4/12/24, 9:26 PM The Basics Of “Criminal Trial” For The Novices In The Bench And The Bar [Q and

The Bench And The Bar [Q and A-Part-III]

Q.11 What is meant by “taking cognizance of an offence” ?

Ans. Every case instituted before a Criminal Court alleging a “cognizable offence” or a “non-cognizable
offence” will have to be scrutinized by the Court and the alleged offence will have to be taken cognizance of
under Section 190 Cr.P.C. Taking cognizance of an offence broadly means “taking judicial notice by a
competent court of a cause or matter presented before it so as to decide whether there is any basis for
initiating proceedings for judicial determination.” (Vide para 34 of Subramanian Swamy v. Manmohan
Singh AIR 2012 SC 1185 = (2012) 3 SCC 64 – G. S. Singhvi, A. K. Ganguly – JJ.) The process of “taking
cognizance of an offence” is a complex process involving careful application of the mind by the “presiding
officer” of the Court concerned. The Magistrate or the Judge has to be satisfied that the “Police Report” or the
“complaint” filed before him makes out the ingredients of the offence alleged. It is only after “taking
cognizance of the offence”, can the Court issue process to the accused. Upon service of process and the
appearance of the accused before Court, he will be supplied with the prosecution records. Then, depending on

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-are-sources-of-taking-cognizance-of-offence-section-190-crpc-253391 1/5
4/12/24, 9:26 PM The Basics Of “Criminal Trial” For The Novices In The Bench And The Bar [Q and A-Part-III]

the mode of trial, either the “substance of accusation” (in a “summons case”) or the framing of a “charge”
(in a “warrant case”) will be stated by the Court.

Also Read - NDPS Act | Officer Must Mandatory Record In Writing Reasons For Arrest/Search As Per S.41(2), Violation
Will Vitiate Trial : Supreme Court

Q.12 Is there a Court empowered under the Cr.P.C. to take cognizance of an offence ?

Ans. Yes. Taking cognizance of an offence is a judicial act performed by a Court during the stage of “inquiry”.
Section 26 read with Column 6 of the First Schedule to the Cr.P.C. decides whether it is a “Magistrate” or a
“Court of Session” or a “Special Court” which has to try the offence. Supposing an offence is to be tried by a
Magistrate, the further question is “which Magistrate” ? Chapter XIII of Cr.P.C. (Sections 177 to 189) decides
which Magistrate or Court has the jurisdiction to conduct “inquiries” and “trial”. The primary rule under
Section 177 Cr.P.C. is that the offence has to be “inquired into” and “tried” by that Court within whose “local
jurisdiction” (territorial limits) the offence was committed. Going by the definition of “local jurisdiction” as
contained in Section 2 (j) Cr.P.C., the local area of a “Court” or “Magistrate” can even include the whole or
any part of the State, as the State Government may, by notification specify. But, the local jurisdiction of
Magistrates is fixed under Section 14 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned, subject to the control of the
appropriate High Court. Certain police stations are allotted to certain Magistrate Courts. By virtue of the
fiction in Section 156 (1) Cr.P.C. read with Chapter XIII of Cr.P.C. the jurisdiction of the police station and that
of the Magistrate are co-extensive.

Also Read - Breaking: Delhi Court Remands BRS Leader K Kavitha To CBI Custody Till April 15 In Liquor Policy Case

In the case of Sessions Courts, they are established for the purpose of exercising jurisdiction in a Sessions
Division which is usually the “revenue district”.

In paras 11 and 14 of Trisuns Chemical Industry v. Rajesh Aggarwal AIR 1999 SC 3499 = (1999) 8 SCC 686
– K. T. Thomas, M. B. Shah – JJ, it has been observed that a Magistrate “taking cognizance of an
offence” need not have “territorial jurisdiction” to conduct “inquiry or trial”. Going by the above verdict, a
Magistrate at Kochi can take cognizance of an offence committed in Delhi or Punjab. With due respect, the
above proposition of law is open to doubt in view of Sections 157 (1), 169, 170 (1), 173 (2) (i), 201, 204 (1) etc.
all of which refer to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence and try. As per the scheme
under the Cr.P.C., it is only a Magistrate who can “try” the offence can conduct an “inquiry” and it is the said
Magistrate who can “take cognizance of an offence”.

Also Read - Liquor Policy Case: Delhi Court Seeks ED, CBI Response On Manish Sisodia's Plea Seeking Interim Bail To
Campaign For Lok Sabha Polls

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-are-sources-of-taking-cognizance-of-offence-section-190-crpc-253391 2/5
4/12/24, 9:26 PM The Basics Of “Criminal Trial” For The Novices In The Bench And The Bar [Q and A-Part-III]

Q.13 What are the different sources available to a Magistrate for taking cognizance of an offence ?

