, i.e., that the higher the price of gold or silver, the higher the price of the stock. You should use
extreme caution in adopting any such conclusions, because such statements do not account for any of the following factors:

• The stage of mining that the public company is engaged in, i.e., whether they are simply an exploration company and have not entered actual
mining operations.

• Whether the mining company will have the necessary capital to conduct exploration and/or mining activities.

• The need for financing for exploration and/or mining activities and the possible inability to obtain such financing at all or on acceptable terms.

• Whether financing will cause significant dilution to shareholders’ interests.

• Whether the exploration and/or mining costs are economical or uneconomical.

• Status of the worldwide economy

• Development of mineral properties is inherently risky and could lead to unproductive properties.

• Failure to comply with regulatory requirements

• Whether the public company is a development stage or early-stage company

• Mining operations are subject to the risks of increasing operating and capital risks that adversely affect results of operations

SPECIAL REPORT 6
• Potential delays, cost overruns, shortages of material or labor, construction defects

Readers should view statements that state that stock prices will track to gold or silver prices with extreme caution and do their research into the
Issuer’s or operator’s financial performance, estimated exploration, extraction and production costs, financial condition, stage of exploration and
mining, whether its operations are contingent upon financing. Mining operations are subject to innumerable risks and high rates of failure and
creating a direct relationship between the price of gold or silver and a gold or silver public company in the absence of other factors is problematic,
i.e., stage of exploration or mining, financial condition, financing, high rate of failure of mining operations.

Accordingly, do not rely upon any claimed relationship between the price of gold and silver and the stock price of a gold and/or silver company, and
conduct your own research using reliable sources.

Penny Stock Disclosure

Many of the securities we profile are considered penny stocks. Penny stocks inherently involve high risk and price volatility. You may lose your
entire investment in any penny stock that you invest in. You should be acutely aware of the following information and risks inherent in any
penny stock investment that you may make, including any issuer profiled on our websites or otherwise: (a) we receive monetary or securities
compensation from persons that claim they are a non-affiliate shareholder or an issuer; however, we conduct no due diligence whatsoever to
determine whether in fact they are a non-affiliate; (b) there is an inherent conflict of interest between our information dissemination services
involving various issuers and our receipt of compensation from those same issuers; (c) we may buy and sell securities in the securities that we
provide information dissemination services, which may cause significant volatility in the issuer’s stock, price declines from our selling activities,
permit us to make substantial profits while we are disseminating profiles or information about the issuer, yet may result in a diminished value to
the stock for investors; (c) we conduct no due diligence on the content of our Publications; (d) Penny stocks are subject to the SEC’s penny stock
rules and subject broker-dealers to customer suitability rules and other requirements, which may lead to low volume in the securities and/or
difficulties in selling the shares; (e) penny stocks are often thinly traded or have low trading volume, which may lead to difficulties in selling your
securities and extreme price volatility; (f) many of the penny stocks we profile or provide information about are subject to intense competition,
extreme regulatory oversight and inadequate financing to pursue their operational plan; (g) the issuer profiles and information we provide is
wholly insufficient to formulate an investment decision and should not be used in any way as a basis for making an investment decision and, at
the most, it should be used a starting point from which you conduct an in-depth investigation of the issuer from available public sources, such as
www.sec.gov, www otcmarkets.com, www.sec.gov, yahoofinance.com, www.google.com and other available public sources as well as consulting with
your financial professional, investment adviser, registered representative with a registered securities broker-dealer; (h) we urge you to conduct an
in-depth investigation of the issuer from the above or other available sources, especially because we only present positive information, which is
an insufficient basis to invest in any stock, yet alone a penny stock; accordingly, you should proceed with such investigation to determine, among
other things, information pertaining to the issuer’s financial condition, operations, business model, and risks involved in the issuer’s business;
(i) the issuers we profile may have negative signs on the otcmarkets.com website (i.e. Stop Sign, No Information, Limited Information, Caveat
Emptor), which you should determine from entering the symbol of the stock profiled into the otcmarkets.com website; (j) you should determine
whether the issuer we profile or provide information about is a development stage company, which is subject to the risks of a development stage
company in a similar such business, including difficulties in obtaining financing for operations and future growth; (k) because we only present
positive information regarding an issuer, ; you should conduct an in-depth investigation of any possible negative factors regarding such issuer;
(l) our information is “as is” and you your use of the information is at your own risk and such information may change at any time and it is not
based upon any verification or due diligence of the statements made; (m) we state that profiled stocks are consistent with future economic
trends; however, future economic trends or analysis has its own limitations, including: (i) due to the complexity of economic analysis as well as the
individual financial and operational characteristics of an individual issuer, such economic trends or predictions may amount to nothing more than
speculation; (ii) consumers, producers, investors, borrowers, lenders and government may react in unforeseen ways and be affected by behavioral
biases; (iii) human and social factors may outweigh future economic trends and predictions that we state may or will occur; (iv) clear cut economic
predictions have their limitations in that they do not account for the fundamental uncertainty in economic life, as well as ordinary life; (v) economic
trends may be disrupted by sudden jumps, disruptions or other factors that are not accounted for in such economic trends analysis; in other
words, past or present data predicting future economic trends may become irrelevant in light of fully new circumstances and situations in which
uncertainty becomes reality rather than of predictive economic quality; (vi) if the trends involves a single result, it ignores all other scenarios that
may be crucial to make a decision in the event of various contingencies; (n) the information we disseminate about issuers contain forward looking
statements, i.e. statements or discussions that constitute predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates, projections as indicated by such words
as “expects”, “will”, “anticipates”, “estimates; therefore, you should proceed with extreme caution in relying upon such statements and conduct a
full investigation into any such forward looking statements; (o) forward looking statements are limited to the time period in which they are made
and we do not undertake to update forward looking statements that may change at any time; and (p) we make statements in our profiles that an
issuer’s stock price has increased over a certain period of time; however, these statements only reflects an arbitrary period of time, and is of little or
no predictive or analytical quality.

SPECIAL REPORT 7