Lecture 3
Lecture 3
Lecture 3
The novel lends itself to many interpretations and can be read from different angles.
One of these facets is Marlow’s gradual discovery of the reality of colonialism.
Another is his exploration of human nature and probing into the unknown realities of
the inner self.
Heart of Darkness is a voyage of self discovery. Conrad is able to reconcile two
aspects of Marlow’s experience: his confrontation with the reality of colonialism and
an introspective voyage leading to spiritual change (“the changes take place inside”).
Several references to dreams occur in the novel. Dreams are the manifestation of the
subconscious as Freud claims.
“I did not see the man in the name any more than you do. Do you see him? Do you see the
story? Do you see anything? It seems to me I am trying to tell you a dream -- making a vain
attempt, because no relation of a dream can convey the dream-sensation, that com- mingling
of absurdity, surprise, and bewilderment in a tremor of struggling revolt, that notion of being
captured by the incredible which is of the very essence of dreams...." (31).
“Confound the man! he had kicked the very earth to pieces. He was alone, and I before him
did not know whether I stood on the ground or floated in the air”.
“They had behind them, to my mind, the terrific suggestiveness of words heard in dreams, of
phrases spoken in nightmares. Soul! If anybody ever struggled with a soul, I am the man.”
The physical fight to bring back Kurtz to the boat takes the form of a psychological
struggle in a dream, as if fighting with a soul.
“The mind of man is capable of anything -- because everything is in it, all the past as well as
all the future. What was there after all? Joy, fear, sorrow, devotion, valour, rage -- who can
tell? -- but truth -- truth stripped of its cloak of time. … He must meet that truth with his own
true stuff -- with his own inborn strength” (39-40).
1
Dr Souad Baghli Berbar Other Themes in Heart of Darkness
This evokes another level, beyond the reality of Africa, understanding the truth about
human nature.
The experience evoked is not the simple prosaic trip on a river but some other voyage
on a different dimension. The “outer”, “central” and “inner stations” which are
actual halts in Marlow's trip evoke, through symbolic language, the three components
of the human psyche, namely the superego that derives from outwardly acquired
precepts, the ego which is central and the id as the inner hidden part.
“You can't understand. How could you? -- with solid pavement under your feet, surrounded
by kind neighbours ready to cheer you or to fall on you, stepping delicately between the
butcher and the policeman, in the holy terror of scandal and gallows and lunatic asylums --
how can you imagine what particular region of the first ages a man's untrammelled feet may
take him into by the way of solitude -- utter solitude without a policeman -- by the way of
silence -- utter silence, where no warning voice of a kind neighbour can be heard whispering
of public opinion?” (58-9).
In society, he butcher’s function is to provide meat and prevent cannibalism
and the policeman’s is to enforce order and deter crimes. In the wilderness when the
individual is deprived of the usual support of society, he must rely on his inner
strength for moral and spiritual support. There is a potential for good and evil inside
every human heart. When nobody watches you and no one can tell on you, would you
do good or evil?
Marlow is the privileged witness of Kurtz’s discovery of his inner truth and the
reality of his nature, facing his subconscious at the moment of death to gain
knowledge of his own self.
“One evening coming in with a candle I was startled to hear him say a little tremulously, 'I am
lying here in the dark waiting for death.' The light was within a foot of his eyes”.
But Kurtz could not see the light because he was on another plane, looking within
himself just before death.
“I saw on that ivory face the expression of sombre pride, of ruthless power, of craven terror --
of an intense and hopeless despair. Did he live his life again in every detail of desire,
temptation, and surrender during that supreme moment of complete knowledge? He cried in
a whisper at some image, at some vision -- he cried out twice, a cry that was no more than a
breath: " 'The horror! The horror!'” (85)
Kurtz discovers his horrible reality, what he has done and what he has become. He
symbolizes man’s capacity for evil whereas the cannibals who had been starving did
not attack the whites but just asked to have the dead man to eat him. They were
capable of controlling the strongest instinct, that of survival, while the so-called
“civilized” Kurtz could not and has yielded to his brutal instincts of greed and
domination. He even almost killed the harlequin for a little ivory.
This transformation from utter goodness to extreme evil is due to his lack of
restraint
“They only showed that Mr. Kurtz lacked restraint in the gratification of his various lusts,
that there was something wanting in him -- some small matter which, when the pressing
need arose, could not be found under his magnificent eloquence”.
Marlow is Kurtz’s alter ego and wonders if in the same circumstances he would
not do the same. He comes back to Europe a changed man, irritated by the ignorance
of the so-called civilized people, feeling that they could not possibly know what he
knew.
2
Dr Souad Baghli Berbar Other Themes in Heart of Darkness
“Droll thing life is -- that mysterious arrangement of merciless logic for a futile purpose. The
most you can hope from it is some knowledge of yourself -- that comes too late -- a crop of
unextinguishable regrets. I have wrestled with death”.
But Marlow did not die though he came near to it, so he did not access knowledge
about himself.
Atavism
The trip upriver is a return too the earliest beginning of the world, “the night of the
first ages”. Marlow’s awareness of his kinship with the natives and feeling their
common humanity echoes Sir James Frazer’s discovery about the hollowness of
civilization and the universal dimension of human behaviour.
“They howled and leaped, and spun, and made horrid faces; but what thrilled you was just the
thought of their humanity -- like yours -- the thought of your remote kinship with this
wild and passionate uproar. Ugly. Yes, it was ugly enough; but if you were man enough
you would admit to yourself that there was in you just the faintest trace of a response to the
terrible frankness of that noise, a dim suspicion of there being a meaning in it which you --
you so remote from the night of first ages -- could comprehend”.