Bingnan Liu
Bingnan Liu
Bingnan Liu
Molecular Sciences
Review
The Role of BDNF, YBX1, CENPF, ZSCAN4, TEAD4, GLIS1
and USF1 in the Activation of the Embryonic Genome in
Bovine Embryos
Bingnan Liu 1,† , Jiaxin Yan 1,† , Junjie Li 1,2 and Wei Xia 1,2, *
1 College of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China;
[email protected] (B.L.); [email protected] (J.Y.); [email protected] (J.L.)
2 Research Center of Cattle and Sheep Embryo Engineering Technique of Hebei Province,
Baoding 071000, China
* Correspondence: [email protected]
† These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: Early embryonic development relies on the maternal RNAs and newly synthesized proteins
during oogenesis. Zygotic transcription is an important event occurring at a specific time after
fertilization. If no zygotic transcription occurs, the embryo will die because it is unable to meet the
needs of the embryo and continue to grow. During the early stages of embryonic development, the
correct transcription, translation, and expression of genes play a crucial role in blastocyst formation
and differentiation of cell lineage species formation among mammalian species, and any variation
may lead to developmental defects, arrest, or even death. Abnormal expression of some genes may
lead to failure of the embryonic zygote genome before activation, such as BDNF and YBX1; Decreased
expression of CENPF, ZSCAN4, TEAD4, GLIS1, and USF1 genes can lead to embryonic development
failure. This article reviews the results of studies on the timing and mechanism of gene expression of
these genes in bovine fertilized eggs/embryos.
after ZGA. However, all processes involved in cell differentiation, as well as in a range of
embryonic development, are closely linked to changes in gene expression and histones. In
mammals, the correct transcription, translation, and expression of genes play a pivotal role
in the formation of blastocysts and the differentiation of cell lineage species. During the
development of bovine embryos, different genes are expressed at different stages, and the
expression of these genes is regulated by many factors, including transcription factors and
epigenetic modifications. The study of these genes and their regulatory mechanisms will
lead to a better understanding of the genetic program of bovine embryonic development.
Many maternal genes are synthesized and accumulated in the oocyte and play a key role
in early embryonic development. Among them, the maternal effector genes (MEGs) refer
to the genes that play an important role in maintaining the survival and development of
mammalian embryos during the cleavage stage after fertilization. For example, knocking
out NOBOX in bovine embryos significantly reduced not only the blastocyst rate but also
the expression of pluripotent genes (POU5F1/OCT4 and NANOG) and the number of cells
in the inner cell mass within the blastocyst [3]. ZNFO has intrinsic transcriptional repressor
activity and is another maternally derived oocyte-specific nuclear factor essential for early
bovine embryonic development. Knockdown of ZNFO by siRNA significantly reduced
embryo development to the 8–16 cell stage and blastocyst stage [4]. Maternal genes can
support early embryonic development before the syn gene is activated and then begins
to degrade. Previous studies have found that nearly 90% of maternal genes are degraded
when cattle congenital gene activation occurs at the 8–16 cell stage [5]. Since the embryonic
genome is transcribed up to the ZGA stage, it is likely that the accumulation of maternal
factors (proteins and mRNAs) during oocyte development has led to the recording of this
phenomenon. In addition, the requirement for extensive epigenetic reorganization prior to
embryo implantation is associated with the pluripotency and activation of the embryonic
genome. Transcription of the zygotic genome is required for the normal development
and differentiation of early animal embryos, and ZGA-related factors are essential for the
transcriptional regulation of the zygotic genome. For instance, OCT-4, a transcription factor
that plays a pivotal role in maintaining the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells (ESCs), has
been demonstrated to elicit a diminished rate of blastocyst development in bovine embryos
with targeted knockdown of OCT-4 via siRNA injection [6,7]. It has been confirmed that
the knockdown of SOX2, an additional transcription factor associated with embryo quality
and essential for maintaining embryonic pluripotency, leads to a reduction in the number
of blastocysts and blastomeres in cattle [8–10]. Knockdown of TSPY by microinjection in
bovine fertilized eggs had no effect on the female embryo population but caused male
embryo development to stop before the blastocyst stage [11].
In recent years, an increasing number of genes associated with oocyte maturation
and early embryonic development have been identified. In order to successfully develop
into healthy offspring, growing and maturing mammalian oocytes and embryos must
undergo matching gene expression and epistatic modifications before they can develop
into new life. Therefore, knowledge of key genes and epistatic modifications for normal
development before implantation is essential to ensure normal gametogenesis, normal
fertilization and maintenance of high fecundity rates, and normal early embryogenesis in
domestic animals. Compared with natural mating and artificial insemination, the success
rate of in vitro production (IVP) of bovine embryos to establish pregnancy is low, and
oocyte quality is a key factor limiting the success of animal pregnancy. Therefore, in order
to better understand the genetic regulation of early embryo development and improve the
efficiency of in vitro embryo production, we summarized the genetic factors that have been
found to inhibit oocyte maturation in recent years.
2.2. Y-Box Binding Protein 1 (YBX1) Reduces Attenuation of Damaging Maternal Genes
YBX1 has a significant function in the stabilization of RNA and regulation of tran-
scription. This particular gene encodes a protein with a cold shock domain that is highly
conserved and possesses broad binding properties toward nucleic acids. The encoded
protein serves as a multifaceted nucleic acid-binding macromolecule, demonstrating its
involvement in manifold cellular endeavors encompassing the orchestration of transcrip-
tion and translation, intricate pre-mRNA splicing, intricate DNA reparation, and delicate
mRNA packaging. Additionally, this protein is an integral constituent within messenger
ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) formations, suggesting potential implications in the intricate
realm of microRNA processing [21]; Y-Box Binding Protein is reported to be enriched in
oocytes [22,23] and recognized as primary constituents of cytoplasmic messenger ribonu-
cleoproteins (mRNPs) with a diverse array of RNA-binding capacities [24]. Deng et al.
