Compendium Vol. 3 - Austenitic and Martensitic SS - BARC Ext Report
Compendium Vol. 3 - Austenitic and Martensitic SS - BARC Ext Report
Compendium Vol. 3 - Austenitic and Martensitic SS - BARC Ext Report
BARC/2021/E/021
COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN NPP MATERIAL PROPERTIES
GENERATED BY RSD, BARC
VOLUME III - VERSION 1
AUSTENITIC AND MARTENSITIC STAINLESS STEELS
by
Suneel K. Gupta, Keshav Mohta, P. K. Singh, Punit Arora,
M. K. Samal, Ather Syed and J. Chattopadhyay
Reactor Safety Division
2021
BARC/2021/E/021
BARC/2021/E/021
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY
02 Distribution : External
08 Contract No. :
10 Title and subtitle : Compendium of Indian NPP material properties generated by RSD,
BARC: Volume III–Version 1 - austenitic and martensitic stainless
steels
13 Project No. :
20 Personal author(s) : Suneel K. Gupta, Keshav Mohta, P.K. Singh, Punit Arora, M.K. Samal,
Ather Syed, J. Chattopadhyay
21 Affiliation of author(s) : Reactor Safety Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai
Type : Government
Contd...
BARC/2021/E/021
53 Gives data on :
Abstract : Austenitic and martensitic stainless steels find various applications in Indian nuclear
60
reactors. Material properties such as tensile properties, creep deformation and stress-rupture
behaviours, fatigue-fracture properties of several austenitic and martensitic stainless steels, used
in Indian NPPs have been evaluated by RSD, BARC over a period of time for various
requirements. These are compiled in the present volume that covers the following materials:
(i) SS304L - High temperature tensile and creep-stress rupture properties of both base and
weld material; fracture properties of base material; (ii) SS304LN - Tensile, fatigue, fracture
and Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (FCGR) properties of both base and weld materials;
(iii) SS403 - Tensile, fatigue, fracture, FCGR and impact properties; (iv) SS316LN - Tensile
properties
99 Supplementary elements :
COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN NPP MATERIAL PROPERTIES GENERATED
BY RSD, BARC
VOLUME III - VERSION 1
AUSTENITIC AND MARTENSITIC STAINLESS STEELS
Suneel K. Gupta*, Keshav Mohta, P. K. Singh, Punit Arora, M. K. Samal, Ather Syed and
J. Chattopadhyay
Reactor Safety Division
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai-400085, India
[email protected]*
Abstract
Austenitic and martensitic stainless steels find various applications in Indian nuclear
reactors. Material properties such as tensile properties, creep deformation and stress-
rupture behaviours, fatigue-fracture properties of several austenitic and martensitic
stainless steels, used in Indian NPPs have been evaluated by RSD, BARC over a period of
time for various requirements. These are compiled in the present volume that covers the
following materials:
• SS304LN - Tensile, fatigue, fracture and Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (FCGR)
properties of both base and weld materials
1
Table.3.1. SS304L chemical composition (%)
2
3.3.2. Yield Strength, Ultimate Strength, Uniform Elongation and Strain at Rupture
The mean value of the strength and ductility properties of SS304L- yield strength, ultimate
tensile strength (σUTS), uniform elongation (%), strain at fracture (%) and reduction in
area (%) are furnished in (Table.3.2). The value of Young’s modulus has been sourced from
[2 & 3] which may be referred for more details.
3
700
600 25˚C
500
Stress (MPa)
170˚C
400
300˚C
(a) 300
425˚C
200
100 550˚C
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Strain (%)
250
700˚C
200
Stress (MPa)
150 850˚C
50
1100˚C
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Strain (%)
4
Table.3.3A. Digital data of engineering stress-strain curves(25°C- 300°C)
5
Table.3.3B. Digital data of engineering stress-strain curves (425°C- 700°C)
6
Table.3.3C. Digital data of engineering stress-strain curves (850°C- 1100°C)
7
Fig.3.4. Creep- stress rupture test specimen
0.07
0.06
0.05
(a)
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
1 10 100 1000 10000
Time (h)
8
200MPa_1 200MPa_2 200MPa_3
147MPa_1 147MPa_2 147MPa_3
0.45 108MPa_1 108MPa_2 108MPa_3
82MPa_1
0.40
0.35 700°C
Creep strain (abs.)
0.30
0.25
(b)
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Time (h)
0.30
0.25
(c)
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Time (h)
9
35MPa_2 35MPa_3 24MPa_2 24MPa_3
16MPa_1 16MPa_2 16MPa_3 11MPa_1
11MPa_2 11MPa_3
0.45
0.40 975°C
0.35
Creep strain (abs.)
0.30
(d) 0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
1 10 100
Time (h)
0.40 1100°C
0.35
0.30
(e) 0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
1 10 100 1,000
Time (h)
Fig.3.5. Creep curves at: (a) 550°C, (b) 700°C, (c) 850°C, (d) 975°C and (e) 1100°C
10
550°C_295MPa 550°C_225MPa 700°C_200MPa 700°C_147MPa
700°C_108MPa 700°C_82MPa 850°C_63MPa 850°C_44MPa
850°C_31MPa 850°C_23MPa
0.1
0.01
Creep rate (abs./h)
(a) 0.001
0.0001
0.00001
0.000001
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Normalized time (t/trupture)
0.1
Creep rate (abs./h)
0.01
(b)
0.001
0.0001
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Normalized time (t/t rupture)
Fig.3.6. Representative creep rate curves at (a) 550, 700, 850°C, (b) 975, 1100°C
3.6.3. Creep-Stress Rupture Test Results - Minimum Creep Rate, Rupture Time
Creep- stress rupture time, steady-state creep rate (also called minimum creep rate),
% elongation and % reduction in area is tabulated in (Table.3.5). Please refer [2,3 & 5] for
more details.
