Unit Iii Group Behaviour

UNIT III GROUP BEHAVIOUR
Defining and Classifying Groups

Group(s)
Two or more individuals interacting and interdependent, who have come together to
achieve particular objectives
Formal Group
A designated work group defined by the organization’s structure
Informal Group
A group that is neither formally structured now organizationally determined; appears
in response to the need for social contact
Command Group
A group composed of the individuals who report directly to a given manager.
Task Group
Those working together to complete a job or task
Interest Group
Those working together to attain a specific objective with which each is concerned
Friendship Group
Those brought together because they share one or more common characteristics.
Why People Join Groups?
• Security
• Status
• Self-esteem
• Affiliation
• Power
• Goal Achievement
The Five-Stage Model of Group Development

Forming Stage
The first stage in group development, characterized by much uncertainty
Storming Stage
The second stage in group development, characterized by intragroup conflict
Norming Stage
The third stage in group development, characterized by close relationships and
cohesiveness.
Performing Stage
The fourth stage in group development, when the group is fully functional.
Adjourning Stage
The final stage in group development for temporary groups, characterized by
concern with wrapping up activities rather than performance.
An Alternative Model: Temporary Groups with Deadlines

Punctuated-Equilibrium Model
Temporary groups go through transitions between inertia and activity.
Sequence of actions:
1. Setting group direction
2. First phase of inertia
3. Half-way point transition
4. Major changes
5. Second phase of inertia
6. Accelerated activity
Group Structure - Roles
Role(s)
A set of expected behavior patterns attributed to someone occupying a given
position in a social unit
Role Identity
Certain attitudes and behaviors consistent with a role.
Role Perception
An individual’s view of how he or she is supposed to act in a given situation
Role Expectations
How others believe a person should act in a given situation
Psychological Contract
An unwritten agreement that sets out what management expects from the employee
and vice versa
Role Conflict
A situation in which an individual is confronted by divergent role expectations
Group Structure - Norms
Norms
Acceptable standards of behavior within a group that are shared by the group’s
members.
Classes of Norms:
• Performance norms
• Appearance norms
• Social arrangement norms
• Allocation of resources norms
The Hawthorne Studies

 A series of studies undertaken by Elton Mayo at Western Electric
Company’s Hawthorne Works in Chicago between 1924 and 1932.
 Research Conclusions:
– Worker behavior and sentiments were closely related.
– Group influences (norms) were significant in affecting individual
behavior.
– Group standards (norms) were highly effective in establishing
individual worker output.
– Money was less a factor in determining worker output than were group
standards, sentiments, and security
Group Structure - Norms

Conformity
Adjusting one’s behavior to align with the norms of the group.
Reference Groups
Important groups to which individuals belong or hope to belong and with whose
norms individuals are likely to conform.
Deviant Workplace Behavior
Antisocial actions by organizational members that intentionally violate established
norms and result in negative consequences for the organization, its members, or
both.
Typology of Deviant Workplace Behavior
Category Examples
Production Leaving early

Intentionally working slowly
Wasting resources
Property Sabotage
Lying about hours worked
Stealing from the organization
Political Showing favoritism
Gossiping and spreading rumors
Blaming coworkers
Personal Aggression Sexual harassment
Verbal abuse
Stealing from coworkers
Group Structure – Status

Status
A socially defined position or rank given to groups or group members by others.
Social Loafing
The tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than
when working individually
Other conclusions:
• Odd number groups do better than even.
• Groups of 7 or 9 perform better overall than larger or smaller groups
Group Structure - Composition
Group Demography
The degree to which members of a group share a common demographic attribute,
such as age, sex, race, educational level, or length of service in the organization, and
the impact of this attribute on turnover.
Cohorts
Individuals who, as part of a group, hold a common attribute.
Group Structure – Cohesiveness
Cohesiveness
Degree to which group members are attracted to each other and are motivated to
stay in the group.
Increasing group cohesiveness:

1. Make the group smaller.
2. Encourage agreement with group goals.
3. Increase time members spend together.
4. Increase group status and admission difficultly.
5. Stimulate competition with other groups.
6. Give rewards to the group, not individuals.
7. Physically isolate the group
Group Tasks
 Decision-making
– Large groups facilitate the pooling of information about complex tasks.
– Smaller groups are better suited to coordinating and facilitating the
implementation of complex tasks.
– Simple, routine standardized tasks reduce the requirement that group
processes be effective in order for the group to perform well.
 Strengths  Weaknesses
– More complete information – More time consuming
– Increased diversity of (slower)
views – Increased pressure to
– Higher quality of decisions conform
(more accuracy) – Domination by one or a
– Increased acceptance of few members
solutions – Ambiguous responsibility
Groupthink
Phenomenon in which the norm for consensus overrides the realistic appraisal of
alternative course of action.
Groupshift
A change in decision risk between the group’s decision and the individual decision
that member within the group would make; can be either toward conservatism or
greater risk.
Symptoms Of The Groupthink Phenomenon

