Comparative Study of Fly Ash Bricks Containing Very Fine Fly Ash With Standard Bricks
Comparative Study of Fly Ash Bricks Containing Very Fine Fly Ash With Standard Bricks
Comparative Study of Fly Ash Bricks Containing Very Fine Fly Ash With Standard Bricks
ISSN: 2456-236X
Vol. 01 Issue 02 | April-2017
ABSTRACT
The aim of present paper is fly ash is to suitable for bricks. Fly ash is a major by product of thermal power plant. It is a
very fine material about 60-70% of which has a size below 0.075 mm. as it is formed by the burning of pulverized coal.
The disposal of such fly ash is creating a serious problem as per its storage space and cost involved in its storage. At
the same time there is a lot of pollution of the environment due to the fineness of the fly ash. The effects for its
utilization for many gainful purposes have been made since late sixties of this century by various research institutions
and public enterprises, but nothing spectacular has really been seen yet in commercial utilities. The present utilization
of the fly ash is about 2% of the total generation. For the present development scenario of India, one of the thrust area
is infrastructure where generation of power holds major share. It is estimated that at present about 125 million tonnes
of fly ash is generated every year from 82 thermal power plants. This amount will reach 200 million tonnes very soon.
The fly ash disposal is going to be a major problem in near future. Thus use of fly ash to Manufacturing bricks & the
bricks are used for construction.
1 INTRODUCTION
Flyash can be used in combination with clay or with lime and sand to produce clay-flyash bricks and flyash-
sand-lime bricks respectively. Production of clay flyash bricks was taken up by setting up a bricks kiln at Lehra Mohabat
with the objective to produce 2 crore bricks. Machine moulded terracotta colour bricks cost Rs 2200 per 1000 no while
hand moulded clay bricks place cost such bricks of first-class quality apart of the second-class and third-class bricks. The
kiln has produced more than 1.8 core of first class clay-flyash bricks of which about 1.5 crore stand consumed by now.
The cost of conventional to place. The variation is quite large and ranges from Rs 12000 to Rs 2200 per 1000 between Rs
1200 to Rs 1700 no bricks. at Lehra Mohabat or in Bathinda region, conventional clay bricks of first class quality are
available at Rs 1300 per 1000 bricks. Taking into account the extra labour cost, power consumption, depreciation of
machinery and interest charge on capital investment, the cost of clay flyash bricks being produced at Lehra Mohabat
works out to be about Rs 1475 per 1000 no bricks. The cost of clay flyash bricks is thus higher by Rs 175 per 1000 no.
The difference in cost of clay flyash bricks and conventional bricks will, however, vary from place to place. It has been
noted that hand-mixing, hand-moulding of clay flaysh bricks is not possible. Proper mixing and blending of soil and
flyash do not take place in hand mixing. However machine-mixing, hand-moulding is possible in these bricks. Clay-flyash
bricks, when tested for various physical requirements laid in IS 13757-1993, give satisfactory results. These bricks need to
be tested for compressive strength, water absorption and efflorescence. Actual results received on testing of these bricks
show that compressive strength of these bricks is very high in comparison to the minimum strength requirement of 105
kg/sq cm prescribed for conventional burnt clay bricks. The water absorption and efflorescence results are also
significantly better than those noted for the conventional bricks. Overall, the test results strongly plead for addition of
flyash to clay for the manufacture of bricks. It has been observed that the buildings where clay flyash bricks have been
used show lesser signs of dampness in comparison to those using conventional bricks. This is because of low porosity of
these bricks. Comparison of machine-mixed, machine-moulding bricks with and without use of flyash was also made at
the kiln site, keeping all other conditions same, to determine the effect of flyash on the strength of bricks. It was found
010201 www.ijiird.com 1
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovative Research & Development (IJIIRD)
ISSN: 2456-236X
Vol. 01 Issue 02 | April-2017
that that average compressive strength of clay flyash brick was 300 kg/cm while that of bricks without flyash was 190
kg/cm. This shows that addition of flyash to soil has a positive effect on the strength of bricks. A saving in fuel
consumption has been noted while manufacturing clay flyash bricks. A flue consumption of 11 to 12 tonne of coal for
production of one lakh clay-flyash bricks has been noted. This is 3 to 4 tonne lesser than the normal corresponding
consumption of coal. This awing occurs due to presence of unburnt carbon in the fly ash. Percentage of un burnt carbon in
fly ash may vary from place to place depending upon the efficiency of boilers of the thermal plant. In general, percentage
of 6-12% unburnt carbon in flyash has been noted. The above saving, however, is for an unburnt carbon content of 3-6%
only. The quality and calorific value of coal also determines its consumption. If good quality coal is used, the
consumption may be further reduced.
010201 www.ijiird.com 2
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovative Research & Development (IJIIRD)
ISSN: 2456-236X
Vol. 01 Issue 02 | April-2017
3) The fly ash should be very fine and can pass through 200 mesh sieve.
4) The unburnt carbon in fly ash with negligible fraction is tolerable for use
3.2 Curing
The stabilized bricks after moulding are further hardened by curing. The chemical changes occur in the bricks
mix contents after moulding and heat of hydration is evolved. The rate of the effect of heat of hydration is mitigated and
lowered with sufficient water in alkali solution is provided to accelerate pozzolanic reaction. There are different process
of curing.
Steam curing under high pressure {normally called
autoclaved curing} Steam curing under normal pressure
Hot water air
curing Water
tank curing
Water curing
in open air.
The cost of curing in all the processes varies and minimum cost involvement is in "water curing in open air" and
maximum cost involvement is in "autoclaved pressurised curing". Water is heated by low cost solar collector and further
increase in temperature of water is made by covering the brick stack by black tarpaulin, after watering the stack by hot
water from solar collector. Unpressurised hot water vapours are produced and the vapours are allowed to pass through the
whole stacks between individual bricks. It accelerates the pozzolanic reaction and reduced final time water dip curing
010201 www.ijiird.com 3
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovative Research & Development (IJIIRD)
ISSN: 2456-236X
Vol. 01 Issue 02 | April-2017
4. CONCLUSION
With the help of fly ash we can produce Compressed Bricks, Tiles, Blocks which are of accurate dimensions
excellent surface finish. The fly ash bricks are eco-friendly, capable of using pollutant like hydrated lime, industrial waste
materials, river silt and non-agricultural sandy soils etc. The fly ash bricks have excellent strength and can be stacked to
the desired level. These are quick drying because of low moisture content. Fly ash bricks has Low power and coal
consumption. These require less manpower. The heavy duty construction offers continuous working with low
maintenance. Ultimate value addition with reduction in the cost of production is achieved
5.REFERENCES:
1) Mukherjee S.M., Mitra B. and Majumdar S.K.-problem of thermal power station including waste disposal
FST, Vol.2149. Page1, para1.Oct 1983.
2) Report on "Changing Trends in Key Building Materials in Urban Housing Activities":- Centre of symbiosis
of Technology, . Page 4, para 2Environment and Management, Bangalore Ministry of science and Technology,
Govt of India New Delhi - 1989..
3) Seshagiri Rao M.V., Janadhana M and Swaroopa Rani M., International conference on civil engineering,
Bangalore, Page 10, para 2. July 2001.
4) Promoting clay flyash bricks by Jagvir Goyal ,Constructuon Journal Of India Page 6, para 1.
August 2005.
5) Chandrakaran S. and Nambiar M.R.M. international conference on civil engineering, Bangalore, Page11,
para1July 2001.
6) Chandra D., Gupta R. para 1.L. and jain S.K. Auto calcium silicate bricks from different mining and
industrial wastes. Page 8.
010201 www.ijiird.com 4