Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    CRM-M 16167 2022 20 07 2022 Final Order

    Uploaded by

    Amrinder
    The document discusses a petition filed seeking anticipatory bail related to an FIR for offenses of forgery and fraud. The petitioner is accused of preparing fake arms licenses for monetary gain along with other co-accused. The court dismissed the petition, finding the petitioner's custodial interrogation necessary to uncover the full scale of the fake license operation and those involved.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    CRM-M 16167 2022 20 07 2022 Final Order

    Uploaded by

    Amrinder
    3 views3 pages
    The document discusses a petition filed seeking anticipatory bail related to an FIR for offenses of forgery and fraud. The petitioner is accused of preparing fake arms licenses for monetary gain along with other co-accused. The court dismissed the petition, finding the petitioner's custodial interrogation necessary to uncover the full scale of the fake license operation and those involved.

    Original Title

    CRM-M_16167_2022_20_07_2022_FINAL_ORDER

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses a petition filed seeking anticipatory bail related to an FIR for offenses of forgery and fraud. The petitioner is accused of preparing fake arms licenses for monetary gain along with other co-accused. The court dismissed the petition, finding the petitioner's custodial interrogation necessary to uncover the full scale of the fake license operation and those involved.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    3 views3 pages

    CRM-M 16167 2022 20 07 2022 Final Order

    Uploaded by

    Amrinder
    The document discusses a petition filed seeking anticipatory bail related to an FIR for offenses of forgery and fraud. The petitioner is accused of preparing fake arms licenses for monetary gain along with other co-accused. The court dismissed the petition, finding the petitioner's custodial interrogation necessary to uncover the full scale of the fake license operation and those involved.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    Neutral Citation No:=2022:PHHC:084558

    CRM-M-16167-2022 -1-

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA


    AT CHANDIGARH.
    209

    CRM-M-16167-2022
    Date of decision: 20.07.2022

    KARWINDER SINGH .....Petitioner

    Versus

    STATE OF PUNJAB .....Respondent

    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

    Present : Mr. Anurag Chopra, Advocate


    for the petitioner.

    Mr. M.S.Nagra, AAG, Punjab


    for the respondent-State.

    ****

    SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL)

    1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 438

    Cr.P.C., whereins, the petitioner seeks the indulgence of this court for

    grant of anticipatory bail.

    2. FIR No. 243 dated 29.08.2015 is registered at Police

    Station City Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran, thereins, offences

    constituted under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 120-B of the IPC, are

    embodied.

    3. The incriminatory roles as assigned, in the petition FIR, is

    that the present bail petitioner in connivance with co-accused Karanbir

    Singh, and, co-accused Manjinder Singh, and, for a monetary quid pro

    quo preparing fake arms licences, and, thereafter, theirs also facilitating

    the purchases of arms by the persons concerned.

    1 of 3
    ::: Downloaded on - 05-03-2024 19:45:04 :::
    Neutral Citation No:=2022:PHHC:084558

    CRM-M-16167-2022 -2-

    4. During the course of investigations into the petition FIR,

    accused Karanbir Singh has been arrested, but during his custodial

    interrogation, he did cause recoveries of fake arms licences to the

    investigating officer concerned.

    5. Be that as it may, the present bail petitioner is an employee

    in the licensing branch, at the Civil Collectorate, at Tarn Taran, and, his

    seat is in the closest proximity to the photostat booth, of his nephew

    one Manjinder Singh. It appears that copies of fake arms licences, as

    may have become ultimately issued from the licensing branch

    concerned, where the present bail petitioner is working as a Licensing

    Clerk, became thereafter photostated at the booth of his nephew one

    Manjinder Singh. Therefore, the nephew of the present bail petitioner

    may have now rather not maintained records thereof. However, for

    ensuring that the present bail petitioner, discloses to the investigating

    officer concerned, the numbers of all the fake licenses, as became

    prepared by him, in collusion with all concerned, and, whereafter(s) he

    prima facie facilitated the purchases of arms, by the concerned, and,

    also after his receiving monies from them, hence the custodial

    interrogation of the present bail petitioner rather is deemed most

    imperative.

    6. The further reason for forming the above conclusion, is

    founded upon the inferences, and, conclusions, as, become drawn by

    this Court, where declining relief of pre-arrest bail, to Karwinder Singh,

    through an order of even date rendered in CRM-M-15562-2022.

    7. Consequently, for uncovering the scale of preparations of,

    2 of 3
    ::: Downloaded on - 05-03-2024 19:45:05 :::
    Neutral Citation No:=2022:PHHC:084558

    CRM-M-16167-2022 -3-

    and, supply of fake Arms Licenses to the concerned, and also, for

    ensuring recoveries thereof, besides for ensuring the eruption(s) of the

    names of persons who therethrough(s) purchased arms, thereupon(s), it

    is too, deemed necessary to order for the custodial interrogation of the

    present bail petitioner.

    8. In view of the above, this Court does not find any merit in

    the petition, rather, becomes constrained to dismiss it.

    9. Dismissed accordingly.

    10. The afore observations are meant only for the disposal of

    the present petition, and, shall not affect the merits of the trial arising

    from the FIR (supra).

    (SURESHWAR THAKUR)
    20.07.2022 JUDGE
    kavneet singh
    Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
    Whether reportable : Yes/No

    Neutral Citation No:=2022:PHHC:084558

    3 of 3
    ::: Downloaded on - 05-03-2024 19:45:05 :::

    You might also like