 Group members rationalize any resistance to the assumptions they have
made.
 Members apply direct pressures on those who express doubts about shared
views or who question the alternative favored by the majority.
 Members who have doubts or differing points of view keep silent about
misgivings.
 There appears to be an illusion of unanimity.
Group Decision-Making Techniques
Interacting Groups
Typical groups, in which the members interact with each other face-to-face
Nominal Group Technique

A group decision-making method in which individual members meet face-to-face to
pool their judgments in a systematic but independent fashion
Brainstorming
An idea-generation process that specifically encourages any and all alternatives,
while withholding any criticism of those alternatives.
Electronic Meeting
A meeting in which members interact on computers, allowing for anonymity of
comments and aggregation of votes.
Evaluating Group Effectiveness
TYPE OF GROUP
Effectiveness Criteria Interacting Brainstorming Nominal
Electronic
Number and quality of ideas Low Moderate High High
Social pressure High Low Moderate Low
Money costs Low Low Low High
Speed Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate
Task orientation Low High High High
Potential for interpersonal conflict High Low Moderate Low
Commitment to solution High Not applicable Moderate Moderate
Development of High High Moderate Low
group cohesiveness
TEAM
Why Teams become so Popular?
 Teams typically outperform individuals.
 Teams use employee talents better.
 Teams are more flexible and responsive to changes in the
environment.
 Teams facilitate employee involvement.
 Teams are an effective way to democratize and organization and
increase motivation
Difference between Group and Team :
a) Work group: A group that interacts primarily to share information

and to make decisions to help each group member perform with in
his or her area of responsibility.
b) Work team: A group whose individual efforts result in performance

that is greater than the sum of the individual inputs.
Types of Teams: There are four most common types of Teams in an

organization.
1. Problem –Solving Teams: Groups of 5-12 employees from the same

department who met a few hours each week to discuss ways of
improving quality, effiency and the work environment.
2. Self –Managed work Teams: Groups of 10 -15 people who take on
responsibilities of their former supervisor.s
3. Cross – Functional Teams: Employees from about the same
hierarchial level, but from different work areas, who come
together to accomplish a task.
4. Virutal Teams ; Teams that use computer technology to tie together
physically dispersed members in order toachieve a common goal.
Team Characteristics
1. The absence of paraverbal and nonverbal cues
2. A limited social context
3. The ability to overcome time and space constraints
Creating Effective Teams
Context:
 Adequate Resources
 Leadership
 Climate of trust
 Performance Evaluation & Rewards
Composition;
 Ability
 Personality
 Roles and Diversity
 Size
 Flexibility
 Preference for Team works
Work Design:
 Autonomy
 Skill Variety
 Task Identity
 Task Signifigance
Process;
 Common purpose
 Specific Goals
 Team Efficacy
 Conflict
 Social loafings
Creating Effective Teams: Diversity

Group Demography
The degree to which members of a group share a common demographic attribute,
such as age, sex, race, educational level, or length of service in the organization, and
the impact of this attribute on turnover.
Turning Individuals Into Team Players
 The Challenges
– Overcoming individual resistance to team membership.
– Countering the influence of individualistic cultures.
– Introducing teams in an organization that has historically valued
individual achievement.
 Shaping Team Players
– Selecting employees who can fulfill their team roles.
– Training employees to become team players.
– Reworking the reward system to encourage cooperative efforts while
continuing to recognize individual contributions.
Teams and Quality Management
 Team Effectiveness and Quality Management Requires That Teams:

1. Are small enough to be efficient and effective.
2. Are properly trained in required skills.
3. Allocated enough time to work on problems.
4. Are given authority to resolve problems and take corrective action.
5. Have a designated “champion” to call on when needed.
Teams Aren’t Always the Answer

 Three tests to see if a team fits the situation:
– Is the work complex and is there a need for different perspectives?
– Does the work create a common purpose or set of goals for the group
that is larger than the aggregate of the goals for individuals?
– Are members of the group involved in interdependent tasks?

Unit Iii Group Behaviour

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unit Iii Group Behaviour

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unit Iii Group Behaviour

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNIT III GROUP BEHAVIOUR

Defining and Classifying Groups

The Five-Stage Model of Group Development

An Alternative Model: Temporary Groups with Deadlines

Group Structure - Norms

The Hawthorne Studies

Group Structure - Norms

Production Leaving early

Group Structure – Status

Group Structure - Composition

Group Structure – Cohesiveness

Increasing group cohesiveness:

Symptoms Of The Groupthink Phenomenon

Group Decision-Making Techniques

Nominal Group Technique

Difference between Group and Team :

a) Work group: A group that interacts primarily to share information

b) Work team: A group whose individual efforts result in performance

Types of Teams: There are four most common types of Teams in an

1. Problem –Solving Teams: Groups of 5-12 employees from the same

Creating Effective Teams

Creating Effective Teams: Diversity

Teams and Quality Management

 Team Effectiveness and Quality Management Requires That Teams:

Teams Aren’t Always the Answer

You might also like