The Ocular Surface
The Ocular Surface
The Ocular Surface
A Journal of Review Linking Laboratory Science, Clinical Science, and Clinical Practice
• Description p.1
• Impact Factor p.1
• Editorial Board p.1
• Guide for Authors p.4
ISSN: 1542-0124
DESCRIPTION
.
Benefits to authors
We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts
on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further
information or help, please visit our Support Center
IMPACT FACTOR
.
EDITORIAL BOARD
.
Editor-in-Chief
Ali Djalilian, University of Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, Chicago, IL, United States of America
Founding Editor
Michael A. Lemp, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, Washington, District of Columbia, DC, USA
Senior Associate Editor
Reza Dana, Harvard University, Boston, MA
Associate Editors
Reiko Arita, Itoh Clinic, Saitama, Japan
Stefano Bonini, Roma Tre University, Roma, Italy
Jennifer P. Craig, University of Auckland, National Eye Care Centre, Auckland New Zealand
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal, The Ocular Surface (TOS) features concise, state-of-the-art,
referenced review articles to elucidate the vast body of findings in this rapidly evolving field. Its
purview ranges from molecular biology to surgery, encompassing lacrimal, lid, and ocular surface
physiology, pathology, pharmacology, and medical/surgical therapeutic interventions. TOS also
publishes select high impact original research reports and articles describing innovative techniques
and technology. Descriptions of desired content and requirements for articles are described below
under the section headings: Review Articles; High Impact Original Research Reports; Innovative
Techniques and Technology; Research Correspondence; and Special Issue Articles.. All manuscripts
undergo peer review by two or more reviewers. Authors are asked to revise their manuscripts,
addressing all the reviewers' suggestions or explaining their reasons for declining to do so.
Submission
Manuscripts must be submitted through Editorial Manager: https://www.editorialmanager.com/
THEOCULARSURFACE/default.aspx
Submission checklist
You can use this list to carry out a final check of your submission before you send it to the journal for
review. Please check the relevant section in this Guide for Authors for more details.
One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details:
E-mail addressFull postal address
Further considerations
Manuscript has been 'spell checked' and 'grammar checked'All references mentioned in the Reference
List are cited in the text, and vice versa Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted
material from other sources (including the Internet)Journal policies detailed in this guide have been
reviewedReferee suggestions and contact details provided, based on journal requirements
While submitting revision, make sure that you submit: 1. The Revised Manuscript with track
changes under the file type "Revised Manuscript with Changes Marked; 2. A clean version
of the Revised Manuscript under the file type "Manuscript File"; 3. Response to reviewers
in a separate file.
Most reviews are written at the invitation of the editors, but independent proposals of articles
are welcomed. To propose a review, please email a brief description of the intended review
to Editor-in-Chief Ali Djalilian, MD ([email protected]) and Managing Editor David Newcombe
([email protected]). If the editors consider the topic to be appropriate, you will be asked
to submit a detailed outline and tentative bibliography for peer review.
Guidelines
Reviews should follow a topic-based outline, labeled with headings and subheadings [I,A,1,a, (1),
(a)]. A TOS review should not be a general overview of a topic, but rather an in-depth, literature-
based, critical review that emphasizes areas of new information, controversies, etc. The authors' own
findings may be cited in the context of findings published in the literature, but original work should
not be the focus of the review. The readers will have various levels of understanding about specific
topic areas, so it is important for authors to provide the background, definitions, and explanations
necessary to enhance understanding. Illustrative figures and diagrams are very helpful.Format
1. Abstract
Please submit a narrative abstract.
2. Length of Text
Appropriate length is usually about 10-14 printed pages (equivalent to about 24-34 double-spaced
manuscript pages, including references, figures and tables).
3. Disclosure
In a paragraph before the reference section, authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
If no potential conflicts exist, that must be stated.
4. Method of Literature Search
The review manuscript should state the method of literature selection, specifying search words and
data bases used, as well as the date of search; number of articles retrieved; criteria for selecting
articles for inclusion in review; criteria for excluding articles.
