Footprint Without Feet Summary and Most Important Questions 2023
Footprint Without Feet Summary and Most Important Questions 2023
Footprint Without Feet Summary and Most Important Questions 2023
GIST
The story ‗A Triumph of Surgery‘ revolves around an ill dog named Tricki and his mistress, Mrs Pumphrey.
The pet dog Tricki is overfed with copious amounts of energy food by its owner. She provides all kinds of
luxury and comforts to her dog. This makes him very obese and his overweight body finds difficulty even to
walk and move around.
One day Tricki stops eating . On seeing his pathetic condition , Mrs Pumphrey takes her pet dog to a
veterinary doctor who treats the dog without using a single medicine . Tricki is hospitalised and the doctor
gives Tricki nothing to eat for the first two days except water.
Moreover Tricki is left with all other dogs to play and get the much-needed physical exercise. This helps him
to lose all his excess fat.
On the third day , signs of improvement are seen in Tricki . He starts taking food properly . Tricki starts
running around and playing with the other dogs cheerfully . Soon, he recovers completely . Mrs. Pumphrey
continues enquiring about Tricki over phone and feels gratitude towards the doctor for her pet‘s cure. She is
overjoyed and eyes are filled with tears of happiness when she comes to discharge Tricki from the hospital.
She calls this the magical recovery as ‗A Triumph of Surgery‘.
170 | P a g e
169
SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS (30 - 40 words)
1. What made Mrs. Pumphrey call the vet?
Ans. Tricki had become fat and lazy. He used to lie on his rug and pant. He also refused to eat his favourite
dishes. His bouts of vomiting added to Mrs. Pumphrey‘s worry and hence she decided to call Dr. James
Herriot, the vet.
171 | P a g e
170
2. Write the character-sketch of Tricki.
Ans. Tricki was a small dog. He was pampered and overfed by his mistress. He was fed with excessive
nutritious food. He was greedy enough to refuse food at any time. He liked eating cream cakes and
chocolates. This made him hugely fat. He looked like a bloated sausage. He had bloodshot and rheumy eyes.
He became dull, flabby, lazy and listless. He was seriously sick. He had bouts of vomiting. He was taken to
Herriot‘s surgery. There he was given no food for two days. He was made to do a lot of exercises. This
changed him and he became fit. He loved his mistress very much. His mistress remarked that Tricki would
pine and die if he did not see her even for a single day.
3. Write the character-sketch of Dr. James Herriot.
Ans: Dr James Herriot is a competent veterinary surgeon. He is really worried about Tricki. He understands
that the real fault of the dog is his greed for food. Dr Herriot instructs Mrs Pumphrey to keep Tricki on a very
strict diet.
Dr James Herriot is practical and pragmatic. He doesn‘t give any medical treatment to the dog. He feeds the
dog with only water. His method works. The grateful mistress thanks Dr Herriot and calls his feat ―A
triumph of Surgery!‖ Dr James is clever enough to enjoy the best of both the worlds. He is tempted to keep
Tricki as a permanent guest. It was a happy period for Dr Herriot and his friends. He used to enjoy eggs for
breakfast and wine and brandy for lunch.
UNSOLVED QUESTIONS:
SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS (30 - 40 words)
1. How did Mrs Pumphrey show her concern for Tricki when he was at the surgery?
2. Do you think Tricki was enjoying his stay at the hospital?
3. What was the main cause of `Tricki‘s ill-health‘?
4. Why did Mr Herriot ask Mrs Humphrey to admit Tricky in a hospital?
5. Why is Mr. Herriot tempted to keep Tricki as a permanent guest?
LONG ANSWER QUESTIONS (100-150 Words)
1. Excess of everything is bad. Comment in the wake of Mrs Pumphrey‗s love for Tricki.
2. What kind of a person do you think the narrator, a veterinary surgeon is? Would you say he is
tactful as well as full of common-sense?
3. The chapter shows the silly and negligent behaviour of rich people like Mrs. Pumphrey who may
harm their near and dear ones by their extra caring nature. Trick‘s declined health was the outcome of
Mrs. Pumphrey‘s over-caring nature. Do you think such people‘s actions can prove to be fatal for the
172 | P a g e
171
health of their kinds? What values would you suggest to such people to emulate in themselves and
why?
4. ―He had never been known to refuse food; he would tackle a meal at any hour of the day or night.‖
Herriot believed that Trick‘s problem was his greed. Did he lack tolerance? What values would you
like Tricky to imbibe? Elucidate
GIST
Hari Singh was a young boy of fifteen. But he was a thief and a cheat. At a wrestling match, he came across
Anil. He won Anil‘s confidence and came to his house as a servant. Anil was a writer and did not earn much.
So, Hari Singh agreed to work for him only for food. Hari Singh did not know how to cook. The first meal
which he cooked for Anil was so bad nthilathArew it to the dogs. But Hari‘s appealing smile made Anil give
up his decision to turn him out.
Hari Singh did odd jobs for Anil. In the morning he made tea and then brought the day‘s supplies from the
market. Often, he made a profit of a rupee a day out of these purchases. Anil had no regular income. He
earned something by writing articles and stories for magazines. But one day Anil came home with a bundle
of notes. He told Hari that he had earned six hundred rupees by selling one of his books. Hari‘s mouth
watered at the sight of money. He decided to steal that money. Anil kept the bundle under his mattress and
went to sleep.
Now Hari Singh went into the room and silently took the money under the mattress. He went to the railway
station to catch the train to Lucknow. But he missed the train and walked in the bazaars. Soon it started
raining and Hari was drenched completely.
