ICOD Zim SRHR GUIDELINES - Final
ICOD Zim SRHR GUIDELINES - Final
ICOD Zim SRHR GUIDELINES - Final
Cover Photo: Adolescent Girls with Disabilities during SRHR Guide consultation at M Hugo High School of the Blind
i
Copyright © 2020 ICOD Zimbabwe
Recommended citation
Institute for Community Development Zimbabwe (2020) Guidelines for providing services to address
sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) for women and girls with disabilities in Zimbabwe.
©Photography
All photos are courtesy of ICOD Zim. All photographs taken with participants involvement were on
a voluntary and consent basis. Other photographs are publicly available on the World Wide Web
and are appropriately acknowledged.
ii
Abbreviations/Acronyms
ANC Ante Natal Care
ASRH Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
CBD Community-Based Distribution
CBR Community-Based Rehabilitation
CEDAW Convention on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women
CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child
CRPD. United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
DPOs Disabled Persons’ Organizations
FP Family Planning
HIV & AIDS Human Immuno Virus
HPV Human Papilloma Virus
ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
ICESCR The International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights
ICPD The International Conference on Population and Development
ICT Information & Communication Technologies
MoHCC Ministry of Health and Child Care
M&E Monitoring & Evaluation
MISP Minimum Initial Service Package
MNH Maternal and Neonatal health
NASCOH National Association of Societies for the Care of the Handicapped
NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations
PNC Post Natal Care
RH Reproductive Health
SDGs Sustainable Development Goals
SGBV Sexual and Gender Based Violence
SGBV Sexual and gender based violence
SRHR Sexual Reproductive Health Rights
iii
STIs Sexually Transmitted Infections
UHC Universal Health Coverage
UNDP United Nations Development Fund
UNFPA, United Nations Population Fund
UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
WGWD Women and Girls With Disabilities
WHO The World Health Organization
iv
Acknowledgements
The development of this guideline was made successful b the cooperation of the development partners of
ICOD- Zimbabwe. We would like to mention the invaluable support of the various disabled persons
organizations who under the auspices of the NASCOH, the coordinating body, participated in the
consultative processes
The work was also made possible by the generous funding that we received from…..our partner
We would also like to acknowledge the entire staff of the Institute for Community Development in
Zimbabwe (ICOD Zimbabwe) for supporting this exercise. The team was ably led by Ms. Talent Maphosa
the Director of ICOD Zimbabwe
Our appreciation goes to Andrew Chimatira, our consultant for facilitating and developing this model SRHR
Guideline for Women and Girls with Disability (WGWDs) in Zimbabwe.
v
Table of Contents
Abbreviations/Acronyms .................................................................................................................. iii
Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................ v
3.0 Inclusive Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Practice ........................................9
Table 4: Strategies/Actions to ensure the uptake of Maternal and New-born Health by WGWDs ... 15
Table 5: Strategies/Actions to ensure the uptake of information, testing, and treatment services for
STIs, including HIV/AIDS for WGWD ................................................................................................... 18
Table 6: Strategies/Actions to ensure the uptake of cervical screening for WGWD .......................... 19
3.7 Sexual and Gender Based Violence (SGBV) services for WGWDs..................................................... 20
Table 7: Strategies/Actions to ensure the uptake of GBV service for WGWD ................................... 21
vi
3. 8 Inclusive SRHR in disasters and crises (e.g. COVID-19) .................................................................... 22
Table 8: Strategies/Actions to ensure the uptake of cervical screening for WGWD .......................... 23
List of Tables
vii
Section A:
1.1 Introduction
The Institute for Community Development in Zimbabwe (ICOD Zim) is a non-partisan, not for profit
organisation formed and led by women for women. ICOD Zim seeks to promote and advance women’s
rights and pays special attention to women with disabilities. The organisation aims to empower
women in their diversities economically, politically and socially through amplifying their voices in all
local and national processes, creating platforms for engagement, advocacy and capacity building. The
organisation focuses on creating platforms and community centred interventions which support
women to access comprehensive Sexual Reproductive Health (SRHR) services and products, counter
violence or overcome discrimination by providing counselling or legal aid, promoting democracy and
good governance.
According to World Development Indicators, around 15% of the world population over 15 years old
are persons with disabilities. Of the global population, it is estimated that approximately 3.8% live
with severe impairments, such as blindness or paraplegia; 80% of all persons with disabilities live in
developing countries. Poverty is both a cause and a consequence of disability. Across the world,
disability is more prevalent among women, older people and poor population groups. Persons with
disabilities are also more likely to experience stigma and discrimination (WHO/World Bank 2011).