5. References
A review article should not cite all publications relevant to the topic of the article; rather, the references
should be selected according to their importance and usefulness in clarifying, documenting, and
providing historical background. Multiple similar references to document a statement are usually not
needed. The appropriate number of references varies according to the length of the article and the
complexity of the topic. The number of references in a 12-14 page review article (20-30 double-
spaced typed pages of text) should seldom exceed 150, although there may be exceptions to this
guideline. Authors are encouraged to request advice from the editors if it seems that more references
are appropriate.
High Impact Original Research Reports
The goal of including original research articles in TOS is to provide rapid, peer-reviewed publication of
high-quality, high-impact information that holds promise of significantly advancing the understanding
of the ocular surface. The work should present new conceptual frameworks or novel research findings
that challenge or enhance our current approach to clinical practice or research.
Guidelines
To this end, the research must:
1. Be original research of the author that is conducted with sound scientific method
2. Provide new information that answers a specific question regarding ocular surface health or disease
3. Provide new, mechanistically based information
4. Be presented according to the author guidelines and format listed below
5. Be performed according to tenets of good laboratory and clinical practice:
a. If involving laboratory animals, the work should conform to the ARVO guidelines for humane use
of such animals;
b. If involving human subjects, the work should conform to the Declaration of Helsinki and provide
for informed consent in an IRB approved protocol;
c. If involving a clinical trial, should be registered with a clinical trial registry
6. Be presented in a clear, logical manner with sufficient detail to be reproducible by other researchers
7. Present rationale and statistical analysis of data support conclusions
Format
1. Title Page: (As above under "Manuscript Preparation")
2. Structured abstract: A structured abstract of fewer than 250 words is required for original research
articles and should be arranged under the following headings: Purpose, Methods, Results, and
Conclusions. Abbreviations should be defined at first mention, Do not include references. The abstract
must be included as part of the main manuscript file.
Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for
experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
All animal experiments should comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and should be carried out in
accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and associated guidelines, EU
Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments, or the National Research Council's Guide for the Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals and the authors should clearly indicate in the manuscript that such
guidelines have been followed. The sex of animals must be indicated, and where appropriate, the
influence (or association) of sex on the results of the study.
Informed consent and patient details
Studies on patients or volunteers require ethics committee approval and informed consent, which
should be documented in the paper. Appropriate consents, permissions and releases must be obtained
where an author wishes to include case details or other personal information or images of patients
and any other individuals in an Elsevier publication. Written consents must be retained by the author
but copies should not be provided to the journal. Only if specifically requested by the journal in
exceptional circumstances (for example if a legal issue arises) the author must provide copies of the
consents or evidence that such consents have been obtained. For more information, please review the
Elsevier Policy on the Use of Images or Personal Information of Patients or other Individuals. Unless
you have written permission from the patient (or, where applicable, the next of kin), the personal
details of any patient included in any part of the article and in any supplementary materials (including
all illustrations and videos) must be removed before submission.
Declaration of interest
All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations
that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential competing interests
include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent
applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Authors must disclose any interests in two
places: 1. A summary declaration of interest statement in the title page file (if double anonymized) or
the manuscript file (if single anonymized). If there are no interests to declare then please state this:
'Declarations of interest: none'. 2. Detailed disclosures as part of a separate Declaration of Interest
form, which forms part of the journal's official records. It is important for potential interests to be
declared in both places and that the information matches. More information.
Submission declaration and verification
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in
the form of an abstract, a published lecture or academic thesis, see 'Multiple, redundant or concurrent
publication' for more information), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that
its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where
the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in
Subscribers may reproduce tables of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal
circulation within their institutions. Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution
outside the institution and for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations. If
excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission
from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article. Elsevier has preprinted forms for
use by authors in these cases.
For gold open access articles: Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a
'License Agreement' (more information). Permitted third party reuse of gold open access articles is
determined by the author's choice of user license.
Author rights
As an author you (or your employer or institution) have certain rights to reuse your work. More
information.
Elsevier supports responsible sharing
Find out how you can share your research published in Elsevier journals.
You should not suggest reviewers who are colleagues, or who have co-authored or collaborated with
you during the last three years. Editors do not invite reviewers who have potential competing interests
with the authors. Further, in order to provide a broad and balanced assessment of the work, and ensure
scientific rigor, please suggest diverse candidate reviewers who are located in different countries/
regions from the author group. Also consider other diversity attributes e.g. gender, race and ethnicity,
career stage, etc. Finally, you should not include existing members of the journal's editorial team,
of whom the journal are already aware.
