Group 7 - Final SOUP
Group 7 - Final SOUP
Group 7 - Final SOUP
STS
Submitted by:
4TOM1 - GROUP 7
Abalos, Angelina Mae
Escala, Allyne Isabel D.
Granado, Gianne Ghyl
Mabilin, Garl Adrianne
Magno, Nicole Adrienne C.
The technocratic paradigm can be defined as a way of thinking which tends to see
the world with problems that need constant solution; however, it can only be resolved
through the decisions of experts (DeCosse & Green, 2015). Today, with the
advancements in technology, it is almost seen in every aspect of an individual’s everyday
life. Technology contributed in a way which created a more efficient and accessible
society. Through smartphones, Wi-Fis, and the internet of things, individuals have
become more connected to information as well as each other. Nevertheless, despite being
able to address societal problems and improve some of our systems, it is undeniable that
technology also gives rise to extreme issues, particularly when users are abusing and
exploiting these advancements. Despite the significant contributions to development, it
may also be a source of harm for the lives of individuals, society, and the environment.
There are two sustainable development goals that are interrelated with the issue of
technocratic paradigm namely SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Technology and SDG
11: Sustainable Cities and Communities. SDG 9 from its name, highlights the need to
strengthen industries, innovations, and infrastructures so that it could improve the lives of
the people and bring positive impacts to the society. Technology is undeniably helpful in
boosting the economy, enhancing the quality of education and healthcare, and enhancing
the capabilities of the government. This SDG empowers technology because it is an
essential tool in solving societal problems and achieving the rest of the 17 Sustainable
Development Goals. SDG 11 talks about having sustainable cities and communities by
making them inclusive and progressive. Similarly to the 9th SDG, this sustainable
development goal emphasizes the importance of technology and innovation in order to
fulfill this goal’s objectives. With technological innovation, it will be possible to improve
infrastructures needed by people such as roads, hospitals, schools, markets which will be
useful especially for those living in rural communities. Both goals are connected to the
concept of technocratic paradigm because they are utilizing technology and innovation to
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
COLLEGE OF TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Tourism Management Department
address different problems that our society faces today. For these goals to be achieved,
collaboration between the government, organizations, and communities should be done to
come up with possible solutions that different technologies could do to have more
resilient and sustainable communities.
The technocratic paradigm originated during the Industrial Revolution in the 18th
and 19th centuries, when technological advancements and scientific discoveries
significantly transformed societies, economies, and governance structures. Engineers,
scientists, and experts played crucial roles in driving these changes, leading to a growing
belief in technical expertise in managing complex systems. The post-war era saw the rise
of Keynesian economics, a technocratic paradigm focused on government intervention
and economic planning, as governments worldwide sought to rebuild their economies and
societies.
The technocratic paradigm issue results from the increasing complexity of modern
societies and governance systems, which require specialized knowledge and expertise to
address complex challenges. Rapid technological advancements and scientific inquiry
have increased the importance of technical expertise in policy shaping and innovation.
Historical events like the Industrial Revolution, the Great Depression, and World War II
have reinforced the efficacy of technocratic approaches in governance structures.
However, this dominance has raised concerns about democratic accountability, social
equity, and the exclusion of diverse perspectives from policy discourse, highlighting the
need for a balanced approach that integrates expertise with broader societal values and
participation.
The technocratic paradigm can be traced back to the idea that science and
technology are the ultimate solutions to human problems. This belief has been around for
centuries, but it has become more prominent in recent times with the development of new
technologies. Another reason for the rise of the technocratic paradigm is the fear of
Luddism, which is the belief that technology is a threat to jobs and traditional ways of
life. In the early 19th century, Luddites protested the development of new machinery that
they believed would put them out of work. Today, some people are concerned about the
impact of automation on jobs.
ethical considerations and the natural world's intrinsic value, as it focuses on efficiency
and productivity at the expense of other values, such as human relationships and the
environment. For instance, some technologies can be addictive, lead to social isolation,
and have negative environmental consequences, such as deforestation and pollution.
Another problem with the technocratic paradigm is that it can give too much power to
experts and decision-makers. When people believe that technology is the answer to all
issues, they may be more willing to defer to experts who claim to have the knowledge
and skills to solve those problems, which can lead to a lack of public participation in
decision-making about technology.
Throughout the years, the issue of whether technology is good or bad has always
been a debated topic. The technocratic paradigm stems from the belief that technological
innovation can address any problem, including those that previous or ongoing
advancements in technology have brought about, such as the following:
recent survey, at least 66% of consumers are willing to pay more for goods from
companies that practice environmental responsibility. Among young people, the
percentage is even higher at 73%. However, one investigation carried out in
Europe demonstrated that 42% of environmental claims made by businesses were
either misleading, inaccurate, or overstated, suggesting an increasing tendency to
greenwashing at the commercial level. Companies are placed in a dangerous
situation by tricking customers into purchasing a company's goods or services.
Greenwashing may initially increase revenues for that business. But, they can also
lose their consumer's loyalty and trust and may even face penalties for having
false claims about the product.