Then Hari Singh remembered Anil. He imagined how sad Anil would be on finding the money stolen. Hari
remembered that Anil used to teach him. He thought that withouthte education he would remain a thief.
173 | P a g e
172
But education might make him a big Mtn. So, he decided to return and replace the money. He reached home
and silently put the money back under the mattress.
Main Points of the Story
The narrator was a thief.
Although only 15, he was experienced and successful in his work.
Luck was against him and he thought of targeting Anil, a young man of 25 years.
The narrator introduced himself to Anil as Hari Singh.
He changed his name every month to escape arrest.
Hari Singh wanted to work for Anil but Anil had no money to pay him regularly.
Anil had no regular income and used to write for magazines.
Anil asked if he could cook, and Hari Singh lied that he knew how to cook.
Hari Singh cooked the food so terribly that it had to be thrown away to the stray dogs.
Anil asked him to go away but the narrator didn‘t leave his company.
Later on, Anil softened and told him that he would teach Hari Singh how to cook.
He also taught Hari Singh to write his name and promised to teach him to write whole sentences and to
add numbers.
It was quite pleasant for Had Singh to work for Anil, and he made a rupee a day from buying the day‘s
supplies.
One evening, Anil came home with a small bundle of notes as he had just sold a booaok t publisher.
Hari Singh saw Anil tuck the money under the mattress.
Hari crept up to the bed, slid his hand under the mattress and took the money out.
Anil sighed in sleep and Hari Singh startled and quickly left the room.
When the narrator (the thief) was on the road, he counted the notes: 600 rupees in fifties.
With that money, he could live like a rich Arab for a week or two.
He could easily jump into the Lucknow Express but hesitated and remained standing at the platform.
He had no friends to go and the only person he knew was Anil whom he had robbed a few hours ago.
It was a chilly night and a light drizzle added to his problem.
Hari Singh had forgotten about his education in the excitement of theft and realised that education could
bring him Character Sketch more money than a few hundred rupees.
Had Singh went back to the room and put the wet notes under the mattress from where he had stolen it?
Next morning, Anil stretched out his hand towards the narrator (Hari Singh) holdingifaty-f rupee
note.
Anil told that he had made some money and he would pay Had Singh regularly.
174 | P a g e
173
Actually, Anil knew everything about the theft but neither his lips nor his eyes showed anything.
2. Anil walked away. I followed casually‘. Why do you think the narrator followed Anil?
Ans. The narrator‘s purpose of robbing Anil had not yet been served. He followed Anil to gain his trust and
look for an opportunity that may help him give shape to his plans.
3. Was Hari Singh successful in robbing Anil? Was Anil the only one who was robbed or did Hari also
rob himself of something?
Ans. Yes, Hari Singh was successful in robbing Anil. But Anil was not the only one who was robbed at that
time. Hari had robbed himself as well. He had lost the chance of receiving education and being literate. He
had robbed Anil monetarily but he had robbed himself of the chance for a better and brighter future, which
was much more valuable.
4. What did Anil and Hari agree upon to be the mode of payment?
Ans. When Anil stated his inability to pay Hari, Anil questioned Hari if he could feed Hari. Hari realised that
he had misjudged his target and moulded the situation for his benefit. Anil then agreed to feed him if he
knew how to cook.
175 | P a g e
174
2. Hari Singh didn‘t board the express and returned to Amil. Why did he return? On what values does
this incidence put light on?
Ans. Hari Singh was a thief and he had stolen Anil‘s money. After the theft, he realised that he had robbed
not only Anil but also himself of the chance of being literate and having a bright future. His conscience
pricked him to think what all he could have got had he not done this. It was difficult for him to rob Anil but it
was tougher for him not to back. He realised that he could not make tea, buy daily supplies and learn how to
read and write then. His inner self did not agree to bypass this and forced him to return. Hari‘s return to Anil
shows that despite indulging in criminal acts, he still had a practical and positive attitude towards life. It is
the awakening of Hari‘s conscience and Anil‘s love and care that reformed Hari‘s character. It teaches us that
love alone can change a person. Anil‘s understanding nature and care changed Hari‘s thinking to mend his
ways for good.
175
beckons Fowler to follow him to his room. The room was in the 6th floor. As they enter the room, they are
startled by a pistol-toting individual staring at them. It is Max, the rival spy of Ausable. He asks them to enter
and lock the room. He threatens Ausable and warns him to hand over the documents to him as soon as they
arrive at his room later that night. Playing rather composed Ausable sits down and complains about the
balcony window that he thought Max used to break into his room. Max claims that he used the master key to
get inside and had he known about the balcony he would have used that instead. Ausable reiterates that he
had complained to the management about the balcony window several times and has had previous break-ins.
Fowler was listening to the conversation intently. Suddenly there is loud clamor at the door. Ausable
suggests that it must be the police that he had arranged to safe keep the documents. Max is gets anxious and
asks Ausable to turn them away while he hides in the balcony.
He threatens to shoot if he smells any trickery. As soon as Max leaps outside the window he yells out of
horror as he crashes to the road below. The room had no balcony after all. Next, the door opens and Fowler
sees a waiter holding Ausable‘s drinks rather any policeman. Fowler is relieved and impressed by Ausable‘s
presence of mind. He realizes that looks can truly be deceiving.
2. How did Max go out of Ausable‘s room to save himself from the police?
Ans. Max was very nervous to find the police at the door. He went out of the window saying that he would
wait in the balcony. He warned Ausable to send them away or he would shoot him. Max did not confirm the
balcony and stepped out of the window and died.