11
Table.3.5. Creep- stress rupture test results
Reduction in
Temp Stress Min. creep rate Rupture life Elongation
SN area
(°C) (MPa) (abs., h-1) (h) % %
1 550 369 5.3781E-04 6.9 54.7 71.7
2 550 295 6.7248E-05 691.5 15.7 13.71
3 550 295 8.3210E-05 703.75 24.7 20.26
4 550 225 3.0871E-06 10221.5 12.10 89.83
5 700 200 4.5814E-02 3.8 54.3 69.4
6 700 200 4.8031E-02 3.3 69 65.8
7 700 200 3.3068E-02 3.2 71.6 65.8
8 700 147 8.6650E-03 29.9 77.4 58.9
9 700 147 8.1644E-03 30.95 68 61.5
10 700 147 6.7826E-03 37.75 68 61
11 700 108 6.0699E-04 344 53.7 48.6
12 700 108 6.9913E-04 314.2 42.9 47.3
13 700 108 6.7588E-04 332.8 38.04 50.4
14 700 82 1.0261E-04 858 41.5 17
15 850 89 * 1.8 62.3 78
16 850 89 * 1.51 67.8 85.8
17 850 89 * 1.49 68.3 85
18 850 63 4.0339E-02 8.51 93.2 77.3
19 850 63 4.2128E-02 7.1 102.6 80.54
20 850 63 2.2304E-02 7.4 124 80.2
21 850 44 8.5232E-03 35.3 86 58.4
22 850 44 8.5498E-03 35.6 81.2 60.2
23 850 44 7.3999E-03 41.7 78 59
24 850 31 1.1946E-03 193 55 45.4
25 850 31 1.4926E-03 185.6 58 45.6
26 850 31 1.6237E-03 164.6 51 41.3
27 850 23 3.8734E-04 578 32.6 31
28 975 35 * 2 69.2 62.9
29 975 35 4.4788E-02 2.6 50.72 62.7
30 975 35 4.4711E-02 2.7 72.6 64.8
31 975 24 * 12.32 59.2 43
32 975 24 1.1678E-02 13.7 65.37 39.8
33 975 24 1.1621E-02 13.1 66.8 42.3
34 975 16 3.1011E-03 91.38 40.6 33.1
35 975 16 3.0469E-03 88 39.8 32.4
36 975 16 4.7361E-03 74.4 38.9 36.2
37 975 11 6.5315E-04 326.6 26 33.5
38 975 11 4.5657E-04 331.5 44 21.6
12
39 975 11 8.4207E-04 286 26.2 30.6
40 1100 14 3.0639E-02 9.6 43 51.9
41 1100 14 2.3282E-02 8.5 67.8 47.3
42 1100 14 2.1429E-02 9.92 69.8 54.3
43 1100 9 2.1726E-03 76.2 38.3 38.2
44 1100 9 2.4988E-03 75.3 39.6 27
45 1100 9 2.8311E-03 79 37.9 41.7
46 1100 6 7.9167E-04 243.5 39.2 57.29$
47 1100 6 6.5602E-04 231.5 27.56 63.38$
48 1100 6 8.0968E-04 268.5 41.4 56$
49 1100 4 1.9443E-04 808.59 19.4 51.82$
50 1100 4 2.8686E-04 # - -
51 1100 4 1.8238E-04 # - -
52 1100 4 2.0085E-04 889 18.6 66.71$
53 1100 4 2.2290E-04 883.04 21.3 57.6$
* Data was not recorded.
# Test not carried out till rupture.
$ Reduction in area is measured after removal of heavy scales by spalling.
3.6.4. Norton Bailey correlation
Minimum creep rate variation with stress shows power law relation, also known as Norton-
Bailey equation, given as:
The evaluated parameters are given in (Table.3.6) along with the goodness of fit (R2).
13
3.6.5. Monkman Grant Correlation
The Monkman-Grant relationship between steady state creep rate (minimum creep rate) and
rupture time is given as:
‘ min’ is the minimum creep rate (h-1)and ‘tr’ is the rupture time (h). The relationship is shown
in (Fig.3.7).
1
, (abs., h-1)
0.1
0.01
550
̇
Min. creep rate,
700
0.001
850
0.0001 975 ̇ 0.2213 ‐ .