Thus, disability is both a development and a human-rights issue.
Guidelines
The development of a comprehensive Sexual Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) guideline for
women and girls with disabilities is informed by the desire to provide practical guidance to ensure
that SRHR services give full effect to the rights of women and girls with disabilities.
‘Person with a disability’ is the person-first language used by the United Nations (UN) Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).
The CRPD explains that: “Persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical,
mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder
their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others”. This Guideline mimics
the use of person-first language utilized by the CRPD.
The CRPD marks a shift from viewing persons with disabilities primarily as recipients of charity,
medical treatment, special services and social protection towards recognizing them as “rights-
holders” and active members of society. It defines disability as an
1
“evolving concept, resulting from the interaction between impairments and attitudinal and
environment barriers that hinders their full and effective participation in society on an equal
basis with others” (CRPD Preamble).
These Guidelines address service delivery for people with all forms of physical, intellectual, mental,
psychosocial, cognitive or sensory impairments. These Guidelines employ the social and human
rights model of disability, which “focuses on the high barriers created by the environment (rather
than by bodily impairment), including in physical, information and communication contexts, the
attitudes and prejudices of society, policies and practices of governments, and the often-exclusionary
structures of health, welfare, education and other systems”.
The aim of this guideline is to provide hands-on guidance to ensure that the rights of women and girls
with disabilities are fully integrated and understood in the provision of SRHR services by providers
in Zimbabwe. The guidelines also serve as a tool for advocacy by PWDs and Disabled Persons’
Organizations (DPOs) when negotiating their rights and inclusion in national programmes.
The document makes practical and consistent suggestions for making SRHR services more inclusive
and open to women and girls with disabilities and for prioritizing strategies to meet their unique
needs for disabilities.
Although SRHR service providers and support staff are the primary audience of this guideline, they
are also intended as a valuable resource for all stakeholders, including those involved in the design,
development, implementation or advocacy of SRHR or SGBV programmes for PWDs/WGWDs,
including those in government, local authorities and the broader civil society.
The Guideline is grounded in international human rights standards and is the result of extensive
consultations with women and girls with disability, local disability service organizations, and SRHR
service providers. The guidelines have adopted and adapted relevant information from many
resources (annex)
2
Expected outcomes and
indicators
Making inclusive SRH Strategies for making inclusive SRH sustainable
sustainable
Cross cutting Issues – Integrating disability sensitive Monitoring & Evaluation in
programmes
Important documents Resource materials for use by stakeholders including government,
and Tools civil society and other interested parties
3
Section B:
The Guidelines employ the social and human rights model of disability, which “focuses on the high
barriers created by the environment (rather than by bodily impairment), including in physical
structure, information and communication contexts, the attitudes and prejudices of society, policies
and practices of governments, and the often-exclusionary structures of health, welfare, education and
other systems”.
The CRPD entered into force in 2008 and has been ratified by many countries including Zimbabwe.
The convention moved away from the medical model of disability whose focus was on the
impairments of persons and their remediable nature to a social model of disability which is widened
and comprises the barriers persons with disabilities encounter. The new understanding of disability
fostered by the code thus is “Persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical,
mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder
their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others” (Part. 1)
The CRPD expands the scope of the existing human rights system: first the concept of accessibility is
further developed as a wide variety of impairments and societal barriers are taken into account. In
addition, the principle of “Respect for difference and acceptance of persons with disabilities as part
of human diversity and humanity” (Part. 3) marks a generally positive approach towards persons
with disabilities.
Persons with disabilities have long been seen as passive recipients of aid, often reduced to their
impairment-related health needs. A human rights-based approach to disability implies that all people
are active subjects with legal claims and that persons with disabilities need to participate in all
spheres of society on an equal basis with their non-disabled peers.
A right based approach calls for programming that addresses the multiple barriers to the inclusion
of persons with disabilities – physical, attitudinal and communication barriers. As these barriers can
be found in all sectors and at all levels, a human rights-based approach to disability is relevant for
programmes in a variety of sectors, including health, infrastructure, water and sanitation, education,
social protection, employment, economic development or governance.
4
With the entering into force of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the issue
of disability is now firmly established as a human rights issue. Persons with disabilities are facing a
range of discrimination and exclusion and their rights are only rarely taken into account by
development cooperation. Yet including persons with disabilities in development efforts is a crucial
part of respecting human rights.