177 | P a g e
176
Long Answer Questions (100 -150 words)
Q1. With reference to `The Midnight Visitor‘, do you think the presence of mind should be developed and to
what advantage? Elaborate highlighting the values possessed by Ausable.
Ans. Max was a spy who was overconfident and too proud. His pride blinded him, and he thought that
wielding a gun would give a further edge over the seemingly slow Ausable. Max lay in wait for Ausable to
steal the important paper from him. As Fowler observed, apart from the pointed gun he didn‘t look very
menacing. Even this proved useless for him as Ausable outwitted him with his presence of mind and
intelligence. Ausable cleverly found out how Max had entered the room and created an extremely believable
story about a non-existent balcony. He kept calm, and, hearing the waiter knock, declared it to be the police.
Max, in an attempt to hide, fell to his death. Thus, Ausable got rid of Max without moving a muscle.
178 | P a g e
177
UNSOLVED QUESTIONS:
Short Answer Questions (30-40 words):
1. What story did Ausable cook up regarding the arrival of the police? How did it affect Max?
2. How did clever Ausable outwit and get rid of his rival or enemy secret agent Max?
3. How do you judge Ausable as a secret agent?
4. What happened to Max after he jumped out of the window?
5. How did Fowler have his first authentic thrill of the day?
GIST
This story is about a thief who gets a taste of his own medicine. Horace Danby can be termed as a thief with
a difference. He steals only once in a year. He is fond of books and spends most of his booty on buying
books. He plans meticulously before attempting a burglary. During his burglary attempt at a big house, he
gathers all the necessary information and enters the house for stealing from the safe. He is cheated by a lady
thief, who claims herself to be the owner of the house. Finally, Horace ends up in prison only to repent at the
way he was deceived by a person from his own profession.
179 | P a g e
178
CLICK ON IMAGE TO
JOIN US ON TELEGRAM
Q2. Why is Horace Danby described as good and respectable but not completely honest?
Ans. Horace Danby was a good person. He made locks. He was very successful in his business. He had
engaged two helpers in his business. But he was not completely honest because he robbed a safe every
year.
Q4. Who is the real culprit in the story, the young lady in red or Horace Danby? Comment.
Ans. Law of any land works on evidence. Horace Danby opened the safe without wearing his gloves. He
didn‘t think it necessary to wear them as he thought he was working for ‗the lady of the house‘. So the police
matched his fingerprints and he was arrested. The lady in the red was actually the real culprit. She made
Horace open the safe for her. She was also a thief and decamped with the jewels. But in the eyes of the law,
Horace was the real culprit because the evidence was against him.
180 | P a g e
179
Ans. Horace Danby was a successful businessman. He was about fifty year‘s respectable citizen but had a
habit that led him to do robberies. Danby loved rare, expensive books and to get them he used to rob a safe
every year. Every year he planned carefully just to get what he wanted. Danby adopted wrong ways to fulfill
his wishes and hence, later got trapped in a plot by a thief like him. People should imbibe good values. They
should learn that hard work is the only key to success One should work hard to fulfill his desires. I think such
people should imbibe the values of honesty, responsibility, hard work, dedication, self-confidence in order to
reform themselves.
2. Horace Danby was a respectable man but he could not be called loyal. What do you think could be the
reasons for leading a respectable man like him on the path of thievery? Did he feel lack of sense of
freedom? Was it not in his nature to accept the differences among people regarding their social status?
Discuss the values he should have possessed.
Ans. Horace Danby‘s habits were not typical of a thief. He was fond of books was a respectable man but his
passion for books lead him to thievery. He used to steal only once. In a year so, he was never stealing more
than his needs. He stole only to buy rare books; he loved rare and expensive books. Moreover, Danby used to
rob only rich people. It was his nature. To accept the differences among people regarding their social status.
He was aware that people with high socio-background can help him to fulfill his desire. He found such
people easy to rob.
3. Horace promised the young lady that he would follow the path of honesty if she would not hand him over
to the police but he could not keep his promise for more than days. Did he lack reconciliation? Was it not in
his nature to keep his promise? Did he lack the courage to fulfill his needs through an honest living? Discuss
the values he needed to imbibe.
Ans. The lady manipulated the whole situation as well as Horace and very skillfully got the jewels without
even touching anything. She talked high things like protecting the society from culprits like Horace. Horace
promised her that he would follow the path of honesty. He helped her in getting the jewels by breaking the
safe without wearing gloves. But after two days, police caught him for stealing the jewels. He could not
convince them that he had not taken the jewels and had helped the owner‘s wife. The condition provoked
him to break his promise. Although he honestly felt that he would not rob any more he could not do so as he
had no other choice left.
4. Horace stated that he robbed only those who had a lot of money. Was he really a threat to the society? Did
he lack the qualities of a good citizen? Discuss the values he needs to imbibe to lead a path of righteousness.
181 | P a g e
180
Ans. I don‘t think Horace was a threat to the society. He never threatened anyone and rather stole for a very
good reason. He used to rob a safe every year to pursue his hobby of getting rare and expensive books to
read. He was not a professional thief. Moreover, he never harmed anyone. He was considered a good and
honest citizen by everyone. He was about fifty years old and unmarried. He had all the qualities of a good
citizen. He was not a criminal or a typical thief. He did so only to fulfill his need. He was an honest and
good man. He believed in the lady‘s story and gave away all the jewels to her. If he had been a criminal, he
would have killed the lady or would have never handed the jewels to her.