used the public RNA-seq dataset to reanalyze the transcription level of YBX1 in bovine
embryos. Bovine YBX1 was progressively up-regulated from oocyte to blastula, and during
the early development of bovine embryos, YBX1 expression was significantly increased in
8-cell embryos [25] (Figure 1). YBX1 is highly expressed in bovine mature oocytes, and its
ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs) with a diverse array of RNA-binding capacities [24]. Deng
et al. used the public RNA-seq dataset to reanalyze the transcription level of YBX1 in bo-
vine embryos. Bovine YBX1 was progressively up-regulated from oocyte to blastula, and
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16019 during the early development of bovine embryos, YBX1 expression was significantly 4 of 12
in-
creased in 8-cell embryos [25] (Figure 1). YBX1 is highly expressed in bovine mature oo-
cytes, and its expression is further increased after fertilization, especially during MZT, as
confirmed
expressionby is Grurgia et al. [26].after fertilization, especially during MZT, as confirmed by
further increased
In order
Grurgia et al.to[26].
further study the effect of YBX1 on embryonic development ability, siRNA
injection was performed
In order to knock
to further study out the
the effect of expression of YBX1 and
YBX1 on embryonic observe the
development expression
ability, siRNA
changes
injectionofwas
YBX1. A total of
performed to 5154
knockdifferentially expressed
out the expression genesand
of YBX1 (DEGs) were
observe obtained
the expressionby
using
changesDESeq2.
of YBX1.It was found
A total of that
5154in the embryosexpressed
differentially with low genes
YBX1 (DEGs)
knockdown,
were the number
obtained by
of 2-cell
using and 4-cell
DESeq2. stage
It was blocked
found embryos
that in increased,
the embryos andYBX1
with low the percentage
knockdown, of the
blastocysts
number
of 2-cell and
decreased 4-cell stageAmong
significantly. blocked embryos
them, 1623 increased, and the percentage
and 3531 up-regulated of blastocysts
and down-regulated
decreased
genes weresignificantly.
enriched in the Among
regionsthem,
that 1623 and RNA
regulate 3531 up-regulated
splicing and RNAand down-regulated
stability. More-
genesawere
over, largeenriched
numberinofthe regions
genes that regulate
related RNA were
to Z-decline splicing and RNA
changed, andstability. Moreover,
these results all
a large number
indicated that YBX1 of genes related to
knockdown Z-decline
would lead towere changed, and
the impairment ofthese resultssplicing
alternative all indicated
(AS)
thatRNA
and YBX1stability
knockdown would
during ZGA, lead to theasimpairment
as well of alternative
the attenuation splicing
of maternal mRNA (AS) and RNA
[25].
stability during ZGA, as well as the attenuation of maternal mRNA [25].
Figure 1. Description of expression patterns of BDNF and YBX1mRNA. The horizontal coordinate
Figure 1. Description
represents of embryonic
the stages of expressiondevelopment;
patterns of BDNF and YBX1mRNA.
The ordinate The horizontal
only represents coordinate
the rise and fall; there
represents the stages of embryonic development; The ordinate only represents the rise and fall; there
is no actual value.
is no actual value.
3. Adverse Effects of Abnormal Gene Expression on Zygotic Genome Activation
3.3.1.
Adverse Effects of Centromeric
Down-Regulation Abnormal Gene Expression
Protein F (CENPF)on Zygotic
May Cause Genome Activation
the Embryo to Stagnate at the
8-Cell Stage Formatting of Mathematical Components
3.1. Down-Regulation Centromeric Protein F (CENPF) May Cause the Embryo to Stagnate at
the 8-Cell
CENPFStage is Formatting
a component of Mathematical Components
of the centromere-centromeric complex, and the expression of
this CENPF
gene results in the production of a protein that is
is a component of the centromere-centromeric complex,linked to this complex.
and theThis protein
expression
plays a critical role in the differentiation of somatic cells. It was found
of this gene results in the production of a protein that is linked to this complex. This pro-that the number of
CENPF
tein plays mRNA decreased
a critical gradually
role in the from 2 to
differentiation of8somatic
cells stage,
cells.and all of
It was themthat
found originated
the number from
the mother line. The transcription of CENPF in embryo begins at
of CENPF mRNA decreased gradually from 2 to 8 cells stage, and all of them originated the late stage of 8 cells,
so it can be assumed that after the appearance of EGA, its gene expression
from the mother line. The transcription of CENPF in embryo begins at the late stage of begins to rise
8
again and remains basically unchanged until the blastocyst stage (Figure
cells, so it can be assumed that after the appearance of EGA, its gene expression begins to 2) [27]. To investi-
gateagain
rise the impact of CENPF
and remains on embryonic
basically unchanged development potential,stage
until the blastocyst Tereza et al. 2)
(Figure employed
[27]. To
CENPF-specific double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to suppress
investigate the impact of CENPF on embryonic development potential, Tereza et al. the corresponding mRNAem-
expression and found that the embryos showed obvious developmental abnormalities until
ployed CENPF-specific double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to suppress the corresponding
the EGA stage and found that the most common defects in the embryos inoculated with
mRNA expression and found that the embryos showed obvious developmental abnor-
CENPF dsRNA were: The size varies, the edge of the blastomere is blurred, the part of
malities until the EGA stage and found that the most common defects in the embryos
the blastomere becomes transparent, there are obvious nuclear fragments in the embryo,
inoculated with CENPF dsRNA were: The size varies, the edge of the blastomere is
even there is no nucleus in the blastomere, only less than 1/3 of the embryos developed to
blurred, the part of the blastomere becomes transparent, there are obvious nuclear frag-
8 cells [28]. CENPF plays an important role in the aggregation, arrangement, and separation
ments in the embryo, even there is no nucleus in the blastomere, only less than 1/3 of the
of chromosomes because CENPF plays an important role in the interaction between cen-
embryos developed to 8 cells [28]. CENPF plays an important role in the aggregation, ar-
tromere and microtubule in somatic cells [29]. The protein functions as a vital component
rangement, and separation of chromosomes because CENPF plays an important role in
of the nuclear framework during the G2 stage of interphase. As G2 nears its conclusion,
the interaction between centromere and microtubule in somatic cells [29]. The protein
the protein establishes connections with the kinetochore and maintains this interaction
functions as a vital component of the nuclear framework during the G2 stage of inter-
until early anaphase. It is found in the spindle midzone during late anaphase and the
phase. As G2 nears
intracellular bridgeitsduring
conclusion, the protein
telophase establishes
and is thought connections
to undergo with the degradation.