Strategies
Programmes can promote the respect for persons with disabilities through developing and
designing: -
2. Ensuring accessibility
The CRPD defines accessibility as a general principle (Part. 3) and a stand-alone right (Part. 9) and
mentions it in many other rights. It thus recognises that removing the multiple barriers to access in
society is a key requirement for the inclusion of persons with disabilities. There are four dimensions
of accessibility:
physical accessibility,
information and communication accessibility,
institutional accessibility, and
economic accessibility
5
Information and communication accessibility: providing information that can be read or
understood by persons with disabilities; accepting and facilitating the use of sign language, Braille,
plain language, barrier-free documents and other alternative modes of communication.
Institutional accessibility: ensuring equal access to justice, property and financial services, social
services (e.g. in the health or education sector), as well as social protection and poverty reduction
programmes.
4. Promoting and ensuring the rights of children with disabilities: In many countries, the
capabilities of children and youth with disabilities are not recognised and their views not taken into
account. They are often denied access to education or vocational training and are more vulnerable to
violence and abuse than their non-disabled peers. The CRPD puts a three-fold focus on the need to
respect the identity and evolving capacities of children with disabilities, to protect them and to
include them fully in society.
Strategies
Development organisations should make sure that the voices of children and youth with
disabilities are heard.
Inclusion-Programmes working specifically on children and youth, in areas such as legal
protection, child health, primary and secondary education or community development
should make sure that young people with disabilities are included in the activities.
6
5. Promoting and ensuring participation and empowerment of persons with disabilities:
Participation is both a means (participatory approach) and an aim (the right to participate). It entails
empowering rights-holders such as persons with disabilities to articulate their expectations towards
the State and other duty bearers, and to claim their rights. This principle is summarised in the central
slogan of the disability rights movement “Nothing about us without us”. In this way, participation
goes beyond a methodology for quality programming and becomes the central idea of disability-
inclusive programming.
Strategies
Provide resources and develop the capacity of persons with disabilities and their
organisations to participate in decision-making processes at local, regional and national level
in a meaningful way.
Participatory mechanisms like encouraging government and partners to involve disabled
people’s organisations whenever the local population is consulted.
6. Strengthening accountability: Accountability can be defined as the process which requires duty-
bearers to show, explain and justify how they have discharged their obligations. There are several
types of accountability mechanisms, ranging from judicial mechanisms (e.g. obliging the government
to review discriminatory laws) and administrative mechanisms (e.g. complaint mechanisms enabling
persons with disabilities to file grievances) to social mechanisms (e.g. involvement of civil society in
budget monitoring).
Accountability can be fostered both by enhancing the capacity of persons with disabilities to hold
their governments accountable, and by strengthening or establishing disability-inclusive
accountability mechanisms. Monitoring is a crucial part of accountability enabling the measuring and
checking of whether governments or development programmes are complying with human rights
obligations and determining the impact of activities on persons with disabilities.
The rights-based approach will work when the following points are considered:
• Small steps count: Starting with those steps towards inclusion which are most relevant and
feasible for your situation.
• Trust your creativity: Come up with simple and creative solutions that contribute to strengthening
the rights of persons with disabilities, rather than looking for a silver bullet that might use up too
many resources.
• Involve your leadership: Ask the leadership of your organisation to serve as an example for
disability inclusion and to lead from the top.
• Let persons with disabilities help you: Consider participation as a way to improve your work and
ask the people who are experts on disability that is PWDs themselves.
• Celebrate your successes: Help change attitudes towards persons with disabilities by sharing the
positive experiences that you had through implementing inclusive activities.
The human rights-based approach to disability is not an add-on activity, but fundamentally changes
the way in which development organisations plan and implement their programmes. It contributes
7
to a more open, more inclusive and more effective development cooperation and thus benefits not
only persons with disabilities, but society as a whole.
The CRPD considers awareness-raising as a key measure to enhance respect for and acceptance of
persons with disabilities.
Article 8 of the CRPD states that State Parties undertake to adopt immediate, effective and
appropriate measures:
a) To raise awareness throughout society, including at the family level, regarding persons with
disabilities, and to foster respect for the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities;
b) To combat stereotypes, prejudices and harmful practices relating to persons with disabilities,
including those based on sex and age, in all areas of life;
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) provide a model to allow people with
disabilities to better integrate socially and economically into their communities by supporting
personal access to information and knowledge, learning and teaching situations, personal
communication and interaction and access to other services including SRHR.