UNSOLVED QUESTIONS:
SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS (30-40 Words):
1. What advice did the lady give Horace regarding his hay fever? Was she really interested in his
health?
2. Did the young lady expect Horace to be caught after the theft?
3. What precautions did Horace make before reaching the safe? Name three of them.
4. Describe Horace Danby‘s encounter with the young lady.
Q2. Horace Danby requested the lady to forget what she saw. Was Horace afraid of being caught? Did he
lack the courage to accept his crime publicly? Explain the values one must imbibe to accept one‘s mistake.
Q3.‖ Horace had some hope because she seemed to be amused at meeting him.‖ Why did Horace feel so?
Did he consider the young lady compassionate towards him? Did he find her free from biases?
Discuss the values Horace should have imbibe understanding of the person. What were Horace Danby‘s
plans for his latest robbery?
GIST:
The story is about a scientist named Griffin. He had been discovering ways which could make a man
invisible and finally swallowed certain rare drugs that made him invisible. He was first noticed by two boys
182 | P a g e
181
in staircase of a house where they could just see his footsteps and started following it. They follow it until the
footsteps are fainter and cannot be seen. First as he is feeling cold he enters a mall for some warmth. After
the stores shutdown he decides to wear some warm clothes and eat something. He first unboxed a few clothes
and wore them. Then from the kitchen of a restaurant he eats cold meat and some coffee. Later he goes to a
grocery store and eats sweets and drinks wine. He then falls asleep on a pile of quilts. He then wakes up in
the morning when some of the store assistants had seen him and started chasing him. He quickly threw away
all the clothes he was wearing and became invisible again. Then he started roaming around again without any
clothes in the cold winters of London. He then decides to steal clothes from a theatre company as he knew he
would get something there to cover his face as well. He then steals bandages for his face, dark glasses, false
nose and a hat for covering himself. He then hits the shopkeeper and steals all his money. Soon he realizes
that London is too crowded to live like this and decides that he would go to a remote village. He books two
rooms at an inn at the Iping village. He reaches there and it is strange for the people of Iping that a stranger
with such a weird appearance has come to stay at an inn during the winter season. Once his money is over, he
steals from people and also hits the landlord and his wife when they try to check his room in his absence.
Then the village constable is asked for help but before that Mrs. Hall, the wife of the landlord asks him
questions regarding who he is and what he did to her furniture. This makes him really furious and he decides
to show her who he really is. The people then see a headless man and Mr. Jaffers, the constable also finds out
that he would have to arrest a man who does not have a head. They are unable to catch Griffin as he removes
all his clothes and becomes invisible. He even knocks out Jaffers as he tries to catch him.
183 | P a g e
182
Answer: As the door was open and nobody appeared to be inside, Halls entered the scientist‘s room. They
saw that the bedclothes were cold, showing that the scientist must have been up for some time and stranger
still, the clothes and bandages that he always wore were lying about the room.
184 | P a g e
183
UNSOLVED QUESTIONS:
Short Answer Questions: - [30-40 words]
Q1. What experiments did Griffin carry out? What was the final result of those experiments?
Q2. What did the London boys follow and why were they fascinated?
Q3. What happened to Jaffers when he tried to catch the invisible scientist?
INTRODUCTION
Richard H. Ebright has contributed significantly to Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. When Ebright was
a little child, he used to collect butterflies, rocks, fossils and coins. He was an eager star-gazer also. But he
was mainly interested in butterflies. During his school as well as college days, he did many experiments for
which he was awarded many prizes. Most of his experiments were on butterflies. These experiments were a
milestone in the world of science.
DETAILED SUMMARY
Richard H. Ebright is one of the leading scientists. He has contributed significantly to Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology. He had been interested in science since his boyhood years. At the age of twenty two, he
excited the scientific world with a new theory. It was concerned with the working of cells. Ebright and his
college room-mate explained the theory in an article. It was published in the journal entitled ‗Proceedings of
the National Academy of Science‘. It was first of his many achievements in the field of science. It started
with his studies on ‗butterflies‘.
Ebright was the only child of his parents. They lived in the north of Reading, Pennsylvania. There was
nothing for Ebright to do there. He had no companions. He was not a good player. But his hobby was
collecting things. Ebright was fascinated by butterflies. He started collecting butterflies in kindergarten. He
also collected rocks, fossils and coins. He also became a star-gazer and an eager astronomer.
Ebright‘s mother recognized his curiosity and encouraged him. She took him on trips. She also bought him
telescopes, microscopes, cameras and other equipment so that he could follow his hobbies. Ebright‘s mother
185 | P a g e
184
was his friend until he started school. She would bring home friends to him. He was her whole life after her
husband‘s death.
Ebright‘s mother would find work for Richie if he had nothing to do. She found learning tasks for him. He
had a great hunger for learning. He earned top grades in school. By the time he was in second grade. He had
collected 25 species of butterflies. These were found around in hometown. One day his mother gave him a
children‘s book. It opened the world of science to Ebright.
That book was ‗The Travels of Monarch X‘. It described how monarch butterflies migrate to Central
America. This book fascinated him. At the end of the book, readers were invited to help study butterfly
migrations. They were asked to tag butterflies for research by Dr Frederick A. Urquhart of Toronto
University. Canada. Anyone who found a tagged butterfly was asked to send the tag to Dr Urquhart. Ebright
started tagging monarch butterflies. The butterfly collecting season around Reading lasts only six weeks in
late summer. He realized that chasing the butterflies one by one won‘t enable him to catch many. So he
decided to raise a flock of butterflies. He would catch a female monarch and take her eggs. He would raise
them in his basement from egg to caterpillar to pupa to adult butterfly. Then he would tag the butterflies‘
wings and let them go.
However, soon Ebright began to lose interest in tagging butterflies. The reason was that there was no
feedback. He was a little disappointed as only two butterflies had been recaptured. And they had been found
not more than seventy-five miles from where he lived. By the time, Ebright reached the seventh grade. He
got busy with other scientific experiments. He entered a county science fair. His entries were slides of frog
tissues. But he did not win any prize He realised that the winners had tried to do real experiments. So he
decided to do further research in his favourite field, that is, insects on which he had already been doing work.
Ebright wrote to Dr Urquhart for ideas. In reply, the famous scientist gave him many suggestions for
experiments. These experiments kept Ebright busy all through high school. He also won many prizes in the
county and international science fairs. For his eighth grade project, Ebright tried to find the cause of a viral
disease that killed all monarch caterpillars. He thought the disease might be carried by a beetle. He tried
raising caterpillars in the presence of beetles. But he didn‘t get any real results. But he showed his
experiment in the science fair and won. The next year his science fair project was testing the theory that
viceroy butterflies imitate monarchs. He said that viceroys look like monarchs because birds do not find
monarchs tasty. By copying monarchs, the viceroys escape being eaten by birds. His project was to see if
birds would eat monarchs. This project was placed first in the zoology division and third overall in the
county science fair.
186 | P a g e
185
In his second year in high school, Ebright‘s research led to his discovery of an unknown insect hormone.
Indirectly, it led to his new theory on the life of cells. He tried to answer a very simple question: What is the
purpose of the twelve tiny gold spots on a monarch pupa? To find the answer Ebright and another student
built a device that showed that the spots were producing a hormone. It was necessary for the butterfly‘s full
development. This project won Ebright first place in the county fair and entry into the International Science
and Engineering Fair. There he won third place for zoology. He also got a chance to work in Walter Reed
Army Institute of Research.
Ebright‘s interest in butterflies never abated. As a high school junior, he continued his advanced experiments
on the monarch pupa. His project won first place at the International Science Fair. In his senior year, he grew
cells from a monarch‘s wing in a culture. He showed that the cells would divide and develop into normal
butterfly wing scales only if they were fed the hormone from the gold spots. That project won first place for
zoology at the International Fair. He also worked at the army laboratory and at the U.S. Dept. of
Agriculture‘s laboratory. The following summer Ebright went back to the Dept. of Agriculture‘s lab and
worked on the hormone theory. Finally, he was able to identify the hormone‘s chemical structure.
A year-and-a-half later, one day, Ebright was seeing the X-ray photos of the chemical structure of cells. He
got the idea for his new theory about cell life. Those photos provided him with the answer to one of biology‘s
puzzles: how the cell can ‗read‘ the blueprint of its DNA. DNA is the substance in the nucleus of a cell that
controls heredity. It is the blueprint for life. Ebright and his college room-mate James R. Wong drew pictures
and constructed plastic models of molecules to show how it could happen.
No one was surprised when Richard Ebright graduated from Harvard with highest honours. He also became a
graduate student researcher at Harvard Medical School. There he began experimenting to test his theory if
the theory proves correct it will be a big step towards understanding the life processes. It might also lead to
new ideas for preventing some types of cancer and other diseases.
Ebright has many other interests also. He also became a champion debater and public speaker, a good
canoeist and an all-around outdoor-Person. He was also an expert photographer of nature and scientific
exhibits.
Ebright‘s social studies teacher, Richard Weiherer had high praise for him. Ebright said about his teacher that
he opened his mind to new ideas. Richard A. Weiherer also spoke highly of Ebright about his interests. He
won because he wanted to do the best job. He said that Ebright was competitive, but not in a bad sense. In the
end, the writer says Ebright possessed those traits which are necessary for the making of a scientist. These
are: Start with a first-rate mind, add curiosity and mix in the will to win for the right reasons. Ebright had
these qualities.
187 | P a g e
186
Main Characters
1.Richard H Ebright
A multifaceted genius; a great scientist, debater, canoeist, etc.
Collected butterflies since childhood
Worked on monarch butterflies, the cell and its DNA
Inspired by his mother, Dr Urquhart and his teacher RA Weiherer
3. Dr Urquhart
Famous for work on monarch butterflies
Taught at University of Toronto, Canada
Helped Ebright with new ideas and suggestions
4. Richard A Weiherer
Q1. Which project of Ebright won first prize in the county science fair?
Ans. Ebright didn‘t win anything at his first science fair, thereby realizing that actual experiments alone
worked. Later, he started winning prizes. Ebright with his scientist friend first built a device that showed that
the tiny gold spots on a monarch pupa were producing a hormone necessary for the butterfly‘s full
development. This project won the first prize in the county science fair and third prize in zoology in the
International science fair.
Q2. What were the factors which contributed to making Ebright a scientist?
188 | P a g e
187
Or
What are the essential qualities for becoming a scientist, according to Albright‘s teacher?
Ans. Sharp brain, d y observant, anal tic mind, driving curiosity, the keen interest in the subject and strong
will for the right cause are some of the essentials for the making of a scientist. He should not run after
prizes, have a competitive spirit but not in a bad sense.
Q3. What idea did Ebright get when he was looking at the X-ray photos of cells?