subsequent kinetochore
The precise pattern of localization for this protein suggests its potential role in promot-
ing chromosome segregation during mitosis. Studies in humans and other animals have
shown that CENPF silencing affects cell division by disrupting the chromosome division
process [30,31]. The research results of cattle also showed that blastomere abnormalities, to
a certain extent, can also be understood as related to the process of chromosome division,
and maintains this interaction until early anaphase. It is found in the spindle midzone
during late anaphase and the intracellular bridge during telophase and is thought to un-
dergo subsequent degradation. The precise pattern of localization for this protein suggests
its potential role in promoting chromosome segregation during mitosis. Studies in hu-
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16019 mans and other animals have shown that CENPF silencing affects cell division by disrupt-
5 of 12
ing the chromosome division process [30,31]. The research results of cattle also showed
that blastomere abnormalities, to a certain extent, can also be understood as related to the
process
but of chromosome
the specific division,
mechanism but the through
or pathway specific mechanism or pathway
which the impact through
on bovine which
embryos
the impact on bovine
remains to be explored.embryos remains to be explored.
Figure
Figure 2. Description of
2. Description of expression
expression patterns
patterns of
of CENPF,
CENPF, ZSCAN4,
ZSCAN4, TEAD4,
TEAD4, GLIS1,
GLIS1, and
and USF1mRNA.
USF1mRNA.
The horizontal
horizontal coordinate
coordinate represents
representsthe
thestage
stageofofembryonic
embryonicdevelopment;
development;The
Theordinate
ordinateonly
onlyrepre-
rep-
resents
sents thethe rise
rise and
and fallfall
andand has
has nono actual
actual value.
value.
reduced. In order to further explore the effect of GLIS1 downregulation on gene transcripts,
mRNA expressions of PGK1, PDHA1, heat shock homologous protein 70 (HSPA8), and
X non-live specific transcripts (XIST-) at cell stage 8–16 were detected. The expression of
PDHA1 and HSPA8 decreased significantly. PDHA1 is involved in glucose metabolism and
plays a key role in embryonic development, especially in cattle and mice [56,57]. HSPA8
encodes HSC70, which is involved in the pretreatment and selective autophagy of intron
RNA, so HSC70 knockdown will lead to a large number of cell death of various types.
In conclusion, GLIS1 down-regulated embryos may lead to the failure of ZGA initiation,
suggesting that GLIS1 may be an important factor in the pre-implantation development of
bovine embryos.
3.5. Upstream Stimulating Factor 1 (USF1) Gene Knockout Affects Early Embryonic Development
in Cattle
USF1 is a transcription factor with a basic helix-loop-helix structure that selectively
attaches to E-box DNA motifs. It is recognized as a cis-element of crucial genes responsible
for oocyte expression, which is vital for early embryonic and oocyte development [58]. Datta
T et al., therefore, first examined the expression patterns of USF1 in bovine oocytes and
embryos at different times. USF1 mRNA was found to increase during meiosis, increase
significantly during 2–8 cells, and then decrease until it is almost undetectable at the
blastocyst stage, indicating that it may play a role in embryo genome activation, indicating
that the gene is maternal in origin and may be consumed or degraded during embryo
genome activation (Figure 2). In order to investigate the role of USF1 in bovine oocyte and
embryonic development, the siRNA program was used to mediate gene silencing in bovine
embryos, and the abundance of USF1 transcripts was significantly reduced after injection
of USF1 siRNA. The study found that the total cleavage rate in bovine embryos after USF1
knockout had no effect but reduced the number of development to the 8–16 cell stage, and
in particular, the blastocyst rate was significantly reduced. In addition, these genes TWIST 2,
JY-1, GDF 9, and FST were found to carry USF1-binding elements (e-boxes) in their promoter
region necessary for the ability of bovine oocytes to develop. The abundance of TWIST2
and JY1 mRNA increased, but the abundance of GDF9 and FST transcripts decreased in
USF1 siRNA oocytes collected at the MII stage. The abundance of GDF9 transcripts was
moderately decreased, suggesting that negative control siRNA had a moderate off-target
effect on GDF9 expression. The transcription factor TWIST2 functions as a molecular switch,
which can either activate or suppress target genes by directly binding to conserved E-box
sequences in promoter regions and enlisting coactivators or suppressors [59]. As such,
USF1 has the potential to regulate the transcriptional levels of GDF9, FST, TWIST2, and
JY-1 during oocyte maturation.