Capacity Development
Individual capacity building is critical for PWDs, their families and support networks because it
enhances their knowledge and skill potential to bring about personal change and contribute to
change at a broader level.
It is also critical to build capacity of service providers like healthcare workers, police and justice
departments as well as disability services programmers so they can be able to deliver appropriate
services and overcome stigma and discrimination or selective service.
8
Section C: Practical guide –
Women and girls with disabilities have the same right to reproductive and sexual health as persons
without disabilities, but they are regularly excluded from services necessary to achieve their
reproductive and sexual health because of a variety of factors.
Reproductive health refers to the “state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, not
merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the reproductive system and to
its functions and processes.
Barriers
WGWD encounter legal and practical barriers to SRHR information and services and the common
barriers include lack of training or awareness raising among service providers and support staff on
how to serve persons with disabilities
Increased Risk
Lack of access to vital information and resources on SRHR increases women and young people with
disabilities' susceptibility to sexual assault, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), unintended
pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes (mother and baby) and denies them the right to the highest
attainable level of sexual and reproductive health.
In addition to being excluded from these critical health services, women and young persons with
disabilities are often subject to coercive healthcare practices and medical procedures, as well as
disrespectful and abusive treatment. Substituted decision-making systems, in particular, have been
associated with heightened rates of abuse of persons with disabilities, allowing parents or
guardians to subject women and young persons with disabilities to medical procedures against
their will.
9
The guidance in this section is organized according to different SRHR services that women and young
persons with disabilities may require. To ensure a continuum of care across all areas of SRHR services
for women and young persons with disabilities, each of these service-area subsections should be read
in conjunction with the other subsections.
GUIDANCE
SRHR incorporates liberties, such as the freedom to make decisions about whether and when to
reproduce free from coercion or violence, and entitlements, such as access to the full range of
essential SRHR services
WGWD have rights to:
receive SRHR services as equal citizens in a dignified and respectable manner
to be informed, have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family
planning, including methods for regulation of fertility, which are not against the law,
of access to appropriate healthcare services to enable women to have a safe pregnancy and
childbirth and provide couples with the best chance of having a healthy infant
The disabled persons act (1992) was enacted to make provision for the welfare and rehabilitation
of disabled persons; to provide for the appointment and functions of a Director for Disabled
Persons’ Affairs and the establishment and functions of a National Disability Board; and to provide
for matters connected with or incidental to the foregoing
A key foundation of the right to health—and therefore the right to sexual and reproductive
health—is the obligation to make health-related information, goods and services available;
accessible; acceptable; and of good quality. The state is obligated to respect, protect, and fulfil
SRHR.
Available, meaning that information, goods, and services exist in sufficient quantity across a
country. This includes having enough trained service providers and appropriate healthcare
facilities equitably distributed.
Accessible, meaning the information, goods, and services can be used by all persons with
disabilities. The requirement of accessibility includes physical accessibility, economic accessibility,
and information accessibility.
Acceptable, meaning that health information, goods and services conform to ethical standards, are
culturally respectful, sensitive to the gender and disability needs of the individual, and respectful of
a person’s privacy and confidentiality.
Quality, meaning that health information, goods and services are scientifically and medically
appropriate and delivered by trained personnel in a respectful and rights-based manner
The UN CRPD underlined that States must ensure that women with disabilities can exercise their
legal capacity particularly in regard to decisions relating to their SRHR, including their right to
found a family and raise their children.
Ensure that adolescents, particularly adolescent girls with disabilities, do not face barriers to
“commodities, information and counselling on SRHR, such as requirements for third-party
consent or authorization”.
11
Review legislation with a view to guaranteeing the best interests of pregnant adolescents and
ensure that their views are always heard and respected”.
Strategies/Actions
Outcome
1. increase in awareness to disability rights by DPOs/WGWD and health care service providers
Indicators
WGWDs require family planning services that are both effective and useful. These services must be
provided in a respectful and non-discriminatory manner and must be accessible by all persons that
require them.
Strategies/Actions
The following practical steps need to be taken to ensure the uptake of SRHR by WGWDs
Outcomes
Indicators
1. Proportion of WGWDs who accessed family planning services by type of disability and age
14
3.4 Maternal and Newborn Health
Issues: WGWD frequently encounter substandard care, including discrimination and abusive
treatment, when accessing maternal and new-born health services. Negative attitudes about
women with disabilities having and raising children can deter them from utilizing these vital
services. They also often lack access to information about maternal and new-born healthcare and
services
The following practical steps need to be taken to ensure the uptake of Maternal and new-born
Health by WGWDs
-to increase awareness about men’s role in facilitating access to maternal and
new-born health services, as well as care and support during the perinatal period )
Involve PWDs in MNH policy/strategy formulation consultations
Information & Avail MNH information in accessible formats including
communication Appropriate print
technologies (ICT) Braille
Sign language
Digital and audio formats
Appropriate software
Capacity Training of healthcare workers to provide MNH services to
development WGWDs
Ethical service provision training
Non-discrimination and stigma reduction
15
Service delivery Ensure that essential MNH services are available to WGWDs
during pregnancy, childbirth, and the time immediately after
birth, as quality care during this period is critical for reducing
maternal, foetal, and neonatal death and injuries, and maintaining
well-being
Services must be provided in disability friendly facilities and
rooms(disability friendly delivery beds/bathroom and ramps)
Non-discriminatory service provision
ANC/Delivery/PNC registers and records must also disaggregate
by disability and type
Financial support for pregnant WGWDs during
ANC/Delivery/PNC (Advocate for comprehensive health
insurance and other social protection programmes)
Ensure waiting mothers’ shelters are available and accessible to
WGWDs.
designing culturally, disability, and gender-sensitive antenatal
classes
Ensure that women with disabilities can be accompanied by a
companion of their choice at birth
Outcomes
Issues: WGWD are often stereotyped as not being at risk for STIs and barriers to accessing STI
services can result in women and young persons with disabilities being excluded from such
16
services. Individuals living with HIV, who may or may not self-identify as a PWDs, are also at risk of
violations of their SRHR.
Women and young persons with disabilities are often excluded from information campaigns
about STIs due to a variety of factors, including stereotypes, isolation, and the inaccessible
nature of some public education campaigns.
Stereotypes around the sexuality of women and young persons with disabilities, including
stereotypes that they are asexual, not sexually active, or not sexually desirable, can lead service
providers and support staff to assume that they are not at risk of contracting STIs. As a result,
service providers often fail to provide women and young persons with disabilities with
information about STI prevention methods (such as HPV vaccines or use of condoms) or to
inform them about or offer them tests for STIs as part of routine healthcare visits.
Some family members or caregivers of women and young persons with disabilities do not want
them to learn about sexual and reproductive health, including STIs, for fear it will increase their
sexual activity.
Lack of disability-sensitive regulations and protocols for pre-and post-exposure for
victims/survivors of rape can exclude women and young persons with disabilities from
prophylactic treatment or STI testing, increasing their vulnerability to contracting STIs and
resulting in STIs going undetected and untreated.
When a woman or a young person with a disability is found to have an STI, service providers
often fail to counsel that woman or young person on how the diagnosis affects other areas of
their SRHR, such as how to have sex safely or how to plan for pregnancy.
Communication barriers can deny women and young persons with disabilities access to
essential counselling and psychological support when making decisions to undergo STI testing,
treatment, and prevention.
Poverty, physical barriers to STI testing facilities, and isolation can prevent women and young
persons with disabilities from accessing STI testing, treatment, and other related services.
The following practical steps need to be taken to ensure the uptake of information, testing, and
treatment services for STIs, including HIV/AIDS for WGWD
Outcomes
18
Issues: WGWDs are under screened for cervical cancer compared with the general population,
likely because, in part, of both emotional and physical challenges associated with Pap testing.
Women with certain disabilities often require an examination under anaesthesia to undergo a
speculum examination. However, anaesthesia is not without risks and the perioperative experience
can be burdensome to patients and caregivers.
Guidance
The WHO (2014) Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to essential practice
Cervical cancer is one of the greatest threats worldwide to women’s lives. The primary cause of
cervical cancer is persistent or chronic infection with one or more of the high-risk types of human
papillomavirus (HPV). Preventing HPV through vaccination is fundamental to curbing cervical
cancer. Service providers must ensure that women and adolescent girls with disabilities have
access to the vaccine. All adolescent girls should receive the vaccine before initiating sexual activity.
Service providers must also be sure to offer the vaccine to women with disabilities who may have
missed out on receiving the vaccine as an adolescent. Since the vaccine does not protect against all
types of HPV, and many women with disabilities may not have received the vaccine before the onset
of sexual activity, service providers should screen all adolescent girls and women with disabilities
for cervical cancer
1. Ensure that programmes are tailored to serve populations of women and young persons with
disabilities who may be even more vulnerable to cervical cancer screening
2. Train women and young persons with disabilities to become peer or community health
educators and foster the development of support groups.