R² = 0.9525
1100
0.00001
1 10 100 1000
Rupture time, tr, (h)
T = test temperature (K), tr = stress rupture life of the test specimen, taken in hours
Larsen Miller Parameter (LMP) v/s applied stress level correlation is obtained from the test
data as follows:
14
1000
550°C
700°C
Stress, , (MPa)
100 850°C
975°C
1100°C
10
1
15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5
LMP = T (log10 tr + 16) Thousands
Fig.3.8. Larsen Miller Parameter (LMP) Vs Stress curve for SS304L
15
Fig.3.9. Tensile
T speccimen of SS
S304L weld
d material
Uniform Strain
No
N %
Tempeerature σYS σUTS elongation
n at
SN
N o
of Reductiion
(°CC) (MPa) (MPa) at UTS fracturee
teests in areaa
(%) (%)
1 25 1 382.00 613.0 26.8 28.3 20.3
2 1770 1 330.00 479.4 26.7 36.0 43.0
3 3000 1 220.00 439.7 30.7 36.7 35.8
4 4225 1 256.00 455.9 27.0 30.7 35.5
5 5550 3 218.77 391.0 27.2 33.5 39.0
6 7000 3 175.00 229.4 14.8 39.1 41.0
7 8550 3 102.88 108.1 0.6 17.1 14.3
8 9770 3 53.5 54.7 0.6 8.7 5.2
9 1100 3 23.2 25.1 1.0 16.2 11.5
(c) En
ngineering Stress-Strai
S in Curves
Engineeering stresss-strain curvves at diffeerent tempeeratures are plotted in (Fig.3.10).. Digital
data froom represeentative enggineering stress-strain
s n curves att different temperaturee up to
1100°CC has been furnished
fu upp to uniform
m elongationn in (Table.33.8A-C).
16
RT
SS 304L weld stress strain curves
170
700 300
425
600 550_1
550_2
500 550_3
SS304
700_1
400 700_2
700_3
300 850_1
850_2
200 850_3
970_1
100 970_2
970_3
0 1100_1
0 10 20 30 40 50 1100_2
Strain (%) 1100_3
17
Table.3.8A. Engineering stress-strain curves (25°C- 300°C) of SS304L weld
18
Table.3.8B. Engineering stress-strain curves (425°C- 700°C) of SS304L weld
19
Taable.3.8C. Engineerin
ng stress-sttrain curvees (850°C- 1100°C)
1 of SS304L weeld
3.7.2. Creep-
C Streess Rupture Properties
(a) Speecimen andd Test Detaiils
Constannt load creeep- stress ruupture tests were
w carried d out as perr ASTM E1139-11(2018) [4] at
700, 8550 and 975°°C at speciffied stress leevels given in (Table.33.9). Flat sppecimens, as shown
in (Fig.3.11), weree machined from
f the SSS304L platee.
SN T
Temperatu
ure (°C) Stress leveels (MPa)
1 700 200, 1477, 108
2 850 89, 444, 31
3 975 24, 166, 11
20
(b) Creep Curves and Creep Rate Curves
Accumulated creep strain with time is shown in (Fig.3.12(a)-(c)). The creep rate curve from a
representative test at each temperature - stress level combination has been shown in
(Fig.3.13). Please refer [6] for more details.
700°C
0.12
0.10
Creep strain (abs.)
0.08
0.06
0.04
(a)
0.02
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Time (h)
200MPa_1 200MPa_2 200MPa_3 147MPa_1
147MPa_2 147MPa_3 108MPa_1 108MPa_2
850°C
0.12
0.10
Creep strain (abs.)
0.08
0.06
0.04
(b)
0.02
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Time (h)
78MPa_1 89MPa_1 89MPa_2
44MPa_1 44MPa_2 44MPa_3
31MPa_1 31MPa_2 31MPa_3
21
975°C
0.08
0.07
0.1
Creep rate (abs./h)
0.01
0.001
0.0001
0.00001
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Normalized time (t/trupture)
700°C_147MPa 700°C_108MPa
850°C_31MPa 850°C_44MPa
850°C_89MPa 975°C_11MPa
975°C_16MPa 975°C_24MPa
22
(c) Creep-Stress Rupture Test Results - Minimum Creep Rate, Rupture Time
Creep- stress rupture time, steady-state creep rate (also called minimum creep rate),
% elongation and % reduction in the area are tabulated in (Table.3.10). Please refer [6] for
more details.
23
Table.3.11. Norton-Bailey equation* parameters for SS304L weld material
where:
‘ min’ is the minimum creep rate (h-1) and ‘tr’ is the rupture time (h). The relationship is
shown in (Fig.3.14).
2
. .
, R = 0.921
T = test temperature (K), tr = stress rupture life of the test specimen, taken in hours
Larsen Miller Parameter (LMP) Vs applied stress level correlation is obtained from the test
data as follows:
24
loge (σ)) = 13.149 – 0.0004*LMP, where σ is stress level (MPaa). The correelation is pllotted in
(Fig.3.115).
-(0.000389*LMP)
σ = 5137749* e
2
R = 0.9907
25
o
8 Fracture test (25 C)
6
Load (kN)
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Displacement (mm)
Fig.3.17. Load-displacement curve of the 0.5T C(T) specimen of SS304L
material tested at 25°C (room temperature)
o
5 Fracture test (600 C)
4
Load (kN)
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Displacement (mm)
26
o
Fracture test (700 C)
3
Load (kN)
2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Displacement (mm)
Fig.3.19. Load-displacement curve of the 0.5T C(T) specimen of SS304L
material tested at 700°C
o
Fracture test (800 C)
2.0
1.5
Load (kN)
1.0
0.5
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Displacement (mm)
Fig.3.20. Load-displacement curve of the 0.5T C(T) specimen of SS304L
material tested at 800°C
27
o
Test Temperature ( C)
1200 25
J-resistance (N/mm)
400
600
900
700
800
600
300
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Crack growth (mm)
Fig.3.21. J-R curves of the 0.5T C(T) specimen of SS304L material tested at
different temperatures ranging from 25°C (room temperature) to
800°C
28
Table.3.12. Load-displacement data of 0.5T C(T) specimen of SS304L material tested at
25°C and 600°C
29
Table.3.13. Load-displacement data of 0.5T C(T) specimen of SS304L material tested at
700°C and 800°C
30
Table.3.14. J-R curve data of 0.5T C(T) specimen of SS304L material tested at
temperatures 25°C, 400°C and 600°C
Table.3.15. J-R curve data of 0.5T C(T) specimen of SS304L material tested at
temperatures of 70°C and 800°C
31
4. SS304LN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL
SS304LN shall be used in PHT pipings of AHWR.
Weldments are generated by girth welding of pipes as per Section IX of ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code [7]. Gas Tungsten Arc welding (GTAW) is followed for welding of
150 NB pipe. GTAW (for root pass and few passes) and Shielded Metal Arc Welding
(SMAW) (filling passes) are followed for welding of 300 NB pipe. Both sizes of pipe are
welded using conventional V-groove (included angle approximately 75°). Filler wire ER308L
and welding electrode E308L specified for 304L are used for welding of pipes. Weld joints
are qualified as per the acceptance criteria requirements given in Section III of the ASME
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code [7].
The chemical composition of the pipe and pipe weld materials are given in (Table.4.1). The
details of the welding consumables, process and parameters are given in (Table.4.2).
32
4.2. Microstructure, Grain Size and Distribution
The optical micrograph of the base metals from 150 NB and 300 NB pipes are shown in
(Fig.4.1(a)&(b)) respectively. The base metal shows well-annealed grain structures with
annealing twins. The average grain size of the base metal was found to be around 30 μm.
(a) (b)
Fig.4.1. Optical microstructure of base metal from (a) 150 NB and (b) 300 NB pipe
33
4.3.2. Yield Strength, Ultimate Strength, Uniform Elongation and Strain at Rupture
Uniform
Temperature σYS σUTS Ductility
SN Specimen elongation
(°C) (MPa) (MPa) (%)
(%)
27 Base (300 NB
1 336 656 46 66
pipe)
27 Base (150 NB
2 311 616 65 83
pipe)
3 27 GTAW 380 607 38 57
4 27 SMAW 536 669 29 42
285 Base (300 NB
5 229 510 29 42
pipe)
285 Base (150 NB
6 193 434 32 43
pipe)
7 285 GTAW 304 446 22 32
8 285 SMAW 421 488 9.3 18.2
The stress-strain curves for the base metal from 150 NB pipe are also shown in the table. In
this case, the base metal shows higher ductility and slightly lower tensile strength along the
circumferential direction in contrast to NB 300 pipe, but the basic character of tensile flow
remains similar. The ductility of the GTAW weld metal is significantly higher than the
SMAW weld but is slightly lower than that of base metal at both test temperatures. The
ductility values in the longitudinal weld specimens are low due to the localized necking in the
weld metal region of the gage length.
34
Tablee.4.4. Stresss-strain cu
urves of SS3
304LN basee and weld metal
Temperaturre
T
SN Pipee size Stresss-strain cu
urve*
(°C)
1 3000 NB 27
2 3000 NB 285
35
3 1500 NB 27
4 1500 NB 285
36
R244 (smooth blennd; No undercutt)
11
6
35 10.89 18 100.89 35
Fig.4.3. Round
R LCF
F Specimen
4.5.2. Fatigue
F Liffe S-N Curvve
LCF cuurves for basse and weldd metals at room
r tempeerature is shoown in (Figg.4.4).
2.8
2.4 Base
2 Weld
1.6
Strain Amplitude (%)
1.2
0.8
0.4
37
extensive crack opening displacement which corresponded to applied J in excess of 1900
kJ/m2 and Δa of 0.6 mm. This plot clearly shows a large drop in the required energy for crack
extension in the case of SMAW weld. The smaller sized specimen from 150 NB pipe base
and weld are shown in (Fig.4.5(b)) where Δa is 2.08 and 1.05 mm in GTAW and base metal
respectively. GTAW weld has lower absorbed energy even when its crack extension is higher
than that in the base metal specimen.
(a) (b)
Fig.4.5. Load and load line displacement using CT (a) 20 mm thick specimens of
300 NB pipe, (b) 8 mm thick specimens of 150 NB pipe
38
B 6
(a) (b)
Fig.4.6. J-R Curves for 300 NB pipe base and weld metals at (a) 27°C (B-6 refer to
base 6 inch pipe, B-12 refer to base 12 inch pipe) (b) 285°C
Initiation fracture toughness values based on onset (deviation of J-R curve from initial
straight line) and the critical SZW (intersection of J-R curve with parallel line equal to critical
(SZW) are shown in (Table.4.5).
39
4.7. Fatigue Crack Growth (FCG) Properties [8]
4.7.1. Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Data
Fatigue Crack Growth (FCG) behaviour of base metal and SMAW weld at different load ratio
(R = min/max) values is shown in (Fig.4.7(a)&(b)). An increase in the load ratio (R)
increases the FCG rate at a given applied ΔK and this is quite clear for the case of R = 0.6.
FCG rates when plotted as a function of ΔKeff are very close to each other for base metal as
shown in (Fig.4.8). The FCG rates when plotted as a function of ΔKeff in the SMAW weld
metal show more scatter but the crack growth rates were nearly the same for R ratio of 0.3
and 0.6.
