FinalReport InnoGEMS 5-8-2023
FinalReport InnoGEMS 5-8-2023
FinalReport InnoGEMS 5-8-2023
MANE 4173-01
SPRING 2023
Dr. Jianzhi Li
Dr. Peiwen Li
5/08/2023
Acknowledgement
InnoGEMS would like to express their profound gratitude to everyone who helped this
project be completed successfully. Your effort, commitment, and help were crucial to its
accomplishment.
First and foremost, we would like to express our gratitude to our project supervisor Dr.
Jianzhi Li and Dr. Peiwen Li for the excellent advice and feedback provided during the process
of completing this project. Your advice and suggestions made it easier for us to accomplish our
objectives.
We also want to express our gratitude to our team members for their constant dedication
and hard work. This project would not have been possible without the teamwork, creativity, and
knowledge that you all contributed.
Abstract
Access to clean drinking water is a basic human need, yet millions of people around the
world lack access to safe drinking water. In many regions, the air is humid and full of moisture,
but there are few methods for capturing and utilizing this moisture for drinking water. However,
recent technological advancements have made it possible to turn humid air into drinking water
using solar panels. This innovative technology uses a process known as condensation to collect
water from humid air. The air is cooled to the dew point, which causes the water vapor in the air
to condense into liquid form. The water is then collected and treated to remove any impurities
before it is safe for drinking. The process is made possible using solar panels, which provide the
energy needed to power the cooling and condensation process. By harnessing the power of the
sun, this technology can provide a sustainable source of drinking water, even in regions with
limited access to electricity. Turning humid air into drinking water using solar panels is a
promising solution to the global water crisis. As the world population grows, and water resources
become increasingly scarce, innovative technologies like this will become essential to ensuring
that everyone has access to safe and clean drinking water.
Table of Contents
Topics Page
1. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………… 4
8. Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………. 22
9. Sources ………………………………………………………………………………… 23
Even though the use of solar energy comes with some cons, it is still a very good option
since the pros that come with solar energy help counter some of the cons. For example, the initial
cost of solar panels may be at a high price rate, however, in the long term, it would become a
cheaper option since we would be using a renewable and sustainable source of energy, which
will help reduce electricity bills over time. Another cost-effective pro that reaffirms how good
the use of solar energy is would be the low maintenance that solar panels require, which means
that they can last several decades with proper care. But overall, the main reason why solar energy
is the better option is because of how eco-friendly it will be. Solar energy does not produce any
harmful pollutants and emissions into the atmosphere; therefore, we are having a positive impact
on the environment as well.
Data for VOC (customer requirement)
To be able to understand how the generator design was going to be, it was important to
know if people would be consuming the product and how much they are willing to pay for
something new. The main idea is to create a big generator from now on that can give a certain
amount of water to sell in bottles to a certain number of customers, and if possible, sell the water
generator itself in a reduced size. Below are some of the survey results and how they influenced
the design decision.
Water is used by a high percentage when being drunk by humans, so the main objective is to
reduce that percentage by finding another water source and by this, preventing possible water
shortages soon. This short survey was created with the purpose of innoGEMS to consider some
important decisions when working on this project for Texas citizens and to know if they are
interested in this idea to bring it to real life. A total of 20 participants answered 13 questions,
some of them were short answers, some of them were multiple choice. The following information
will include the results in graphs/tables.
● Question 1 ‘Your city’ results:
Figure 1. Results
From this graph, we can notice that Harlingen had 3 people but there were mistypes that
made them count separately. The majority of the participants with a total of 5 - Brownsville, 3 –
Edinburg, 3 - Harlingen, 3 - McAllen.
● Question 2 ‘Your county’ results:
Figure 2. Results
From this graph, we noticed that we had 7 people from Cameron County and 7 people from
Hidalgo County, meaning that this county’s out of all in Texas were the most interested in the
project. With this, we might consider started selling the product with people from this county in
Texas.