3. Train service providers and support staff and implement safeguards to guarantee privacy and
confidentiality of cervical cancer screening. Ensure results are given in private, unless the
4. Develop education programmes for family members and caregivers to understand the
importance of cervical cancer screening
The following practical steps need to be taken to ensure the uptake of cervical screening for WGWD
Outcomes
Indicators
Percentage of women and young persons with disabilities who received cervical cancer
screening tests and get the results within the past year.
Breast, uterine, pelvic, and cervical cancer identification protocols explicitly include women
and adolescent girls with disabilities
3.7 Sexual and Gender Based Violence (SGBV) services for WGWDs
Issues: WGWDs experience the same forms of GBV as individuals without disabilities. However,
they also experience unique forms of GBV as a result of their disability, such as sexual abuse by a
caregiver; withholding of medication or an assistive device; purposefully substandard care; denial
of necessities like food, toileting, or grooming; control of sensory devices; financial control;
restriction of communication devices control of sensory devices; financial control; restriction of
communication devices
Lack of accessible prevention initiatives may prevent WGWDs from being screened, recognized or
reported for GBV. GBV prevention programmes for persons with disabilities are underfunded,
limiting the effectiveness of and access to critical programs for women and young persons with
disabilities at risk of GBV.
Guidance
20
The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, General Recommendation No.
19: Violence against Women (Eleventh Session, 1992)
Established that GBV is a form of gender-based discrimination that violates fundamental rights,
including:
The right to be free from GBV, protected in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities (CRPD
The right to equality and non-discrimination, protected in the CRPD, and CEDAW.
The right to life, protected in the CRPD
The right to be free from torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment, protected in the CRPD
The right to be free from practices that harm women and young persons with disabilities,
protected in CRPD,
The right to equality before the law and access to justice, protected in the CRPD.
The right to protection and safety for persons with disabilities in situations of risk, including
humanitarian emergencies, protected in the CRPD.
States have specific obligations under international human rights law to prevent, protect against,
investigate, punish, and redress GBV—obligations that are collectively referred to as a State’s due
diligence obligations
Strategies/Actions
The following practical steps need to be taken to ensure the uptake of GBV service for WGWD
Indicators
Guidance
Humanitarian Emergencies—WGWD Access to Health Information and Services
The Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for Reproductive Health is a set of priority
interventions that is designed to “reduce mortality, morbidity and disability among populations
affected by crises, particularly women and girls. The MISP contains guidelines for providing
coordinated RH services during the earliest phases of an emergency (natural disaster or man-
made) and guides the planning for comprehensive RH services when the situation has stabilized.
ASRH programmes should engage other sectors to ensure that health staff, adolescents, community
members, and other humanitarian actors are aware of the rights of adolescents, particularly as they
22
relate to RH. All efforts should be made to ensure that adolescents, including marginalized groups
and those with disabilities, have access to RH information and services and that they are not
subjected to human-rights violations. Suspected or known violations of adolescents’ human rights
during an acute emergency or while providing comprehensive RH services, should be reported
Strategies/Actions
The following practical steps need to be taken to ensure the uptake of cervical screening for WGWD
Outcomes
Indicators
23
Section D:
4.1 Introduction
SRHR are the cornerstones of universal health coverage (UHC). Investing in SRHR is cost-effective
and affordable. Gender barriers to accessing UHC must be addressed in order to achieve the right to
health and the achievement of the SDGs, ensure universal access to SRHR and eliminate preventable
maternal mortality and gender-based violence. UHC programmes around the world include SRHR
and have demonstrated that this approach can improve affordability and save lives.
4.2 Strategies
Community-Based Rehabilitation
The CRPD specifies the right of persons with disabilities to live within their communities (Art. 19).
Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR) focuses on enhancing the quality of life for people with
disabilities and their families; meeting basic needs; and ensuring inclusion and participation. It is a
multi-sectoral strategy that empowers persons with disabilities to access and benefit from education,
employment, health and social services.