(a) (b)
Fig.4.7. FCGR for 300 NB pipe (a) base metal, (b) weld metal for load ratio, R = 0.1, 0.3
and 0.6
40
(a) (b)
4.7.2. Paris
P Law Constants
C
FCGR is modelledd using the Paris law giveng as: da K)m, where C and m aree FCGR
a/dN=C(ΔK)
constannts. These constants
c arre valid if da/dN
d is in
n m/cycle and
a ΔK in M MPa√m. Ev valuated
Paris coonstants are furnished in
i (Fig.4.9) and (Table.4.6).
-9 2.974
For base: da/dN = 4.214 x 10 K ASME
1E-3 -13 6.78
For weld: da/dN = 2.322 x 10 K
da/dN, mm/cycle
1E-4
1E-5
Base
Weld
1E-6
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1/2
K, MPam
Fig..4.9. FCGR
R of base an
nd weld meetals
41
Table.4.6. Paris power law constants of base and weld materials (da/dN in m/cycle and
K in MPa√m)
Material C m
Fig.4.10. CT Specimen and its orientation with respect to the pipe axis
The tests were conducted in a de-mineralized water environment with different levels of
dissolved oxygen (varying from 10 ppb to 1500 ppb), temperature (RT to 300°C) and
pressure (around 150 bar). The de-mineralized water with a low level of conductivity of
0.06 μS/ cm at 25°C was used.
42
ASTM E647-05 [10] procedure was followed for carrying out tests. The cyclic load of
constant amplitude with a load ratio of 0.1 was applied for carrying out tests. The sinusoidal
and trapezoidal waveforms were applied with a 0.005 Hz loading frequency. The low
frequency (0.005 Hz) was chosen such that there is sufficient time for material-environment
interaction which will lead to damage in the material. Trapezoidal waveform with the same
loading frequency (0.005 Hz) was applied during the test to understand the effect of material-
environment interaction for a longer time at peak load. The peak load in trapezoidal
waveform was maintained for half (100 s) of one cycle time (200 s). The loading and
unloading times were equal and kept as one-fourth of one cycle time. The typical trapezoidal
and sine waveforms are shown in (Fig.4.11). Please refer [11]for more details.
Fig.4.11. Typical Trapezoidal and sine waveform used in FCGR test in water
environment
For all tests conducted in a water environment, Direct Current Potential Difference (DCPD)
technique-based instrument was used for crack growth monitoring.
FCGR curves in water at 300°C for a different level of Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and different
waveforms are shown in (Fig.4.12). This figure shows that FCGR in water with DO varying
from 10 ppb to 1500 ppb at 300°C is marginally lower than the corresponding level of DO in
water at room temperature.
43
Fig.4.12. FCGR at different level of dissolved oxygen and different wave forms at
300°C
40 R = -1.0
V = 0.1 mm 60 304LN Weld
30 V = 0.1mm
R = -1.0
20 40
10
20
Load, kN
0
Load, kN
0
-10
-20 -20
-30
-40
-40
304LN 12" pipe/Base/1CT -60
-50
0 1 2 3 4
-0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4
Load-line displacement, mm
Load line displacement, mm
(a) (b)
Fig.4.13. Cyclic Load-Load Line Displacement curve at R=0.1 and ΔV=0.1 mm for
(a) base metal, (b) weld metal
44
4.8. Mechanical Properties Evaluated Using a Non-Standard Method
4.8.1. Ball Indentation
Carbon manganese steel (SA312 Type 304LN) pipes in the solution annealed conditions
conforming to the specifications of ASME B&PV [7] Section II and Section III is used for
evaluation of mechanical properties using Automated Ball Indentation (ABI) Techniques.
0.2 Eq.(4.1)
where, is true plastic strain, dp is plastic indentation diameter, D is the ball diameter.
The plastic indentation diameter is calculated from hp and Young’s modulus of elasticity (ball
and specimen material), ball diameter and applied load (P). Tungsten carbide ball diameters
vary from 0.75 mm to 1.57 mm. Tests were conducted in load controlled mode. The true
stress (σ) is evaluated as follows:
4
Eq.(4.2)
where δ is a constraint factor, which increases as the plastic zone increases and reaches a
maximum until whole of the material around the indentation is in a state of full plasticity. The
δ is a function of constraint factor (α), which in turn depends on strain rate sensitivity and
triaxial hardening.
45
The Yield Strength (YS) is evaluated as follows:
Eq.(4.3)
where βm is material type constant and A is intercept of P/dt2 versus (dt/D) curve on log–log
scale. The constant βm is different for different class of material. The dt is total indentation
diameter and is evaluated as follows
2√ Eq.(4.4)
Using Eq.(4.1) and Eq.(4.2), the true stress versus true plastic strain pairs are calculated at
each unloading stage. Assuming the power law fit, the strength coefficient (K) and strain
hardening exponent (n) are calculated. Using n and K the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) is
evaluated as follows:
Eq.(4.5)
Fig.4.15. Yield strength from ball indentation tests and its comparison with
conventional tests
46
Fig.4.16. Ultimate Tensile Strength from ball indentation tests and its comparison with
conventional tests
C Si Mn P S Cr Ni Mo Nb Cu Al Fe
0.16 0.44 0.68 0.019 0.004 12.45 0.35 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.009 Rest
The specimens were made using the material between Di=80 mm to Do=180 mm of the bar.
The material extraction plan for specimen fabrication is shown in (Fig.5.1). Specimens for all
mechanical tests were fabricated in longitudinal and circumferential orientation with respect
to the bar geometry.
47
Fig.5..1. Schemaatic of speciimen extraaction from
m the supplied 403 barr for variou
us tests
5.2. Microstructu
M ure, Grain Size and Distribution
D n
Optical and SEM microstructu
m ures of the material aloong the diammeter of thee bar from region
r 2
is show
wn in (Fig.55.2). The tem mpered maartensitic strructure was homogeneeous through hout the
cross-seection of thhe bar. Therre were carrbide precip pitates both along the inter-lath an
nd prior
austenitte grain bouundaries witth an averagge size of ab
bout 300nm m.
O
Optical micrro-graph As seen from SEM
48
5.3. Mechanical Properties (YS, UTS and Ductility)
5.3.1. Specimen and Test Details
Tensile tests were conducted using cylindrical specimens of 8 mm nominal diameter and
25 mm gauge length (Fig.5.3), fabricated both in longitudinal and circumferential directions,
under a constant displacement rate of 0.003 mm/s (corresponding to a strain rate of ~ 10-4/s).
A 25 mm GL extensometer was used for strain measurement. All tests were as per
ASTM E8/E8M-16a [1] specifications. For high temperature and low-temperature tests, an
environmental chamber fitted with a temperature capability of +300°C to -150°C was used.
At least two thermocouples were attached to the specimen for monitoring on-specimen
temperature. Please refer [13] for details.
5.3.2. Yield Strength, Ultimate Strength, Uniform Elongation and Strain at Rupture
Summary of test results is given in (Table.5.2). Strength and ductility properties of SS304L-
yield strength (σYS), ultimate tensile strength (σUTS), uniform elongation (%), strain at fracture
(%) and reduction in area (%) are furnished. Yield and tensile strengths are reduced on
increasing the temperature. There is insignificant effect of orientation observed on the tensile
properties.
49
Table.5.2. Tensile properties of MSS403
Uniform Total %
Temperature σYS σUTS
SN Orientation elongation elongation Reduction
(ºC) (MPa) (MPa)
(%) (%) in area
1 -60 643.5 827.77 4.78 14.72 49.1
2 -60 676.45 834.66 6.75 16.18 55.89
3 -40 661.74 809.14 6.56 -- 51.17
4 -40 638.76 784.74 6.09 15.7 57.94
5 -10 646.64 768.24 5.7 14.5 60.3
6 -10 629.62 757.05 7.05 15.34 59.55
Longitudinal
7 28 623.26 743.36 6.52 -- 61.32
8 28 626.64 749.007 6.97 14.18 62.05
9 150 565.82 672.78 5.58 11.87 59.03
10 150 570.33 671.00 4.8 12.07 58.45
11 285 563.11 654.78 5.36 10.34 59.43
12 285 557.69 641.41 4.05 9.86 61.06
13 -60 659.14 812.79 6.89 16.31 56.04
14 -60 656.98 815.66 5.35 15.39 57.32
15 -40 636.55 783.7 7.57 16.64 59.67
16 -40 643.22 789.15 5.37 14.45 57.18
17 -10 632.87 767.22 6.82 15.44 60.35
18 -10 626.93 763.69 6.68 15.31 63.18
Circumferential
19 28 623.61 742.53 5.83 13.95 62.2
20 28 613.99 736.36 6.33 13.54 60.01
21 150 574.28 669.19 4.95 11.01 60.74
22 150 569.69 673.96 6.16 13.28 62.35
23 285 554.2 648.25 5.15 10.31 60.48
24 285 551.13 643.32 5.15 10.33 59.1
50
Fig.5.4. Low cycle fatiguetest specimen
51
10
Load, kN
-10
0.25%_1
0.25%_2
20
10
Load,kN
-10
0.35%_1
0.35%_2
-20
-0.3 0.0 0.3
Strain,%
52
20
Load,kN 0
0.5%_1
-20 0.5%_2
20
Load,kN
0.75%_1
-20 0.75%_2
20
Load,kN
1%_1
-20 1%_2
-1 0 1
Strain,%
53
5.5. Frracture Prooperties
5.5.1. Specimen
S a Test Deetails for Evvaluation off Fracture Toughness
and T
Fracturee tests (KICI ) were pe erformed using
u Comp pact Tensioon (CT) sppecimens (Fig.5.6)
(
fabricatted in longgitudinal annd circumfeerential direections, folllowing ASTM E1820 0-09 [9].
Specimmens were pre-cracked
p prior to fracture testss. All tests were conduucted at a constant
c
displaceement rate of
o 0.003 mm m/s. A 5 mm m GL COD D gauge fitteed to the inttegral knife-edge of
the specimen at thhe load linee was used for measurring the Load-Line Diisplacementt (LLD).
Tests were
w stoppedd once the specimens
s w
were fracturred and loadd on specim
men dropped d to near
zero vaalue since all
a the speccimens exhhibited unsttable crack extension upon reach hing the
maximuum load. Looad - load line displaceement plot was w used foor K calculaation, follow wing the
ASTM E1820-09 standard. Physical measuremeent of pre--crack lenggth was measured m
employying 7 pointt average method
m andd the same was used for f the calcculation of fracture
toughneess. For testts other thann RT, a sim
milar set-up/mmethod as described
d inn tensile testting was
used. Pllease refer [13]for
[ detaails.
