Australian Drama 1
Australian Drama 1
Australian Drama 1
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 182.65.224.172 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 09:11:54 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Developments in Recent Australian Drama
By PETER FITZPATRICK tide like the Pioneer Players. The other new factor
& HELEN THOMSON was the very noisy arrival of the ocker.
The ocker rode in on the back of the break-
It took a depressingly long time before the Aus-
throughs in censorship which occurred in Australia
tralian theatre could lay claim to a tradition in localin the late sixties; those new freedoms
and elsewhere
drama that was lively, distinctive, andcoincided lasting.happily
The with a period of relative generosity
last two-and-a-half decades, in which that develop-
in funding for the arts. The ocker was brash, crude,
ment has at last occurred, provide a concentrated and a violator of all decorums, big in his talk and his
and very suggestive instance of that process drinking, inandan (by his own graphic but questionable
urban postcolonial society: there is the quest account)for ancul-
accomplished sexual performer as well.
tural definition, characterised by a strong He wasreaction
mostly young and middle-class, and he was
against the received values of the "parent" alwaysculture;
self-advertisingly male. For the first time the
there is the creation, through a complex set of
theatre had fac-
found a stereotype which represented
tors, of a theatrical mainstream confirmed by the
cultural distinctiveness in a form that urban audi-
repertoire of the establishment theatre and bycould
ences publi-recognize as corresponding to aspects of
cation; and there is the reaction, once that main- their own experience.
stream has been identified, of those antiestablish- The mythology of the wide brown land, in which
ment interests which would subvert it as it once so many playwrights had in earlier decades sought to
subverted the colonial power. Observers still occa-
locate their sense of Australianness, had proved fairly
sionally wonder whether the strength and momen- remote to that audience. It had also been hostile to
tum that marked Australian theatre in the the early
conventions and assumptions of naturalism, the
1970s has petered out, as so many promisingmode move-
which dominated the theatre of the time. The
ments did before; but what has been evident stridently
in the local theatre of the early 1970s fitted the
last fifteen years has been a series of quiet but social-realist
signifi- frame quite snugly, though its manner
cant little revolutions, small by comparison with the satiric caricature. And while the new audi-
was mostly
transformations of that period, but involving encesthemight not always want to be identified with the
kinds of challenges to the audience that make a liv-
figure of the ocker, he came from the suburbs as they
ing theatre. did, and everyone knew somebody a bit like him.
Two important elements coincided in the late The ocker's particular attraction for the "New
1960s to create the revolution that began at the al- Wave" theatre lay not only in his uncouthness and
ternative seasons at the Jane Street Theatre in Syd- comic vigour, but also in his complexity as a speaker.
ney and, especially, at the La Mama Theatre and the For the first time Australian theatre presented a style
Pram Factory in Melbourne, which was quickly of talk which reflected the shifts in conversational
dubbed the "New Wave" of Australian theatre. One
register so striking in a culture where idiom has very
was the opportunity for writers to work closely with a to do with regional variations and a great deal
little
performance company, which the playwrights of pre-to do with the class to which one belongs or aspires.
vious decades had mostly lacked; in the case of Mel-
Kenny Carter, the motor mechanic in David Wil-
bourne's Australian Performing Group, the collabo-
liamson's play The Removalists (1971), who defines
rative model was underpinned by the radical political
himself as "just a beer-swilling slob," makes it clear
commitment which has been characteristic of inno-
that he is crude by choice and not by necessity. His
vative companies throughout the world and which first scene in the play, in which he rationalises his vi-
might have sustained earlier swimmers against the toward his wife on the previous evening as a
olence
"love pat" which she had earned because of her slop-
py housekeeping, shows him moving through a num-
Helen Thomson is Senior Lecturer in English at Monash Uni- ber of conversational roles ranging from quite com-
versity in Melbourne and is Melbourne theatre critic for the Aus- plex and polysyllabic ironies to deliberately shocking
tralian. Soon to appear is her book The Madwoman in the Bush: crudity. When he stuffs bread into his mouth and
The Madwoman in Australian Literature.
swigs beer from the bottle in a calculated affront to
Peter Fitzpatrick is Associate Professor of English at Monash
his pretentious sister-in-law, his challenge, "Don't
University. He is the author of After "The Doll": Australian Dra-
you like my manners?" might stand as a motto for all
ma Since 1955, Williamson, and Stephen Sewell: The Playwright as
Revolutionary. Forthcoming is his dual biography of Louis and the ockers who followed him onto the stage. The
Hilde Esson. challenge was directed against the decorums of a
This content downloaded from 182.65.224.172 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 09:11:54 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
490 WORLD LITERATURE TODAY
This content downloaded from 182.65.224.172 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 09:11:54 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
FITZPATRICK & THOMSON 49 1
This content downloaded from 182.65.224.172 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 09:11:54 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
492 WORLD LITERATURE TODAY
This content downloaded from 182.65.224.172 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 09:11:54 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
FITZPATRICK & THOMSON 493
This content downloaded from 182.65.224.172 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 09:11:54 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms