Triaxial Compression Test
Triaxial Compression Test
Triaxial Compression Test
Compression Test
Introduction
The following discussion is taken directly from Holtz and Kovacs (198 1). During the early history of soil
mechanics, the direct shear test was the most popular shear test.
Then, about 1930, A. Casagrande while at M.I.T. began research on the development of cylindrical
compression tests in an attempt to overcome some of the serious disadvantages of the direct shear test. Now
this test, commonly called the triaxial test, is by far the more popular of the two. The triaxial test is much more
complicated than the direct shear but also much more versatile. We can control the drainage quite well, and
there is no rotation of the principal stresses like the direct shear test. Stress concentrations still exist, but they
are significantly less than in the direct shear test. Also the failure plane can occur anywhere. An added
advantage: we can control the stress paths to failure reasonably well, which means that complex stress paths in
the field can more effectively be modeled in the laboratory with the triaxial test. Drainage conditions or paths
followed in the triaxial test are models of specific critical design situations required for the analysis of stability
in engineering practice. These are commonly designated by a two-letter symbol. The first letter refers to what
happens before shear--that is, whether the specimen is consolidated. The second letter refers to the drainage
conditions during shear.
The test you will be performing in lab is a consolidated - drained (CD) triaxial test. This test is typically used
for stability analysis of granular soils under constant (or long term) loading conditions, such as the stability of a
retaining wall after construction.
PRINCIPLES OF THE TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
The triaxial compression test is used to measure the shear strength of a soil under controlled drainage conditions.
In the conventional triaxial test, a cylindrical specimen of soil encased in a rubber membrane is placed in a triaxial
compression chamber, subjected to a confining fluid pressure, and then loaded axially to failure. Connections at the
ends of the specimen permit controlled drainage of pore water from the specimen. The test is called "triaxial"
because the three principal stresses are assumed to be known and are controlled. Prior to shear, the three principal
stresses are equal to the chamber fluid pressure. During shear, the major principal stress, 1 is equal to the applied
axial stress (P/A) plus the chamber pressure, 3.
The applied axial stress, (1- 3) is termed the "principal stress difference" or sometimes the "deviator stress". The
intermediate principal stress, 2 and the minor principal stress, 3 are identical in the test, and are equal to the
confining or chamber pressure hereafter referred to as 3.
Comparison Of The Triaxial And The Direct Shear Test
The advantages of the triaxial test over the direct shear test are:
§ Progressive effects are less in the triaxial.
§ The measurement of specimen volume changes are more accurate in the triaxial.
§ The complete state of stress is assumed to be known at all stages during the triaxial test, whereas only the
stresses at failure are known in the direct shear test.
§ The triaxial machine is more adaptable to special requirements.
The advantages of the direct shear test are:
§ Direct shear machine is simpler and faster to operate.
§ A thinner soil sample is used in the direct shear test, thus facilitating drainage of the pore water from a saturated
specimen. See Section 10.5 in Holtz and Kovacs (1981) for additional comments about these types of tests.
Equipment:
A-load equipment
1- Mechanical load frame of 10 kN capacity is suitable, either hand operated or machine driven capable of providing platen
speed in the range (0.5-4) mm/minute.
2- load measuring ring of 5 kN, which has a calibration factor in (kN/division).
3- Dial gauge, 25 mm travel reading to 0.01 mm sensitivity.
Dial gauge
load measuring ring
Mechanical load frame
B-Triaxial cell
where dt is the average diameter based on the two top measurements and taking into account membrane thickness, etc.
Compute the corresponding value of initial sample area A0 using the average diameter just computed.
15. Place the lucite cylinder on the cell base. Be sure the base is free of soil grains so that an airtight seal can be obtained.
Place the cell in the compression machine.
16. Fill the chamber with water through the cell chamber line with the bleed off valve at the top of the chamber open.
17. Attach pressure line to the cell chamber line and slowly apply a cell pressure of 20-30 kPa while slowly decreasing the
vacuum. Disconnect the top specimen drainage line from the vacuum and connect to a burette.
18. To saturate the specimen, slowly flow water through the bottom specimen drainage line until the sample and the top
specimen drainage line are saturated.
19. The water level in the burette should be brought to a reading about the midpoint of its scale in order that either
expansions or contractions can be measured. (Water can be added to the burette during the test if necessary.)
20. Raise the chamber pressure to 50 kPa.
21. When the chamber pressure is applied, it can be seen that the load dial deflects slightly due to the difference
between the weight of the load piston and the upward chamber pressure on the piston base. Carefully lower the
piston until the load dial just flickers as recontact of the piston and soil specimen is made. Now set the load dial
to zero to approximately tare the system for the weight of the load piston and the pressure acting on its base so
that the load dial readings are the actual (stress difference) loads being applied to the soil specimen.
22. Attach a deformation dial (reading to 0.001 in. or 0.0025mm) to the piston so that the deformation of the sample
can be obtained. Set the dial gauge to zero; then very carefully manually compress and release the dial plunger
several times and observe the zero reading. Readjust the dial gauge to zero if necessary. Recheck the load dial for
zero reading. Recheck the chamber-pressure gauge.
23. Set the compression machine to the desired strain rate (between 0.02 and 0.1 mm/min, as specified by the
instructor).
24. Turn on the compression machine. For the first 2% of axial strain, take a set of readings about every 0.2% of
strain. For the rest of the test, take readings every 0.5% to 1% strain. Time observations need only be made
every third or fourth set of regular readings. Load dial, deformation dial, and burette readings must be taken at
each regular reading.
25. Continue the test until an axial strain of about 20% is reached. Note: It is possible to run a multi-stage triaxial test (a test
at more than one confining pressure). This saves time in specimen and apparatus setup, etc., and eliminates some of the
variability associated with obtaining a failure envelope with three different specimens. If a multi-stage test is to be run,
the steps are the same until this point (step 25). At this point, the test is carried out not until 20% strain, but until the
compressive force remains constant for two readings. At this point, strain is stopped, and the cell pressure is raised to a
higher level (the second desired cell pressure). Step 24 is then repeated until, once again, two consecutive load readings
are the same. At this point, the cell pressure is raised once again, and the specimen sheared. For the final cell pressure
applied, the test should be carried out to approximately 20% strain.
26. Apply a vacuum of 50 + kPa through the top specimen drainage line, at the same time you lower the cell pressure.
27. Drain the chamber water.
28. Disassemble the apparatus (removing the chamber nuts one-half to one revolution at a time).
29. Sketch the failed specimen. On the sketch, dimension the maximum and minimum diameters, the length of the
specimen, and the angle of inclination of the failure plane, if there is one.
30. Release the vacuum and remove the specimen.