Note: the editor decides whether or not to invite your suggested reviewers.
Style
Follow guidelines of style, terminology, measurement, and quantitation as set forth in the American
Medical Association Manual of Style (10th ed., New York, Oxford University Press, 2007).
PREPARATION
Queries
For questions about the editorial process (including the status of manuscripts under review) or for
technical support on submissions, please visit our Support Center.
Peer review
This journal operates a single anonymized review process. All contributions will be initially assessed by
the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of
one independent expert reviewer to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor is responsible
for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's decision is final. Editors
are not involved in decisions about papers which they have written themselves or have been written
by family members or colleagues or which relate to products or services in which the editor has an
Highlights should be submitted in a separate editable file in the online submission system. Please
use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including
spaces, per bullet point).
Structured abstract
A structured abstract, by means of appropriate headings, should provide the context or background for
the research and should state its purpose, basic procedures (selection of study subjects or laboratory
animals, observational and analytical methods), main findings (giving specific effect sizes and their
statistical significance, if possible), and principal conclusions. It should emphasize new and important
aspects of the study or observations.
Keywords
Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of 8 keywords in alphabetical order, using
American spelling and avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example,
'and', 'of'). Be sparing with abbreviations: only abbreviations firmly established in the field may be
eligible. These keywords will be used for indexing purposes.
Abbreviations
Define abbreviations that are not standard in this field in a footnote to be placed on the first page of
the article. Such abbreviations that are unavoidable in the abstract must be defined in parentheses
at their first mention, as well as at their first mention in the text. Ensure consistency of abbreviations
throughout the article.
Formatting of funding sources
List funding sources in this standard way to facilitate compliance to funder's requirements:
Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant numbers xxxx, yyyy];
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [grant number zzzz]; and the United States Institutes
of Peace [grant number aaaa].
It is not necessary to include detailed descriptions on the program or type of grants and awards. When
funding is from a block grant or other resources available to a university, college, or other research
institution, submit the name of the institute or organization that provided the funding.
If no funding has been provided for the research, it is recommended to include the following sentence:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or
not-for-profit sectors.
Acknowledgements
Collate acknowledgements in a separate section at the end of the article before the references and do
not, therefore, include them on the title page, as a footnote to the title or otherwise. List here those
individuals who provided help during the research (e.g., providing language help, writing assistance
or proof reading the article, etc.).
Appendices
If there is more than one appendix, they should be identified as A, B, etc. Formulae and equations in
appendices should be given separate numbering: Eq. (A.1), Eq. (A.2), etc.; in a subsequent appendix,
Eq. (B.1) and so on. Similarly for tables and figures: Table A.1; Fig. A.1, etc.
Publisher's permission should be obtained to reprint any figure or table that substantially resembles
one that has been previously published, even if some details have been modified. Caption should
state: Reprinted (or modified) from (author's name and reference number) with permission from
(publisher's name).
Tables
Please submit tables as editable text and not as images. Tables can be placed either next to the
relevant text in the article, or on separate page(s) at the end. Number tables consecutively in
accordance with their appearance in the text and place any table notes below the table body. Be
sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results
described elsewhere in the article. Please avoid using vertical rules and shading in table cells.
References
Citation in text
Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice
versa). Any references cited in the abstract must be given in full. Unpublished results and personal
communications are not recommended in the reference list, but may be mentioned in the text. If these
references are included in the reference list they should follow the standard reference style of the
journal and should include a substitution of the publication date with either 'Unpublished results' or
'Personal communication'. Citation of a reference as 'in press' implies that the item has been accepted
for publication.
Reference links
Increased discoverability of research and high quality peer review are ensured by online links to
the sources cited. In order to allow us to create links to abstracting and indexing services, such as
Scopus, CrossRef and PubMed, please ensure that data provided in the references are correct. Please
note that incorrect surnames, journal/book titles, publication year and pagination may prevent link
creation. When copying references, please be careful as they may already contain errors. Use of the
DOI is highly encouraged.
A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it as a permanent link to any electronic article.