Ans. One day, Ebright was seeing the X-ray photos of the chemical structure of cells. He got the idea for his
new theory about cell life. Those photos provided him with the answer to one of biology‘s puzzles: how the
cell can ‗read‘ the blueprint of its DNA.
1. ‘Success is failure turned inside out‘. Prove the above statement with instances from the journey
taken by Richard Albright from losing at the science fair to winning at the international fair.
Ans. Success is the fruit of failure. It never comes straight but through failure. This can be seen in the life of
Richard Albright. Although he earned top grades in school, on everyday things he was just like every other
kid. He faced many failures in his life but every failure strengthened his will to succeed. When he was in
seventh grade he participated in County Science Fair with his slides of frog tissues. But he could not win a
prize. This made him determined to win the prize and in his eighth grade, he again participated in the science
fair with the experiment of viral disease in monarch caterpillars and won the prize. The very next Year he
participated with his experiment of whether viceroy butterflies copy the monarch butterflies in order to save
their life from the birds and this project won Albright, third prize in overall county science fair.
His experiment regarding gold spots of monarch liar which he built a device that showed. That the spots
produced hormones necessary for the full development of butterflies won third prize in international science
and engineering fair.
Next year his advanced experiments on the monarch pupa won him first place at the international science
fair. Thus, for Richard Albright, we can say that success is failure turned inside out.
189 | P a g e
188
readers were invited to help study butterfly migrations. They were asked to tag butterflies for research by Dr
Frederick of Toronto University, Canada. Anyone who found a tagged butterfly was asked to send the tag to
Dr Frederick. Ebright started tagging monarch, butterflies. The butterfly collecting season lasts only six
weeks in late summer. He realized that chasing the butterflies one by one won‘t enable him to catch many.
So he decided to raise a flock of butterflies.
Q3. What other interests, besides science did Richard Ebright pursue? Why did Ebright respect and praise
his Social Studies teacher so much?
Ans. No doubt, first and foremost, Richard Ebright was a scientist. He was interested in science; he first
began to collect butterflies. But this scientist found time for other interests too. He was a man of many parts
— a multifaceted genius. Not only did he collect butterflies but also took a deep interest in other activities.
He collected rocks, fossils, and coins. He became an eager astronomer. He would indulge in star-gazing
sometimes all night. Ebright also became a champion debater and public speaker. In this field, his Social
Studies teacher turned Ebright‘s tremendous energy towards the Debating and Model United Nations Clubs.
He was a good canoeist and all-around outdoors-person. He was also an expert photographer. He excelled in
nature and scientific exhibits. In brief, besides being a remarkable scientist, Richard Ebright enjoyed all
pleasures, adventures, hobbies and entertainments that a happy and civilised living provided to him.
190 | P a g e
189
Lesson 7: THE NECKLACE
INTRODUCTION
The Necklace‘ is one of the well-known stories of Guy De Maupassant. The story centers round Matilda
Loisel, who is a beautiful woman. She suffers greatly because of her desire to appear rich and fashionable.
She is married to a clerk and leads an ordinary life. But she wants to be rich and famous. Her husband gets an
invitation to attend a dance party given by the Minister of Public Instruction. Matilda borrows a diamond
necklace from her rich friend Madame Forestier to wear it at the party. She looks charming and everybody
praises her. But when she returns home, she finds that she has lost the necklace. She and her husband borrow
a big amount of money to replace the necklace. Both of the world hard for ten years to pay off their debt.
Their life becomes miserable. One day, after the debt, is paid off. Matilda comes across Madame Forestier.
Matilda is shocked to learn from her that the necklace was made of artificial diamonds and its price was not
more than 500 francs.
GIST
‗The Necklace‘ is a mild satire but with a strong message. It is ridiculous for people of ordinary means to
copy the rich. One should live within one‘s means. Otherwise, he or she invites unnecessary problems,
anxieties and confusion in his or her life.
The main message of the story is that we should be what we are. False pride is the cause of our sufferings.
The loss of a false necklace by Mrs. Loisel was not a big loss. Things could have been settled right if she had
confessed the loss of the necklace to the owner, Madame Forestier. This small lapse or mistake of Mrs.
Loisel makes her whole life miserable and dark. And the irony was that the cause of all these sufferings was
a false necklace.
Main Characters
1. Matilda:
Matilda is a pretty, young lady. She wanted to lead a rich and luxurious life. But she was born into a humble
family and had to marry an ordinary man. She felt sad about her petty economic and social status. When
Matilda got an invitation to a ball, she wanted to pretend as a rich woman. She gave in to vanity. She
disregarded the advice of her good husband. She is a woman who sought the praise and admiration of others.
She feels very happy when men appreciated her beauty and grace at the dance ball. Matilda is a woman
191 | P a g e
190
CLICK ON IMAGE TO
JOIN US ON TELEGRAM
2.Mr. Loisel:
Mr. Loisel is a simple man working as a clerk. He loves his wife and does everything to make her happy. He
gets an invitation to a ball with his wife. When his wife wants a costly necklace, he suggests she should
borrow a necklace from her rich friend, Madame Forestier. When Matilda loses her necklace, he uses his
hard-earned savings to buy a new necklace. He starts working very hard to repay the debt they had incurred.
Mr. Loisel is ready to make an enormous sacrifice to maintain his family. He is a man who believes in living
a life within one‘s means. Unfortunately, because he is lenient towards his wife, he has to undergo much
suffering.
Q2. Why did Madam Loisel leave the ball in a hurry? What does it show about her character?
Ans. Madam Loisel left the ball in a hurry because her husband threw the modest wraps around her
shoulders, whose poverty clashed with the elegance of the ball costume. She did not want to be noticed by
the other woman who was wrapping themselves in rich furs. It shows the hypocrisy and show off life of
Madam Loisel. It shows her dissatisfaction, anger and frustration with life.
Q3. What kind of a husband was M. Loisel? Discuss with reference to the chapter ‗The Necklace‘.
Or
Why do you think that M. Loisel was a loving husband?
Ans. Mr. Loisel was a simple and poor clerk. He made every effort and sacrifice to make his wife happy. He
sacrificed his 400 francs that he had saved to buy a gun for himself in order to buy a new party dress for his
wife. It proves that he was a loving husband.
192 | P a g e
191
Q4. How was Mrs. Loisel ‗a mistake of destiny‘?
Ans. Mrs. Matilda Loisel was very charming and pretty. She appeared to be a lady of a high family. But she
was born in a family of clerks. As her parents did not have much money, she was married to a clerk. But her
thoughts were high. She wanted to enjoy the luxuries of life. So, the writer says that she was ‗a mistake of
destiny.‘
Q2. ―Oh! My poor Matilda! Mine was false.‖ Confession saves you from a lot of trouble and the sense of
guilt. Justify the statement.
Ans. Matilda‘s friend Mme Forester meets her after a long time, nearly a gap of ten years. Perhaps it was
destined to. She does not recognize Matilda — old, hard and crude with dishevelled hair and skirts awry. She
is astonished to see Matilda in this pathetic condition. Matilda tells her the reason for this — the loss of the
original necklace and the misery that followed after replacing the necklace. Mme Forester could only
sympathies with Matilda, for the necklace she had lent to Matilda was not of original diamonds. She could
have told this clearly to Matilda while giving it to her. Perhaps Mme forester thought she should not dampen
Matilda‘s spirits by revealing the truth. But what the loss of it, brought to Matilda was irreversible. Matilda
on her part should have revealed the loss of the necklace to her friend. If it had been of real diamonds, then
she could have asked for some time to replace it. Matilda could have thus taken her friend into confidence,
but the silent suffering had really taken its toll on her life. If Matilda had only taken courage and been honest
to her friend, she would still have been living comfortably, thus justifying the statement given above. Her
own senseless attitude led to her ruin.
193 | P a g e
192
UNSOLVED QUESTIONS SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS:
Q1. How did Mr and Mrs Loisel replace the lost necklace and gave that to Madam Forestier?
Q2. . What made Matilda a grand success at the ball?
Q3. Why did Matilda throw the invitation card spitefully upon the table?
CHARACTER SKETCH
1. Oliver Lutkins:
Oliver Lutkins is a crook who lives in the country town of New Mullion. Though he lives in a small town, he
easily cheats the lawyer who comes to serve a summons on him. He pretends to be Bill Magnuson, the hack
driver and manages to cheat the narrator of his money. He manages to convey the lawyer that it is very
difficult to trace Lutkins. He takes the lawyer too many shops but does not allow the lawyer to directly talk
194 | P a g e
193
succeeded in befooling the lawyer easily. When he came to know that the lawyer did not identify Lutkins, he
introduced himself as Bill. He was neither honest nor helpful. He was very clever. But he was creative,
humorous and witty. He presented the people of New Mullion in an entertaining and humorous manner,
reflecting his cheerful wisdom. He exhibited a nice hospitality.
UNSOLVED
SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS (30-40 Words)
Q1. What information did the delivery man give about Lutkins?
Q2. How did Lutkins‘ mother treat the lawyer?
Q3. Why didn‘t the narrator like his work?
Q.4 How could the lawyer have avoided being taken for a ride?
8
Lesson 9: BHOLI
GIST
From a very young age, Bholi was neglected at home. She had remained a backward child and had contacted
small-pox at the age of two which left her permanently disfigured by deep black pock-marks. She was late to
start speaking and she stammered which made the other children make fun of her. This resulted in her
speaking very little, until she went to school and learned to read and write with the help of a dedicated
teacher.
SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS
1. Why was Ramlal worried about his daughter Bholi and not about his other children?
2. Why did the Tehsildar come to Ramlal‘s village? What did he ask Ramlal to do? Answers
1. Ramlal was worried about Bholi because she had neither good looks nor intelligence. She stammered
and had pock-marks on her face. He was worried, that nobody would marry her.
197 | P a g e
194
2. The Tehsildar came to the village to perform the opening ceremony of the new primary school for
girls that was being opened there. He asked Ramlal to set an example to villagers as he was a
representative of the government, and send his daughters to school.
HINTS
Bholi a simpleton, not so good looking but educated --- Parents‘ decided to get her married --- Found an old,
lame, widow but a wealthy shopkeeper, Bishamber --- Parents persuaded her to marry – though it is an
unequal match --- Somehow she agrees--- The day of the marriage arrives - when the marriage was about to
take place --- The priest ask herto garland Bishamber ---Bishamber glanced at her pock marked face and
refused to garland Bholi --- He demanded five thousands rupees as a dowry --- Bholi‘s father was ready to
pay two thousand --- But Bholi rejected this demand and refused to marry him --- Bholi asked her father not
to request him --- She said that she would teach in the school and live with her parents --- It shows that the
education she has got has made her independent, confident and able to take decision in her life ---She was
not the same Bholi but totally changed Bholi --- as School education turned Bholi
2. The chapter ‗Bholi‘ highlights the discrimination against the girl child. Analyze this statement.
‗Nature does not discriminate, but society does‘.