● Question 3 ‘How bad is the water shortage where you live?’ results:
Figure 3. Results
From this graph, we noticed that just 10% - 2 people have poor access to water, 0% - 0
people have extremely poor, 15% - 3 people have good access, 35% - 7 people have neutral
access and 40% - 8 people had sufficient access.
● Question 4 ‘How often do you have water shortages?’ results:
Figure 4. Results
From this graph, we noticed that none of them always have water shortages, which means
that these participant’s counties are still in good water conditions. 60% - 12 people rarely have,
30% - 7 people never have, 5% - 1 people sometimes have.
● Question 5 ‘what are the methods you use to conserve water?’ answers:
● Question 6 ‘Did the methods mentioned above make a difference in your community?’
results:
Figure 5. Results
From this graph, 65% - 13 people said yes and 35% - 7 people said no to making a difference
in the community.
Figure 6. Results
From this graph, the range in cups was from 2 cups daily-16 cups daily. The highest
percentages were with 16, 5, and 7 cups with a total of 15% on each.
● Question 8 ‘Would you drink purified water obtained from other source?’ results:
Figure 7. Results
From this graph, we were able to see that 95% - 19 people have a positive view from this
idea, where 50% - 10 people are completely sure, 45% - 9 people could try and 5% - 1 people
said no.
● Question 9 ‘Drinking water is one of the reasons for the water shortage thus to the
elevated amount of people on Earth. Do you think that obtaining drinkable water from
other sources would help?’ results:
Figure 8. Results
From this graph, we were able to see that 95% - 19 people, which is above 60%, represents
that it is a positive idea that they think would help to prevent water shortages, 1% - 1 people said
no.
● Question 10 ‘Humid air can be turned into water. If innoGEMS finds a way to purify it
and make it drinkable, would you switch to consuming this water and help water shortage
for future generations?’ results:
Figure 9. Results
From this graph, 100% of them have positive answers towards switching to innoGEMS
water, where 65% - 13 people were completely sure and 35% - 7 people could think about it.
● Question 13 ‘What is the price you are willing to pay per bottle?’ results:
From this graph, we noticed that the price range that participants are willing to pay is
between $1-$2 USD, but the maximum percentage was to $1.25 with 50% - 10 people, $1 with
35% - 7 people and $2 with 15% - 3 people. If we want to sell this to them, $1.25 would be the
price.
The focus of this project was for all the Texas citizens but after doing this small survey, it
was noticed that most of the support came from two different counties, Hidalgo, and Cameron.
The focus will be now on Texas citizens living in these counties and if it succeeds, expand to all
Texas. Most of the results were as estimated, and more than 60% were positive towards our
project. The final question was very important because with this, it can now be planned how
much will be invested in the project and the dimensions/prototype of it. For now, selling water to
enhance the sales and knowledge of this new technology seems like a short-term goal, but in the
long run, selling the water generators on a small scale might be a good business idea.
Design & Innovation
- Design options
3D MODEL
High 98 70
Low 51 40
Table: Temperature data found here. Relative humidity data found here.
Goal:
Produce 5 gallons of water per day using the dehumidification process (refrigeration cycle)
Material
Aluminum 5052-H32 is a corrosion resistant material that can withstand air that contains high
moisture content.
Fan Calculations
Initial Conditions: 51F and 40%
Water Generated = (Volume of Air Processed) x (Initial Relative Humidity - Final Relative
Humidity) x (Weight of Water per Volume of Air at Final Conditions)
Components:
Compressor: Needed to compress the refrigerant to a high pressure and high-temperature gas
Condenser: Needed to lower the temperature of the pressurized gas.
Expansion Valve: Needed to decrease the pressure and temperature of the gas
Evaporator: Allows low-temperature refrigerant to condense the liquid that is in the moist air
Fan: Transfers ambient air into the condenser and the evaporator.
Water collector basin: Collects the water from the evaporator
Solar Panel: Provides energy for the system.
Innovation & Differentiation
Design Schematic: