What RAID Level Is Best

What RAID Level is Best?
RAID is a technology that is used to increase the performance and/or reliability of data storage. Thus,
increasing the performance for a web server is not the same as increasing the performance for a database
server, which is not the same as increasing the performance of a file server. Let's talk about the general
background for RAID before progressing.
RAID stands for Redundant Array of Inexpensive (or Independent) Disks. A RAID system consists of two
or more drives working in parallel. These disks can be hard discs but we are seeing increasing use of SSD
(solid state drives) for server environments. There are different RAID levels, each optimized for a specific
situation. These are not standardized by an industry group. This explains why there is a lot of confusion
surrounding RAID and which RAID level is best because honestly, most folks do not know.
Types of RAID
 RAID 0 – Striping
 RAID 1 – Mirroring
 RAID 5 – Striping with parity
 RAID 6 – Striping with double parity
 RAID 10 – Combining mirroring and striping
 Hardware RAID - Providing RAID via a hardware RAID controller
 Software RAID - Providing increased disk performance and/or fault tolerance via software, not a hardware
controller
RAID 0 – Striping
In a RAID 0 system, data is split up in blocks that get written across all the drives in the array. By using
multiple disks (at least 2) at the same time, this offers superior I/O performance. This performance can be
enhanced further by using multiple controllers, ideally one controller per disk.
Advantages of RAID 0
 RAID 0 offers the best performance, both in read and write operations. There is no overhead caused by
parity controls.
 All storage capacity is used, there is no overhead.
 The technology is easy to implement.
Disadvantages of RAID 0
RAID 0 is not fault-tolerant. If one drive fails, all data in the RAID 0 array is lost. It should not be used for
mission-critical systems.
Ideal use of RAID 0

RAID 0 is ideal for non-critical storage of data that have to be read/written at a high speed, such as a graphic
designer workstation or video editing workstation. If you want to use RAID 0 purely to combine the storage
capacity of two drives in a single volume, consider mounting one drive in the folder path of the other drive.
This is supported in almost all distributions of Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows and has the advantage that a
single drive failure has no impact on the data of the second disk or SSD drive.
RAID 1 – Mirroring
RAID 1 has several advantages over RAID 0. In RAID 1, data is stored in two locations, or sets of data drives.
The first location is the "live" dataset. The second is a mirror drive (or set of drives) . If a drive fails, the
controller uses either the data drive or the mirror drive for data recovery and continues operation. You need at
least 2 drives for a RAID 1 array.
 RAID 1 offers excellent read speed and a write-speed that is comparable to that of a single drive.
 In case a drive fails, data doesn't have to be repaired. Depending on the configuration, a drive replacement
can rectify the problem and you're back online with minimal involvement.
 RAID 1 is a very simple technology.
 The main disadvantage is that the effective storage capacity is only half of the total drive capacity because
all data gets written twice.
 Software RAID 1 solutions do not always allow a hot swap of a failed drive (meaning it cannot be replaced
while the server keeps running). Ideally a hardware controller needs to be used in order for a replacement
drive to be put online while the server is online.
Ideal use of RAID 1

RAID 1 is ideal for mission critical storage, for instance for web servers, or servers with small chassis where
only 2 drives can be used. This is especially valuable if data on these systems doesn't change often, so
restoration of the data from a backup is not very complex.
RAID 5 - Parity with striping

RAID 5 is the most common secure RAID level. It requires at least 3 drives but can work with up to 16. Data
blocks are striped across the drives and on one drive a parity check sum of all the block data is written. The
parity data is not written to a fixed drive, they are spread across all drives, as the diagram shows. Using the
parity data, the server can recalculate the data of one of the other data blocks, should that data no longer be
available. That means a RAID 5 array can withstand a single drive failure without losing data. Although RAID
5 can be achieved in software, a hardware controller is recommended. Often extra cache memory is used on
these controllers to improve the write performance.
 Read data transactions are very fast while write data transactions are somewhat slower (due to the parity that
has to be calculated).
 If a drive fails, you still have access to all data, even while the failed drive is being replaced and the storage
controller rebuilds the data on the new drive.
 Drive failures have an effect on throughput, although this is still acceptable.
 This is complex technology. If one of the disks in an array using 4TB disks fails and is replaced, restoring
the data (the rebuild time) may take a day or longer, depending on the load on the array and the speed of the
controller. If another disk goes bad during that time, data is lost forever.
Ideal use for RAID 5

RAID 5 is a good all-round system that combines efficient storage with excellent security and decent
performance. It is ideal for file and application servers that have a limited number of data drives.
RAID 6 – Striping with double parity

RAID 6 is like RAID 5 but it writes the parity data to two drives. That means it requires at least 4 drives and
can withstand 2 drives dying simultaneously. The chances that two drives break down at exactly the same
moment are of course very small. However, if a drive in a RAID 5 systems dies and is replaced by a new drive,
it takes hours to rebuild the swapped drive. If another drive dies during that time, you still lose all of your data.
With RAID 6, the RAID array will even survive that second failure.
 Like with RAID 5, read data transactions are very fast.
 If two drives fail, you still have access to all data, and can replace the drives while the server is still online.
So RAID 6 is more redundant than RAID 5.
 Generally more expensive because you are paying for at least 4 hard drives as opposed to 2 or 3 in other
RAID configurations.
 Write data transactions are slowed down due to the parity that has to be calculated.
 Recovery time is longer than in most configurations. Rebuilding an array in which one drive failed can take
a long time to completely repair.
Ideal use of RAID 6

RAID 6 is a good all-round system that combines efficient storage with excellent security and decent
performance. It is preferable over RAID 5 in file and application servers that use many large drives for data
storage.
RAID 10 – Combining RAID 1 & RAID 0
It is possible to combine the advantages (and disadvantages) of RAID 0 and RAID 1 in one single system. This
is a nested or hybrid RAID configuration. It provides security by mirroring all data on secondary drives while
using striping across each set of drives to speed up data transfers.
 If something goes wrong with one of the disks in a RAID 10 configuration, the rebuild time is very fast
since all that is needed is copying all the data from the surviving mirror to a new drive. This can take as
little as 30 minutes for drives of 1 TB.
 Half of the storage capacity goes to mirroring, so compared to large RAID 5 or RAID 6 arrays, this is an
expensive way to have redundancy.
Ideal use of RAID 10

In a larger MS SQL server environment, RAID 10 is great for log data. As Microsoft has stated over and over
again, "RAID 1+0 will provide better throughput for write-intensive applications. The amount of performance
gained will vary based on the HW vendor’s RAID implementations. Most common alternative to RAID 1+0 is
RAID 5. Generally, RAID 1+0 provides better write performance than any other RAID level providing data
protection, including RAID 5."
Other RAID Resources

 RAID Calculator - Find out how much usable disk space you'll have after a RAID configuration.

What RAID Level Is Best

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What RAID Level Is Best

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

What RAID Level Is Best

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What RAID Level is Best?

Ideal use of RAID 0

Ideal use of RAID 1

RAID 5 - Parity with striping

Ideal use for RAID 5

RAID 6 – Striping with double parity

Ideal use of RAID 6

Ideal use of RAID 10

Other RAID Resources

You might also like