It is a strategy within general community development targeted on rehabilitation, equalization of
opportunities and social inclusion of all children and adults with disabilities. CBR is implemented
through the combined efforts of PWDs themselves, their families and communities, and the
appropriate health, education, vocational and social services. CBR has developed from a medical
approach to one based on the human rights of persons with disabilities. Thus the focus of CBR has
evolved from medical rehabilitation towards more comprehensive multi-sector approaches such as
access to health care, education, vocational training, income generation programmes and community
participation and inclusion. Again it is essential to have (i) the direct participation of PWDs in
planning and implementation of CBR programmes, (ii) increased collaboration between sectors
providing services, and (iii) government support in development of national policies. CBR is an
essential component of community development
24
Figure 1: CBR Matrix (Source: Toolkit on Disability for Africa-Inclusive health services for persons with disability)
25
SECTION E:
Data on the rate at which PWDs use health services is often not readily available in Zimbabwe. The
uptake of SRHR by persons with disabilities is rarely measured. General surveys do not fully or
consistently disaggregate data on disability in such a way that a distinct analysis of the social,
economic and demographic factors relating to disability in health services can be made. The CRPD
(article 31) requires States to collect appropriate information, including statistical and research
data, to enable them to formulate and implement policies to give effect to inclusive health services
and other rights guaranteed in the treaty.
The purposes for measuring disability are to be able to generate evidence for programme planning
and decision making. It is necessary to measure disability to inform:-
• Provision of services
• Monitoring the functioning of the population
• Assessing the equality of opportunities for persons with disabilities and persons without
disabilities
Providing Services. One reason for collecting data on disability is to design and implement
services for persons with disabilities — either via special programmes for them, or by making
general programmes more inclusive. Estimating the need for services requires collecting
information that serves for eligibility determination. But, beyond that, the need exists for gathering
information on the specific types of services required and the specific barriers limiting the delivery
of those services, such as: what types and what quantities of assistive devices, trained personnel
and distribution systems are needed.
Monitoring the Functioning of the Population. Monitoring can also take place at various levels of
functioning — body function, activity or participation — depending on the goal of the monitoring. A
government might want to assess the scope of potential concerns relating to disability. Monitoring
body functioning pertains more to programmes designed for the prevention of impairments
associated with disability. This requires less detailed information than providing for services.
Equalization of Opportunities. The third main reason for collecting data on disability is to track
whether society is becoming more inclusive; that is to determine whether the opportunity gap
between persons with disabilities and those without disabilities is closing. One may want to see if
and to what extent participation of persons with disabilities is limited because of an inaccessible
and disabling environment.
26
5.2 Mainstreaming disability data collection
A key issue in the collection of disability data is the extent to which the data needs can be met by
integrating disability information into existing surveys and censuses and the extent to which
special modules or even special disability surveys are required. Mainstreaming the collection of
disability data has several important advantages.
First, it allows the disaggregation of existing indicators that are well understood. Second, it
effectively reduces the cost of collecting disability data by only adding a disability module into
existing tools. And third, it provides a signal that the considerations of persons with disabilities are
a core policy issue, rather than being tangential and suitable only for special surveys. Nevertheless,
there are times when a special disability survey may be required. The government may wish to
obtain information that goes beyond what is appropriate for existing instruments. Maybe the
desired information is too detailed, and thus would require excessive space when using the data
tool. Sometimes a different sample is needed to disaggregate results by type of disability or some
other sub-population characteristic.
Finally, some indicators may be expected to change slowly, and are thus not required to be
collected as regularly as some core economic or social indicators. For example, the key barriers to
employment may not change much on a yearly basis, so information on those barriers should only
be collected every few years. For these reasons, there are times when a special disability survey is
required — or a special module on disability that can be included with ongoing survey instruments
— but only at certain periodic intervals
The key indicator for monitoring SRHR services for WGWDs is the proportion of WGWDs who
access SRHR services compared to women and girls without disabilities.
Definition
The proportion of females aged 15–49 with disabilities who report having accessed any type of
sexual or reproductive health services of the government and civil society, including informational
services and/or the provision of health services during the past year.
Various indicators can be developed to monitor different aspects of SRHR service provisions. The
indicators mentioned in the guidance will be a starting point.
The starting point for improving the disability-sensitivity of an M&E system is to conduct a rapid
assessment of each of its component parts from a disability perspective. This can be done by way of
a rapid assessment by asking managers of M&E systems the following questions for each of the 12
components of the UNAIDS organizing framework of a functional M&E system;
Is there an M&E policy that explicitly articulates the goal of identifying disability-based
health inequalities?
Does the M&E staff have the capacity to generate, compile, analyse, interpret and
disseminate data that captures disability-based inequalities in SRH or HIV?
Are there partnerships in place with stakeholder organizations that are working on, have
expertise in and/or can advocate for disability equality, including researchers,
nongovernmental women’s rights organizations, other civil society organizations (for
example, women living with HIV, youth groups), or disability focal points in different
ministries and international agencies?