4. Conclusions
After fertilization, mammals may require a specific object or abundant eggs for mRNA
transcription and protein synthesis to give them the ability to develop fully. In mice,
blastocyst formation is dependent on the presence of maternal factor(s) as mRNA in the egg
and also on syncytial genetic information [60,61]. The normal expression of these genes is
inextricably linked to the normal development of the blastocyst and the normal attachment
of the early embryo. Moreover, abnormal oocyte mRNA level abundance and pattern
of oocyte–follicle axis of development may lead to oocyte development failure and thus
affect later development [62]. Large mammals similar to mice, such as cattle and sheep,
have similar mechanisms. Among them, transcripts of genes required for oocytes and
zygotes of some domestic animals have been identified, and different levels of transcript
deletion cause developmental arrest and other developmental disorders at different stages,
including BDNF, GLS1, YBX1, GENPF, ZSCAN4, and TEAD4, and at which stage they play
a key role, as shown in Figure 3. A general pattern emerges from various studies: During
the continuous division and maturation of the primordial follicle, a series of transcriptome
changes occur. Two attenuation occurs during the period; the first is M-attenuation, starting
and zygotes of some domestic animals have been identified, and different levels of tran-
script deletion cause developmental arrest and other developmental disorders at different
stages, including BDNF, GLS1, YBX1, GENPF, ZSCAN4, and TEAD4, and at which stage
they play a key role, as shown in Figure 3. A general pattern emerges from various studies:
During the continuous division and maturation of the primordial follicle, a series of tran-
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16019 scriptome changes occur. Two attenuation occurs during the period; the first is M-attenu- 8 of 12
ation, starting from the GVBD stage. The second attenuation from the MII phase is called
Z-attenuation; after fertilization, maternal mRNA will be heavily degraded via a key de-
velopmental
from the GVBD process
stage.known as maternal
The second to zygotic
attenuation transition
from the MII phase(MZT), in which
is called develop-
Z-attenuation;
mental
after control is transferred
fertilization, from maternally
maternal mRNA supplied
will be heavily gene products
degraded to products
via a key synthe-
developmental
process known
sized from as maternal
the zygotic to zygotic
genome, transition
resulting (MZT),ofinthe
in activation which developmental
syngeneic control
genome [63–66].
is transferred
Thus, from maternally
oocyte-derived mRNAs supplied genemay
and proteins products
play to
anproducts
important synthesized
role in thisfrom the
process
zygotic
[67]. genome, resulting in activation of the syngeneic genome [63–66]. Thus, oocyte-
derived mRNAs and proteins may play an important role in this process [67].
Figure 3. The process of the action of each gene is summarized. BDNF and YBX1 played an important
role before
Figure ZGA.
3. The CENPF
process of ZSCAN4,
the actionTEAD4
of eachGLIS1,
gene isand USF1 affect BDNF
summarized. the growth of the late
and YBX1 ZGA.
played an im-
portant role before ZGA. CENPF ZSCAN4, TEAD4 GLIS1, and USF1 affect the growth of the late
ZGA.For example, if BDNF is defective during the maturation and early embryonic devel-
opment of buffalo follicles and oocytes, the expression levels of related genes and receptor
genesForareexample,
dysregulatedif BDNFso that cumulus
is defective cells and
during their receptor
the maturation andNTRK2 cannot promote
early embryonic devel-
oocyte
opmentmaturation. However,
of buffalo follicles and after YBX1
oocytes, thegene knockdown,
expression levels ofit related
affects genes
the stability of AS
and receptor
and RNA, thus leading to the development defects of pre-ZGA
genes are dysregulated so that cumulus cells and their receptor NTRK2 cannot promote embryos. However, the
difference is that studies on pigs, sheep, mice, zebrafish, and other
oocyte maturation. However, after YBX1 gene knockdown, it affects the stability of AS species have shown
that
and the
RNA,development
thus leading of embryos is affected bydefects
to the development m6A modification, while the mechanism
of pre-ZGA embryos. However, the of
the effect on cattle has not been reported [68–71]. CENPF, ZSCAN4,
difference is that studies on pigs, sheep, mice, zebrafish, and other species have shown GLIS1, TEAD4, and
CDX2
that thealldevelopment
inhibited the development
of embryos isofaffected
early ZGA to varying
by m6A degrees. while
modification, For example, CENPF-
the mechanism
specific knockdown resulted in mRNA and protein silencing
of the effect on cattle has not been reported [68–71]. CENPF, ZSCAN4, GLIS1, TEAD4, during pre-implantation
development, disrupting the morphology of blastomere and inhibiting the development
and CDX2 all inhibited the development of early ZGA to varying degrees. For example,
of 8 cells after implantation. ZSCAN4 knockdown affected PIWIL2 mRNA level, which
CENPF-specific knockdown resulted in mRNA and protein silencing during pre-implan-
may affect the normal function of transposons and lead to a decrease in the number of
tation development, disrupting the morphology of blastomere and inhibiting the devel-
16-cell stage embryos. Down-regulation of GLIS1 affected the expression levels of PDHA1
opment of 8 cells after implantation. ZSCAN4 knockdown affected PIWIL2 mRNA level,
and HSPA8, thus inhibiting the embryonic development from the 16–32 cell stage. TEAD
which may affect the normal function of transposons and lead to a decrease in the number
and CDX2 should interact with each other to ensure the stable expression of the TE gene;
of 16-cell stage embryos. Down-regulation of GLIS1 affected the expression levels of
otherwise, the transcriptional regulation of pluripotency-related genes in bovine blastula
PDHA1 and HSPA8, thus inhibiting the embryonic development from the 16–32 cell stage.
TE and ICM cell lines will be affected, leading to the failure of embryonic development.
TEAD and CDX2 should interact with each other to ensure the stable expression of the TE
USF1, on the other hand, alters the developmental capacity of oocytes by affecting the
gene; otherwise, the transcriptional regulation of pluripotency-related genes in bovine
promoter-binding element E-box. In addition, the time of the first division after embryo
blastula TE and
fertilization ICM
is also cell lines
closely willtobethe
related affected,
normalleading to the failure
development of the of embryonic
embryo. If thedevel-
time
opment. USF1, on the other hand, alters the developmental capacity
interval of the first division after embryo fertilization is too long, the igf-1 ligand of oocytes by affect-
may
ingreduced
be the promoter-binding
or even absent,element and theE-box.
mRNA In abundance
addition, themaytimebeof the firstindivision
changed responseafter
to
embryo fertilization is also closely related to the normal development
the unfavorable growth environment, thus adversely affecting the development of the of the embryo. If
embryo [72,73]. The role of the fallopian tube in the development of the early embryo
should not be ignored, and the mechanism of embryo-fallopian tube interaction also af-
fects changes in transcription levels [74,75]. We can see that there is up-regulation and
down-regulation of gene expression before embryo implantation. During this period, no
matter how large or small the gene is, once the expression disorder occurs, the embryo
development will encounter problems. Therefore, the research on important genes related
to genes before embryo implantation is of great significance and also poses great challenges.