An example of a citation using DOI for an article not yet in an issue is: VanDecar J.C., Russo R.M.,
James D.E., Ambeh W.B., Franke M. (2003). Aseismic continuation of the Lesser Antilles slab beneath
northeastern Venezuela. Journal of Geophysical Research, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000884.
Please note the format of such citations should be in the same style as all other references in the paper.
Web references
As a minimum, the full URL should be given and the date when the reference was last accessed. Any
further information, if known (DOI, author names, dates, reference to a source publication, etc.),
should also be given. Web references can be listed separately (e.g., after the reference list) under a
different heading if desired, or can be included in the reference list.
Data references
This journal encourages you to cite underlying or relevant datasets in your manuscript by citing them
in your text and including a data reference in your Reference List. Data references should include the
following elements: author name(s), dataset title, data repository, version (where available), year,
and global persistent identifier. Add [dataset] immediately before the reference so we can properly
identify it as a data reference. The [dataset] identifier will not appear in your published article.
Sample
1. Oguro M, Imahiro S, Saito S, Nakashizuka T. Mortality data for Japanese oak wilt disease
and surrounding forest compositions, Mendeley Data, v1; 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/
xwj98nb39r.1.
Journal Article
2. Jones JP. Pitfalls in the design of clinical trials for anti-dry eye agents. Ocul Surf 2015;13:2-16
Abstract
3. Smith PS, Williams LC. Effects of artificial tear solutions on osmolarity of dry eyes (abstract). Invest
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;59, ARVO E-Abstract 4015
Book
4. Charles PO, van Housen Q Jr, Duchen PX, et al (eds): Cornea, conjunctiva, lid: new concepts. New
York, NY, Random House, 2015
Chapter in book
5. Aay OK: Effect of estrogen medications on the cornea, in Charles PO, van Housen Q Jr, Duchen PX,
et al (eds): Cornea, conjunctiva, lid: new concepts. New York, NY, Random House, 2015, pp 234-25
Journal abbreviations source
Journal names should be abbreviated according to the List of Title Word Abbreviations.
Journal abbreviations source
Journal names should be abbreviated according to the National Library of Medicine style (PubMed,
Index Medicus).
Data visualization
Include interactive data visualizations in your publication and let your readers interact and engage
more closely with your research. Follow the instructions here to find out about available data
visualization options and how to include them with your article.
Research data
This journal encourages and enables you to share data that supports your research publication
where appropriate, and enables you to interlink the data with your published articles. Research data
refers to the results of observations or experimentation that validate research findings. To facilitate
reproducibility and data reuse, this journal also encourages you to share your software, code, models,
algorithms, protocols, methods and other useful materials related to the project.
There are different ways to link your datasets to your article. When available, you can directly link
your dataset to your article by providing the relevant information in the submission system. For more
information, visit the database linking page.
For supported data repositories a repository banner will automatically appear next to your published
article on ScienceDirect.
In addition, you can link to relevant data or entities through identifiers within the text of your
manuscript, using the following format: Database: xxxx (e.g., TAIR: AT1G01020; CCDC: 734053;
PDB: 1XFN).
Mendeley Data
This journal supports Mendeley Data, enabling you to deposit any research data (including raw and
processed data, video, code, software, algorithms, protocols, and methods) associated with your
manuscript in a free-to-use, open access repository. During the submission process, after uploading
your manuscript, you will have the opportunity to upload your relevant datasets directly to Mendeley
Data. The datasets will be listed and directly accessible to readers next to your published article online.
For more information, visit the Mendeley Data for journals page.
Data statement
To foster transparency, we encourage you to state the availability of your data in your submission.
This may be a requirement of your funding body or institution. If your data is unavailable to access
or unsuitable to post, you will have the opportunity to indicate why during the submission process,
for example by stating that the research data is confidential. The statement will appear with your
published article on ScienceDirect. For more information, visit the Data Statement page.
AUTHOR INQUIRIES
Visit the Elsevier Support Center to find the answers you need. Here you will find everything from
Frequently Asked Questions to ways to get in touch.
You can also check the status of your submitted article or find out when your accepted article will
be published.
© Copyright 2018 Elsevier | https://www.elsevier.com