From time immemorial the world has discriminated against the girl child. The chapter, ‗Bholi‘ throws, up
many instances. Ramlal‘s sons go to school and college. His daughters are not educated because it would be
difficult to marry them off.
Her mother does not think it necessary to take Bholi‘s consent for her marriage. The groom is an old and
lame widower. Still he demands dowry. Her father is ready to pay him. It is the girl herself who realizes that
she is being demeaned and hence opposes the marriage. She raises her voice against the man‘s undue
demand and refuses to marry him. She is criticized and humiliated for standing up for her dignity. But she is
firm and decides the course of her life. From the dumb cow and stammering fool, she transforms herself into
a bold girl who is ready to speak her mind.
198 | P a g e
195
UNSOLVED QUESTIONS SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS
1. Why did Bholi‘s mother favour Bishamber as a suitable husband for Bholi?
2. Who is the artist in the story? What is masterpiece? How did she become a masterpiece?
3. Why were all the relatives amazed to hear Bholi speak up and reject the proposal of Bishamber?
HINTS
Bholi‘s teacher changed the direction of Bholi‘s life through her love and affection --- she filled her mind
with hope and faith --- She told Bholi to cast out all fear from her mind --- It was because of her guidance
that Bholi developed her personality now she could face all the problems of life with great courage and
confidence.
HINTS
This is very significant because Bholi is now no more Bholi (Simpleton) --- She had grown wiser and more
self-confidence due to her education and her teacher‘s training --- She proves that education is like a
philosopher‘s stone which can turn a base metal into gold.
9
Lesson 10 THE BOOK THAT SAVED THE EARTH
GIST
The Book, That Saved the Earth is a drama set in 25th century. A historian in the museum is telling the story
about 20th century; the century of the books. He tells how an old book of rhymes, Mother Goose, saved the
earth from Martian invasion. The invaders from Mars consider themselves too intelligent for the earthlings.
They think they are superior race than the inhabitants of the earth. Think- Tank is the Commander-in-Chief
and ruler of Mars. He is praised and flattered as the most intelligent and powerful creature in the whole
universe. Various members from the invaders‘ team enter a library. They are unable to identify what a book
is. They make several wild guesses. Think-Tank gives ridiculous and fantastic interpretations of books. He
calls them sandwiches and finally arrives at the conclusion that it must be a communication device for the
earthlings. They try to decode what is written in the book. The book is full of nursery rhymes. Their
199 | P a g e
196
encoding tells them that earthlings must have been on a mission to attack the Mars. Fearing that, they
immediately leave the earth and fly away to the distant Alpha Centauri.
ANSWERS:
1. The space probe lands in a public library. The crew is shocked because the place looked very strange
as they had no idea of books. They think the library to be some kind of storage barn.
2. Think-Tank told his crew that the books were sandwiches. He even ordered his crew to eat them.
Then, he called them communication devices and later he said that they were meant for watching.
3. Think-Tank wanted the probe crew to find out what was in the books. So, the probe crew takes
vitamins to increase their intelligence. They are able to read the books after taking those vitamins.
4. The crew of Think-Tank read about Humpty-Dumpty‘s fall in the rhyme and showed the picture to
Think-Tank. Think-Tank‘s head resembled that of Humpty-Dumpty. This makes Think-Tank feel that
earthlings were planning to invade Mars and capture him.
ANSWERS
1. The invaders from Mars considered themselves too intelligent for the earthlings. They thought they
were a superior race than the inhabitants of the earth. As ordered by Think-Tank, the Commander-in- Chief
and ruler of Mars who was praised and flattered as the most intelligent and powerful creature in the whole
universe, various members from the invaders‘ team entered a library. They were unable to identify what a
book is. They made several wild guesses. Think-Tank gave ridiculous and fantastic interpretations of books.
He called them sandwiches and finally arrived at the conclusion that it must be a communication device for
the earthlings. They tried to decode what was written in the book. The book was full of nursery rhymes.
200 | P a g e
197
This book was totally misunderstood by the Martians. Think-Tank misunderstood the Phrases like ‗shell‘,
‗silver ‗and ‗garden‘. They gave him a false idea that earthlings grew silver and weapons. He started thinking
that earthlings were very advanced technologically. The crew of Think-Tank read about Humpty-Dumpty‘s
fall in the rhyme and showed the picture to Think-Tank. Think-Tank‘s head resembled that of Humpty-
Dumpty. This made Think-Tank feels that earthlings were planning to invade Mars and capture him. So, he
ordered them to cancel the invasion and they cancelled their invasion of Earth and went back. Thus one old
book of nursery rhymes saved the Earth from a Martian invasion.
2. Noodle and Think-Tank have contrasting characters. Think-Tank likes to be called the ‗Great and the
Mighty‘. He orders and commands. He is the ruler of Mars, but has no intelligence. He thinks
books to be sandwiches. He is wrong about everything. He demands that the crew obey him. He likes to pass
on other‘s idea as his own. He is a coward who simply boasts about his power.
Noodle, his apprentice, is very clever and wise. He corrects the mistakes of the ruler (Think-Tank) very
gently. He never takes credit for his ideas. But he offers them to the ruler very gently. Think-Tank makes
them as his own.
REFERENCES:
1. https://ncert.nic.in/textbook.php
2. https://www.cbse.gov.in/cbsenew/question-paper.html
3. https://www.educationobserver.com
201 | P a g e
198
CLICK ON IMAGE TO
JOIN US ON TELEGRAM