Fig.5.6. CT
C specim
men details
5.5.2. Fracture
F Tooughness Test
T Results
A consoolidated ressult of all fracture toughness resultts is given in
i (Table.5.4). It may be
b noted
that alm
most all the tests did noot meet thee Pmax/PQ an
nd/or the sppecimen thicckness criteeria, and
hence a valid KICC of the maaterial couldd not be obtained.
o Hoowever, thee tentative fracture
toughneess value, KQ, has beenn compared for its variaation with teest temperatture.
54
It is noted that the material exhibited an insignificant crack tip plasticity during the fracture
tests, bearing the high-temperature test at 285°C. At this temperature also, the material
behaved largely in a quasi-brittle fashion. Any change in the crack tip constraint is, therefore,
not expected to alter the KQ values significantly and hence the obtained KQ can be considered
as a lower bound value, even though a valid KIC could not be obtained even after considering
full CT (1T CT) specimen geometry. The variation of fracture toughness (KQ) with
temperature is shown in (Fig.5.7).
55
140
120
80
60
Longitudinal Transverse
40
20
0
-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Temperature, ºC
56
5.6.2. Paris Law Constants
Paris regime FCGR data for LC and CR orientation (Fig.5.8) is given in (Fig.5.9(a)&(b))
respectively. No significant difference in the Paris regime crack growth data has been
observed in the two orientations in terms of the Paris slope during either decreasing ΔK or
constant ΔP test.
-08 2.50186
1E-4 da/dN =3.5x10 K
da/dN, mm/cycle
-09 3.2285
da/dN =2.207x10 K
1E-5
(a) -09 3.13036
da/dN =2.305x10 K
K decreasing test_1
1E-6
K decreasing test_2
Const P test
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
0.5
K, MPam
57
2.542
dN = 3.521E--08 k
da/d
1E
E-4
3.11273
dN = 3.616E--09 k
da/d
da/dN, mm/Cyc
3.008
da 8E-09 k
a/dN = 4.878
(b)
1E
E-5
Decresing K _1
Decresing K _2
Constant P
1E
E-6
8 9 10
0 20 30 40 50 60
0.5
K, MPa-m
M
Figg.5.9. Com
mparison off FCGR beh haviour usiing ΔK deccreasing and constant ΔP
meth
hods for (a)) LC and (b
b) CR orien
ntation
5.7. Ch
harpy Impaact Propertties
5.7.1. Specimen
S a Test Deetails
and
Charpy Impact Tests
T were conductedd using speecimens faabricated inn longitudinal and
circumfferential dirrections following AS STM E24-5 58 [15] staandard (Figg.5.10). Tessts were
conductted in the temperature
t e range of -60°C
- to +150°C. A temperature
t e bath fitted
d with a
temperaature controoller was ussed for soakking the speecimens. Diial gauge reeading was used
u for
measuriing the eneergy absorpption by thhe specimeen. Three tests for eaach conditio on were
perform
med.
58
5.7.2. Charpy Impact Energy Variation with Temperature
Charpy impact energy variation with temperature in 403 martensitic steel is shown in
(Table.5.6) and (Fig.5.11). For both the orientations, the impact energy showed a systematic
rise with test temperature indicating a rise in toughness values. In fact, the variation showed a
near transition curve with a certain lower shelf and an almost saturating upper shelf. A fitting
of determined Charpy energy with temperature is furnished in (Table.5.7).
59
Lateral Temp, Energy, Lateral
SN Temp,°C Energy, J SN
Expn,mm °C J Expn,mm
7 -15 12.38 0.236 31 -60 6.21 0.305
8 -15 20.52 0.393 32 -60 6.95 0.17
9 -15 21.48 0.497 33 -60 3.93 0.12
10 -20 21.34 0.326 34 30 27 0.482
11 -20 20.11 0.253 35 30 NA NA
12 -20 18.63 0.287 36 30 NA NA
13 -25 11.95 0.253 37 60 40.55 0.613
14 -25 19.03 0.354 38 60 53.18 0.836
15 -25 17.04 0.236 39 60 45.73 0.792
16 -30 14.59 0.273 40 90 71.43 0.943
17 -30 16.13 0.169 41 90 95.85 1.543
18 -30 13.89 0.337 42 90 96.43 0.968
19 -35 17.04 0.219 43 120 145.91 2.04
20 -35 12.07 0.185 44 120 147.93 1.449
21 -35 11.46 0.225 45 120 161.5 2.14
22 -40 17.17 0.325 46 150 168.98 1.765
23 -40 4.42 0.136 47 150 157.48 1.356
24 -40 4.2 0.18 48 150 185.94 1.802
TDBTT = 101.16 C
240
o
200
Charpy impact energy, J
160
120
Best fit curve for both data
80 2
(Adj. R : 0.96732)
40
0
Longitudinal
-40
Transverse
60
Table.5.7. Equation parameters: Charpy energy with temperature
Equation
∗ ∗
Type of C Cr Ni Mn Mo Si N S P Fe
element
Wt % 0.028 17.5 12.3 1.7 2.5 0.21 0.08 0.0055 0.012 rest
61
Fig.6.2. Fractograph of smooth tensile specimen of SS316LN tested at room
temperatures showing enlargement of ductile voids and their coalescence.
62
Load (kN) 6
Tensile test
2 o
25 C
o
650 C
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Displacement (mm)
Fig.6.3. Load-displacement data of SS316LN stainless steel smooth tensile spcimens of
4 mm diameter tested at 25°C (room temperature) and 650°C.