However, as technology advances and we learn more about genes and the mechanisms by
which they work, the more comprehensive the study will be.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16019 9 of 12
Author Contributions: W.X. and J.L. conceived and designed this review. B.L. and W.X. wrote the
manuscript. J.Y. contributed to the revisions. All authors have read and agreed to the published
version of the manuscript.
Funding: Supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1200401),
Biological Agriculture Joint Fund of Hebei Natural Science Foundation (C2023204007), Key Project
of Educational Commission of Hebei Province of China (ZD2022005), Project for overseas talents
in Hebei Province (ZD20220513), the Special Project for Talents Enrollment of Hebei Agricultural
University (YJ2021013) and Basic Research Funds for Colleges of Hebei province (KY2021006).
Institutional Review Board Statement: These studies were approved by the Hebei Agriculture
University Animal Research Ethics Committee (Baoding, Hebei, China).
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge all the teachers and students in the Research
Center of Cattle and Sheep Embryo Engineering Technique of Hebei Province.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
TE Trophoblastic ectoderm
ICM Inner cell mass
ESCs Embryonic stem cells
MEGs Maternal effector genes
NOBOX Newborn ovary homeobox
OCT4 Octamer-binding transcription factor 4
ZNFO Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) containing zinc finger transcription factor
SOX2 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2
K-252a NTRK2 inhibitor
pep5 p75 inhibitor
K-252a NTRK2 inhibitor
TSPY Testis specific protein Y-encoded
BDNF Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
IVM Oocytes in vitro maturation
NTs Neurotrophins
YBX1 Y-Box Binding Protein 1
MZT Maternal-to-zygotic transition
AS Alternative Splicing
m6A N6-methyladenosine
CENPF Centromeric protein F
ZSCAN4 Zinc Finger and SCAN Domain Containing 4
PIWIL2 Piwi-like RNA-mediated gene silencing 2
DPPA2 Developmental pluripotency-associated gene 2
TE Trophoblast ectoderm
PGK1 Phosphor glycolate 15 kinase 1
PDHA1 Pyruvate dehydrogenase 1α
HSC70 Heat shock homologous protein 70
GLIS1 GLI-Similar 1
USF1 Upstream stimulating factor 1
References
1. Ren, W.; Gao, L.; Mou, Y.; Deng, W.; Hua, J.; Yang, F. DUX: One Transcription Factor Controls 2-Cell-like Fate. Int. J. Mol. Sci.
2022, 23, 2067. [CrossRef]
2. Rossant, J. Genetic control of early cell lineages in the mammalian embryo. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2018, 52, 185–201. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16019 10 of 12
3. Tripurani, S.K.; Kyung-Bon, L.; Lei, W.; Gabbine, W.; Smith, G.W.; Lee, Y.S.; Latham, K.E.; Yao, J. A novel functional role for
the oocyte-specific transcription factor newborn ovary homeobox (NOBOX) during early embryonic development in cattle.
Endocrinology 2011, 152, 1013–1023. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Hand, J.M.; Zhang, K.; Wang, L.; Koganti, P.P.; Mastrantoni, K.; Rajput, S.K.; Ashry, M.; Smith, G.W.; Yao, J. Discovery of a novel
oocyte-specific Krüppel-associated box domain-containing zinc finger protein required for early embryogenesis in cattle. Mech.
Dev. 2017, 144, 103–112. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Telford, N.A.; Watson, A.J.; Schultz, G.A. Transition from maternal to embryonic control in early mammalian development: A
comparison of several species. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1990, 26, 90–100. [CrossRef]
6. Simmet, K.; Zakhartchenko, V.; Philippou-Massier, J.; Blum, H.; Klymiuk, N.; Wolf, E. OCT4/POU5F1 is required for NANOG
expression in bovine blastocysts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 2770–2775. [CrossRef]
7. Sakurai, N.; Takahashi, K.; Emura, N.; Fujii, T.; Hirayama, H.; Kageyama, S.; Hashizume, T.; Sawai, K. The Necessity of OCT-4 and
CDX2 for Early Development and Gene Expression Involved in Differentiation of Inner Cell Mass and Trophectoderm Lineages
in Bovine Embryos. Cell. Reprogramming 2016, 18, 309–318. [CrossRef]
8. Yao, X.; Amaral, T.F.; Ross, P.J.; Soto, D.A.; Diffenderfer, K.E.; Pankonin, A.R.; Surawich, J.; Paula, T.; Hansen, P.J. Importance of
WNT-dependent signaling for derivation and maintenance of primed pluripotent bovine embryonic stem cells. Biol. Reprod. 2021,
105, 52–63.
9. Denicol, A.C.; Dobbs, K.B.; Mclean, K.M.; Carambula, S.F.; Loureiro, B.; Hansen, P.J. Canonical WNT signaling regulates
development of bovine embryos to the blastocyst stage. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1266. [CrossRef]
10. Tribulo, P.; Leão BC, D.S.; Lehloenya, K.C.; Mingoti, G.Z.; Hansen, P.J. Consequences of endogenous and exogenous WNT
signaling for development of the preimplantation bovine embryo. Biol. Reprod. Off. J. Soc. Study Reprod. 2017, 96, 1129–1141.
[CrossRef]
11. Rho, N. Key Role of Testis Specific Protein y Encoded (TSPY) in Bovine Early Embryo Development. Ph.D. Thesis, University of
Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2020.
12. Dissen, G.A.; Mayerhofer, A.; Ojeda, S.R. Participation of nerve growth factor in the regulation of ovarian function. Zygote 1996, 4,
309–312. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Lara, H.E.; Hill, D.F.; Katz, K.H.; Ojeda, S.R. The gene encoding nerve growth factor is expressed in the immature rat ovary: Effect
of denervation and hormonal treatment. Endocrinology 1990, 126, 357–363. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Mayerhofer, A.; Dissen, G.; Parrott, J.; Hill, D.; Mayerhofer, D.; Garfield, R.; Costa, M.; Skinner, M.; Ojeda, S.J.E. Involvement of
nerve growth factor in the ovulatory cascade: trkA receptor activation inhibits gap junctional communication between thecal
cells. Endocrinology 1996, 137, 5662–5670. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Ojeda, S.R.; Romero, C.; Tapia, V.; Dissen, G.A. Neurotrophic and cell–cell dependent control of early follicular development. Mol.
Cell. Endocrinol. 2000, 163, 67–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Waraksa, J.A.; Lindsay, R.M.; Ip, N.Y.; Hutz, R.J. Neurotrophin-3 augments steroid secretion by hamster ovarian follicles in vitro.
Zool. Sci. 1995, 12, 499–502. [CrossRef]
17. Barbacid, M. The Trk family of neurotrophin receptors. J. Neurobiol. 1994, 25, 1386–1403. [CrossRef]
18. Dissen, G.A.; Garcia-Rudaz, C.; Ojeda, S.R. Role of Neurotrophic Factors in Early Ovarian Development. In Seminars in
Reproductive Medicine; Thieme Medical Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 24–31.
19. Seifer, D.B.; Feng, B.; Shelden, R.M.; Chen, S.; Dreyfus, C.F. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: A novel human ovarian follicular
protein. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 655–659. [CrossRef]
20. Zhao, X.; Du, F.; Liu, X.; Ruan, Q.; Wu, Z.; Lei, C.; Deng, Y.; Luo, C.; Jiang, J.; Shi, D. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
is expressed in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) ovarian follicles and promotes oocyte maturation and early embryonic development.
Theriogenology 2019, 130, 79–88. [CrossRef]
21. Mordovkina, D.; Lyabin, D.N.; Smolin, E.A.; Sogorina, E.M.; Ovchinnikov, L.P.; Eliseeva, I.J.B. Y-box binding proteins in mRNP
assembly, translation, and stability control. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 591. [CrossRef]
22. Bouvet, P.; Wolffe, A.P. A role for transcription and FRGY2 in masking maternal mRNA within Xenopus oocytes. Cell 1994, 77,
931–941. [CrossRef]
23. Lau, E.S.-W.; Zhu, B.; Sun, M.-A.; Ngai, S.M.; Ge, W. Proteomic analysis of zebrafish folliculogenesis identifies YB-1 (Ybx1/ybx1)
as a potential gatekeeping molecule controlling early ovarian folliculogenesis. Biol. Reprod. 2023, 109, 482–497. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
24. Sun, J.; Yan, L.; Shen, W.; Meng, A.J.D. Maternal Ybx1 safeguards zebrafish oocyte maturation and maternal-to-zygotic transition
by repressing global translation. Development 2018, 145, dev166587. [CrossRef]
25. Deng, M.; Chen, B.; Liu, Z.; Wan, Y.; Li, D.; Yang, Y.; Wang, F. YBX1 mediates alternative splicing and maternal mRNA decay
during pre-implantation development. Cell Biosci. 2022, 12, 1–11. [CrossRef]
26. Kakourou, G.; Jaroudi, S.; Tulay, P.; Heath, C.; Serhal, P.; Harper, J.C.; SenGupta, S.B. Investigation of gene expression profiles
before and after embryonic genome activation and assessment of functional pathways at the human metaphase II oocyte and
blastocyst stage. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 99, 803–814.e23. [CrossRef]
27. Kaňka, J.; Kepkova, K.; Němcová, L.J.T. Gene expression during minor genome activation in preimplantation bovine development.
Theriogenology 2009, 72, 572–583. [CrossRef]
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16019 11 of 12
28. Toralová, T.; Šušor, A.; Němcová, L.; Kepková, K.; Kaňka, J.J.R. Silencing CENPF in bovine preimplantation embryo induces
arrest at 8-cell stage. Reproduction 2009, 138, 783–791. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Bomont, P.; Maddox, P.; Shah, J.V.; Desai, A.B.; Cleveland, D.W. Unstable microtubule capture at kinetochores depleted of the
centromere-associated protein CENP-F. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 3927–3939. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Holt, S.V.; Vergnolle, M.A.; Hussein, D.; Wozniak, M.J.; Allan, V.J.; Taylor, S.S. Silencing Cenp-F weakens centromeric cohesion,
prevents chromosome alignment and activates the spindle checkpoint. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 4889–4900. [CrossRef]
31. Liao, H.; Winkfein, R.; Mack, G.; Rattner, J.; Yen, T. CENP-F is a protein of the nuclear matrix that assembles onto kinetochores at
late G2 and is rapidly degraded after mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 130, 507–518. [CrossRef]
32. Falco, G.; Lee, S.-L.; Stanghellini, I.; Bassey, U.C.; Hamatani, T.; Ko, M.S. Zscan4: A novel gene expressed exclusively in late 2-cell
embryos and embryonic stem cells. Dev. Biol. 2007, 307, 539–550. [CrossRef]
33. Zalzman, M.; Falco, G.; Sharova, L.V.; Nishiyama, A.; Thomas, M.; Lee, S.L.; Stagg, C.A.; Hoang, H.G.; Yang, H.T.; Indig, F.E.; et al.