Not having access to the internet and gadgets could negatively impact our
society. One of its impacts is less social interactions. We all know how useful
messaging apps are, such as the Facebook Messenger, especially during the
pandemic when we were all confined to our homes and physical interaction was
discouraged to stop the spread of Covid 19. We maximized the use of these online
platforms to connect with our peers that we couldn’t see physically. With many
people in different parts of the world that lack access to the internet, it is difficult
for them to have communication with their loved ones that are far from them.
Also, now that we mostly get news from the internet, those who don’t have access
to it miss out on what is currently happening in the society. Another impact of the
digital divide is people who are not digitally knowledgeable are more prone to
become victims of cybercrime. Because there are many who don’t know how to
use ICT tools, they will be more vulnerable to fake news, online scams, identity
theft etc. The digital divide likewise impacts the quality of education that students
receive. When schools worldwide shifted online, there were many students who
couldn’t attend their online classes regularly because they didn't have a good
internet connection or an access to it. According to the Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers (2023), in some rural states in the USA, the reason why
there are students who can’t connect to the internet is because it is unaffordable.
The digital divide also brings negative impacts to the economy because it hinders
those who are not digitally knowledgeable to get good paying jobs since being
“computer literate” is one of the major requirements in applying for a job
nowadays. Also without access to the internet, it is hard for them to find job
listings as it is now mostly done in job posting sites.
In order to widen the gap of the digital divide the United Nations and other
organizations worldwide have made some initiatives that are in line with SDG 9:
Industry, Innovation, Infrastructure. These initiatives focus on expanding access
to technology and internet connectivity in underserved communities, particularly
in developing countries. Efforts include building infrastructure such as broadband
networks and improving digital literacy through education and training programs.
Additionally, initiatives promote innovation in technology to create affordable and
accessible solutions for all populations. By addressing the digital divide and
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
COLLEGE OF TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Tourism Management Department
PLAN OF ACTION
friendly transportation
alternatives.
V. Concept Map
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
COLLEGE OF TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Tourism Management Department
References
Camus, M. R. (2019, March 15). Automation, AI seen killing more PH jobs. INQUIRER.net.
https://business.inquirer.net/266682/automation-ai-seen-killing-more-ph-jobs
Correll, D. J. (2015, October 23). Is society too dependent on Computers/Phones? | SIOWFA15:
Science in Our World: Certainty and Controversy.
https://sites.psu.edu/siowfa15/2015/10/23/is-society-too-dependent-on-computersphones/
Corporativa, I. (n.d.). We promote inclusive and sustainable industrialisation as a driver of
employment and growth. Iberdrola.
https://www.iberdrola.com/sustainability/committed-sustainable-development-goals/sdg-
9-industry-innovation-and-infrastructure
Decosse, D., & Green, B. (2015). Excerpts from Laudato Si for Discussion in Class.
https://www.scu.edu/media/ethics-center/environmental-ethics/encyclical-handout.pdf
Esmark, A. (2020). Technocratic Revolutions: From industrial to post-industrial technocracy. In
Bristol University Press eBooks (pp. 19–52).
https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529200904.ch002
Martin. (2023a, October 20). Cities - United Nations Sustainable Development Action 2015.
United Nations Sustainable Development.
https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
COLLEGE OF TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Tourism Management Department
Martin. (2023b, October 20). Infrastructure and Industrialization - United Nations Sustainable
Development. United Nations Sustainable Development.
https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/infrastructure-industrialization/
Okey, S. (2021, September 28). What Comes After the Failure of Technocracy? Church Life
Journal.
https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/what-comes-after-the-failure-of-technocracy/
Paul Scherz. (n.d.). The Challenge of Technology to Moral Theology. Journal of Moral
Theology, Vol. 10(No. 2 (2021): 239–268).
https://25771-the-challenge-of-technology-to-moral-theology.pdf
Rotondo, F., Abastante, F., Cotella, G., & Lami, I. M. (2020). Questioning Low-Carbon
Transition Governance: A Comparative Analysis of European Case Studies.
Sustainability, 12(24), 10460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su100000000000000000022410460
Steele, C. (2018, November 16). Top five Digital divide solutions. Digital Divide Council.
http://www.digitaldividecouncil.com/top-five-digital-divide-solutions/
Storck, T. (n.d.). Laudato Si’ and the Critique of the Technocratic Paradigm. The Distributist
Review. https://distributistreview.com/archive/laudato-si-critique-technocratic-paradigm
Taylor, K. (2023, August 17). The Digital Divide: What It Is, and What's Being Done to Close It.
Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/the-digital-divide-5116352
Touro College & Touro University. (2021, February 8). How to avoid technology addiction.
Touro University.
https://www.touro.edu/news--events/stories/how-to-avoid-technology-addiction.php
Trade and Development Commission, (n.d). The contribution of consumer protection to
sustainable consumption Retrieved March 8, 2024, from
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/cicplpd17_en.pdf
What Consumers and Businesses Need To Know About Greenwashing. (n.d.). Lingarogroup.com.
Retrieved March 8, 2024, from
https://lingarogroup.com/blog/what-consumers-and-businesses-need-to-know-about-gree
nwashing
Zucaro, A., Maselli, G., & Ulgiati, S. (2022). Insights in Urban Resource Management: A
Comprehensive Understanding of Unexplored Patterns. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.807735