Are such stakeholder groups consulted by or included in advisory bodies of M&E units?
Is the national M&E plan for the particular health topic (for example, SRH or HIV) aligned
with national disability equality priorities and with global commitments such as the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) or the Convention on Elimination of Discrimination
against Women (CEDAW)?
Does the M&E plan include targets for both women and men/girls and boys and subgroups
among them?
Are there resources allocated in the M&E plan for gathering and analysing data: a) on the
different situations of women and men, including health inequalities and disability
inequality as social determinant of health; b) for monitoring how programmes are meeting
the specific needs of women and men and promoting disability equality?
Does the communication and advocacy in relation to the M&E data include explicit
reference to developing messages and undertaking advocacy for disability equality based
on data?
28
Are there efforts to sensitize service providers and programmes staff to the importance of
sex-disaggregated data for monitoring disability-based health inequalities?
Are there mechanisms or processes in place to ensure that data remain disaggregated as
they are compiled and reported from the local level to the national level?
Are data disaggregated by other variables (such as age, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity)
generated, as appropriate, in epidemiological surveillance and population-based surveys?
Are sources of data that provide direct information about disability equality as a
determinant of health included in the surveillance system?
Is there ability to triangulate data across different databases (for example, health, national
social statistics about disability inequality) and different types of data sources, both
quantitative and qualitative?
Are data quality audits undertaken to check for disaggregated data at various levels and to
ensure data quality and timeliness?
Do supervision and accountability measures support the inclusion of disability in the M&E
systems?
Does the national research agenda include topics related to disability inequality in the
context of SRH or HIV?
Are questions about the impact of disability inequality included in evaluation plans for SRH
and HIV programmes?
Is there an explicit plan to conduct disability analysis and to develop products that
disseminate findings about disability inequality?
Do information products of the M&E system convey a picture of how men and women are
differently affected and/or how the national response to the particular health issue is
addressing disability inequality?
Are the key findings or messages about disability-based inequalities presented in a direct,
compelling and easy to understand manner?
29
Are data regularly, widely and in a timely manner disseminated to stakeholders (for
example, through data review and dissemination workshops), especially to those
implementing programmes, making policy decisions, conducting research, and advocating
for disability equality, including women’s NGOs?
30
Section F
This section presents the major resources used for the developments of these guidelines
3. Toolkit on Disability for Africa-Inclusive health services for persons with disability
4. The African charter on human and peoples’ rights on the rights of persons with Disabilities
in Africa
6. United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).
7. UNFPA (2018)Women and Young Persons with Disabilities (Guidelines for Providing Rights-
Based and Gender-Responsive Services to Address Gender-Based Violence and Sexual and
Reproductive Health and Rights)
8. Women Enabled International
9. UNFPA, UN Women, WHO, UNDP & UNODC, Essential Services Package for Women and Girls
Subject to Violence (2016)
10. WHO & UNFPA, Promoting Sexual and Reproductive Health for Persons with Disabilities
(2009)
31
References
1. Government of Zimbabwe: Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
2. Government of Zimbabwe: Disabled Persons Act (1992): CHAPTER 17:01/ Government
Printers
3. ICPD (2013): Implementation of the Programme of Action of the International Conference
on Population and Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, USA
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): The Resource: Part II.
International Human Rights System, 3/11 (un.org)
5. UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities : resolution /
adopted by the General Assembly, 24 January 2007, A/RES/61/106
6. WHO and the World Bank (2011) World report on disability. Geneva. Available at:
http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en/index.htm
7. WHO (2014) Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to essential practice
8. Women With Disabilities Australia (WWDA) (2016) Submission to the National Inquiry into
Equal Recognition Before the Law and Legal Capacity for People With Disability - January
2014
9. Women With Disabilities Australia (WWDA)(2010) Submission to the Preparation Phase of
the UN Analytical Study on Violence against Women and Girls with Disabilities
(A/HRC/RES/17/11)
10. The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, General
Recommendation No. Violence against Women (Eleventh Session, 1992
11. UNAIDS ()2009) 12 Components Monitoring and Evaluation System Strengthening Tool.
Geneva:
12. Toolkit on Disability for Africa-Inclusive health services for persons with disability: Toolkit
on Disability for Africa | DISD (un.org)
13. UNFPA (2020)Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for SRH in Crisis Situations-
Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for SRH in Crisis Situations | UNFPA - United
Nations Population Fund
14. The Guttmacher–Lancet Commission Report (2018)-
https://www.guttmacher.org/guttmacher-lancet-commission
32