Zscan4 regulates telomere elongation and genomic stability in ES cells. Nature 2010, 464, 858–863. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Takahashi, K.; Ross, P.J.; Sawai, K. The necessity of ZSCAN4 for preimplantation development and gene expression of bovine
embryos. J. Reprod. Dev. 2019, 65, 319–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Manakov, S.A.; Pezic, D.; Marinov, G.K.; Pastor, W.A.; Sachidanandam, R.; Aravin, A.A. MIWI2 and MILI have differential effects
on piRNA biogenesis and DNA methylation. Cell Rep. 2015, 12, 1234–1243. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Siomi, M.C.; Sato, K.; Pezic, D.; Aravin, A.A. PIWI-interacting small RNAs: The vanguard of genome defence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell
Biol. 2011, 12, 246–258. [CrossRef]
37. Gou, L.T.; Dai, P.; Yang, J.H.; Xue, Y.; Hu, Y.P.; Zhou, Y.; Kang, J.Y.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Hua, M.M.; et al. Pachytene piRNAs instruct
massive mRNA elimination during late spermiogenesis. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 680–700. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Amano, T.; Hirata, T.; Falco, G.; Monti, M.; Sharova, L.V.; Amano, M.; Sheer, S.; Hoang, H.G.; Piao, Y.; Stagg, C.A.; et al. Zscan4
restores the developmental potency of embryonic stem cells. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1966. [CrossRef]
39. Akiyama, T.; Xin, L.; Oda, M.; Sharov, A.A.; Amano, M.; Piao, Y.; Cadet, J.S.; Dudekula, D.B.; Qian, Y.; Wang, W.J.D.R. Transient
bursts of Zscan4 expression are accompanied by the rapid derepression of heterochromatin in mouse embryonic stem cells. DNA
Res. 2015, 22, 307–318. [CrossRef]
40. Noriyuki, N.; Ken-ichi, I.; Kenjiro, A.; Hiroshi, K.; Mitsunori, O.; Amy, R.; Norikazu, Y.; Shino, H.; Robert, O.S.; Narumi, O.J.D.C.
The Hippo Signaling Pathway Components Lats and Yap Pattern Tead4 Activity to Distinguish Mouse Trophectoderm from Inner
Cell Mass. Dev. Cell 2009, 16, 398–410.
41. Chen, M.; Huang, B.; Zhu, L.; Chen, K.; Liu, M.; Zhong, C. Structural and functional overview of TEAD4 in cancer biology.
OncoTargets Ther. 2020, 13, 9865. [CrossRef]
42. Yagi, R.; Kohn, M.J.; Karavanova, I.; Kaneko, K.J.; Vullhorst, D.; DePamphilis, M.L.; Buonanno, A. Transcription factor TEAD4
specifies the trophectoderm lineage at the beginning of mammalian development. Development 2007, 134, 3827–3836. [CrossRef]
43. Emura, N.; Takahashi, K.; Saito, Y.; Sawai, K. The necessity of TEAD4 for early development and gene expression involved in
differentiation in porcine embryos. J. Reprod. Dev. 2019, 65, 361–368. [PubMed]
44. Strumpf, D.; Mao, C.-A.; Yamanaka, Y.; Ralston, A.; Chawengsaksophak, K.; Beck, F.; Rossant, J. Cdx2 is required for correct cell
fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 2005, 132, 2093–2102. [PubMed]
45. Saha, B.; Ganguly, A.; Home, P.; Bhattacharya, B.; Ray, S.; Ghosh, A.; Rumi, M.A.K.; Marsh, C.; French, V.A.; Gunewardena, S.;
et al. TEAD4 ensures postimplantation development by promoting trophoblast self-renewal: An implication in early human
pregnancy loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 17864–17875. [PubMed]
46. Akizawa, H.; Kobayashi, K.; Bai, H.; Takahashi, M.; Kagawa, S.; Nagatomo, H.; Kawahara, M.J.R. Reciprocal regulation of TEAD4
and CCN2 for the trophectoderm development of the bovine blastocyst. Reproduction 2018, 155, 563–571.
47. Zhao, B.; Ye, X.; Yu, J.; Li, L.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Yu, J.; Lin, J.D.; Wang, C.-Y.; Chinnaiyan, A.M.; et al. TEAD mediates YAP-dependent
gene induction and growth control. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008, 22, 1962–1971.
48. Lai, D.; Ho, K.C.; Hao, Y.; Yang, X. Taxol Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells Is Mediated by the Hippo Pathway Component TAZ
and Its Downstream Transcriptional Targets Cyr61 and CTGFCyr61/CTGF Mediate TAZ-induced Taxol Resistance. Cancer Res.
2011, 71, 2728–2738.
49. Nakanishi, G.; Kim, Y.-S.; Nakajima, T.; Jetten, A.M. Regulatory role for Krüppel-like zinc-finger protein Gli-similar 1 (Glis1) in
PMA-treated and psoriatic epidermis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2006, 126, 49–60. [CrossRef]
50. Kang, H.S.; ZeRuth, G.; Lichti-Kaiser, K.; Vasanth, S.; Yin, Z.; Kim, Y.-S.; Jetten, A.M. Gli-similar (Glis) Krüppel-like zinc finger
proteins: Insights into their physiological functions and critical roles in neonatal diabetes and cystic renal disease. Histol.
Histopathol. 2010, 25, 1481.
51. Khalesi, E.; Nakamura, H.; Lee, K.L.; Putra, A.C.; Fukazawa, T.; Kawahara, Y.; Makino, Y.; Poellinger, L.; Yuge, L.; Tanimoto,
K. The Krüppel-like zinc finger transcription factor, GLI-similar 1, is regulated by hypoxia-inducible factors via non-canonical
mechanisms. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 441, 499–506.
52. Maekawa, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nakamura, T.; Shibukawa, R.; Kodanaka, I.; Ichisaka, T.; Kawamura, Y.; Mochizuki, H.; Goshima,
N.; Yamanaka, S.J.N. Direct reprogramming of somatic cells is promoted by maternal transcription factor Glis1. Nature 2011, 474,
225–229.
53. De Lima, A.S.; Stein, C.E.; Casemiro, K.P.; Rovere, R.K. Epidemiology of Melanoma in the South of Brazil: Study of a city in the
Vale do Itajaí from 1999 to 2013. An. Bras. de Dermatol. 2015, 90, 185–189.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16019 12 of 12
54. Kim, Y.S.; Lewandoski, M.; Perantoni, A.O.; Kurebayashi, S.; Nakanishi, G.; Jetten, A.M. Identification of Glis1, a novel Gli-related,
Krüppel-like zinc finger protein containing transactivation and repressor functions. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 30901–30913.