The usual modes by which Magistrates take cognizance of offences are by means of cases instituted on a
“police report” and by means of cases instituted on a “complaint” (i.e. otherwise than on a police report).

Q.14 If cognizance of the offence has been taken by a Magistrate under any of the two sources of clause
(c) of Section 190 (1) Cr.P.C., is there any further duty on the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence
?

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-are-sources-of-taking-cognizance-of-offence-section-190-crpc-253391 3/5
4/12/24, 9:26 PM The Basics Of “Criminal Trial” For The Novices In The Bench And The Bar [Q and A-Part-III]

Also Read - S.27 Evidence Act | To Use Statement Of Accused On Fact Discovery, Prosecution Must Establish No One Else
Had Information About It : Supreme Court

Ans. Yes. The Magistrate has to comply with Section 191 Cr.P.C. by giving the accused an option to have the
case tried by another Magistrate. This is because the Magistrate who has suo motu taken cognizance of the
offence is in the position of a “complainant” or an “aggrieved person”. No person shall be a Judge in his own
cause. (Nemo judex in causa sua; nemo in propria causa judex, esse debet). This is a rule against bias.

Q.15 Is cognizance of an offence whether on a “Police Report” or on a “complaint”, mandatory for

Ans. Yes. Cognizance of the offence alleged in the “police report” or the “complaint” as the case may be, is a
must for the Magistrate to proceed further no matter whether the offence alleged is a “cognizable offence” or a
“non-cognizable offence”.

There is a misconception that a “non-cognizable offence” does not have to be taken cognizance of by a Court.
It is wrong. Every offence whether it be a cognizable offence or non-cognizable offence, has to be taken
cognizance of.

Q.16 How does a Magistrate take cognizance of an offence on a “Police Report” under Section 190 (1) (b)
Cr.P.C.?

Ans. If after applying his mind to the “Police Report” and the documents produced along with it, the
Magistrate takes the case on file against all or any of the accused persons for all or any of the offences made
out against them, he can be said to have taken cognizance of the offence on a “Police Report” under Section
190 (1) (b) Cr.P.C.

Q.17 How does a Magistrate take cognizance of an offence on a “complaint” under Section 190 (1) (a)
Cr.P.C.?

Ans. If after perusing the averments in the complaint and after considering the statements on oath, if any, of the
complainant and his witnesses, if any, the Magistrate applies his mind for the purpose of proceeding under
Chapter XV Cr.P.C. starting with Section 200 onwards, the Magistrate can legitimately be said to have taken
cognizance of the offence. (Vide –

R. R. Chari Vs The State of U.P – AIR 1951 SC 207 - 3 Judges – M. H. Kania – CJI, M. Patanjali
Sastri, S. R. Das – JJ;
Gopal Das Sindhi v. State of Assam - AIR 1961 SC 986 - 3 Judges – S. J. Imam, K. Subba Rao,
Raghubar Dayal – JJ;
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-are-sources-of-taking-cognizance-of-offence-section-190-crpc-253391 4/5
4/12/24, 9:26 PM The Basics Of “Criminal Trial” For The Novices In The Bench And The Bar [Q and A-Part-III]

Jamuna Singh v. Bhadai Shah – AIR 1964 SC 1541 - 3 Judges – B. P. Sinha – CJ, M.
Hidayatullah, K. C. Das Gupta – JJ;
State of Karnataka V. Pastor P. Raju (2006) 6 SCC 728 – G. P. Mathur, Dalveer Bhandari – JJ;
Para 35 of Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Dr. Manmohan Singh and Another (2012) 3 SCC 64 – G. S.
Singhvi, A. K. Ganguly – JJ.)

Q.18 How does a “Court of Session” take cognizance of an offence ?

Ans. Section 193 Cr.P.C. provides that except otherwise provided by the Cr.P.C. or by any other law, no Court of
Session can take cognizance of an offence as a Court of original jurisdiction unless the case has been
committed to it by a Magistrate.

Therefore, a Court of Session cannot directly entertain a “Police Report” or a “complaint” alleging the
commission of an offence triable exclusively by a Court of Session. Such a “Police Report” or
a “complaint” will have to be filed before the Magistrate having jurisdiction and such Magistrate will have to
commit the case to the Court of Session under Section 209 Cr.P.C.

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-are-sources-of-taking-cognizance-of-offence-section-190-crpc-253391 5/5