600
500
Engg. Stress (MPa)
400
300
Fig.6.4. Engineering stess-strain curves of SS316LN stainless steel tested at 25°C (room
temperature) and 650°C.
63
Tensile test
800 o
25 C
o
650 C
True Stress (MPa)
600
400
200
0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
True Strain
Fig.6.5. True stess-strain curves of SS316LN stainless steel tested at 25°C (room
temperature) and 650°C.
Table.6.3. Load-displacement data from tensile tests conducted at 25°C and 650°C
respectively using smooth tensile specimens
64
12.70858 6.96457 1.67133 2.46124
14.15225 6.96457 1.76762 2.55437
14.962 6.94404 1.86396 2.60968
15.4541 6.75914 1.97683 2.65532
15.76995 6.53314 2.06764 2.72963
16.11927 5.93736 2.16399 2.77551
16.46813 5.23884 2.26307 2.84024
16.85153 4.39652 2.36493 2.88604
16.98882 3.63637 2.45845 2.9792
17.1615 2.91732 2.57135 3.01539
3.32538 3.30568
3.63187 3.42836
3.8894 3.57014
4.2969 3.71155
4.6519 3.80561
5.05688 3.89955
5.51185 3.99335
5.86533 4.05892
6.46877 4.12388
6.92122 4.17021
7.47318 4.20679
8.87247 4.19375
9.3684 4.11653
9.70927 3.94473
10.05068 3.78244
10.08705 3.52596
10.2699 3.20263
10.37355 2.32874
10.40225 2.86993
10.43425 1.5879
10.43865 2.61345
10.45138 1.91072
10.57162 1.35014
10.7055 1.04594
65
Table.6.4. Engineering and True stress-strain data as obtained from tensile test
conducted at 25°C
66
Table.6.5. Engineering and True stress-strain data as obtained from tensile test
conducted at 650°C
67
0.3549 333.728 0.30373 452.1677
0.37474 327.583
0.38837 313.912
0.40203 300.997
0.40348 280.587
0.4108 254.857
0.41494 185.315
0.41609 228.382
0.41737 126.361
0.41755 207.972
0.41806 152.05
0.42286 107.441
0.42822 83.2332
7. CONCLUSION
The material properties of various austenitic and marensitic stainless steels, which have been
generated by RSD for use in different structural analyses and qualification requirements have
been compiled in the present volume of the compendium. These include:
- SS304L: Tensile and creep stress rupture properties of base and weld materials up to
1100ºC have been reported. Fracture toughness properties of base material up to
800ºC are also reported.
- SS304LN: Tensile, fatigue, fracture and fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) properties
at room temperature and 285ºC, of both base and weld materials have been furnished.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The contribution of various agencies in generating the material properties presented here is
gratefully acknowledged. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) contributed
by providing the SS 304L plates and modified MSS403 bar material for this study. IGCAR,
Kalpakkam supplied 316LN material for the tensile tests reported in this document. Majority
of tests on SS304L, MSS403(modified) and SS304LN materials were conducted at CSIR-
National Metallurgical Laboratory (NML), Jamshedpur under different consultancy projects.
The contribution of Dr. S. Tarafder, Dr. J. Swaminathan, Dr S. Sivaprasad, Dr. H. N. Bar and
other supporting staff of MTE-division, NML is gratefully acknowledged.
68
REFERENCES
[1] American Society for Testing Materials. ASTM E8/E8M-16a. “Standard test
methods for tension testing of metallic materials”, West Conshohocken: ASTM
International, 2016.
[2] Mohta, Keshav et al. “High temperature tensile and creep properties of calandria
material SS 304L”, BARC/2019/E/011, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, 2019.
[3] Mohta, Keshav et al. “High temperature deformation behavior of Indian PHWR
Calandria material SS 304L”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 368:110801, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110801
[4] American Society for Testing Materials. ASTM E139-11(2018). “Standard test
methods for conducting creep, creep-rupture, and stress-rupture tests of metallic
materials”, West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2018.
[6] Mohta, Keshav et al. “High temperature tensile and creep properties of SS 304L
weld material of calandria”, BARC/2021/E/003, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre,
2020.
[7] American Society of Mechanical Engineers. “ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Code”, New York: ASME, 2017.
[8] Dubey, J.S. et al. “Fracture behavior of Type 304LN stainless steel and its welds”,
In: 14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering,( Miami Florida, USA:
ICONE 14, July 17-20, 2006), New York : American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, 2006
[9] American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM E1820-09. “Standard test
method for measurement of fracture toughness”, West Conshohocken: ASTM
International, 2009.
[10] American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM E647-05. “Standard test method
for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates”, West Conshohocken: ASTM
International, 2005.
[11] Arora, Punit et al. “Effect of dissolved oxygen and temperature on fatigue crack
growth rate behaviour of SA312 Type 304L(N) material in water environment”,
International Journal of Fatigue, 95:204-215, 2017.
[12] Bhasin, V. et al. “Round robin exercise on ball indentation technique in India: Indian
Nuclear Reactor Materials”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 330:303-316. 2018.
[13] “Fatigue and fracture characterization of modified 403 martensitic stainless steel”,
BARC- CSIR NML Project report, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, 2020.
69
[14] American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM E606 / E606M-21. “Standard test
method for strain-controlled fatigue testing”, West Conshohocken: ASTM
International, 2021.
[15] American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM E24-58. “Definitions of terms
relating to rheological properties of matter”, West Conshohocken: ASTM
International, 1958.
70