[PubMed]
55. Takahashi, K.; Sakurai, N.; Emura, N.; Hashizume, T.; Sawai, K. Effects of downregulating GLIS1 transcript on preimplantation
development and gene expression of bovine embryos. J. Reprod. Dev. 2015, 61, 369–374. [PubMed]
56. Pliss, L.; Pentney, R.J.; Johnson, M.T.; Patel, M.S. Biochemical and structural brain alterations in female mice with cerebral
pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency. J. Neurochem. 2004, 91, 1082–1091. [CrossRef]
57. Machado, G.M.; Ferreira, A.R.; Guardieiro, M.M.; Bastos, M.R.; Carvalho, J.O.; Lucci, C.M.; Diesel, T.O.; Sartori, R.; Rumpf, R.;
Franco, M.M.; et al. Morphology, sex ratio and gene expression of day 14 in vivo and in vitro bovine embryos. Reprod. Fertil. Dev.
2013, 25, 600–608. [CrossRef]
58. Datta, T.K.; Rajput, S.K.; Wee, G.; Lee, K.; Folger, J.K.; Smith, G.W. Requirement of the transcription factor USF1 in bovine oocyte
and early embryonic development. Reproduction 2015, 149, 203. [CrossRef]
59. Franco, H.L.; Casasnovas, J.; Rodríguez-Medina, J.R.; Cadilla, C.L. Redundant or separate entities?—Roles of Twist1 and Twist2
as molecular switches during gene transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 1177–1186.
60. Babinet, C.; Richoux, V.; Guénet, J.-L.; Renard, J.-P. The DDK inbred strain as a model for the study of interactions between
parental genomes and egg cytoplasm in mouse preimplantation development. Development 1990, 108, 81–88.
61. Renard, J.-P.; Baldacci, P.; Richoux-Duranthon, V.; Pournin, S.; Babinet, C.J.D. A maternal factor affecting mouse blastocyst
formation. Development 1994, 120, 797–802.
62. Lonergan, P.; Gutiérrez-Adán, A.; Rizos, D.; Pintado, B.; De La Fuente, J.; Boland, M.P. Relative messenger RNA abundance in
bovine oocytes collected in vitro or in vivo before and 20 hr after the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge. Mol. Reprod. Dev.
Inc. Gamete Res. 2003, 66, 297–305.
63. Vastenhouw, N.L.; Cao, W.X.; Lipshitz, H.D.J.D. The maternal-to-zygotic transition revisited. Development 2019, 146, dev161471.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Schultz, R.M.; Stein, P.; Svoboda, P. The oocyte-to-embryo transition in mouse: Past, present, and future. Biol. Reprod. 2018, 99,
160–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Schulz, K.N.; Harrison, M.M. Mechanisms regulating zygotic genome activation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 20, 221–234. [PubMed]
66. Sha, Q.-Q.; Zhang, J.; Fan, H.-Y. A story of birth and death: mRNA translation and clearance at the onset of maternal-to-zygotic
transition in mammals. Biol. Reprod. 2019, 101, 579–590. [CrossRef]
67. Cao, R.; Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Xia, L.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Tempst, P.; Jones, R.S.; Zhang, Y.J.S. Role of histone H3 lysine 27
methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 2002, 298, 1039–1043. [CrossRef]
68. Deng, M.; Chen, B.; Liu, Z.; Cai, Y.; Wan, Y.; Zhang, G.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F. YTHDF2 regulates maternal transcriptome
degradation and embryo development in goat. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 580367. [CrossRef]
69. Jiang, W.J.; Sun, M.H.; Li, X.H.; Lee, S.H.; Heo, G.; Zhou, D.; Cui, X.S. Y-box binding protein 1 influences zygotic genome
activation by regulating N6-methyladenosine in porcine embryos. J. Cell. Physiol. 2023, 238, 1592–1604. [CrossRef]
70. Hao, J.; Hu, H.; Jiang, Z.; Yu, X.; Li, C.; Chen, L.; Xia, Y.; Liu, D.; Wang, D. microRNA-670 modulates Igf2bp1 expression to
regulate RNA methylation in parthenogenetic mouse embryonic development. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4782. [CrossRef]
71. Xia, H.; Zhong, C.; Wu, X.; Chen, J.; Tao, B.; Xia, X.; Shi, M.; Zhu, Z.; Trudeau, V.L.; Hu, W. Mettl3 mutation disrupts gamete
maturation and reduces fertility in zebrafish. Genetics 2018, 208, 729–743. [CrossRef]
72. Lonergan, P.; Gutiérrez-Adán, A.; Pintado, B.; Fair, T.; Ward, F.; Fuente, J.D.L.; Boland, M. Relationship between time of first
cleavage and the expression of IGF-I growth factor, its receptor, and two housekeeping genes in bovine two-cell embryos and
blastocysts produced in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. Inc. Gamete Res. 2000, 57, 146–152.
73. Gutiérrez-Adán, A.; Rizos, D.; Fair, T.; Moreira, P.; Pintado, B.; de la Fuente, J.; Boland, M.; Lonergan, P. Effect of speed of
development on mRNA expression pattern in early bovine embryos cultured in vivo or in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. Inc. Gamete
Res. 2004, 68, 441–448. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
74. García, E.V.; Hamdi, M.; Barrera, A.D.; Sánchez-Calabuig, M.J.; Gutiérrez-Adán, A.; Rizos, D. Bovine embryo-oviduct interaction
in vitro reveals an early cross talk mediated by BMP signaling. Reproduction 2017, 153, 631–643. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
75. Rizos Dimitrios, D.; Pintado, B.; De La Fuente, J.; Lonergan, P.; Gutiérrez Adán, A. Development and pattern of mRNA relative
abundance of bovine embryos cultured in the isolated mouse oviduct in organ culture. Mol. Reprod. Dev. Inc. Gamete Res. 2007, 74,
716–723. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.